Orbit Post Sitemap
PANews reported on September 1 that according to "Embers," Maji Big Brother issued the Meme token "TAIWAN" on the Robinhood chain today, and in the evening purchased about 27.56 million TAIWAN tokens using approximately 16,700 USDC, with a purchase market value of about $600,000. Embers stated that they do not recommend participating in this scheme, citing reasons including that Maji Big Brother has issued Meme tokens multiple times before; in 2024, he issued the Meme coin Bobaoppa for his own dog, raising about 220,000 SOL (approximately $40 million) but only injected about 60,000 SOL into the pool, keeping the rest for personal use, and set a transaction tax of about 8.75%. This token has now basically become worthless.#美伊再交火、油轮遇阻，布油重返90美元
The U.S. military struck Iranian targets for the first time in a month—two rocket launchers on Larak Island near the Strait of Hormuz. Iran immediately retaliated by targeting U.S. forces in Jordan and the UAE, shooting down an MQ-9 drone. On the same day, Trump vowed to "hit them hard."
What really pushed oil prices back to $90 was the tankers. On August 31, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard claimed that a supertanker caught fire after hitting a mine while "illegally passing" south of the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. Central Command promptly denied any ship had hit a mine.
But on September 1, new incidents occurred—two supertankers, Sidr and Senegal Prosperity, were hit by projectiles while leaving the Strait of Hormuz, and the UK Maritime Trade Operations office also confirmed a tanker was attacked three times. As a result, Brent crude surged past $92.
More critical than the ships is diesel. The U.S. diesel crack spread has surpassed $100, with Goldman Sachs warning that "diesel is at the center of supply squeeze." Currently, global refinery daily throughput is down 7 million barrels compared to the same period last year. Damage to Middle Eastern and Russian refineries alone is enough to push refined product margins to new highs. Crude oil can be supplemented by reserves, but refining capacity cannot.
$90 is just the starting point. Refining bottlenecks are structural and cannot be resolved in the short term. For the crypto market, the higher the oil price, the stronger the inflation expectations, and the more confidence there is for a rate hike in September.Today let's talk about a hot topic in the tech circle: Apple's leadership change, with Ternus taking over as CEO. Regardless of whether this move ultimately happens, let's do a forward-looking explanation of the "post-succession changes" and see where Apple might head. Many people aren't very familiar with Ternus, but he is actually the soul figure behind Apple's hardware engineering. The full transition of Mac to self-developed chips, the launch of the M series, and the internal structural upgrades of the iPhone all bear his mark. An engineer by background, low-key, pragmatic, and capable of execution—these are his labels. So the question arises: Will Apple undergo a major change with Ternus at the helm? My judgment is: it won't suddenly change drastically, but there will be slight directional adjustments. First, the product rhythm will be steadier, but don't expect "one big hit per year." Ternus excels at turning technology into mass-producible products. After he takes over, Apple will most likely continue a steady iterative path: minor iPhone updates, Macs following chip development pace, and steady upgrades to wearable devices. Engineering feasibility will be prioritized more, reducing delays, but the Jobs-style "one more thing" moments will become fewer. Innovation will lean more towards mature technology integration rather than radical risk-taking. Second, the supply chain will continue to "de-risk," but there won't be a shock-style relocation. Cook left a large supply chain setup; although Ternus isn't like Cook who spent his life in operations, he is very clear about costs, yield rates, and assembly processes. After taking over, production capacity in India and Vietnam will continue to increase to reduce dependence on a single region. However, he will be very concerned about quality control, so the relocation will definitely be gradual, notThe most worth watching in crypto today is not how much $BTC has dropped, but a clear contrast: prices are falling, but funds are not retreating in sync. BTC has returned to around $77,000, and $ETH has also adjusted accordingly, but ETFs still maintain net inflows. Meanwhile, there is already a clear divergence within altcoins. 1. BTC is once again pushed back by $80,000 BTC is currently around $77,000, down about 2% in 24 hours, recently dipping to $76,500. This indicates that $80,000 remains the most obvious resistance area. However, structurally, BTC has not completely weakened. The price is still in a high-level consolidation phase after the rapid rise in August, with around $76,000 temporarily becoming an important support area below. ETH is currently above $2,400 and has also experienced a pullback. ETH/BTC remains around 0.031; recently, ETH has indeed improved relative to BTC, but there is no obvious acceleration yet, so it is more appropriate to define this as "rotation signals still present" rather than ETH having officially taken over the market. 2. The really interesting thing is: prices have fallen, but ETFs are still buying In the latest full trading day, the US spot BTC ETF saw a net inflow of about $217 million, with BlackRock IBIT contributing about $206 million. The ETH ETF also maintained inflows, with a net inflow of about $87.6 million in the latest full trading day, of which BlackRock ETHA accounted for about $59.9 million. SoThis weekend's market action was really turbulent.
$BTC first dropped to 76800, then pulled back to 79400, and fell again to 77700, causing a total liquidation of 1.15 billion USD.
I mentioned last Friday that if 80,000 doesn't hold, the short-term bullish structure would be broken, and the liquidity zone between 75,000 and 78,500 would become a risk point. The current trend basically unfolded as predicted.
But one thing cannot be ignored: the weekly and monthly charts still firmly stand above the key breakout level of 74,000, so the large-scale trend has not been directly invalidated.
Currently, liquidity on both sides of the market is balanced:
Below, 74,500–77,500, there is 3 billion USD in liquidation orders piled up;
Above, 79,000–82,000, there is also 3 billion USD in liquidity.
On the short-term cycle, focus on two key areas: below 77,000–77,700 and above 79,100–79,900. Today, it is very likely to sweep back and forth between these two sides, causing a double kill for bulls and bears.
Whales have placed a large number of support orders between 74,500 and 77,500, but there is a heavy sell wall pressing down between 80,000 and 83,000. Smart money is betting on both sides simultaneously.
Another danger signal: open interest in contracts continues to rise, futures leverage is entering frantically, and although spot buying has slightly recovered, Coinbase premium remains deeply negative.
Leverage growth far outpaces real spot buying, which is not a bullish signal.
⚠️This is a personal market review and does not constitute investment advice The probability of a rate hike in September has reached 66%, $BTC has hit 77,000, and the test is just beginning.
Overnight, BTC slid toward the 77,200 range, with clear macro pressure: after a hawkish statement from Walsh, the market quickly priced in a September move, short-term US Treasury yields rose, the dollar strengthened, and risk assets were generally suppressed. Some institutions have already started pricing in consecutive moves in September and December, with liquidity expectations less loose than before.
This week's data is the main event: JOLTS, ADP, and non-farm payrolls will be released in sequence. The market expects new jobs to be in the range of 50,000 to 80,000, with the unemployment rate around 4.1%. Any deviation will amplify crypto volatility, especially since BTC and ETH derivatives positions are already very sensitive.
Seasonally, don't overlook that September has historically been a weak window for crypto. Coupled with the rate hike path and geopolitical uncertainties, the short-term margin for error is very low. In terms of operations, don't bet on direction based on data; first watch for support and rebound volume around 77,000. If it breaks, wait for structural confirmation and don't rush to add positions. Position sizing is more important than judgment.
#就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验 #BTC高位震荡，与黄金联动增强 🔥$BTC Why is the “ETF frenzy buying but no price rise”? Three forces to watch in September
🔥In August, $BTC rose about 25%, with the US spot BTC ETF attracting about $3.5 billion, IBIT taking the lion's share, looking like institutional return; but once September started, it hovered around 77,000 again, leaving many confused: Didn’t the money come in?
Actually, the current pricing is pulled by three forces:
1) Bullish base — ETF and “devaluation trading”
The Treasury expanding long bond repurchases, marginal changes in the real interest rates of the dollar and US bonds, and continuous net inflows into ETFs will make some funds allocate BTC as a “scarce asset”; strong inflows in August indicate institutional demand hasn’t disappeared.
2) Bearish pressure — Fed turns hawkish again
After Jackson Hole, the market repriced the September rate hike probability from around 30% to over 60%, the 10-year US Treasury yield returned near 4.7%, pressuring risk asset valuations; BTC, as a high beta asset, reacts first to “tight liquidity.”
3) External disturbances — geopolitics and oil prices
US-Iran/Hormuz news pushed Brent crude above 90, oil price rise → inflation expectations rise → rate hike expectations rise → risk assets fall. This chain currently dominates the short-term more than “Bitcoin as a safe haven.”
So don’t just chase ETF daily inflows. A more reasonable observation framework:
Price stands back above 80,000 and holds → ETF inflows convert into a trend;
77,000 repeatedly holds → high-level oscillation washing out chips;
Effective break below 75,000 → macro + geopolitical double hit, don’t rush to bottom-fish; $BTC Is capital shifting towards altcoins?
ETF fund flows signal: On August 31, $BTC attracted $217 million, while $ETH increased by $87.68 million. Last week, $SOL and $XRP attracted about $142.7 million and $110.5 million respectively, while $HYPE reached $56.8 million.
What I’m focusing on:
$BTC → ETF + structure
$ETH → inflows + ETH/BTC
$SOL → ETF + momentum
$XRP → institutional fund flows
$HYPE → relative strength
Capital is spreading, but this does not confirm an altcoin season. I hope $BTC stabilizes and altcoin fund flows continue before increasing risk.SOL is quoted at about $99.7, down about 3.2% in 24h, with an intraday range of 98.33–104.38, just breaking below the 100 whole number level, showing short-term weakness.
Technical: The daily MACD red bars (DIF 7.08 > DEA 6.51) remain above the zero line, the bullish structure is intact, but after reaching 104.4 today, it fell back and closed bearish below MA5 (102.87), indicating weakening momentum.
MA20=91.6, MA30=86.0, mid-term moving averages are trending upward. Key levels: Support at 100 (psychological level, broken) → 97.15 (Supertrend) → 94.4 (weekly support) → 91.6 (MA20); Resistance at 103.35 (needs to reclaim to turn strong) → 118.84 → 123.
Funds/On-chain: The US spot SOL ETF has had net inflows for 7 consecutive weeks, with over $153 million in a single week, cumulative net inflow reaching $1.32 billion, net assets $1.49 billion, showing strong institutional support; however, 77% of holdings are concentrated in the single product BSOL, indicating high concentration.
Whales (wallets with 10,000+ SOL) increased by 52 (+1.58%) this week, exchange reserves dropped 4.91% (about 2.6 million SOL withdrawn), indicating locked-up chips. Derivatives long positions are crowded, Binance/OKX long-short account ratios are 1.93/1.8, about 66% of leveraged accounts are bullish, making breakouts prone to chain liquidations.
