Orbit Post Sitemap
ENGLISH BELOW
DOGE 这单，我盯的是 0.07029 那道空头防线。
$DOGE/USDT - 做空
交易计划：（置信度：95.00%）
入场区间：0.06994 – 0.07002
止损：0.07029
止盈1：0.06975
止盈2：0.06960
止盈3：0.06937
为什么关注这个机会？
日线还是 bearish，BTC 大方向给的是 NEUTRAL，没有来添乱，这种环境下做空 DOGE 属于顺着大趋势找节奏。4 小时图上的参考位就在 0.06998，这位置不是随便画的，是空头压制的关键节点，现在价格贴着它，就是在等一个表态。
15 分钟 RSI 已经掉到 36.87，动能偏弱但还没到超卖，意味着下跌可能还有空间，但别指望一口气砸穿。1 小时 ATR 是 0.000352，波动不算小，所以进场别追，等价格回到 0.06994 到 0.07002 这个区间再动手。SL 放 0.07029，TP 分三档：0.06975、0.06960、0.06937，先把风险边界划清楚。
这单我有九成五的把握，但关键不在我多有信心，而在 0.07029 这个位置守不守得住。破了，计划作废，不跟它较劲。
你怎么看？
TP1 到了之后，你们是直接拉保本，还是让它自由波动吃 TP2？
ENG:
DOGE short setup — the line I care about is the 0.07029 defense zone.
$DOGE/USDT - SHORT
Trade plan (confidence: 95.00%)
Entry range: 0.06994 – 0.07002
Stop loss: 0.07029
Take profit 1: 0.06975
Take profit 2: 0.06960
Take profit 3: 0.06937
Why watch this setup?
Daily trend is still bearish, and BTC is sitting at NEUTRAL, which isn't throwing any curveballs. In that kind of environment, shorting DOGE is just following the larger trend. The 4H reference sits at 0.06998 — this isn't a random level, it's where the bears have been holding. Price is hugging it right now, waiting for a clear move.
RSI on the 15m is already down to 36.87, so momentum is weak but not yet oversold. That tells me there could be more downside, but don't expect a straight flush down. The 1H ATR is 0.000352, which means volatility is moderate — don't chase entries. Wait for price to come back into the 0.06994 to 0.07002 zone before pulling the trigger. SL sits at 0.07029, with three TP targets: 0.06975, 0.06960, and 0.06937. Risk is defined before anything else.
I'm about 95% confident on this one, but the real test isn't my conviction — it's whether 0.07029 holds. If that breaks, the plan is void. I'm not going to fight it.
What do you think?
Once TP1 hits, are you moving your stop to breakeven or letting it ride for TP2?
#DOGE #Crypto #CryptoTrading #OKX #Trading #Short一句话总结：费率回归中性，但大户仍在极端看空，CRV空头挤压结束，市场处于"假平静"状态。 【数据速览】 🟡 情绪指数：-0.07σ（黄区·中性） | 主导：观望 | 市场状态：观望 【关键发现（3条）】 1. 【CRV空头挤压结束】 🟣 CRV偏离度从-2.16σ极端空头反弹至+0.84σ，费率从-0.01396%飙回0.01%——空头被大规模清算，但回归正常≠趋势反转，只是情绪从极端回归理性。 2. 【大户与费率背离】 🔴 BTC费率-0.97σ只是绿区轻度空头，但OKX大户持仓多空比跌至0.40（极端看空）——大户在费率正常时仍在加仓空头，认为价格仍有下行空间。 3. 【爆仓激增+持仓回升】 💥 24h爆仓2.42亿（+66.63%），多空双杀；但持仓OI回升至1134.04亿（+1.42%）——"换庄"信号：旧多头被爆，新资金入场是"换庄"信号：旧多头被爆，新资金入场。 ⚡ 交叉验证结论：费率说"中性"，大户说"看空"，爆仓说"波动"。三个指标给出三个不同信号——典型的"假平静"：表面风平浪静，水下暗流涌动。 📝 我的操作记录 💼 持仓：空仓观望（现金80%，稳定币While the market is still watching the next chapter of large model storytelling, smart money has already begun laying out a harder logic—chips. The essence of the AI arms race is a race for computing power supply, and chips have shifted from "optional accessories" to strategic materials. Outline of this article - What 🔄 is happening in this sector - ⚙️ What is the real driving force - 📊 Representing the target - 🎯 How to participate and how to defend I. What 🔄 is happening in this sector From the perspective of capital flows, although $BTC and $ETH have been volatile recently, $QQQ has closed higher for consecutive days, with chip stocks leading the gains. AI chip demand has moved from expectations to earnings reports—leading companies have successively raised their guidance, and capital expenditures for building new wafer fabs have surged. This is not conceptual hype; it is a real capacity expansion. At the same time, AI-related tokens in the crypto world (such as $FET and $RNDR) are also seeing a surge in volume, indicating that hot money is seeking the intersection of "technology + crypto." As underlying hardware, chips naturally have a foundation for cross-market speculation. The AI narrative is shifting from software to hardware, with chips being the hardest logic. 2. What is ⚙️ the real driving force? Behind this AI chip boom are three real drivers: Explosive demand for large model training: new-generation models like GPT-5 are driving exponential growth in GPU/TPU consumption, NVIDIA's capacity schedule is now through next year, and the shortage of supply is unsolvable in the short term. Geopolitics have fueled computing power independence: countries have shifted from "buying chips" to "manufacturing chips," with equipment and material suppliers becoming shovel sellers, $ASBitcoin has reclaimed $63,000, but the bigger question is whether this is the start of a new trend—or simply a relief rally.
U.S. equities opened August on a strong note, helping lift risk assets, while oil prices continued to ease. Even so, crypto remains caught between improving macro sentiment and lingering headwinds.
Liquidity is still relatively thin, ETF flows remain mixed, and the recent Coldcard firmware vulnerability has shaken confidence among some self-custody users. While the issue doesn't affect Bitcoin itself, it serves as another reminder that operational risks can quickly weigh on market sentiment.
At the same time, institutional activity continues to evolve. Strategy has kept reducing its Bitcoin holdings while repurchasing preferred shares, BlackRock is expanding its tokenized cash products on-chain, and decentralized exchanges recorded a new monthly market share high in July—evidence that capital is still actively rotating within the crypto ecosystem.
From a market structure perspective, this looks like a typical consolidation phase. $BTC is attempting to establish support around its long-term moving average, while $ETH continues to consolidate with signs of steady accumulation. $SOL , $XRP , and $BNB are largely tracking the broader market without emerging as clear leaders.
Meanwhile, $ADA has shown relative resilience following recent ecosystem developments, while $ALGO, $INJ, and $ENA continue attracting selective buying interest. Assets such as $LINK, $DOT, $AVAX, $DOGE, $HYPE, and $UNI remain closely tied to overall market liquidity and risk appetite.
None of this guarantees the next move higher. August has historically been a challenging month for Bitcoin, ETF demand remains inconsistent, and upcoming regulatory developments—including the CLARITY Act timeline—along with earnings from major crypto firms could shape sentiment in the weeks ahead. Geopolitical uncertainty also remains an important variable.
#DailyOrbit BTC & Macro – Stocks explode, Bitcoin is still "slow"
🔥 BTC has just touched $63,800–$64,000 as the Nasdaq opened August up more than 2%!