$SOL, $DOT, $ZEC Gold has fallen from above $4700 to around $4380 in the past week, a decline of about 7%. Today, it briefly dipped to $4364 during the session before slightly rebounding to around $4385. This low point coincides almost exactly with the 100-day moving average at $4366, where technical support played a key role. The apparent driving factor comes from the Federal Reserve Chair's hawkish remarks at Jackson Hole: PCE inflation at 3.7%, 6-month annualized at 4.1% still accelerating, with market expectations for a September rate hike rising quickly from 30% to 60%. The stronger dollar has put pressure on gold. However, considering the current federal funds rate is already in the 3.5%-3.75% range, economic growth is about 2%, and unemployment is 4.3%, the feasibility of aggressive rate hikes is questionable, suggesting the market may be overinterpreting. More notably, while ETFs and retail investors are exiting in panic, central banks continue to buy. Goldman Sachs maintains a year-end target of $4900 and expects central banks to purchase an average of 50 tons of gold monthly in 2026, far exceeding pre-2022 levels. The long-term logic of de-dollarization, Middle East geopolitical risks, and rising oil prices remains unchanged. This correction seems more like a stress test for the bull market. In the short term, resistance lies at 4400-4430 and 4450-4460, with support at 4360-4370 and 4320-4300. Tonight's JOLTS and ISM data may act as directional catalysts; softer data could support a rebound, while hotter data warrants caution for a breakdown. Risk warning: Market volatility is high; the above analysis is provided accordingly. News, communities, and various analyses are all bullish, with one positive factor after another emerging, yet the coin price remains flat and even quietly dips. Clearly, good news is everywhere, so why isn't the market moving up? The common intuition: with such concentrated positive news, it's just a short-term consolidation and shakeout; the selling pressure is mainly from small retail investors, and a big rally will definitely break out later, so just hold and wait for the pump. Many people see the screen full of good news and even add positions, expecting a big surge driven by the news. Recently, macro risk appetite has somewhat warmed up, and optimistic interpretations continue to spread, but the inflow of new funds into the crypto market is weaker than expected. There is a very realistic logic in the market: the market trades on expectations, not on news that has already materialized. When a positive factor has spread through all communities and almost everyone knows about it, this optimistic expectation has long been priced into the market. Early low-entry holders take advantage of the positive atmosphere across the network to gradually sell off their positions. When new external funds cannot keep up with the selling of old chips inside the market, the situation of "positive news flying everywhere, but prices not rising and instead weakening" occurs. There are two common pitfalls here: 1. Equating the quality of news with market strength. Optimistic news ≠ immediate price increase; the key is whether the positive factor has already been digested by the market or not yet priced in. 2. Blindly adding positions when the news is hot, ignoring whether new incremental funds are really entering, ending up buying at the top. A screen full of good news is not a natural buy signal. What truly drives the rise is information that has not yet been fully anticipated by the public, and real...Total supply of 2.1 billion challenged? CORE's "8.31" incident embroiled in "token inflation" controversy
Circulating opinions online:
"$CORE is a shocking scam, the project team staged a play that was exposed, the protocol code was changed on the 31st, the circulating supply surged, which equals token inflation. There were traces on Twitter long ago, the protocol was modified a week earlier, the project team deliberately concealed it; official tweets repeatedly emphasized the total supply of 2.1 billion two weeks ago, which is like hiding something obvious."
I. Confirmed objective facts
1. Official announcement on August 31: a protocol reward logic bug occurred, a small number of validators received block rewards exceeding protocol rules, user assets and network security were not compromised.
- It was not the project team manually modifying contract permissions in the backend; it was a consensus-layer reward calculation logic flaw; it was not unlimited arbitrary inflation, but an abnormal mining reward issuance.
- Coinbase suspended deposits and withdrawals, LBank suspended deposits, these were risk responses by exchanges, not due to asset theft.
- The official promised to release a full incident review report afterward, but has yet to disclose the exact amount of excess issuance, whether the excess tokens will be reclaimed or burned, which remains the biggest controversy in the community.
2. CORE's maximum cap is fixed at 2.1 billion tokens, released gradually over an 81-year cycle; the controversy over this bug is whether it released future mining rewards prematurely or minted extra tokens exceeding the 2.1 billion cap. On-chain data has not yet conclusively determined this.
3. The official repeatedly emphasized the total token supply of 2.1 billion in previous tweets as routine tokenomics education, but did not warn about this technical vulnerability a week before the bug surfaced, which is a key point of community suspicion.
II. Which online claims are speculation and which cannot be verified
❌ Online claim: The project team knew about the protocol tampering a week ago, staged the incident, and only pretended to expose it on the 31st.
This is community speculation without on-chain evidence or official internal leaks. Blockchain protocol bugs can be triggered only under specific block height conditions; the code may have latent risks but not immediately manifest, and the team may not have reproduced the issue in advance.
⚠️ Key distinction:
1. Malicious manual contract inflation by the project team (scam): the team uses admin privileges to mint new tokens directly, which is fraudulent.
2. Protocol code bug causing reward overflow: a logic defect causing reward miscalculation, a technical accident, but still impacts supply and harms token holders.
The official classifies this incident as the second type, but because the exact amount of excess tokens and handling plans have not been disclosed, many investors suspect it is effectively disguised manual inflation, causing major disagreement.
III. Real impact on token holders
1. Existing CORE balances held in exchanges and wallets have not been tampered with; assets will not be wiped out directly.
2. The risk lies in: if a large amount of excess tokens enter the market circulation, it will create huge selling pressure and suppress the token price; if the team does not burn or roll back the excess tokens, the tokenomics credibility will be severely damaged.
3. Some exchanges have already placed CORE on watchlists, with potential delisting risks.
IV. Three key signals ordinary participants should track
1. Official full incident review report disclosing how many excess CORE tokens were produced;
2. Handling plan for overflow tokens: reclaim, burn, or allow market circulation;
3. Subsequent deposit, withdrawal, and trading policy changes for CORE by major exchanges.
Summary: The confirmed fact is an abnormal protocol reward incident, but the community speculation that "the project team knew in advance and staged a scam" lacks conclusive evidence; regardless of intent, the abnormal token supply is a very serious trust crisis for the project.After the escalation of the US-Iran conflict, energy and interest rate expectations strengthened simultaneously, putting pressure on the crypto market to decline. Bitcoin briefly fell below $77,000 on Tuesday evening, and Ethereum also lost the $2,400 level, with market risk aversion clearly rising.
Watcher.Guru data shows that during the market downturn, the crypto market liquidation scale was about $100 million within 60 minutes. However, this figure changes quickly and is more suitable as an intraday snapshot rather than a total for the whole day.
Oil prices and US Treasury yields exert pressure simultaneously
The direct background of this decline is the US-Iran conflict driving crude oil prices rapidly higher. The market is worried about increased transportation risks near the Strait of Hormuz. Brent crude briefly rose above $94 per barrel, with an earlier intraday quote from Reuters around $93.93.
At the same time, the US 10-year Treasury yield rose to about 4.79%. Rising energy prices have intensified inflation concerns and increased market expectations that the Federal Reserve will maintain a tight policy stance. For assets like Bitcoin that do not generate fixed income, rising yields usually increase holding costs.
The same pressure also appeared in the US growth stock sector. The article mentions that risk assets such as the Nasdaq were also dragged down that day, indicating that this crypto market decline is not an isolated event but part of a broader decline in risk appetite.
ETF fund inflows did not stop the decline
Despite the price weakness, fund flows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs showed signs of recovery. On August 31, these products collectively attracted about $217 million in net inflows, reversing the outflows from the previous trading day.
Among them, BlackRock's IBIT contributed about $205.9 million, accounting for almost all of the day's net inflows. Earlier in August, Bitcoin ETFs recorded nine consecutive trading days of buying, accumulating about $3 billion in inflows for the month.
However, the new funds did not immediately translate into price support. Bitcoin briefly rose above $81,000 in August before falling back to around $78,500 by the end of the month. Coinpaper's previous statistics showed that BTC's cumulative gain in August was about 24%, but momentum had begun to slow by month-end.
Geopolitical conflict changes market sentiment again
The article also mentions that a similar situation occurred earlier in August. As tensions around the Strait of Hormuz escalated, Bitcoin briefly fell below $64,000, then quickly recovered after the situation eased.
The current market focus is whether ETF demand can continue to absorb a new round of macro shocks. If Brent crude remains near $95 per barrel and US Treasury yields stay high, Bitcoin may still be closer to a high-volatility risk asset in the short term rather than a hedge against geopolitical risk. $BTC $SOL Tonight, the U.S. stock market opened with a weak sentiment, with the three major indices collectively opening lower: the Dow Jones down 0.61%, the Nasdaq down 1.29%, and the S&P 500 down 0.68%. The seven tech giants all declined, with Nvidia down 1.68%, Meta down 2.49%, Microsoft down 1.72%, Tesla down 2%, Amazon down 2.46%, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index down 2% at open, SanDisk down 2.72%, and both Micron and SK Hynix down more than 2%.
There are two main factors suppressing risk assets. First, the escalation of geopolitical conflicts: after the U.S. military airstrike on Iran's Larak Island, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard launched missiles at U.S. military bases in retaliation. Brent crude oil neared $92 per barrel, pushing inflation expectations higher. Second, rising expectations of interest rate hikes: after a hawkish stance from Waller last week, the swap market prices the probability of a rate hike in September at over 60%, and the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rose to 4.782%, a new high since January this year. High oil prices combined with high interest rate expectations create a double squeeze on growth stocks.
Sector differentiation is evident: oil and gas stocks are strong against the trend, with energy ETFs up about 2%, while technology and semiconductors are under comprehensive pressure. September started facing dual tests of geopolitics and interest rates, with Friday's nonfarm payroll data being a key variable. Large funds may remain cautious before the data is released. Risk warning: market volatility is significant, please control your positions prudently and make independent judgments. $SNDK $BTC $ETHUS and Iran clash twice in three days! The yellow-haired guy issues harsh words again: the final strike is brewing, Iran may be "almost gone"
The Middle East situation has escalated to the brink of full-scale conflict overnight.
Brent crude oil has directly broken through the $90 mark, gold surged briefly, everyone is shouting that safe-haven assets are about to take off, but have you noticed that $BTC's reaction has not kept up with this rhythm at all?
The narrative of "BTC as a hedge against geopolitical risks" that was hyped for more than half a year, why did it actually dip first in the face of real conflict?
Do you really think this is just a temporary withdrawal of short-term funds? Is it possible that BTC still hasn't completely shed its "high-risk growth asset" nature, and under the pressure of soaring oil prices pushing inflation and renewed expectations of Fed rate hikes in September, its safe-haven confidence is nowhere near as strong as gold's?
If the Strait of Hormuz is truly blocked for navigation, do you think BTC will rally with gold in a safe-haven move, or will it continue to weaken dragged down by expectations of tightening liquidity?
Many people are rushing in to bottom-fish BTC betting on a safe-haven rally, but have they realized that this geopolitical conflict fundamentally does not bring pure benefits, but rather slaps the market with the dual pressures of "high inflation + high interest rates" again?
The BTC market in the coming week will likely experience twice the usual spike volatility, are you really prepared for risk control?
The above is only an analysis of the situation and market logic, and does not constitute any investment advice. The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, please strictly manage your risk when trading.
#美伊再交火、油轮遇阻，布油重返90美元 $ETH $BTC ——$ETH
Today is September 2nd, and the US-Iran conflict is still ongoing (on August 31, Iran just launched missiles at a US military base). The impact on the crypto space currently appears to be mainly short-term emotional shocks, not altering the long-term trend, but the risk for leveraged positions is very high.
Short-term volatility is intense, but the direction is uncertain: war news initially triggers panic selling, with Bitcoin and other crypto assets possibly plunging along with risk assets; however, safe-haven funds quickly flow back due to Bitcoin's "digital gold" attribute, often causing prices to fall during the day and rise back at night, resulting in little change by the close. Liquidations mostly happen to leveraged positions.
The impact on spot markets is small, but large on leveraged positions: such geopolitical conflicts rarely change the original trend of the crypto market, mainly hitting high-leverage positions. Once a trend forms, it is hard for war news to reverse it, so long-term holders are less affected.
Current special variable: On August 25, the US just announced a new round of sanctions on Iran, with the sanctions scope including digital assets for the first time. This will bring new pressure on crypto capital flows and trading compliance, which is a more direct risk point than the war itself.
⚠️ Additionally, the US-Iran conflict is pushing up oil prices and inflation expectations, which will strengthen the Federal Reserve's rate hike expectations. This is a suppressing factor for all risk assets (including crypto), so attention should be paid to the market reaction after the US stock market opens tonight.
SOL's momentum is clearly accelerating, but the sentiment and capital direction remain two different matters.
OKX Onchain OS recorded 49 mentions of SOL in one hour at 05:00 on September 2nd, which is about 1.76 times the 24-hour hourly average. The current sentiment is "clearly bullish dominant."
Here, we need to separate two things: an increase in mention frequency only indicates more new discussions; bullish or bearish dominance only reflects text classification, and neither equates to actual buy or sell orders. In this round of sources, X accounts for 47 mentions and news for 2. The more concentrated the sources, the easier it is for a single narrative to be amplified.
I will wait for the next snapshot to confirm if the speed and sources continue, then review spot trading volume, funding rates, open interest, and on-chain usage. When the data corroborates each other, this wave of momentum is worth a closer look.On September 2nd, new tensions arose in the US-Iran situation, mainly causing short-term emotional impacts on the crypto space, but it is difficult to change Bitcoin's own medium- to long-term trend. What has been clearly felt in the circle these days is actually amplified volatility, not a reversal of direction.
$BTC ——$ETH ——$SOL
Specifically, the impact roughly focuses on three lines:
Risk-off and risk-on tug-of-war: Bitcoin is seen as "digital gold" and attracts safe-haven funds when tensions rise; on the other hand, it is a risk asset in institutional holdings and is easily sold off for liquidity during panic, so the market often oscillates back and forth rather than surging or crashing unilaterally.
Energy and hash rate impact: Iran is a major global Bitcoin mining hub; conflicts cause large-scale shutdowns of local mining farms, leading to a short-term contraction in global hash rate and increased mining costs, strengthening the scarcity narrative from the supply side; meanwhile, war pushes up energy prices, further raising mining thresholds and indirectly benefiting coin prices.
Leverage amplifies volatility: This kind of news affects leveraged trading the most, with relatively small impact on spot markets. Prices may drop several points during the day, then rise back at night, finally closing with a bullish candle with a lower shadow—positions are gone, but prices remain in place.
Additionally, note that the new round of US sanctions includes Iran's digital assets in the crackdown scope. Combined with oil prices, inflation, and Federal Reserve rate hike expectations, volatility in the cryptocurrency market may further intensify. Recent capital flows from US spot ETFs reveal signals more nuanced than mere risk aversion. From August 24 to 28, BTC attracted about $924 million, followed by ETH with about $824 million, while SOL and XRP absorbed about $154 million and $110 million respectively. The real highlight came on August 28: BTC saw a single-day net outflow of about $202 million, while ETH went against the trend with inflows of about $102 million, and SOL and XRP remained positive, with inflows of about $18 million and $26 million respectively. This divergence is worth noting. If funds were truly systematically withdrawing from the crypto market, it should be a full outflow; But what is now showing is asset migration, more like portfolio rebalancing and selective risk, rather than a complete exit. The next few trading days will be especially critical: whether BTC can slow ETF outflows and stabilize will affect overall sentiment; If ETH can continue to attract funds and ETH/BTC strengthens, it will further prove that rotation has surpassed Bitcoin. SOL inflows need to be converted into price resilience to be effective, and the improvement in institutional demand for XRP is also worth tracking. If weekly ETF inflows hit the 2026 high, attention will increase further. Additionally, HYPE's performance relative to BTC and ETH may reveal the direction of risk appetite concentration. However, ETF flows only indicate where funds are going and do not mean prices will follow immediately. Risk warning: The market is highly volatile, and ETF capital flows do not represent future trends. Please view rationally.$BTC is still leading, but the real signal is whether liquidity starts rotating. My focus: 🟠 $BTC — direction 🔵 $ETH — momentum 🟣 $SOL — ecosystem strength 🟢 $XRP — market reaction ⚡ $LINK — infrastructure 💧 $AAVE — DeFi 🏦 $ONDO — RWA 🔥 $HYPE — trader attention The question isn't whether crypto is bullish. It's where capital flows next. BTC leads. ETH follows. Then narratives compete for liquidity. That's when real opportunities emerge. 👀 #BTC #ETH #Crypto #LaborMarketTestsWalsh #BTCGoldAt 4 a.m. market, the candlestick shrinks into a thin doji, like a person holding their breath. $SNDK is still more than an hour away from the U.S. stock market opening, with last night's closing price at 1566, and today is very likely to open lower. But this lower open actually feels a bit interesting—normally, the opening price would fill a sharp angle back to the closing price. If this sharp angle is completed and the market can directly move upward to stand above 1600, then the daily doji would really be like a spring compressed to its limit. Several consecutive days of doji indicate a repeated tug-of-war between bulls and bears here; bears can't push the price down, bulls can't drive it up, but the price center of gravity hasn't actually shifted downward. This kind of structure usually means the downside space has been mostly ground down, and all that's left is to wait for a trigger point. What concerns me more is that the 24-hour level short ratio is quietly climbing. This sounds like bad news, but from another perspective, the more shorts accumulate, the more fuel there is. The most intense rallies in the market are often not driven by bulls buying, but by shorts being forced to cover. The current rise in the short ratio is like someone adding firewood to the stove; the fire hasn't been lit yet, but the wood is already stacked. If a high-volume bullish candlestick appears in the next few days, it is very likely not just a normal rebound, but a squeeze-driven surge. The target is first to stabilize above 1600, then look for higher levels. However, the risk must also be presented: if the lower open's filling sharp angle breaks through 1550 directly, it means shorts are still increasing their positions, and this pile of firewood might have to be cooked in a different pot. The consecutive appearance of daily dojis itself signals a market turning point.The pawn line has already pushed past the center line, and now every piece on the entire market chessboard is holding its breath— the moves of Dell and Broadcom will sound the first round in September. I sit before the board, behind me is the computing power crown just claimed by Nvidia, but true masters never dwell on the pawns they've already captured; they calculate the next twenty moves of sacrifices and repositioning.
The hardware move has never been a solo advance. Dell is like a bishop lurking on the c-file, its diagonal aiming at the deep defense line of enterprise servers; Broadcom is like a heavy rook, charging straight through every intersection of custom chips and networks. The most dangerous moment on the board is not when the opponent gives a check, but when the seemingly solid pawn chain in the formation suddenly breaks—whether those orders can turn from "expectations" into "cash flow" is like whether the pawn chain from c4 to d5 can truly hold the center steady. If the hardware camp delivers only bluff exchanges in the third and fourth rounds, then the entire king's wing (servers and networks) valuation will collapse like a castle with its base pulled out.
As for the software camp, Snowflake is that quiet queen. It doesn't rush in a straight line; it controls all the diagonals in the cloud data territory—subscription revenue, usage, retention—these are the true long-term controls. There is a theory in chess: the queen should not easily enter the complex center, but once she secures the central square, the entire board's attack and defense rhythm is set by you. Snowflake's financial report is the touchstone to test whether this queen occupies d5 or is gradually pushed back to its own half by the opponent.
Nvidia has already proven that the demand for computing power is real, just like controlling the center with the Latin opening in the early stage. But the real game lies in whether this computing power frenzy stays only on the chip queen or can spread like a knight's jump and bishop's diagonal to multiple diagonals of servers, networks, and enterprise software? If the subsequent pieces can't keep up, then Nvidia's victory is just a midgame illusion of a lone hand—you know, the scariest thing on the board is not losing a single piece, but your entire pawn structure being fragmented, allowing the opponent to slowly strangle you in the endgame without even giving a check.
Right now, the market is at the critical point of midgame offense and defense. Dell and Broadcom are the hard rooks, Snowflake is the shadow of the soft queen. They are not financial numbers to be dissected separately, but three pieces that mutually restrain each other in the same game. True grandmasters watch the coordination of pieces: when server orders, custom chip shipments, and cloud data revenues advance simultaneously on three fronts, the entire valuation's king castle will be impregnable; as long as one wing falls behind, the opponent will seize the hanging pawn and create permanent tactical weaknesses in your position.
When I play black, I often say: the opening determines the character of the midgame, and the midgame decides the outcome of the endgame. The two moves in September have yet to fall, but the air on the board has already frozen. Dell's inventory, Broadcom's gross margin, Snowflake's consumption backlog—these three pillars are like the king's front pawn chain on e6, d6, c6; even a slight looseness in one square is enough to expose the king behind to the long diagonal's penetration.
No need to overinterpret Nvidia's old victories; that was just a small knight won in the opening. True players will tell you: the decisive move is always the sacrifice at the end of the midgame. When the hardware profit sheet and software subscription sheet meet in the same quarter, the market will face a subtle quiet move—no check, no capture, just a gentle shift of the center of gravity. And by the time you notice, the outcome of the entire game is already decided.
Check is never the most exciting; the most exciting is that seemingly useless, quietly locking all your defensive connections move. #BroadcomDellAIResults Last night, the US stock market fell, but $BTC didn't really follow down.
Oil prices surged, US Treasury yields also rose, and high-valuation indexes like the Nasdaq took the hit first. $BTC is still hovering around 78,000; it hasn't reclaimed 80,000 yet, but at least it wasn't dragged down together.
On Friday, $200 million flowed out of ETFs, and on Monday, over $200 million flowed back in, so the money hasn't completely left.
That's the current situation: when US stocks fall, it doesn't rise; when US stocks stabilize, it doesn't necessarily surge immediately.
Let's first see if it can reclaim 80,000.
If it can't, altcoins should avoid too much fuss.$BTC $ETH
If you were around in August, you probably experienced the same kind of heartbeat.
First, there was the chill of not wanting to watch the market just above 60,000, then it was pulled all the way up to 81,000, and people on social media started saying the bull market had arrived. Then after Jackson Hole, you opened your eyes to see it back at 78,000. Happiness and panic were separated by just one bearish candle.
This is very normal. What’s not normal is using one day’s mood to draw conclusions for the entire month.
That jump in August had at least two real money flows underneath: the US spot Bitcoin ETF brought in about 3.3–3.5 billion USD, the strongest month in nearly ten months; the other was shorts being squeezed, pushing the price up. So it wasn’t just pure air. But on August 28, about 200 million USD flowed out, breaking a nine-day inflow streak, indicating the supporters started to take a break—not everyone was ready to keep buying above 80,000.
I look at levels, not slogans:
76,000–78,000 is still holding as a turnover after a big rise.
81,000–82,000 needs to be firmly retaken before we can talk about whether August’s wave turned from a rebound into a trend.
In between, whoever rushes to define the market is likely to hand their position over to emotions. $ETH is now at 2450–2470, following but softer; the main line is still Bitcoin.
The buyback on September 9 and the legislative milestones around September 15 will determine the temperature ahead more than tonight’s green-red candle. September on the calendar tends to be weak, having closed red for three consecutive years, so no one should use the month as a strategy.
Which one do you feel tonight: that 80,000 has already been given back, or that the people are still here, just their hands are shaking?
Just personal observation, not investment advice.📊 $ETH Contract Liquidation Express (September 1)
Direction changed hands three times, 4-hour long and short balanced, 12-hour bulls dominate with a 6.5x nuclear-level squeeze, 24-hour exhaustion down to 4.7x — squeeze momentum peaked at 12 hours and then continued to decline
Time Total Liquidation Long Liquidation Short Liquidation
1 hour $57,100 $41,300 $15,800
4 hours $2,808,300 $1,420,400 $1,387,900
12 hours $58,420,200 $50,667,700 $7,752,500
24 hours $72,858,700 $60,119,600 $12,739,000
From ETH liquidation data, 1-hour bulls control the market with a 2.61x advantage, volume only $57,100, indicating a mild squeeze start; 4-hour bulls' advantage sharply drops to 1.02x, almost perfectly balanced, volume surges to $2,808,300 — both longs and shorts liquidated simultaneously in the 4-hour window, showing clear bidirectional harvesting characteristics; 12-hour bulls take full control with a 6.54x ratio, volume explodes to $58.42 million, squeeze reaches nuclear peak; 24-hour bulls' advantage narrows to 4.72x at close, long liquidations $60.12 million vs. shorts $12.74 million, total liquidation surpasses $72.85 million. Bull multiples from 2.61x → 1.02x → 6.54x → 4.72x show a V-shaped reversal then exhaustion trajectory, squeeze momentum peaked at 12 hours and then declined. 12-hour liquidation accounts for 80.2% of the 24-hour total, highly concentrated — large-scale liquidations are highly focused in the 12-hour window, with limited late-stage increments. Leverage is recommended to be compressed below 3x; direction is clear but momentum is falling from the peak, avoid blindly chasing longs.