US stocks started the month strongest in nearly 4 years, but Bitcoin only inched slightly after a series of weak days. ETF flows are still mixed, volume is thin, CME open interest is at a low level in 2023.
Real traders can clearly see that risk-on is returning to tech stocks, but crypto is still "hanging" because of the lack of new institutional cash flow. August is historically weak for BTC, plus weekend payrolls worries.
Private Insight: When equity explodes and BTC doesn't follow, it's usually a sign of capital waiting for a clearer catalyst, not panic.The essence of CoreWeave's business model is: borrow money to buy NVIDIA GPUs, rent them out to others, and earn the difference between rent and interest. The full value of this model depends on two numbers—the asset's unleveraged return rate and the cost of debt. $CRWV #谷歌为AI数据中心债务兜底, in exchange for 20% equity A useful reminder that on-chain means on-display: wallets tied to Trump Media (DJT) moved 2,628 BTC, about $165M, to Crypto.com over the weekend, and the whole market watched it happen in real time. The company says it wasn't a sale, just a relocation. Sale or not, everyone got to speculate, because the ledger is public.
That transparency is the double-edged feature people forget. When a public company holds Bitcoin, its treasury moves are visible to anyone with a block explorer, no filing delay, no press release required. It's radically more open than traditional finance, and it also means a routine custody transfer can spook a market before the company can explain it. For the corporate-BTC trend, this is the trade-off of holding a transparent asset: credibility and scrutiny arrive together. I'd take the company at its word while noting the lesson, on-chain, you can't move quietly. Watching whether disclosure catches up to the visibility.
Just my read, not advice.
#TrumpMedia2628BTC #OKXOrbitU.S. stocks did well on Monday. The Dow hit a record high, with the S&P spread 0.1% and the Nasdaq +2.1%. The core is just one thing—oil prices have collapsed.
Trump said he wouldn't attack Iran for now, and Brent dropped nearly 5% in one day. As inflation expectations cooled, U.S. Treasury yields followed suit, and tech stocks collectively recovered. The ISM Manufacturing PMI was 55.6, which is also good. Palantir and SpaceX will release their earnings reports tonight, which are worth watching.
The A-share market was very volatile yesterday: the Shanghai Composite fell 0.6%, the ChiNext dropped 1.2%, but over 4,000 stocks rose, with 83 hitting the daily limit. Micro-cap stocks continue to be strong, rising 13% from the end of July to now. Large-cap tech stocks are selling hard, with Cambricon, NANO, and Huachuang both starting at -6%. Trading volume shrank to 2 trillion, indicating that large funds are taking a wait-and-see approach.
Personally, I feel that the US stock market breakout has laid a solid foundation for the Asian session. A-shares are currently following the classic rhythm of "individual stocks moving first, with the stabilization of large tech stocks signaling the next wave." Hong Kong stocks Haitong said August led and stabilized, and I am also somewhat optimistic.
Closely monitoring Friday's nonfarm payrolls, with intermittent U.S.-Iran talks and judgments in between, oil prices will act as a mood switch.Will the US and Iran resume negotiations? The US stock market is hyped first, but how much can this script be trusted?
$DOGE $SOL
Last night's big bullish candlestick in the US stock market boiled down to two words: sentiment.
Trump shouted, "Talk to Iran on Monday," causing oil prices to panic. Brent crude once fell more than 7%, and US stock futures surged accordingly, ultimately with the Nasdaq up 2%.
But don't get too worked up; you need to take this into account.
First, did you negotiate? Everyone has their own story.
Trump is confident, saying, "We'll talk tomorrow afternoon, and there will be agreements on the strait and nuclear issues." Iran has directly poured cold water on the situation: a Foreign Ministry spokesperson said there are no plans to receive or send delegations recently, and currently there are no negotiations with the United States. One said "we want to talk," the other said "no plan"—the whole Pacific was missing in between.
Second, why did US stocks rise first? What is being traded is the expectation of "not fighting." $BTC
What the market fears most is uncertainty, especially the scenario of full-scale conflict in the Middle East and soaring oil prices. Now Trump has proactively halted large-scale military strikes against Iran, saying that allies like Saudi Arabia and the UAE have advised him not to fight, believing talks can be made.
Oil prices plummeted in response, effectively cooling global inflation expectations, which eased the tension first. Moreover, expectations of Fed rate hikes already weigh heavily on the market, making this a breathing room.
Third, what does the so-called "defense and offense rise together" mean?
This shows that funds are still betting on both sides. The biggest gains were still tech and semiconductors, which were hit hardest in the previous period—a typical oversold rebound + sentiment recovery.
Meanwhile, data from Morgan Stanley shows that funds are also hiding in defensive sectors like insurance and healthcare. All are rising, but their minds vary—some feel the risk is over and rush in to buy the dip, while others are still seeking stability.
Fourth, can negotiations really go through this time? Difficult.
Both sides are now stuck in the deadlock of the Strait of Hormuz. Iran's stance is tough: management of the strait must be mine, and the US wants to open a new shipping lane in Oman to bypass it, but there's no way for it.
Moreover, Iran has clearly stated that unless the United Nations or a regional power guarantees that the U.S. will not cheat or act unfairly, it cannot trust the U.S.; the foundation of trust is almost zero.
#特朗普媒体链上转账2628BTC, the nature of the matter has not been disclosed
#Tether季度盈利15亿, gold increased to 146 tons
#CLARITY法案错过休会窗口 🚨 The chart tells one story. On-chain data tells another.
This morning's on-chain data suggests the market is under pressure—but not necessarily at a breaking point.
Here are the key takeaways:
🔹 Short-term holders are capitulating. More than 30,000 BTC was reportedly moved to exchanges and sold at a loss over the past 24 hours, a sign that recent buyers are giving up.
🔹 The $62K–$65K zone is becoming a major battleground. Buyers continue absorbing supply in this range, making it an important area to watch.
🔹 The 16,400 BTC whale transfer wasn't sent to exchanges. It moved to a new wallet, suggesting custody restructuring or an OTC transfer rather than an immediate market sale.
🔹 The Coldcard incident has shaken confidence in self-custody, but there are no clear signs of large amounts of the stolen BTC being dumped onto exchanges.
My takeaway?
The market is showing signs of short-term exhaustion, but it still hasn't reached the kind of panic that has marked major cycle bottoms in the past.
For now, this looks like a range where weak hands are being cleared out—not a market that has already chosen its next direction.
Patience still offers the best risk-to-reward.
#BTC #Bitcoin #Crypto #OnChain #DailyOrbit
#DailyOrbit Citadel's operation looks like manipulation—but pay attention to a few details:
1️⃣ The rate hike warning is not unfounded—the Fed meeting did have 3 votes in favor of rate hikes
2️⃣ AI stocks also fall due to fundamental reasons (capital expenditure, earnings below expectations)
3️⃣ The castle itself is a market maker, so buying during market panic is normal business
It may look like manipulation, but it might just be a "smart deal."🚨 The Market May Be Overlooking This Bitcoin Warning
Back in 2022, Michael Saylor's Strategy sold 704 $BTC .
At the time, many dismissed it as insignificant.
Not long afterward, Bitcoin dropped more than 30%.
Now Strategy has sold 1,638 $BTC —more than double its 2022 sale.
This doesn't necessarily mean another major decline is coming, and the sale itself isn't proof of a bearish trend.
But it does raise an important question.
The bigger takeaway isn't the size of the sale—it's that Strategy has demonstrated a willingness to reduce its Bitcoin holdings when circumstances require it.
That could alter how investors think about the company's role in the market.
If conditions worsen, additional sales may become easier to justify.
A potential feedback loop could emerge:
$BTC weakens → $MSTR comes under pressure → capital becomes more difficult to raise → incentive to sell more $BTC increases.
It's only one factor among many, but it's a risk worth watching closely.
Do you think the market is underestimating this development?
Follow for timely Bitcoin insights and market updates.$BTC
Why did Trump announce the resumption of US-Iran negotiations, so why did BTC instead see an opportunity as oil prices plummeted?
Trump announced that the United States and Iran have officially launched negotiations and suspended previous military strike plans against Iran. Both sides will hold consultations on navigation in the Strait of Hormuz and the Iranian nuclear issue. After the announcement, international oil prices plunged rapidly, with WTI crude oil plunging nearly 7% intraday, and Brent crude also dropping over 7%, marking a clear cooling of market risk aversion.
Many people think this is just news from the crude oil market, but in fact, it has an equally significant impact on the crypto world.
The reason is that the market's previous biggest concern was the escalation of the situation in the Middle East. If transportation in the Strait of Hormuz is disrupted, about one-fifth of the world's maritime crude oil supply will be affected, oil prices could soar further, and global inflationary pressures will resurface. High inflation means the Fed finds it harder to cut rates, and high rates persist longer, which is unfriendly to risk assets like BTC and ETH.
After negotiations began, the market believed geopolitical risks had temporarily eased and oil prices fell, indicating that future inflationary pressures are likely to ease. This has led investors to renew bets that the Fed may enter a rate-cutting cycle sooner, improving global liquidity expectations.
For the crypto world, this is more important than the oil price itself.
If the market believes interest rates will fall in the future, institutional funds typically gradually increase their allocation to risk assets such as tech stocks, BTC, and ETH. Therefore, whenever international tensions ease, risk appetite in US stocks and crypto markets often rebounds.
However, traders should also remain rational. Currently, negotiations have only officially begun, and whether substantive progress can be made on core issues such as nuclear issues, sanctions, and security in the Strait of Hormuz remains highly uncertain. If negotiations stall and geopolitical risks flare up again, oil and gold prices may rebound quickly, and BTC may once again be hit by sentiment in the short term.
Therefore, what truly affected the crypto world was not how much oil prices fell, but that global capital began to reassess risks. If oil prices continue to fall, US stocks remain strong, and the dollar weakens, BTC and ETH are likely to see capital flow back; Conversely, if geopolitical tensions worsen again and market risk aversion intensifies, the crypto market will continue to face volatility challenges in the short term.
Do you think the US-Iran negotiations will become a new catalyst for risk assets, or just a brief emotional recovery? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments section.🚨 Everyone is watching Bitcoin's price. Few are watching what Strategy is doing.
Back in 2022, Strategy sold 704 BTC. Most people dismissed it.
Months later, Bitcoin fell more than 30%.
Now, Strategy has sold 1,638 BTC—more than double that amount.
I'm not saying this sale will trigger another major decline.
But it does change one important assumption:
Strategy has shown it's willing to sell Bitcoin when the situation calls for it.
That matters because it introduces a potential feedback loop:
📉 BTC falls → 📉 MSTR weakens → 💰 Raising capital becomes harder → 🪙 Selling more BTC becomes a more realistic option.
Will that happen? No one knows.
But it's a risk the market shouldn't ignore.
The biggest signals often aren't the headlines everyone is talking about.
They're the shifts in behavior that quietly change the story.
#Bitcoin #BTC #MSTR #Crypto #Investing
#DailyOrbit Brothers, a major event has happened in the bond market. The yield on the 30-year U.S. Treasury reached a peak of 5.281% last week, the highest since 2007. Although it slightly fell back to around 5.22% on Monday, it hasn't been seen above 5.2% in 19 years. The last time the 30-year U.S. Treasury yield hovered near 5.2% was in July 2007—just over a year before Lehman Brothers collapsed and the subprime crisis erupted. What does this number mean? The 10-year yield also rose above 4.75%, setting a new high for the year. Meanwhile, the policy-sensitive 2-year yield instead declined, resulting in one of the most pronounced "bear steeps" in the yield curve since the mid-1990s. In plain language: the short-term side is falling (the market believes there won't be a sharp rate hike in the short term), the long-term side is soaring (the market believes long-term inflation and fiscal deficits cannot be suppressed). The interest rate spread between short and long sides is widening rapidly, and the bond market is tightening extremely strict financial conditions for the Federal Reserve. Why is the long-term debt collapsing? Three things stacked together. First, the Fed's credibility is in trouble. At the July FOMC meeting, 9 votes were in favor of keeping rates unchanged, while 3 votes were against advocating for rate hikes. It was the first time since September 2016 that three hawkish members voted against the same vote. Chairman Walsh took a tough stance but failed to take substantive action, and the market simply lost interest. Investors are beginning to doubt: Can the Federal Reserve really bring inflation back to 2%? Second, the fiscal deficit is spiraling out of control. U.S. federal debt has reached 100% of GDP, and the deficit ratio remains above 6% during the expansion period. JPMorgan has raised its year-end target for the 30-year term to 5ETH mentioned 30 times: tone with direction, attention speed not necessarily coordinating
ETH popularity needs to be split into two halves: one is how many people are talking, and the other is which side the conversation leans to.
In the official snapshot of 07:00 (China time) on August 4, OKX Onchain OS recorded 30 mentions of ETH in one hour, including 27 times on X and 3 times in the news; A total of 524 times in twenty-four hours.
The latest hourly speed is 1.37 times the 24-hour average, in other words, about 37% higher than the 24-hour average, which is overall considered a "noticeably accelerated." This describes attention rhythm but cannot replace price, transaction, or flow data.
In terms of tone, the one-hour bullish is 37%, bearish 10%, and neutral about 53%, so currently, the bullish bias is clearly dominant. The 24-hour correspondence is 34% bullish and 18% bearish; Whether the short window is deviating from the long window is more meaningful than looking at just one percentage.
What I care about most here is actually the denominator: only 30 times. If there are a few more focused discussions, the proportions may be clearly rewritten; Retweets, quotes, and news retellings may all be talking about the same thing. You can write the position as long or bearish as is, but it shouldn't be casually translated as how much capital has established positions in the same direction.
Currently, ETH's source structure is "mainly driven by X." If X mentions the increase first and the news is still scarce, it feels more like the community spreading first; If news increases simultaneously, it only means more verifiable materials will be available, and you still need to return to the original announcements from foundations, agreements, regulators, or trading platforms to confirm details.
The 24-hour source background is X 421 times, and 103 news times. Comparing it with 27.3 times in an hour, you can see whether the new round of discussion has changed its distribution channels. Channel changes themselves are neither positive nor negative, but they do affect the speed and verifiability of information.
For ETH, community signals are best cross-checked with two independent data lines. Network usage allows users to view transaction fees, active addresses, L2 settlements, and staking changes; Market structure depends on spot trading, futures basis, funding rates, and options skew. Any of these are closer to real needs than a single emotional proportion.