🔥 Market Indicator | September 1
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: Wash's hawkish tone is about to face the ultimate test from employment data, Bitcoin and gold deeply linked under "fiat credit revaluation," and Broadcom and Dell's earnings will successively verify the sustainability of AI hardware returns.
📊 Nonfarm Payrolls Friday Debut: Can Wash's "Hawk" Withstand the Data "Blade"?
At 20:30 Beijing time on September 4, the US August nonfarm payroll report will be released. Reuters survey expects an increase of 58,000 jobs, unemployment rate steady at 4.1%; ING economists expect about 65,000 new jobs. July nonfarm unexpectedly decreased by 23,000, and May-June combined were revised down by 103,000.
Last week, Fed Chair Wash delivered his first keynote speech since taking office at Jackson Hole, clearly stating that if inflation does not "fall clearly and fast enough" to the 2% target, the Fed "still has work to do." CME data shows September rate hike probability surged from about 35% before the speech to 66.1%. Citi economists believe there was no consensus for a rate hike at July FOMC; cooling inflation and slowing hiring mean hikes are unlikely this year. If this week's data weakens again, the 66% hike expectation may quickly collapse.
₿ BTC High-Level Volatility: Gold Linkage Hits Record High, $7 Billion Flows into ETFs
Bitcoin rose 28% in August, once breaking $81,000, but fell under pressure after Wash's hawkish speech, currently oscillating between $77,000-$78,000.
The 90-day correlation coefficient between Bitcoin and gold hit a record high, with the 30-day indicator reaching a yearly peak of 0.8. This shift is driven by "fiat credit revaluation" — US Treasury debt surpassing $40 trillion, investors no longer choosing between gold and Bitcoin but buying both "non-government credit assets" simultaneously. In the past five trading days, gold and Bitcoin ETFs attracted a record $7 billion inflow. SPDR Gold ETF attracted nearly $3.4 billion, BlackRock Bitcoin ETF $1.5 billion. Bitcoin is completing its role shift from "tech asset" to "digital gold."
🖥️ Broadcom and Dell Take Over: AI Hardware Returns Under Further Test
Following Nvidia's explosive $96.2 billion revenue report, the AI hardware sector faces a new round of tests this week.
Dell first reported after market close on September 1 with better-than-expected results: Q2 revenue $46.97 billion, far exceeding the expected $44.92 billion; AI-optimized server revenue $16.4 billion, also beating expectations; company significantly raised full-year AI server sales forecast to $74 billion. Shares rose 5% after hours.
Broadcom will release Q3 earnings after market close on September 2. Institutions expect revenue of $29.43 billion, up 84.5% year-over-year; EPS $2.55, up 199.5%. Market focus includes whether the $16 billion AI semiconductor target can be met and if Google's custom chip orders will be diverted due to Marvell's involvement.
💎 Summary
Three events paint the same picture: This Friday's nonfarm payrolls will test Wash's "still has work to do" hawkish stance — if employment weakens again, the 66% rate hike expectation may quickly collapse; Bitcoin and gold deeply linked under "fiat credit revaluation," with $7 billion ETF inflows setting records and correlation hitting all-time highs; Dell has proven AI server demand is still booming with better-than-expected earnings, Broadcom takes over tonight for verification.
As employment data, macro narratives, and AI earnings converge in the same week — the market awaits the final answer on September 4. As ETH is the core asset second only to BTC, liquidation data gives a clear signal: 4-hour almost perfectly balanced long-short double liquidation, 12-hour 6.5x nuclear-level squeeze, 24-hour falling back to 4.7x — the whale completed the full cycle of shakeout, squeeze, and final release on ETH. The extremely high 80.2% concentration indicates leverage was basically cleared in the 12-hour window. The big direction still depends on the nonfarm outcome. #就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验 #BTC高位震荡，与黄金联动增强 #财报观察员：博通与戴尔接棒，AI回报再受检验 US East 9-1 Fund Details (Unit: Million USD)
$BTC Spot ETF
IBIT (BlackRock) +182.4
FBTC (Fidelity) +12.7
ARKB (21Shares) -7.3
BITB (Bitwise) +6.1
MSBT (Morgan Stanley) +2.8
HODL (VanEck) -9.7
BTC (Grayscale Mini) -4.1
GBTC (Grayscale Old) -16.0
BTC Total: +198.9
$ETH Spot ETF
ETHA (BlackRock) +51.3
FETH (Fidelity) +9.6
ETHE (Grayscale) -2.2
Other minor increases and decreases
ETH Total: +71.6
Market Interpretation
9-1 continues to maintain large net inflows, closing positive for the second consecutive day, but structural divergence has appeared. BTC inflows still heavily rely on BlackRock's IBIT, with redemptions in many other products; incremental inflows are concentrated and follow-the-leader buying has weakened, indicating no broad market entry. ETH inflow scale slightly declined but still maintains a long-term trend of continuous net inflows, showing resilience.
Combined with the sudden Middle East geopolitical conflict late at night, after the news broke BTC briefly dropped to around 77576, continuing the divergence between fund inflows at close and intraday price drops. ETFs represent medium- to long-term institutional sentiment; geopolitical news will dominate short-term market volatility, and single-day inflows cannot offset the selling pressure caused by sudden negative news. #BTC高位震荡，与黄金联动增强 When a skyscraper sways at the $80,000 elevation, all structural engineers focus on the same strange anchor — gold.
After BTC surged past the $80,000 mark and then pulled back, not far from its peak, it left the Nasdaq’s glass curtain wall behind. What does this resemble? Like suddenly discovering in a city’s geological report that the tower no longer resonates with the adjacent tech building but instead starts to pulse with the gold veins beneath the crust. When the geotechnical conditions change, the foundation must be recalculated.
The US spot BTC ETF had nine consecutive days of net inflows, like nine trucks of concrete being pumped one after another into the pile cap, each raising the floor elevation. But on August 28, the pump stopped, and some slurry was even withdrawn. What the engineers saw was not just an "outflow" but the rebound value in the foundation load test — will the flowing incremental funds retreat and take away the gravel beneath the roadbed? That’s the real danger. Can the lateral constraint force brought by nine days of grouting lock the soil’s prestress without continued grouting? No one on the construction site can give a perfect answer.
On-chain retail activity surged to a nearly two-year high. The constant knocking sounds on the wall are retail workers laying bricks. Each on-chain transfer they make is like moving red bricks from a wheelbarrow onto scaffolding. Though small, these bricks determine the shear wall’s fill rate and energy dissipation capacity. When the ETF’s large machinery quiets down, whether the mortar in these handmade brick joints can withstand wind loads depends on whether there are reliable tie bars between the masonry and the frame.
The rising correlation between BTC and gold, and the falling correlation with the Nasdaq, is called a "structural system switch" in architectural terms. Previously, this building was a light steel frame with a glass curtain wall, trembling lightly with the breath of the US stock market; now it begins to use old-fashioned stone arches, embedding the density curve of gold block by block. This switch is dangerous: arches require a series of key blocks to be in place simultaneously; if one block slips, the entire arc pressure line collapses. Meanwhile, the wind tunnel test data for the Nasdaq side no longer applies to the current shape.
Retail demand is the internal live load; the ETF is the external prestress. Live loads leave the office at night, but prestress must endure with the beams throughout their lifespan. The current problem is: the prestressing steel strands suddenly relax after nine tensionings, while the live load on the floor remains high — whether the building can stand depends on whether the concrete creep synchronizes with the steel relaxation.
More subtly, the length of the gold anchor cable is still changing. If this cable is truly welded into the building’s main structure, then every future column must be reinforced according to the constitutive model of the gold mine rock mass. But the welding process has only lasted three months, and the ultrasonic inspection report of the welds is not yet complete.
Which data set will fail first: the brick joints of the on-chain retail beneath the foundation, or the static load settlement after the nine-story tower crane was withdrawn to the warehouse? No one knows. Structural engineers can only stand at the edge of the foundation pit, watching the red pointer on the elevation gauge gently flicker at 80 meters. The pointer neither rises nor falls, just like the bubble in a level, suspended exactly on the mark.
And this skyscraper still does not have a single final structural drawing that has passed review. #BTCGoldCorrelation CORE: Saying Goodbye to the Inflation Narrative, Entering the Era of Real Revenue in 2026
⚠️ Content is for track communication and review only, not investment advice
Many people's impression of CORE still lingers in the early days of airdrops and inflation incentives.
But in 2026, it has adopted a new approach.
In the past, public chains relied on token subsidies to fuel the ecosystem and used inflation to generate hype; when the hype faded, the token price reverted to its original state. This is a cycle that most public chains cannot escape.
Core DAO’s answer this year: no longer telling stories through token issuance, but relying on real ecological transaction fee revenue to create a buyback flywheel.
Its positioning is very clear: the Bitcoin power grid.
Bitcoin has trillions in assets long-term stored in cold wallets, which can only be hoarded, not yield interest or participate in DeFi. lstBTC is non-custodial liquid staking; BTC holders don’t have to give up ownership but can obtain liquid staking certificates to lend, trade, and earn yields, unlocking liquidity from dormant Bitcoin stock.
Custodial institutions like BitGo, Cobo, Fireblocks, etc., are all integrated, offering BTC staking services to institutions; SatPay Bitcoin payment banking continues to advance, connecting staking yield, lending, and debit card spending to generate real transaction fee income, which flows back into token buybacks.
The previous dispute and settlement with Maple Finance was widely interpreted as a defeat.
In essence, it was a business stop-loss: both parties did not admit fault, ended the long litigation, recovered user assets, cleared ecological negatives, and focused all energy on 2026 revenue realization, no longer wasting resources on internal conflicts.
The bullish logic is straightforward:
✅ BTCFi is a major trend; the financialization of Bitcoin assets is an important narrative for the next bull market;
✅ Shifting from inflation-driven to business revenue-driven; if ecological fees and buybacks can be executed, the token value logic will be completely rewritten;
✅ Institutional custody, lstBTC, and SatPay are advancing simultaneously with product launch expectations.
But risks cannot be ignored:
🔴 Strong narrative, but ultimately depends on execution progress; a blueprint does not equal real output;
🔴 Intense competition in the BTCFi track, with competitors continuously siphoning off users;
🔴 Token unlock pressure remains; the overall Bitcoin market will greatly affect CORE’s performance, and small-cap volatility will far exceed BTC.
In a bull market, track stories only provide imagination space; what truly determines how far it goes is whether the narrative can be turned into tangible revenue.
CORE is now standing at this crossroads of validation.
$CORE #CoreDAO #BTCFiFrom "Digital Gold" to "Yield-Generating Asset": CORE Institutional Edition Launches, Comparing Bitcoin's Long-Term Value and Short-Term Limitations
⚠️This article is for industry information exchange only and does not constitute investment advice
Recently, CORE launched an institutional solution targeting professional capital, focusing on compliant BTC staking and lstBTC liquidity services, specifically connecting with custodial institutions, asset management companies, and family offices. This objectively breaks down the long-term value and short-term expectations of this news.
Long-Term Positive Logic
1. Directly addresses core institutional pain points: Many institutions hold BTC long-term in cold wallets, lacking compliant channels to generate yield. CORE collaborates with leading custodians like BitGo and Hex Trust, allowing assets to remain within the custody system without transfer, using time-locked staking to generate BTC yield without cross-chain wrapping into WBTC. This mature yield solution is expected to increase traditional capital's willingness to allocate to Bitcoin.
2. Completes the BTCFi narrative system. Bitcoin has long been seen primarily as a digital store of value with limited financial application scenarios. After institutional tools are implemented, BTC can participate in staking, lending, and liquidity certificate issuance, further broadening Bitcoin's acceptance in traditional finance.
3. Optimizes chip structure. Institutional holders no longer rely solely on buying low and selling high for profit; stable staking yields will encourage long-term funds to reduce short-term selling, potentially easing spot selling pressure in the mid to long term.
Short-Term Constraints to View Rationally
1. Institutional business implementation involves a lengthy cycle. Risk control reviews, system integration, and capital strategy adjustments often take months; large capital inflows will not occur immediately upon product launch, so the positive impact has a clear time lag.