The 24-hour average also smooths out spikes caused by announcements and market sessions. If the latest hour is below the average, it may just be a quieter period; If it is above the average, it may simply be a single event with concentrated fermentation. Two to three consecutive snapshots still in the same direction look more like a continuation rather than instantaneous noise.
This set of proportions can easily be rewritten in the next snapshot. Once the sample size is scaled up, if the overly long and empty parts quickly return to close together, it means that a small amount of text was pulling the ball just now; If the tone gap is maintained and the speed continues to rise, and there is on-chain usage or transaction data to support this, then confidence will have reason to go upward.
This round of ETH doesn't need to be forced into a conclusion. Discussions clearly accelerated, and the tone was clearly more prevalent. The main source was X, so just remember these three points first. It has yet to prove a breakout, net capital inflow, or change in on-chain demand; Whether the next round of samples can still be established after expanding is the real issue.BTC has been trading sideways between 62-65K for nearly a month, unable to break out effectively.
The reason is actually quite simple:
First, after a round of drops at 57K, bearish momentum has clearly weakened, and the willingness to continue selling has diminished, leaving the market without new bearish fuel.
Second, the 62-65K range is not an ideal accumulation zone for large funds. If the price isn't cheap enough and the main players lack the momentum to keep buying, the rebound naturally lacks sustainability.
Third, macro risks have not truly been resolved. U.S. Treasury yields, yen volatility, valuation pressures on US stocks, and policy uncertainty are all suppressing sentiment toward risk assets. Recent global bond market volatility has once again reminded the market that liquidity remains a key variable for BTC.
So currently, it feels more like a weak recovery after a decline, rather than the start of a new rally.
Personal view: If key support is lost later, BTC pushing back to the 50,000 or even 40,000 level is not an unimaginable scenario.
The hardest part of the market is that most people want to see the answer immediately.
But real big opportunities often emerge when no one believes them.
Be patient and wait for your own price. $BTC Yesterday, the U.S. Senate announced this week's agenda, but the clear bill is not on the list at all. Instead, there is a procedural vote on another resolution. August 7 is Senate recess, leaving only 72 hours for the bill. The Senate process is extremely complicated. Step one: submit the application to end the debate, which requires signatures from 16 senators. Step two: Voting requires 60 votes, and even if the Republicans support unanimously, they only get 53, so at least one Democrat is needed. It was precisely these seven people who kept the bill stuck for two months. Step three: if the vote is passed, another 30 hours of debate is required before voting on "whether to proceed to deliberation." If 16 signatures are not made before Wednesday Eastern Time, the bill will not even have a chance to be rejected. Even if the application is submitted on Wednesday and voted on as early as Friday, the recess will come and the bill itself will not have time to be considered. The biggest disagreement in the bill currently lies in its ethical provisions. The draft prohibits certain senior officials from issuing or sponsoring digital assets before 2029, but Democrats argue that enforcement loopholes are too wide, and existing holdings and family arrangements are not effectively constrained. So far, the White House has not officially responded to the draft amendment. The Trump family has profited considerably from crypto assets, further eroding Democrats' trust in the bill. Moreover, stablecoin rewards remain a powder keg; banks believe the reward mechanism is similar to deposit interest and will divert funds from traditional banking systems. Crypto companies believe this protects banks from competition. The current compromise prohibits passive interest but allows trading, staking, and platform event rewardsAt the start of a bull market, there is always a chance of a fake fall
A single bearish candlestick can start to cause fear and bearishness
The next is Bitcoin's fake drop in March 2023, which was recovered two or three days later
One is ETH dated June 22, 2025, which was also withdrawn in the following two days
If it were a real bear market, after a decline, people would still hold onto hope
If it were a true bull market, after the drop, people would be anxious and desperate, even if it only dropped a little
The emotions of those in short positions are meaningless, because they always hope to drop more, getting happier the more they fall. Even if it's a fake drop, they're happy, thinking it's a bear market rebound, but the result is missing out
The emotions of fully invested investors are the most important; even a slight drop and anxiety is unbearable. This is the sign that a bear market cannot continue从昨天到今天，$PIPPIN 涨了非常多。 我很早很早之前就谈这个币了，我甚至还把它列入了妖币观察名单。 人话讲就是，我认为这个币是有可能重新成为妖币的。 这个币在年初的时候是$0.9 ，和现在相差四五十倍。 这个比例还是很夸张的，如果它能回到年初的价格，那这个涨幅还是相当的惊人的。 —————————————————— 虽然它已经涨了很多了，但我认为现在还算是底部。 为什么这么讲呢？我们需要通过一些数据去解释。 我们看一下它的合约数据。 可以发现，在昨天11点的时候，它的合约持仓量是有一次波动的。 当时，它的合约持仓量和多空比是同步升高的，这说明当时有资金进去做多。 不过这个波动确实是有点小，我也没有察觉出来。 再之后，伴随着它价格的一路升高，它的持仓量和多空比是呈反方向的。 它的持仓量在不断上升，但是多空比却在不断下降，说明是有非常多的资金在做空的。 这个也算是正常，毕竟价格也是涨了很多嘛。 我们再去看一下它长期的数据。 可以发现，在七月早些时候，它的多空比也是有一次锐降的，当时$PIPPIN 也是价格突然拉上去。 今天和上一次还是情况蛮相似的，按照上一次的情况，现在应该是止盈我多$SOL 录得历史首次连续 10 个月月线收阴，长周期极度超卖的价格结构与持续复利的链上基本面形成背离，核心矛盾聚焦于末期投降抛盘与慢动作筑底的博弈。
在价格结构上，10 连阴打破了该资产历史最长下跌纪录，同期 $BTC 与 $ETH 均早已终止连跌形态，凸显出该资产独特的技术面超卖压力。
市场主导逻辑在于极度悲观的情绪出清掩盖了链上活动韧性。虽然价格走势持续下行，但网络开发者活动与 DeFi 采用度的底层复利仍在悄然累积。
在上行剧本中，若多头能触发一记强劲的月度绿线收盘，超卖指标将快速修复，链上活动与网络强度的估值重塑会在数周内迅速推高价格波动区间。
在下行剧本中，若宏观流动性继续收紧或整体市场遭遇更深试探，持仓结构可能无法承受末期压力，进而诱发投降式抛盘并向下寻找新支撑。
如果多头始终无法完成月线反转，且链上使用度与 DeFi 参与度出现停滞，则基本面支撑下的慢动作筑底结构宣告失效，盘面将顺应原有的下行通道惯性演化。
未来 7 天最核心的观察变量是大盘整体流动性状态以及 $SOL 月线级别的止跌企稳迹象。
#SPCX首份财报将公布，千亿美元解禁在即 #Tether季度盈利15亿，黄金增至146吨 #Coldcard安全事件升级，第四波攻击预警Facts speak:
Michael Thaler: I have never sold my Bitcoin
·" "Never sell" applies to individuals. "The strategy applies to listed companies."
[Strategic Listed Company] Behavior is $MSTR
Strategy discloses trading records both in SEC filings and in its official ledger.
For example, on December 22, 2022, the company sold about 704 Bitcoins, cashing out approximately $11.8 million, with an average selling price of about $16,776 per coin. This was indeed a company-level operation, not his personal move.
There are also selling records afterward, including 32 coins sold at the end of May 2026 and 1,638 coins disclosed in early August 2026. These are all matches between company documents and media reports.
This clarifies his second viewpoint: it is true that the strategy applies to listed companies.
[Personal Never Sell] behavior
Looking at his personal perspective, Saylor did publicly say in 2020 that he held 17,732 Bitcoins, with an average purchase cost of about $9,882 per Bitcoin.
But that was his personal public statement on social media, and he did not disclose the full wallet address or on-chain signature proof.
Later, in interviews, he also mentioned that he hadn't sold and was still buying, but still lacked complete data that could be independently verified by the public.
I haven't found any new personal portfolio figures or average costs disclosed in 2025 or 2026.
So a more responsible statement is: the company has documents and data to check, while the individual level is mostly his own public statement, making independent verification difficult.
My view is simple: don't just listen to what he says, see what you can find.
Personal beliefs are one thing; the financial operations of listed companies are another.
Looking at such companies, the ultimate focus is still on verifiable data, such as disclosed holdings, buying and selling records, and average costs. These are more worth referencing than slogans. 【美股复盘 · 8月4日】
大市方面，美股三大指数全线报升，标普500指数升1.51%，纳斯达克指数升1.83%，道琼斯工业平均指数升1.27%。消息面上，特朗普突然叫停原定的军事打击计划，道指应声急升逾550点，避险情绪随即降温，原油跟随跳水；惟黄金却不受落淡友沽压，照样高开走高，反映资金对地缘缓和的信号仍留一手。大市气氛偏向进取，波动指数(VIX)徘徊15附近的偏低水平，反映风险胃口未见收敛。
板块方面，科网股表现最为突出，带动大市造好。大型科技股财报季全面报喜，Meta单日急升6%，微软造好4.7%，亚马逊升5.4%，甲骨文亦扬4.7%，四家龙头股齐齐向好，一举压下市场对"AI资本开支拖累现金流"的忧虑，回调布局论重新获得印证。
焦点方面，中国科网股中的阿里巴巴( $BABA )隔夜暴涨，皆因集团放话指其自研新模型的表现足以跟Anthropic正面竞争；分析指阿里在算力受限、只能采用阉割版芯片的条件下仍力追顶配硬件对手，成为市场焦点话题。另外，亚马逊( AMZN )股价直逼历史收市高位。个股方面亦有插曲：主打比特币储备策略的Strategy公司被揭悄悄沽出1.05亿美元比特币用作优先股派息，与其创办人早前声称"从未沽出比特币"的说法形成对照；同时，马斯克密集为旗下SpaceX造势唱好，时间点正值该公司史上首份对外财报即将披露之前。
小结：环球地缘风险降温加上科技股财报全面向好，是带动今日美股造好的两大主因，唯黄金逆市走强显示避险资金未完全撤离；分析指往后走势将视乎科技巨头财报效应能否延续，以及VIX能否续守15附近低位以支持风险胃口。In the bear market, DEX trading volume remains stable, indicating that the related coins may truly be bottom-fished! In July 2026, the crypto market underwent structural changes, with DEX spot trading volume accounting for over 24% of CEX spot trading, setting a new all-time high. Compared to previous years when it accounted for less than 10%, on-chain trading is rapidly capturing the share of centralized exchanges, clearly signaling the industry's trend toward decentralization. This increase in proportion is not due to a surge in DEX trading volume, but rather a result of an overall market weakness, with spot funds on CEXs fleeing and trading volumes dropping even more, causing the relative share of DEXs to rise against the trend. The core driver is the ongoing tightening of global regulations, and users are accelerating their shift toward wallet self-custody and on-chain DEX trading to avoid platform freezes and custody default risks. At the same time, DEX infrastructure has matured significantly, with low-gas L2s and optimized slippage through aggregated routing, and the experience continues to align with CEX. Currently, the vast majority of newly launched Meme, Tauto, and RWA assets are first launched on-chain, with price discovery rights gradually shifting to DEXs. The industry landscape has officially diverged: retail speculation, newly issued tokens, and on-chain RWA trading continue to be decentralized; Fiat currency ingresses and withdrawals, institutional bulk trading, and derivatives are still dominated by CEXs. In the medium to long term, DEX shares will continue to rise, and the decentralized trading sector will show strong incremental certainty. $LDO $HYPE Up +2% as Japan’s First Public Company Buys In During the Dip
While most of the market is bleeding and altcoins are struggling to catch a bid, $HYPE is pushing back with a +2% gain. That’s relative strength in a correction.
The headline driver: Japan.
eole Inc., a TSE-listed company, just became the first public Japanese firm to buy $HYPE. Initial purchase: 1,078 HYPE. They’ve also announced plans to scale that to roughly JPY 100M, over $600K, this month.
It’s more than a buy. It’s a signal. The first corporate endorsement for the Hyperliquid ecosystem in Japan, and it’s happening right when macro uncertainty and profit-taking are dragging everything else down.
That timing matters. It tells you capital isn’t leaving crypto. It’s getting picky. Institutions are rotating into specific narratives and tokens with real traction, not spraying money across the board.
Still, don’t get ahead of yourself. $BTC still sets the tone short-term. If we see a deeper flush, even strong names like $HYPE will feel it. High-beta assets don’t get a free pass in risk-off.
But right now, $HYPE is one of the few alts showing buyers willing to step in on weakness. That kind of relative performance during a pullback is what leadership cycles are made of.
If more corporates follow eole’s lead, $HYPE could easily be one of the names leading the next rotation.
#HYPEJapanFirstBuy
#HYPEStressTest
#OKXOrbitTopics
$HYPE
$BICO $BTC #USJapanYenIntervention #30YrYieldTopOrStart 看客盯着那个跳动的价格，我盯着庄家指尖滑落的牌背。八月二日，特朗普传媒的袋子里飞出两千六百二十八枚比特币，扑棱棱落在Crypto.com的帽檐上，价值一点六五亿美金，分两笔，干净利落，像拆解一套早已排练好的双翻。
多聪明的障眼法：账本上说质押了四千二百六十点七三枚，钱包里就留着四千二百六十一枚——差那零点二七枚，是魔术师故意留在掌缝里的一缕彩带。观众数着大数，欢呼着“一点没动”，却忘了先前那七千多枚早已穿过袖口化作了白鸽。奥妙不在你看见的那只手，而在你认定空无一物的那只手。
分析师们盯着链上转移的方向，试图从交易哈希里读出“意图”，仿佛观众的喝彩声能解释魔术师的动作。可这一行的铁律是：转移本身从不撒谎，但转移的意义永远是魔术师最贵的道具。一千一百五十枚，两千六百二十八枚，累计七千二百八十一枚——这些数字才是真正的牌面，被洗进牌堆里，每一次切牌都让散户的目光偏离桌面中心。
同一天，市价恰好刺穿五个月的下行趋势线。多么精密的节拍：大额转账完成当日，行情恰如其分地抬头。诸位，魔术师最爱的不是大把撒币，而是让观众以为自己看穿了他——以为这是“出货”，以为那是“质押”。真正的底牌永远压在第四十二层：四千二百六十一枚咬死四千二百六十点七三枚，像用强词牌锁住整场表演的结幕。当你盯着余额以为什么都没发生时，真正的鸽子早已飞出剧场屋顶。
三点一八亿美元的已实现亏损悬在第二季度报表上方，像一枚还没落地的硬币。观众在等它落下的声音，而我数的是它翻转的圈数——每一次旋转都把“出售”或“托管”的图案搅成同一张灰白牌面。
这种把戏我做了一辈子。你以为筹码在牌桌上，其实筹码在观众眼睛里。你以为币在链上，其实链上只有影子。
数字全部对上了，亏得也太整齐。历史上每一次这种“巧合”的质押余额，都是最后一只鸽子飞出袖口前收紧的绳结。真正的底牌——它从来没有亮相，它只是换了一顶帽子寄存。📊 $NEAR Contract Liquidation Express (August 4)
According to liquidation data, short-cycle bulls are being pinned down and rubbed wildly, but medium- and long-term bears have directly collapsed...