2. The core drivers of Bitcoin's market remain USD liquidity, Federal Reserve policy, ETF funds, and overseas regulatory policies. BTCFi is a derivative narrative that can boost the market but is unlikely to independently drive price strength against macro trends.
3. Competition in the sector continues; many BTC layer-2 and staking solutions exist, and institutional funds will diversify, making it difficult to concentrate all capital in a single ecosystem.
Impact on the $CORE Ecosystem
Relying on the ecosystem's dual staking mechanism, BTC holders seeking higher yields need to stake CORE together, which is expected to continuously generate token demand in the long term.
Key signals to monitor going forward: official cooperation announcements from leading asset management and custody institutions; steady growth in on-chain native staked BTC. Without real on-chain growth, market moves are likely just short-term sentiment pulses.
Trading Thoughts
Without a clear easing turning point in macro liquidity, it is unwise to rely on a single ecosystem's positive news to bet on a unilateral surge.
Over a longer cycle, the continuously improving institutional BTCFi infrastructure is an important foundational buildup for the next bull market, representing a gradual and progressive long-term logic. CORE's market performance is closely tied to BTCFi sector heat; continue to watch official cooperation announcements and on-chain data changes.
$BTC $CORE #CORE #Bitcoin #BTCFiStablecoins are becoming everyday currency in Argentina!
A16z found that about 1 in 5 Argentinians use ₿$BTC cryptocurrency, and up to 94% of crypto trading volume denominated in pesos flows into stablecoins.
Initially, this made a lot of sense: severe inflation, restrictions on buying official dollars, and 💲$USDT/USDC provided another way to access dollars. Now the context is very different:
• Monthly inflation → dropped from 25.5% in December 2023 to 2.1% in July 2026
• Most restrictions on buying dollars → lifted
• Crypto-to-dollar premium → dropped to about 4%
• Lemon app downloads → still growing each quarter from 2024 to 2026
So I think what we’re seeing is stablecoins shifting from an emergency hedge against inflation to a regular financial habit.
As a16z said: “In Argentina, buying crypto increasingly means buying dollars—just on-chain.”
#OKX预言家：CS2波尔图激战，F1与英超接力 Today I saw that UniSat has consolidated the API documentation into a single entry point. Previously, the materials were scattered everywhere, but now from checking interfaces, reading guides to applying for keys, everything can be done in one place. On the surface, this is to make things easier for developers, but to me, it looks more like filling a gap. Wallets are for users, while documentation and APIs are for application developers. Lowering the threshold makes it possible for people to actually write things on this system later. The halving is about a week away, and FIP-102 plans to bring some FB to the Bitcoin mainnet. At that time, if the development side is also easier to connect with, FB will no longer be just about mining and rewards, but more like something used in this infrastructure. Getting the documentation in order first gives applications a chance to catch up. I quite agree with this order. With the halving approaching, actions that pave the way for Builders give me more anticipation than just releasing another feature introduction. #FB #UniSat $FB Treat ETFs and gold as dual anchors to understand the market logic of $BTC, $ETH, and $SOL 🔍
When trading crypto, you can't just focus on candlestick charts. BTC ETF capital flows and gold price trends are currently the two most important external observation anchors.
BTC directly absorbs institutional buying from ETFs, and the institutions' stance determines major support levels; ETH is more elastic, and when macro bearish factors arrive, its decline will be sharper than BTC's; $SOL benefits from its own public chain ecosystem, allowing it to generate localized excess returns during market fluctuations, but it remains vulnerable to systemic corrections.
The logic distinction between the two: ETFs represent institutional confidence in crypto; gold represents global risk aversion sentiment.
When ETFs keep flowing in + gold weakens, it's a golden window for crypto bulls; if ETFs stagnate + gold surges, it's a risk warning signal.
Futures are not suitable for betting on one-sided moves. Don't blindly go long just because ETFs are flowing in, nor blindly short just because gold is strengthening. Observing the resonance of these two indicators is more practical than simply guessing price movements.
#就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验
#BTC高位震荡，与黄金联动增强
#财报观察员：博通与戴尔接棒，AI回报再受检验 Top influencers on foreign networks predict another step forward; 0.01 will be reached soon 👀
The node reward bug incident is fermenting, combined with exchange deposit maintenance, causing the foreign network community discussions to explode. Many overseas influencers have reinforced their views again: the 0.01 threshold is getting closer and closer, and the prediction is being realized step by step.
But the more the entire network reaches consensus on a price level, the greater the trap in the game.
🔻 Logic behind the bearish realization
1. The aftermath of the protocol bug incident is still ongoing. Although it’s not a team-initiated token issuance, the solution for handling the excess tokens remains undecided, leaving the market uncertain and panic selling pressure persists.
2. The exchange temporarily closed deposits, so external incremental funds cannot enter the market; only existing chips are competing inside, lacking buying support.
3. The market is about to enter the employment data week. If employment data exceeds expectations with a hawkish tone, the entire crypto market will be under pressure, and small-cap tokens like CORE will be dragged down, accelerating the test of the lower psychological threshold.
4. A large number of bottom-fishing orders are piled near 0.01, liquidity is concentrated, making it easy to trigger a spike to touch this level.
⚠️ Beware of the reverse scenario
1. Everyone is waiting to bottom-fish at 0.01, but the main force may not follow the crowd’s expectations.
Scenario A: Quickly dip below 0.01, sweep all ambushed long stop losses, then rapidly pull back, trapping all bottom-fishers.
Scenario B: No chance to enter at 0.01 at all, absorb panic chips and rebound directly, leaving many waiting to bottom-fish empty-handed.
2. Even if the price touches 0.01, it doesn’t mean a solid bottom or an immediate reversal.
If excess reward tokens flow into the market and selling pressure is not relieved, breaking below 0.01 could lead to deeper declines. Don’t treat this psychological price as an absolute bottom-fishing holy ground.
🎯 Practical approach
Don’t go all-in betting on 0.01.
- Spot: When it truly retraces near this level, try small positions in batches to test, always keep a backup plan;
- Futures: Leverage risk is extremely high at this level, with a high probability of spikes triggering stop losses, so reduce position size as much as possible.
Top influencers on foreign networks are just sharing opinions; the market moves based on actual developments, not predictions. The final direction depends on the official solution for excess tokens and this week’s employment data impact on the market.
Brothers, if it really approaches 0.01, are you ready to enter and bottom-fish, or will you continue to wait for clearer signals? 👇
$CORE#OKXPlanetInstitutional buying has switched tactics again: Strive uses SATA preferred stock to continuously raise funds and buy $BTC for 9 consecutive trading days
While many are still watching whether MicroStrategy sells coins, on the other side Strive (ASST) has turned "corporate BTC hoarding" into a capital market clockwork.
The logic is simple:
• Tool: Nasdaq ticker SATA, variable rate Class A perpetual preferred stock, par value $100, about 13% annualized yield, switching to daily dividends starting June 2026
• Operation: When SATA price returns near $100 par value → start ATM market price issuance → money raised is not held as cash, directly exchanged for BTC
• Rhythm: Estimated SATA fundraising from 8/24–8/28 can buy about 1,192 BTC in a single week; company states "purchasing Bitcoin through preferred stock financing for 9 consecutive days"; holding 21,356 BTC as of 8/21, aiming for 23,156 BTC by end of August, zero long-term debt
Biggest difference from MSTR: no convertible bonds, no BTC collateral, no debt servitude, purely equity instruments snowballing. But the downside is clear—if BTC stagnates or pulls back, the 13% preferred stock dividend still must be paid, and unrealized losses are on them.
If this wave of enterprise-level buying continues, spot selling pressure will be quietly absorbed; but if SATA falls below par value, the issuance window closes immediately, and the story runs out of fuel.Glassnode: Bitcoin's correlation with the S&P is near a two-year low
Glassnode on-chain data shows that the rolling correlation between $BTC and the S&P 500 has fallen to a near two-year low. The previous strong linkage between Bitcoin and U.S. stocks is changing.
During the past two years' rate hike cycle, BTC basically moved in tandem with U.S. stocks, behaving as a high-beta risk asset. When U.S. stocks plunged, crypto markets also experienced synchronized sell-offs. Now, with correlation significantly lower, it indicates a shift in market driving logic. BTC is no longer simply led by U.S. tech stocks and has shown increased linkage with gold, reviving the narrative of digital gold in the market.
Personal view: Decoupling does not mean an immediate one-sided surge; this distinction should be rationally understood.
A decline in correlation only means the two can diverge in price movement: when U.S. stocks fall, BTC does not necessarily crash; when U.S. stocks rise, BTC may not necessarily rally in sync. However, macro core variables such as Federal Reserve interest rates, the U.S. dollar, and U.S. Treasury yields will still simultaneously influence both markets, so they have not completely detached from the broader macro framework.
Practical significance for traders: Going forward, trading decisions should not simply rely on U.S. stock market movements to judge BTC trends. When U.S. stocks surge, do not blindly go long on crypto; when U.S. stocks plunge, do not panic sell crypto outright. More attention should be paid to crypto-specific factors such as internal capital flows, ETF inflows, and on-chain institutional accumulation.
A caution: Correlation is a dynamic indicator. When risk panic hits, the two markets can quickly re-synchronize. Do not mistake temporary decoupling for a permanent state.Reasons for OKX Delisting CORE On-Chain Earning (Staking) Feature
Risk Warning: Virtual currencies are not protected by domestic laws. The following is only an industry information review and does not constitute investment advice.
The exchange has not issued a long qualitative announcement specifically for CORE. Based on industry rules, product mechanisms, and community information, there are four layers of real reasons:
1. Protocol-level risks: CORE staking has a long unlocking period and high technical uncertainty
CORE on-chain staking has an unlocking waiting period; after delegating staking, immediate redemption is not possible. In case of mainnet upgrades, validator failures, or protocol bugs, the exchange cannot quickly retrieve user assets.
On-chain earning means the exchange delegates staking on the public chain on behalf of users. If the network encounters anomalies, the exchange must bear the redemption pressure from users. Core DAO’s early validator reward mechanism had abnormal incidents, amplifying platform risk control concerns.
Note: This does not mean CORE is worthless; the exchange simply no longer provides the staking entry. Users can still withdraw tokens to the official wallet and stake on-chain themselves.
2. Exchange’s overall strategy contraction for on-chain earning products
OKX is not only delisting CORE but also gradually discontinuing on-chain staking products for multiple public chains (Avalanche, OKT, etc.).
Overseas regulations (such as EU MiCA) impose increasingly strict compliance requirements on centralized platforms proxying DeFi staking: platforms must bear compliance responsibility for risks, returns, and lock-up consequences of staking. Many exchanges proactively reduce third-party public chain delegated staking services to lessen compliance burdens.
The on-chain earning protocol itself allows platforms to pause or remove staking products at any time, as stated in the user agreement.
3. Mismatch between returns and operational costs
- CORE staking rewards come from block inflation rewards, which fluctuate greatly; inflation release schedules may change;
- The exchange must maintain nodes, collect rewards, pay on-chain gas fees, and manage user redemption scheduling;
- If the token price continues to bottom out, staking returns become less attractive, the platform bears technical and redemption risks, but the commercial value generated is limited, so the product is prioritized for removal.
4. Clarification of market misconceptions
❌ Misconception 1: Delisting earning = delisting CORE trading
→ Incorrect, only the "on-chain earning/staking financial product" is delisted; spot trading and deposits/withdrawals remain normal.
❌ Misconception 2: The project had a major security breach and ran away
→ No official announcement disclosing major security incidents; the mainnet is operating normally.
❌ Misconception 3: The exchange is bearish on this project
→ Delisting financial products ≠ denying the token narrative; financial products are independent and have separate review logic from token listing.