The liquidation amount in the past hour was about $313.83
Long position liquidation is about $247.82
Short positions were liquidated at about $66.01
The liquidation amount in the past 4 hours was approximately $3,753.73
The long liquidation was about $3,420.13
Short positions were liquidated at about $333.60
The liquidation amount in the past 12 hours was approximately $36,500
Long liquidation was about $5,451.69
Short positions were liquidated by about $31,100
The liquidation amount in the past 24 hours was approximately $76,800
Long positions were liquidated by about $36,800
Short positions were liquidated by about $40,000
From $NEAR liquidation data, 1-hour and 4-hour long liquidations crushed shorts, with long liquidations 3.7 times and 10 times the shorts, respectively, marking a long sell-off; the 12-hour direction suddenly reversed, with short liquidations crushing the bulls, with shorts 5.7 times the bulls, leading to a full-scale short squeeze; the 24-hour direction reversed again, with long liquidations overtaking the bears, but the advantage was extremely weak, and the long-short forces tended to balance over the long cycle. On NEAR, Gouzhuang completed repeated bull and short squeezes—selling longs→ squeezing short squeezes→ selling long again, with cumulative liquidations exceeding $76,000. Everyone should control their positions carefully to avoid being bought back.
🔥 Market Barometer | August 4th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the reset of global asset pricing anchors and the limits of policy intervention—the bond market is punishing the Fed's hesitation, the forex market is joining forces to fight the trend, and earnings season is facing a real "big test."
📈 30-Year U.S. Treasury: A 19-Year High, Top or New Beginning?
This may not be the end yet.
On July 29, the Federal Reserve kept rates unchanged at 3.50%-3.75%, but the vote of 9 in favor and 3 against revealed internal divisions. More importantly, Chairman Walsh withdrew the forward-looking guidance, disrupting market expectations.
The 30-year yield has soared to 5.27%, the highest in nearly 19 years since 2007; The 10-year yield rose to 4.75%, a new high for the year. Three major drivers: the Federal Reserve's credibility in fighting inflation has been damaged; joint US-Japan intervention requires selling US Treasuries to exchange for liquidity; US-Iran tensions are driving up inflation risks.
A large number of contracts in the options market are betting on the 30-year term breaking through 5.4% before August 21. Brandywine bluntly stated: "Long-end investors do not believe in his anti-inflation narrative." "
💴 US and Japan confirm joint foreign exchange purchase: first joint effort in 15 years
On August 3, the U.S. and Japanese Treasury Ministries simultaneously confirmed that they had jointly bought the yen on July 31. This is the first joint intervention since 2011, and the first yen purchase since the 1998 Asian financial crisis. After the intervention, the yen rose to the 156-yen range per US dollar.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Bescent said it "effectively curbed the disorderly fluctuations of the yen," and Trump stated he would "not hesitate to participate in further joint intervention." The last time such a partnership was during the Asian financial crisis—the forex market had entered crisis response mode.
📊 This week's earnings report is a "super storm": four draws, with Circle as the grand finale
This week is the most intensive week with earnings reports:
· After market close on August 4: SpaceX (SPCX) released its first earnings report since listing, with the market expecting revenue of about $6.82 billion. But the real storm came two days later—on August 6, about 911.5 million restricted shares were unlocked, and shorts had already bet $24.6 billion. Morgan Stanley warned that this is the "most dangerous moment." On the same day, AMD's earnings report showed market expectations of $11.3 billion in revenue, with data center revenue likely to double.
· Pre-market on August 5: Circle (CRCL) made a grand debut, with market expectations for revenue of $714 million and EPS of $0.16. Morgan Stanley has cut its target price from $106 to $38. On the same day, Eli Lilly and Disney released their results.
💎 Summary
The bond market punished the Fed's "inaction" with a 19-year high of 5.27%; The US and Japan announced that the foreign exchange market had entered crisis mode for the first time in 15 years with joint intervention; Meanwhile, SpaceX's $100 billion unlock and Circle's earnings report are testing whether AI and crypto narratives can hold their ground amid the interest rate storm. In the first week of August, three major tests approached simultaneously. #30年期美债, the top or a new beginning?
#美日确认联合购汇
#财报观察员: Four draws this week, with Circle as the grand finale 以太坊的走势，似乎和美国政治周期之间存在着某种微妙关联。 分析师Joao Wedson梳理了以太坊在美国总统选举、就职典礼和中期选举期间的历史表现，发现了一个值得关注的规律： 总统选举与就职：涨跌各半 2016年特朗普选举：以太坊下跌 → 2017年就职：转为看涨 2020年拜登选举：上涨 → 2021年就职：继续上涨 2024年特朗普选举：上涨 → 2025年就职：大幅下跌 总统选举和就职典礼的表现没有一致规律，涨跌各半，更多取决于当时的市场环境、流动性状况和加密市场自身周期。 最明显的模式：中期选举必跌 2018年中期选举：以太坊下跌 2022年中期选举：以太坊下跌 2026年中期选举周期：同样处于下滑趋势 Wedson指出，每次中期选举周期对以太坊的影响均为看跌，这一模式在三个周期中保持高度一致。 为什么中期选举会形成“下跌规律”？ 可能的传导链条：中期选举伴随政策不确定性上升，流动性收紧，风险偏好下降。同时，选举前后的政治博弈可能分散市场对经济政策的关注，短期内影响资金流向。但这个模式本身是相关性，而非因果性——加密市场规模、流动性和宏观环境已今非昔比，历史规律可能被打破。 总$SKHYNIX Market + News analysis
⚠️ Just casual chat on the market and does not constitute investment advice!!
📰 Grassroots news aspect
🟢 Positive
1. Q2 earnings hit a record high in profits, large-scale mass production and shipment of HBM4 have been secured, and long-term contract orders have already been secured from overseas cloud vendors; DRAM and NAND spot prices rose, with third-quarter guidance for DRAM shipments to +10% quarter-on-quarter, indicating real demand for AI server storage.
2. SK Group Chairman personally increased his own holdings, with funds from the Korean national team entering to support the Korean market; Previously, SK Hynix hit the 30% daily limit, providing emotional support to underlying stock prices.
3. Market inflation data cooled, U.S. Treasury yields retreated, and the highly elastic storage sector saw oversold capital covering, with short covering driving a recovery rally.
🔴 Core bearish news (suppressing the main trend)
1. Although the financial report and profits were explosive, revenue and profit were slightly below market consensus expectations, raising concerns about long-term HBM expansion competition. Micron and Samsung's continued expansions will squeeze future high gross margins, which is the root cause of the earlier crash.
2. New regulations in the Korean stock market tighten the threshold for leveraged ETFs, leading to a retreat of speculative hot money; Korean stocks are highly volatile, with circuit breakers and sharp rises and falls being the norm, directly transmitted to on-chain contracts.
Current market status
After a sharp drop, it rebounded in a V-shaped pattern and is now in the middle of the rebound; Trading volume was mainly concentrated during the opening session of the Korean stock market; With the Korean stock market closed, liquidity on the market is very poor, and there are more insertions.
There is a lot of trapped positions piling up above. A large part of this rally comes from oversold + short covering, not large-scale new buying in. The continuity of the rebound requires confirmation of trading volume.
Key price points
- First resistance above at 1185-1210: Strong short-term cap; a steady rebound with increased volume is needed for continuation; Unlimited volume surges to highs, making it very easy to pull back.
- Strong resistance between 1270-1300; only after breaking through 1210 will there be a chance to test this range.
- Short-term lifeline support is at 1070-1090. This round of rebound is within the core defensive range, holding the box consolidation range.
- If it truly breaks below 1030, this round of structural recovery will be damaged, and bears will regain the upper hand.
⚠️ Key distinction: Momentary insertion of a needle piercing does not count as a valid breakdown; false insertions during the Korean stock market closure often occur, so do not set your stop loss directly at the whole number.
Bullish and bearish reality logic
✅ Bulls:
Hynix HBM has solid fundamentals; Domestic funds in the Korean stock market are supporting the market; US Treasury yields retreated, and after the storage sector was oversold, capital competition rebounded.
❌ Bears:
Earnings below expectations raise valuation concerns; Competitive pressure for long-term industry capacity expansion; On-chain oracles and low liquidity bring risks of flash crashes; Foreign capital outflows from Korean stocks and weakening market sentiment will directly trigger a contract crash.
Three scenario simulations
1️⃣ Optimistic scenario: Holding support at 1070-1090, Korean storage stocks continue to strengthen, contract volume surges above 1210, challenging above 1270; It's not suitable to chase highs, only for existing positions to rebound through gambling.
2️⃣ Baseline scenario (probability is high): 1070-1210 large box price swings violently; Korean stocks opened following real stock trends, with stop-loss losses repeatedly inserted during the market closure, waiting for HBM spot data and Micron earnings to choose direction.
3️⃣ Pessimistic scenario: Effectively breaking below the 1070 lifeline, combined with liquidity shocks on the crypto side, pushing further below 1030.
The biggest pitfall in this contract isn't fundamentals, but a flash crash in the oracle, which has already harvested a large number of bull positions. After the Korean stock market closes, try not to open large positions; leverage must be kept very low.
Already held: stop loss below 1070, avoiding round numbers; The rebound to 1185-1210 is stagnant, so gradually reduce positions to avoid risk.
No positions: prioritize observance; If you make mistakes, participate with very small positions, strictly set stop-losses, and avoid deep positions late at night for gambling.Let's skip those empty K-line manuals; let's just go from big logic to small market points to get this matter through to the fullest.
Let's start with the macro level: the pool has gotten bigger, but the pipe hasn't been turned open yet
Look at the current global economy. To sum it up in one sentence: money is getting more expensive, and everyone is waiting.
On the Fed's side, Powell keeps repeating every day that he wants to look at the data, but the underlying message is "We don't dare to act recklessly." U.S. national debt has skyrocketed, and the interest paid every year is astronomical. Against this backdrop, asking them to continue raising rates is truly unbearable. But even if he was told to cut interest rates and inject liquidity aggressively, he wouldn't dare, fearing that the monster of inflation would reappear.
So, we are in a huge, global "waiting period." The market isn't short of money; a large amount of money is lying in money market funds and living off 5% interest. What does this mean for risk assets, including Bitcoin? This means the new flood hasn't arrived yet; now it's all about the stock in the game. Don't expect pigs to fly like in 2020, when the tap is turned on. This macro phase is destined for a very tangled and tangled market trend.
On a more micro level, let's talk about what's happening inside the market: turnover and structure
Chip turnover
Spot ETF buying is quite aggressive, like a sponge, constantly absorbing chips released from the market. But on the other side, old miners had to pay electricity bills and upgrade their machines, and those ancient whales in Mentougou were slowly shipping for US dollars.
This has led to the current situation: the market is steadily supported by a wave of long-term buying, so if it falls, it won't fall deeply; But short-term selling pressure and the bull-bear tug-of-war between contract funds have made price increases less smooth, and every rally can be smashed down. This is reflected on the candlestick line, showing endless needle insertion and sideways consolidation. This microstructure is the least friendly to right-side traders doing trend tracking.
Finally, the unavoidable topic of U.S. international politics: the biggest variable
Many people analyze Bitcoin only by looking at candlesticks and not the news, which is dangerous. Right now, geopolitics, especially domestic political struggles in the United States, are the biggest variable in the next six months.
Look at the U.S. presidential campaign: Trump is now packaging himself as a "crypto-friendly president," accepting crypto donations and vowing to keep all Bitcoin mining in the U.S. What is this? This is the vote, this is politics. Whether sincere or not, his stance has already forced the Democratic Party to take a stance, or else it will lose the narrative power of this segment of voters and the tech sector.
So, the closer the election approaches, the more likely cryptocurrencies are to become a political balloon being kicked back and forth. Today it might surge due to a policy favorable rumor, and tomorrow it could plunge again due to regulatory FUD. This is intense, directionless volatility on the market. We must clearly realize that short-term prices are no longer determined solely by supply and demand, but are now manipulated by political sentiment.
My final take:
So, now you ask me what I think? To be honest, strategically, I am extremely optimistic because ETFs have opened the ceiling; But tactically, I am more vigilant than ever.
Right now is the "garbage time" in a bull market, which drains patience and capital the most. My strategy can be summed up in one word: wait. Once the Fed signals a clear rate cut, when the U.S. election is settled, and when macro and political uncertainties are resolved, the market will naturally show the smoothest trend.
Those who are constantly rushing in and out of the market, hoping to buy high and buy lows to take every profit, will most likely return all their hard-earned chips to the market before the real bull market rally arrives. Don't try to predict; let the market choose its own direction. We should just be fools following along. $BTC $ETH Pure handwritten copying, not AI
The USD/JPY joint exchange purchase pushed USD/JPY from above 162 to below 156, then rebounded again to 157.22 this morning. The policy red line has indeed appeared, but the trend has not been changed by a single sum of money.
The market reveals its true colors: if yen arbitrage has already been unraveled, risk assets should continue to be deleveraged; But QQQ still rose 1.75% overnight. This is more like taking away the good days of "cost-free one-sided short selling of the yen," which is essentially a reversal of the spread logic.
$USDJPY I only watch two places: whether 156 can be held, and whether the official team will still take action around 160. Only if 156 is below 156 is the arbitrage group accelerating its retreat; Returning to 160 indicates the market is still betting on limited policy resources. Don't chase the direction in the middle of the 157 level. Data as of 08:24 Beijing time on August 4 does not constitute investment advice.
#美日确认联合购汇 #日元 #外汇 #全球流动性$ETH 【🧱ETH Consolidates at 1851 — When Will the Stalemate Break?】
Ethereum has been stuck around 1850 for days, with barely 3% intraday volatility — the market is in extreme contraction.