Practical tips for users
1. For CORE already in on-chain earning: the exchange will execute redemption and return funds to the account; pay attention to platform redemption cycle notifications;
2. For those who still want to participate in CORE staking: withdraw CORE from the exchange to the official Core wallet and delegate stake directly on the Core DAO official website, bearing lock-up and network risks yourself;
3. Distinguish between exchange-custodied staking vs. user self-custodied on-chain staking; the risks are completely different.Are Trump and Waller performing a double act? One wildly hints at a possible rate hike, while the other wildly demands a rate cut!
Trump just publicly said that since the U.S. is number one in the world, it should have the lowest interest rates globally, and discussing rate hikes now is absurd.
But three days ago, Waller spoke very firmly at Jackson Hole: U.S. PCE inflation is still at 3.7%, employment is near full employment, and if inflation does not clearly and quickly return to 2%, the Fed still has work to do.
The market has already started siding with Waller. After the Jackson Hole speech, the probability of a rate hike in September surged from 35.4% to 55.7%, and is now around 60%.
The 2-year U.S. Treasury yield rose nearly 13 basis points that day, while Bitcoin dropped 3.3%. Barclays even changed its forecast from no hikes this year to two 25 basis point hikes in September and December.
The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield is now above 4.7%, and oil prices are again approaching $90.
If the market believes the Fed is being politically pressured to cut rates despite 3.7% inflation, short-term rates can certainly be pushed down, but inflation expectations, term premiums, and dollar credit risk could easily push long-term rates higher.
Mortgage rates, corporate financing, and the actual money the U.S. government has to pay may not necessarily decrease.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验
#BTC高位震荡，与黄金联动增强 $XAU Gold at 4336, has fallen below 4400.
Dropped from 4465 to 4332, down 260 dollars. RSI6=14.09, even when BTC dropped to 49000 in early August, it wasn't this low. SAR=4436 is pressing down, EMA21=4436 also pressing, EMA55=4490 even further above, all overhead. The structure is indeed weakening, and very weak.
In August, it rose 10%, from 4330 to 4698, then in two days of September it dropped 360 dollars. It's not that the bulls are weak, but macro pressure has arrived—the Fed rate hike expectations are heating up, treasury yields are rising, the dollar is rebounding, and gold as a zero-yield asset is indeed under pressure. Geopolitical conflicts continue, central bank gold purchases continue, but these medium- to long-term logics can't overcome rate hike expectations in the short term. The long-term logic for gold hasn't changed: rate cut expectations, geopolitical conflicts, central bank gold purchases—all still there. But in the short term, the 4400-4500 range has indeed trapped many.
On August 8, RSI hit 14, at which time gold bounced back from 4330 to 4698. The same RSI value, different position—can it bounce back this time? Share your thoughts in the comments, do you think this wave of gold is a pullback to build momentum, or a phase top? 🫡#Employment data densely released, Wash's policy stance under scrutiny
The probability of a rate hike in September surged to 66%, $BTC reached 77,000, the test has just begun.
Woke up to find BTC already dropped to around 77,200. After Wash's speech, the probability of a September rate hike jumped from 35% to over 60%, and Ball added another push, now peaking at 66%. The 2-year US Treasury yield hit a one-month high, the dollar strengthened, and risk assets collectively came under pressure. Barclays even revised its forecast to predict one rate hike each in September and December.
There are still three key data releases this week: JOLTS job openings, ADP employment, and Friday's nonfarm payrolls. The market expects an increase of 50,000 to 80,000 jobs, with an unemployment rate of 4.1%. Wash has already set the market to "data-sensitive mode," where any number could trigger sharp volatility.
September is already called Rektember, one of the worst months historically, and this year it’s compounded by rate hike expectations and geopolitical risks. The next move for BTC depends on whether this week's employment data shows some favor. Cathie Wood bought $37.4 million while Block fell and continues to increase her holdings in $CRCL. This time, Cathie Wood is not betting on a single coin, but on two future financial gateways for crypto. ARK's latest trading disclosure shows that after Block's stock price fell about 1.85% on August 31, ARK's three ETFs together bought 456,059 shares of Block, valued at about $37.4 million. Meanwhile, ARK continued to buy 35,192 shares of Circle, worth about $3.36 million. Notably, Circle actually rose about 9.65% that day. 1. Block Falls, She Buys $37.4 Million in One Go What is truly worth watching is Cathie Wood's choice to significantly increase her position during Block's decline. Behind Block are not only traditional payment services but also Cash App and the Bitcoin ecosystem. So buying Block doesn't mean directly betting on BTC's price, but rather betting on whether Bitcoin can further enter payments, wallets, and financial services. Second, on the other hand, she's still buying Circle Circle represents a completely different crypto path. The core isn't Bitcoin, but USDC and stablecoin infrastructure. This makes ARK's funding move quite interesting: Block → Bitcoin + payment entry CircBTCFi Four Kings Ultimate Review: Steady, Hardcore, Elastic, Ambush — Who Is the True Leader of the Bull Market?
⚠️ This article only outlines the track logic and project architecture and does not constitute any investment advice.
The Bitcoin ecosystem bull market wave continues to advance, with many investors confusing STX, CORE, MERL, and BABY as all BTCFi track targets.
In fact, they are completely different levels, logics, and capital narratives.
The four projects respectively represent the four top BTCFi schools: Native Steady, Full-Chain Infrastructure, Inscription Elasticity, and Underlying Security. Their underlying architecture, asset risk, growth potential, and capital logic differ vastly.
1. Core Positioning of the Four Schools: Clearly Distinguish the Hierarchy
STX | Native Steady School: The Orthodox Bitcoin L2 Benchmark
Stacks is the earliest and most orthodox L2 infrastructure in the Bitcoin ecosystem.
It does not alter Bitcoin’s base layer; relying on PoX consensus + a dedicated programming language, it realizes on-chain smart contracts on Bitcoin and builds a complete BTC-denominated DeFi system based on sBTC.
Advantages: orthodox ecosystem, high institutional recognition, most stable trend.
Drawbacks: not EVM compatible, slower ecosystem expansion, limited explosive potential.
Positioning: BTCFi defensive leader, following a long-term steady compound growth path.
CORE | All-Purpose Infrastructure School: Bitcoin’s Only Independent L1 Public Chain
The biggest market misconception: treating CORE as a Bitcoin Layer 2.
CORE is an independent Layer 1 public chain, not L2!
It relies on exclusive Satoshi Plus hybrid consensus, leveraging Bitcoin’s entire network hash power as a security base, fully EVM compatible, truly a "Bitcoin Supergrid."
Coverage: BTC staking, institutional lstBTC liquid staking, SatPay payments, lending, RWA real-world assets; the only BTCFi leader with a complete commercial revenue system.
Entering cash flow profitability era in 2026, with real business, real institutional demand, and real buyback expectations.
Positioning: BTCFi aggressive infrastructure leader, largest growth potential, most hardcore narrative.
MERL | Inscription Elasticity School: Dedicated Channel for Bitcoin Native Assets
Merlin Chain focuses on ZK Layer 2 + inscription ecosystem, precisely solving BRC20, Ordinals asset congestion, and high Gas fees.
All ecosystem activity, popularity, and capital are tied to the Bitcoin inscription cycle.
Advantages: extremely strong bull market elasticity, highest gains during hot trends.
Drawbacks: market highly dependent on sector sentiment, no independent narrative, strong cyclical nature.
Positioning: BTCFi cyclical speculative target, riding waves and trends.
BABY | Underlying Security School: Bitcoin Security Leasing Dark Horse
Unique and completely differentiated track.
Does not do DeFi, trading, or applications; only one thing:
Zero-risk staking of Bitcoin native assets and full-network PoS public chain security leasing.
User BTC remains in native addresses throughout, no custody, no cross-chain, no wrapping; the highest security model in the BTCFi network.
Earns continuous income by "renting out Bitcoin’s top-level security," belonging to the most fundamental and essential public chain infrastructure narrative.
Positioning: ultra-long-term ambush-type underlying dark horse, highest odds.
2. Asset Security Hierarchy (The Most Important Watershed in BTCFi)
✅ BABY | Ceiling-Level Security
BTC remains in native UTXO addresses throughout, pure cryptographic staking, zero custody, zero wrapping, zero bridge risk, absolutely secure assets.
✅ CORE | Non-Custodial Hardcore Security
BTC locked with Bitcoin mainnet timelocks, principal never leaves BTC chain, no institutional custody risk, only data relay synchronization, extremely low risk.
⚠️ STX | Consortium Multi-Signature Mode
Asset security depends on node consortium; although there is a penalty mechanism, theoretical risk of consortium misconduct exists.
⚠️ MERL | MPC Custody Mode
Assets require custody mapping; native BTC leaves mainnet, exposing institutional counterparty risk.
3. Value Capture Logic: Determines Bull Market Multiples
STX
Pure ecological consumption + BTC-denominated staking yield, slowly raising value through ecosystem expansion, steady but slow.
CORE
Dual staking lockup + 2026 cash flow realization
lstBTC institutional service fees, cross-border payments, on-chain fees, future revenue buybacks
— the only BTCFi leader transitioning from "storytelling" to "real money earning."
MERL
Inscription ecosystem fees + 50% profit buybacks, market fully follows sector bull and bear cycles, high elasticity, weak sustainability.
BABY
Continuous income from full-network public chain security leasing fees, unique track, long-term value severely underestimated.
4. Ultimate Summary: Four Targets Suit Different Investors
✅ Seeking stability, holding long-term, avoiding volatility: choose STX
Bitcoin native orthodox, heavy institutional holdings, most stable trend.
✅ Riding the bull market main rise, earning growth dividends, focusing on fundamentals: choose CORE
BTCFi’s only L1 infrastructure + only cash flow track, core mainline of this bull market.
✅ Speculating on hot trends, capturing waves, playing cyclical markets: choose MERL
When inscription trends arrive, elasticity crushes the field.
✅ Low-position ambush, betting on underlying narrative breakout, super high odds: choose BABY
The safest BTC staking model in the network, underlying infrastructure dark horse.
The true money-making logic in the bull market:
Not randomly buying BTCFi, but selecting the mainline that fits your style.
#STX #CORE #MERL #BABY #BTCFiRecently, discussions about Bitcoin ecosystem finance (BTCFi) have remained hot, but based on on-chain data and regulatory pace, the industry is more likely to be in a recovery phase rather than on the eve of a breakout. Data shows that in Q1 2026, the total value locked in this sector shrank by about 74% compared to the 2025 peak, Babylon has stabilized above $4 billion, Stacks and Core are beginning to generate real revenue, and the market is shifting from a subsidy-driven false boom to a stage of fundamental validation. From a time perspective, the true scale leap may not come until after the second half of 2027. At that time, if native programmability upgrades like OP_CAT are implemented, combined with the resonance of the halving cycle, BTCFi's penetration rate is expected to rise from the current about 1% to 2.3%, corresponding to a total locked value between $20 and $30 billion. Large-scale institutional capital inflows are more likely to occur in the mid-to-late phase of the next bull market in 2028-2029, provided that at least two conditions are met: auditable income for multiple consecutive quarters, income ETF approval, and custody of standardized products by major players. It is worth noting that in 2024-2025, there was already a "false explosion" where the market surged to $9.1 billion before being halved, significantly enhancing the market's ability to distinguish between subsidy TVL and real fee revenue. At the token level, stocks like STX and CORE usually lag behind protocol data by more than a quarter and are constrained by unlocking models; overall sector upward movements do not necessarily mean individual stocks are strengthening simultaneously. For medium- to long-term investors, 2027 is the observation window and 2028 to 2029 is the time to realize their benefits📊 $BTC Contract Liquidation Express (September 1)
Shorts probed control in 1 hour, bulls reversed with 4x dominance in 4 hours, bulls exploded with 9.7x nuclear-level dominance at 12 hours hitting today's peak, and then collapsed avalanche-style to 6.4x at 24 hours — short squeeze momentum gradually declined from the nuclear peak, but bulls still firmly control the market.
Time Total Liquidation Long Liquidation Short Liquidation
1 hour $51,800 $16,000 $35,800
4 hours $20,091,900 $16,129,500 $3,962,400
12 hours $78,402,300 $71,076,000 $7,326,300
24 hours $99,660,900 $86,217,300 $13,443,700
From BTC liquidation data, shorts held a slight 2.2x advantage in 1 hour with only $51,800, indicating a tentative start; direction reversed in 4 hours — bulls violently overtook with 4.07x, volume surged to $20.09 million, triggering a full short squeeze; 12-hour bull dominance soared to 9.7x, volume exploded to $78.4 million, reaching a nuclear peak of short squeeze; 24-hour bull dominance sharply dropped to 6.4x close, with bull liquidations at $86.22 million versus shorts at $13.44 million, total liquidation exceeding $99.66 million. Bull multiples followed an inverted V pattern from 4.07x → 9.7x → 6.4x, showing short squeeze momentum peaked at 12 hours then steadily declined. 12-hour liquidations accounted for 78.7% of the 24-hour total, indicating a moderately high concentration. Leverage is recommended to be compressed below 3x; direction is clear but momentum is retreating from the peak, avoid blindly chasing longs.
🔥 Market Barometer | September 1
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: Wash's hawkish tone is about to face the ultimate test from employment data; Bitcoin and gold deeply correlate under "fiat credit revaluation"; and Broadcom and Dell's earnings will successively verify the sustainability of AI hardware returns.
📊 Nonfarm Friday Debut: Can Wash's "Hawk" Withstand the "Blade" of Data?
At 20:30 Beijing time on September 4, the US August nonfarm payroll report will be released. Reuters surveys expect an increase of 58,000 jobs, unemployment steady at 4.1%; ING economists forecast about 65,000 new jobs. July nonfarm unexpectedly shrank by 23,000, with May and June revised down by a total of 103,000.
Last week, Fed Chair Wash delivered his first keynote speech since taking office at Jackson Hole, clearly stating that if inflation does not "clearly and quickly" return to the 2% target, the Fed "still has work to do." CME data shows the probability of a September rate hike surged from about 35% before the speech to 66.1%. Citi economists believe there was no consensus for a July FOMC hike; cooling inflation and slowing hiring suggest rate hikes are unlikely this year. If data weakens again this week, the 66% hike expectation could quickly collapse.
₿ BTC High-Level Volatility: Gold Correlation Hits Historic High, $7 Billion Flows into ETFs
Bitcoin rose 28% in August, briefly surpassing $81,000, but fell under pressure after Wash's hawkish speech, currently oscillating between $77,000-$78,000.
The 90-day correlation coefficient between Bitcoin and gold hit a historic high, with the 30-day indicator reaching a yearly peak of 0.8. This shift is driven by "fiat credit revaluation" — US debt surpassing $40 trillion, investors no longer choosing between gold and Bitcoin but buying both "non-government credit assets" simultaneously. In the past five trading days, gold and Bitcoin ETFs attracted a record $7 billion inflow. SPDR Gold ETF drew nearly $3.4 billion, BlackRock Bitcoin ETF $1.5 billion. Bitcoin is completing its role shift from "tech asset" to "digital gold."
🖥️ Broadcom and Dell Take Over: AI Hardware Returns Under Further Scrutiny
Following Nvidia's explosive $96.2 billion revenue report, the AI hardware sector faces a new round of tests this week.
Dell led with an earnings beat after market close on September 1: Q2 revenue $46.97 billion, well above the expected $44.92 billion; AI-optimized server revenue $16.4 billion, also exceeding expectations; company sharply raised full-year AI server sales forecast to $74 billion. Shares rose 5% after hours.
Broadcom will release Q3 earnings after market close on September 2. Analysts expect revenue of $29.43 billion, up 84.5% year-over-year; EPS $2.55, up 199.5%. Key market variables include whether the $16 billion AI semiconductor target can be met and if Google's custom chip orders will be diverted due to Marvell's involvement.
💎 Summary
Three events paint the same picture: This Friday's nonfarm will test Wash's "still has work to do" hawkish stance — if employment weakens again, the 66% rate hike expectation may quickly collapse; Bitcoin and gold deeply correlate under "fiat credit revaluation," with a record $7 billion ETF inflow and historic correlation highs; Dell has proven AI server demand is still booming with an earnings beat, and Broadcom will be tested tonight.
As employment data, macro narratives, and AI earnings converge this week — the market awaits the final answer on September 4. As the market barometer, BTC liquidation data already gives a clear signal: the nearly 10x short squeeze dominance in the 12-hour window is today's most extreme expression of bull power; but the 24-hour multiple has fallen to 6.4x, indicating the momentum for chasing longs is rapidly fading. The big direction still depends on the nonfarm outcome. #就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验
#BTC高位震荡，与黄金联动增强
#财报观察员：博通与戴尔接棒，AI回报再受检验 ✍️ $BTC $80K and the new market structure
Bitcoin surpassing $80,000 is sparking much debate about the quality of the rally. Spot CVD remains relatively stable while the rising price may reflect a larger role of derivatives and leverage. Nevertheless, ETF inflows and short position liquidations continue to be important supporting drivers. What needs to be monitored now is confirmation from spot demand. Price increases are positive, but do not yet fully confirm an established uptrend.After the latest CPI data was released, the crypto market remains on edge. Inflation strength directly influences policy expectations, which is the fundamental reason for the recent market fluctuations. $BTC strongly rebounded from the low of 57809, surged to 82842 before hitting resistance, and is now contesting around 79000. The price has risen above the 20-day moving average, giving short-term bulls a slight advantage, but heavy overhead supply makes breaking the previous high dependent on macroeconomic support. $ETH follows the overall market trend with better elasticity than BTC, showing good momentum during rebounds but has yet to establish an independent trend. SOL remains popular with frequent positive news, and capital rotation speculation causes high volatility. Established mainstream coins like XRP and $ADA show moderate movements, usually performing only during major market events. MEME coins such as $DOGE and $SHIB continue to be driven by sentiment, with large swings being common and risks very high. TRX is relatively stable with decent capital support. Overall, the current market is structurally driven by macro factors, with CPI as the biggest variable. Before the trend becomes clear, mainstream coins may oscillate while small caps take turns being active. Avoid blindly chasing hot spots and be cautious of profit-taking after news releases. Risk warning: Crypto assets are highly volatile; please manage your positions rationally and practice sound risk management.BTCFi Four Kings Ultimate Review: Steady, Hardcore, Elastic, Ambush — Who Is the True Leader of the Bull Market?
⚠️ This article only outlines the track logic and project architecture and does not constitute any investment advice.
The Bitcoin ecosystem bull market wave continues to advance, with many investors confusing STX, CORE, MERL, and BABY as all BTCFi track targets.
In fact, they are completely different levels, logics, and capital narratives.
The four projects respectively represent the four top BTCFi schools: Native Steady, Full-Chain Infrastructure, Inscription Elasticity, and Underlying Security. Their underlying architecture, asset risk, growth potential, and capital logic differ vastly.
1. Core Positioning of the Four Schools: Clearly Distinguish the Hierarchy
STX | Native Steady School: The Orthodox Bitcoin L2 Benchmark
Stacks is the earliest and most orthodox L2 infrastructure in the Bitcoin ecosystem.
It does not alter Bitcoin’s base layer; relying on PoX consensus + a dedicated programming language, it realizes on-chain smart contracts on Bitcoin and builds a complete BTC-denominated DeFi system based on sBTC.
Advantages: orthodox ecosystem, high institutional recognition, most stable trend.
Drawbacks: not EVM compatible, slower ecosystem expansion, limited explosive potential.
Positioning: BTCFi defensive leader, following a long-term steady compound growth path.
CORE | All-Purpose Infrastructure School: Bitcoin’s Only Independent L1 Public Chain
The biggest market misconception: treating CORE as a Bitcoin Layer 2.
CORE is an independent Layer 1 public chain, not L2!
It relies on exclusive Satoshi Plus hybrid consensus, leveraging Bitcoin’s entire network hash power as a security base, fully EVM compatible, truly a "Bitcoin Supergrid."
Coverage: BTC staking, institutional lstBTC liquid staking, SatPay payments, lending, RWA real-world assets; the only BTCFi leader with a complete commercial revenue system.
Entering cash flow profitability era in 2026, with real business, real institutional demand, and real buyback expectations.
Positioning: BTCFi aggressive infrastructure leader, largest growth potential, most hardcore narrative.
MERL | Inscription Elasticity School: Dedicated Channel for Bitcoin Native Assets
Merlin Chain focuses on ZK Layer 2 + inscription ecosystem, precisely solving BRC20, Ordinals asset congestion, and high Gas fees.
All ecosystem activity, popularity, and capital are tied to the Bitcoin inscription cycle.
Advantages: extremely strong bull market elasticity, highest gains during hot trends.
Drawbacks: market highly dependent on sector sentiment, no independent narrative, strong cyclical nature.
Positioning: BTCFi cyclical speculative target, riding waves and trends.
BABY | Underlying Security School: Bitcoin Security Leasing Dark Horse
Unique and completely differentiated track.
Does not do DeFi, trading, or applications; only one thing:
Zero-risk staking of Bitcoin native assets and full-network PoS public chain security leasing.
User BTC remains in native addresses throughout, no custody, no cross-chain, no wrapping; the highest security model in the BTCFi network.
Earns continuous income by "renting out Bitcoin’s top-level security," belonging to the most fundamental and essential public chain infrastructure narrative.
Positioning: ultra-long-term ambush-type underlying dark horse, highest odds.
2. Asset Security Hierarchy (The Most Important Watershed in BTCFi)
✅ BABY | Ceiling-Level Security
BTC remains in native UTXO addresses throughout, pure cryptographic staking, zero custody, zero wrapping, zero bridge risk, absolutely secure assets.
✅ CORE | Non-Custodial Hardcore Security
BTC locked with Bitcoin mainnet timelocks, principal never leaves BTC chain, no institutional custody risk, only data relay synchronization, extremely low risk.
⚠️ STX | Consortium Multi-Signature Mode
Asset security depends on node consortium; although there is a penalty mechanism, theoretical risk of consortium misconduct exists.
⚠️ MERL | MPC Custody Mode
Assets require custody mapping; native BTC leaves mainnet, exposing institutional counterparty risk.
3. Value Capture Logic: Determines Bull Market Multiples
STX
Pure ecological consumption + BTC-denominated staking yield, slowly raising value through ecosystem expansion, steady but slow.
CORE
Dual staking lockup + 2026 cash flow realization
lstBTC institutional service fees, cross-border payments, on-chain fees, future revenue buybacks
— the only BTCFi leader transitioning from "storytelling" to "real money earning."
MERL
Inscription ecosystem fees + 50% profit buybacks, market fully follows sector bull and bear cycles, high elasticity, weak sustainability.
BABY
Continuous income from full-network public chain security leasing fees, unique track, long-term value severely underestimated.
4. Ultimate Summary: Four Targets Suit Different Investors
✅ Seeking stability, holding long-term, avoiding volatility: choose STX
Bitcoin native orthodox, heavy institutional holdings, most stable trend.
✅ Riding the bull market main rise, earning growth dividends, focusing on fundamentals: choose CORE
BTCFi’s only L1 infrastructure + only cash flow track, core mainline of this bull market.
✅ Speculating on hot trends, capturing waves, playing cyclical markets: choose MERL
When inscription trends arrive, elasticity crushes the field.
✅ Low-position ambush, betting on underlying narrative breakout, super high odds: choose BABY
The safest BTC staking model in the network, underlying infrastructure dark horse.
The true money-making logic in the bull market:
Not randomly buying BTCFi, but selecting the mainline that fits your style.
#STX #CORE #MERL #BABY #BTCFiWhy does Bitcoin rise every 4 years?
⚠️ Market review only, not investment advice; the crypto market is highly volatile.
This can be divided into six major layers: supply side, demand side, macro liquidity, regulatory expectations, chip and leverage, narrative and belief.
1. Supply side: Scarcity, four-year halving (fundamental basis)
Total permanent cap of 21 million coins, no additional issuance.
Halving occurs every 4 years, cutting miners' daily new Bitcoin production in half, reducing new selling pressure in the market.
- Historical pattern: The market often trades ahead of halving expectations; major peaks mostly appear 12-18 months after halving.
- Current status: 94% of Bitcoin has been mined, with fewer new coins entering circulation; a large amount of coins remain unmoved long-term (whales hoarding, cold wallets), reducing liquid chips on exchanges, so a small amount of capital can push prices up.
2. Demand side: Real buying pressure, institutions are the biggest variable this cycle
1. US spot ETFs
BlackRock and other ETFs provide pension funds, family offices, and ordinary Americans a compliant channel to buy BTC; continuous net inflows into ETFs represent ongoing passive buying and are the most important indicator of the mid-term trend.
2. Public companies hoarding coins (e.g., MicroStrategy)
Companies convert part of their cash into Bitcoin on their balance sheets, continuously buying and directly absorbing circulating market chips.
3. Global retail and high-net-worth allocations
Treat Bitcoin as "digital gold" to hedge fiat overissuance and geopolitical risks.
3. Macro liquidity (largest impact, primary short-term driver)
Bitcoin is a highly elastic risk asset, highly sensitive to US dollar liquidity.
1. Fed rate cut expectations, US Treasury yields declining
Lower risk-free interest rates cause funds to flow out of bonds into stocks, Bitcoin, and other risk assets; when Treasury yields surge, Bitcoin usually comes under pressure.
2. Weakening US dollar makes Bitcoin priced in dollars more likely to rise.
Simply put: In a loose liquidity environment, Bitcoin is more likely to bull; when liquidity tightens, even strong narratives are easily suppressed.
4. Regulatory policy expectations
- Positive: Clear crypto legislation in the US, softer SEC stance, ETF approvals, more countries allowing compliant holdings will open space for incremental capital inflows.
- Negative: Comprehensive bans and strict regulations directly suppress the market.
A large part of the bull market is trading on "expectations of improved regulation."
5. Chip structure + leverage short squeeze (short-term surge catalyst)
1. Long-term on-chain holders do not move: large amounts of BTC locked in cold wallets, not sold, shrinking circulating supply.
2. Derivatives leverage: When price breaks key resistance, a large number of accumulated short positions are forcibly liquidated; shorts buying coins to close positions become passive buying pressure, further driving prices up—this is a short squeeze. Many rapid large green candles come from leverage liquidations, not all from spot buying.
6. Narrative belief: value consensus
Two core narratives:
1. Inflation resistance, hedge against fiat depreciation: governments can print money, but Bitcoin’s total supply cannot be changed.
2. Decentralized digital value storage, not controlled by any single country.
The narrative itself does not directly drive price up but attracts capital willing to allocate, turning the story into real money.
Conversely, what can interrupt the rise?
1. Fed rate hikes again, liquidity tightening; US Treasury yields continue rising.
2. ETFs shift from net inflows to sustained large redemptions, institutional capital withdraws.
3. Global economic crisis, all risk assets crash together.
4. Major negative regulatory news.
5. Excessive leverage accumulation followed by concentrated long liquidations causing a crash.
In summary
Halving tightens supply as the foundation; macro liquidity determines the overall environment; ETFs and institutional funds provide incremental buying; regulation opens institutional space; leverage and sentiment amplify price swings.
Looking at a single factor alone leads to misjudgment; multiple factors must resonate together to produce a major bull market.🔥$BTC Morning Watch｜Battle for 77,000, 80,000 as the Rebound Watershed
🔥This morning, Bitcoin perpetual contracts are quoted around $77,100, with a 24h range of approximately $76,400–$79,200; some platforms briefly dipped below 77,000 during intraday trading. Ethereum is also weak, falling below around $2,400.
Market Highlights:
Support: 77,000 is a short-term psychological level; below that, look to 76,000 and 75,000; if 75,000 breaks, technical traders will eye the 72,000 area.
Resistance: 79,000–80,000 is the first hurdle; 82,000–83,000 is near the weighted cost zone of some spot ETFs, and only a breakout there can lead to a renewed rally.
Capital Flow: In August, the US spot BTC ETF net inflow was about $3.5 billion, with BTC rising about 25% for the month; however, after the hawkish tone at Jackson Hole on August 28, there was a single-day outflow of about $200 million, followed by a net inflow of about $217 million on August 31, indicating a divergence phase of "inflows without price follow-through."
Catalysts: Middle East/Hormuz Strait news pushed Brent crude above $90, the Fed's September rate hike expectations are priced above 60%, and the upcoming big variables are the September 5 Nonfarm Payrolls/September ADP employment report and the September 16 FOMC meeting.
Summary: August was a recovery bull driven by ETFs and short covering; September started with a pullback due to "geopolitics + rate hikes + seasonal weakness." Holding 77,000 means strong consolidation; breaking 75,000 means don't stubbornly catch the falling knife.
$BTC Core DAO Project Major Event Decryption
⚠️Note: The content is only a compilation of publicly available information and does not constitute any investment advice.
Many people have a major misconception: that Core's official cross-chain bridge supporting multiple EVM chains for asset transfers means a large number of projects are fully migrating to Core. The truth is quite the opposite; almost no projects have completely shut down their original chain operations, with the vast majority only choosing to expand multi-chain layouts.
Core's official bridge connects Ethereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Polygon, Avalanche, Optimism, and Base—seven EVM chains—with significant differences in project entry enthusiasm across these chains.
BNB Chain is the public chain with the most projects laying out on Core. Since the second half of 2023, projects like LFGSwap, numerous Meme projects, yield aggregators, ASX Capital, and others have successively deployed on Core. The BSC track is highly competitive with new projects continuously diluting traffic, while Core focuses on the scarce BTCFi narrative, with extremely low EVM-compatible development costs, combined with official Ignition ecosystem incentives. Projects can simultaneously capture BSC's existing users and BTC holders, opening a new growth curve. Ethereum mainly expands through blue-chip protocols multi-chain, with representative project Solv Protocol launching SolvBTC.CORE in October 2024. The Ethereum LST track is fiercely competitive; Core has a native Bitcoin staking system that can form a complete staking and lending business loop, helping Solv reach BTC holders that the Ethereum ecosystem struggles to cover. Infrastructure like oracle Pyth and LayerZero have also been deployed to improve the underlying ecosystem.
Arbitrum has many re-staking and derivatives protocols planning new layouts from late 2024 to 2025. The Arbitrum track focuses on ETH re-staking, with weak BTCFi layout. Core's unique BTC+CORE dual staking mechanism can create differentiated yield products; meanwhile, on-chain fees are lower, making it more suitable for retail DeFi users. Polygon, Avalanche, Optimism, and Base have very few mature projects actively laying out, with only sporadic small new projects launching simultaneously. These public chains have their own ecosystem support policies, native assets mainly ETH-based, lacking BTC existing funds, and projects have little motivation to expand outward.
The core logic behind projects willing to lay out on Core is clear: most EVM public chains compete around the Ethereum ecosystem, while Core is a scarce BTCFi underlying track with a differentiated narrative; smart contract changes are minimal and development costs controllable; it can also absorb incremental funds brought by BTC hashrate narrative.
It is essential to clarify a key concept here: asset cross-chain channels only facilitate token transfers for users and do not equal ecosystem migration. Core's current leading applications Colend and Pell Network are native development projects, not migrated from external public chains.
Track dividends ultimately rely on continuous implementation and realization. Ongoing observation of project activity and real on-chain fee income will determine whether ecosystem expansion can convert into long-term value.
#CORE #BTCFi #PublicChainEcosystem Everyone is doing BTCFi, but STX, CORE, MERL, and BABY are fundamentally different asset types
⚠️ This article is only for outlining track logic and technical architecture, and does not constitute any investment advice
The Bitcoin ecosystem is booming, but many friends tend to confuse STX, CORE, MERL, and BABY. In fact, although these four targets all carry the "BTCFi" label, their underlying positioning, security models, and business logic are completely different. Some are building elevated bridges, some are creating new continents, and others are doing "security business." Today, we will thoroughly clarify these four tracks in 1000 words.
1. Core Positioning: Four Completely Different Species
STX (Stacks): The "veteran" of Bitcoin native L2
Stacks is one of the earliest explorers of Bitcoin Layer 2. It uses a unique PoX consensus and Clarity language, aiming to implement smart contracts without modifying the Bitcoin mainnet.
Core logic: Connect assets through sBTC, allowing users to play DeFi on top of Bitcoin. After the Nakamoto upgrade, it achieved second-level confirmation, but its non-EVM characteristic means it is a relatively closed yet highly native track.
CORE (Core DAO): The "independent L1" with its own power grid
CORE is not a layer two but an independent Layer 1 public chain. It pioneered the Satoshi Plus hybrid consensus, "borrowing" idle computing power from Bitcoin miners to secure its own chain.
Core logic: Build an EVM-compatible "Bitcoin power grid." It serves not only retail users but also focuses on institutional lstBTC (liquid staking Bitcoin) business, aiming to become the underlying infrastructure for RWA and payments.
MERL (Merlin Chain): The "ZK express lane" for inscription players
MERL is an authentic Bitcoin ZK-Rollup Layer 2 network. It was created to solve congestion and high gas fees for BRC20 and inscription assets on the BTC mainnet.
Core logic: EVM compatible, specifically serving liquidity release for BTC native assets (Ordinals/Runes). Its success heavily depends on the activity of the inscription market.
BABY (Babylon): The "wholesaler" of Bitcoin security
BABY’s concept is the most unique. It is not a chain for running applications but a Bitcoin staking protocol.
Core logic: Allows users to stake BTC directly on the Bitcoin mainnet and "rent out" the security of these BTC to other PoS public chains (such as the Cosmos ecosystem). It is currently the only solution to achieve BTC non-custodial staking.
2. Security Watershed: Who is truly guarding your BTC?
This is the most hardcore metric to distinguish these four projects.
BABY (top tier): BTC always remains in the Bitcoin mainnet’s UTXO, no cross-chain bridges, no wrapped assets (no wrapping), pure cryptographic staking. This is currently the safest trust model in the industry.
CORE (non-custodial): User BTC is locked in Bitcoin mainnet’s CLTV time lock, private keys are not handed over to anyone. The main risk lies in the state synchronization mechanism of relay nodes (Relayers).
STX (consortium-based): Connects assets through sBTC, relying on a decentralized signer alliance. Although there are economic incentives and penalties, there is still a theoretical risk of alliance collusion.
MERL (custodial): User BTC enters MPC multi-signature custodial addresses, mapping out stMBTC. Assets leave the mainnet, trusting the honesty of the MPC custodian, with counterparty risk.
3. Token Value Capture: Who is paying for the tokens?
STX: Burn model. Users consume STX when using the sBTC ecosystem; staking STX can earn BTC rewards (BTC-denominated yield).
CORE: Dual staking necessity. To obtain advanced yields, you must stake CORE; the official plan is to use revenue from institutional businesses like SatPay and lstBTC to buy back tokens.
MERL: Profit buyback. The official commitment is to use 50% of ecosystem profits for MERL buybacks. On-chain gas primarily consumes BTC; MERL is mainly used for node staking and governance.
BABY: Security rent. PoS public chains pay Babylon fees to obtain Bitcoin-level security. Meanwhile, BABY is also the network’s gas and governance token.
5. Summary
STX is the "conservative reformer" on Bitcoin, pursuing nativeness and stability.
CORE is the "radical infrastructure fanatic" in the Bitcoin world, pursuing scale and institutionalization.
MERL is the "traffic operator" of Bitcoin assets, pursuing speed and inscription popularity.
BABY is the "behind-the-scenes arms dealer" of Bitcoin security, pursuing ultimate cryptographic trust.
In this cycle, understanding which layer the asset is on (L1/L2/middleware) and who holds custody (non-custodial/custodial/consortium) is far more meaningful than just watching the K-line.
#STX #CORE #MERL #BABY #BTCFi