On the news front: ETFs have seen net outflows for three consecutive days, totaling over $120M. Meanwhile, post-Cancun upgrade, Layer2 activity has cooled, and fee revenue hit a yearly low — on-chain sentiment remains weak. However, Grayscale has been quietly accumulating, suggesting long-term players are still buying the dip.
On-chain data: Gas dropped below 2 gwei, sitting in historic extreme territory — often a precursor to a major move.
Technical view: 1850 is a dense chip zone. The daily Bollinger Bands are squeezing tightly. A break above 1870 could open the door to 1900, while losing 1820 may send it down to 1780.
Short-term strategy: Stay on the sidelines. The direction of a volume-backed breakout will define the near-term trend. Don't guess — wait for the signal.
—— Tight consolidation, big breakout ahead? Or "time to decline"? Share your take below.
#30年期美债，顶部还是新起点？ #美日确认联合购汇 #财报观察员：本周四场开奖，Circle压轴 $BTC $SOL Don't be fooled by Microsoft's $15 billion "paper reduction" 🔥
Recently, Microsoft extended the depreciation period for servers from a few years to 25 years, and correspondingly lowered its capital expenditure guidance by $15 billion. Many people exclaimed "AI cooling down," but this is actually just an accounting trick—the money spent hasn't decreased at all; it's just been deferred in the books.
❶ The real investment hasn't changed; what changed is the "payback period"
This is not a budget cut, but an extension of the amortization cycle. The short-term profit statement looks better, but the cost is that the time window to verify returns is also extended. If the AI business doesn't meet expected returns within three years, the extended depreciation will instead become a hard loss in the future. This isn't saving money; it's "borrowing" future profits to smooth current results.
❷ Extending depreciation equals extending the verification period, which is precisely a risk signal
The longer the depreciation, the more management is signaling: "We are willing to wait longer to see returns." This is a double-edged sword in the rapidly evolving AI field—if computing efficiency or model paradigms change drastically within five years, a 25-year depreciation cycle will severely distort the balance sheet. Accounting optimism often corresponds to business uncertainty.
❸ What really deserves attention is Moody's figure: $785 billion
Don't focus on Microsoft's $15 billion accounting game; look at the big picture: the six major cloud providers have raised their capital expenditure to $785 billion by 2026, which is real, hard cash being poured into infrastructure. Microsoft's accounting adjustment is just a ripple compared to the total— the AI infrastructure arms race hasn't stopped; it's accelerating.
Conclusion: Don't take accounting treatments as a weather vane. The real $785 billion in cash is the industry trend you should trust.
"When giants start playing the depreciation game, it means short-term performance pressure has arrived; but when they collectively raise total spending, it means no one dares to fall behind strategically."
#折旧年限延至25年，微软资本开支指引下调 家人们早上好！开盘精准拿捏！行情从横盘拐头到往下震荡，全被咱们提前算到了！都是景恒踩了无数坑攒的经验，你们不用再走我的老路，依托多年实战经验来做到帮助你们。
布林带上下轨开口由发散转向收缩，印证单边下跌动能充分释放，市场即将进入低波动率震荡整理阶段。当前价格运行于布林带中轨上方，且4小时周期收盘稳固站稳中轨，标志短期空头压制瓦解，多头着手夺回短期主导权，布林带中轨同步由承压位切换为支撑位。价格下探至6.2万美元关口时曾刺穿布林带下轨，但并未延续下行，快速回弹确认下轨区域强力买盘支撑。K线结构上，长下影阳线搭配后续强势大阳线完成失地收复，近似经典底部反转形态“启明星”，底部承接力度得到验证。注意到价格试探中轨及上轨阻力后，多头动能出现阶段性衰减，综合研判，短线交易策略维持看多。
大饼在62700-63000附近多，关注64500。二饼在1820-1840附近多，关注1880
$BTC $ETH #30年期美债，顶部还是新起点？ 今天的AI分析和我自己的分析出现了分歧。
7月22号以来，4小时级别的高点一路从66900降到65800、65100、64000——低点也从63700降到62200。两周了，高点越来越低、低点越来越低，这是教科书级别的下降通道。
均线也一样，短周期全部跑到长周期下面去了，多头排列早就没了。但之前的分析一直在"等做多"——让日线的过渡期判断盖过了4小时正发生的下跌趋势。这个偏差今天必须承认。
BTC 现价 $63,479，在下降通道中段偏下。通道上沿大概在 $64,000-$64,200，下沿大概在 $61,500-$62,000。中间位置两个方向都没性价比——做多是逆势猜底，做空是追在脚后跟。
接下来几根4小时K线，更可能是继续在通道里磨。真正值得动手的位置只有两个：要么反弹到通道上沿附近，4小时动能指标同时给出做空确认——那是顺势的卖点，止损放通道上方就行；要么价格在下沿附近止跌，形成更高的低点，同时动能指标给出做多极值——那是通道内唯一值得试的买点。除此之外的位置，不动。
长线这边，150日均线已经走平了，5个月熊市结构终结是客观事实。但走平不等于马上就涨——过渡期可以持续很久，4小时的下降通道就是过渡期内的一次回踩。现货小步定投没问题，合约必须等4小时自己把方向选出来。$BTC According to reports from Cailian Press and Jiemian Compilation: The well-known Bitcoin hardware wallet Coldcard has been exposed for a major firmware vulnerability.
According to Galaxy Research statistics, as of August 3, hackers had breached about 5,000 affected wallets, stealing a total of 1,755 BTC with a market value of approximately $110 million.
The core truth of the incident
The root cause of the vulnerability traces back to the 2021 firmware version: the device had a flaw in the random number algorithm when generating mnemonic phrases, insufficient seed entropy value, and mnemonic phrases that were predictable.
⚠️ The most disruptive point of understanding:
Wallets are kept offline the entire time, stored in safes, and never connected to the internet, yet still cannot escape being hacked. Hackers do not need to touch hardware devices and can calculate private keys offline using algorithms.
Wallet provider Coinkite has confirmed the vulnerability and pushed a firmware fix to urge affected users to migrate their assets as soon as possible.
There has long been an industry consensus: keeping assets in a cold wallet and away from the internet is the highest level of security.
This attack directly shattered that consensus.
The risk does not lie in cyberattacks, but in inherent flaws in the underlying code of the hardware wallet. Private keys have been inherently inherently risky; even if you keep mnemonic phrases safe, assets will still be exposed to risk.
Two-layer market interpretation, rejecting pure panic speculation
1. Limited short-term real selling pressure
The total stolen amount was only 1,755 BTC, which is very small compared to the entire BTC circulating market. No need to hype up "massive dumping and institutional panic flight";
However, the emotional shock cannot be ignored. Many long-term holders of cold wallets have lost their sense of security, which in the short term suppresses market risk appetite.
2. Long-term industry signals are crucial
(1) Self-custody does not guarantee absolute security. The trust foundation of cold wallets and hardware wallets faces challenges;
(2) The value of the BTCFi track is being re-examined. People pursue cold wallet storage, essentially because they don't want to transfer control of BTC. Self-custody staking mechanisms like CORE, which do not require transferring BTC ownership, will further highlight the advantages of underlying security logic;
(3) Funds will begin to diversify storage strategies: The heavy holding model of single hardware wallets is being questioned, and demand for multi-wallet and multi-signature solutions is increasing.
Provides traders with a realistic reminder
1. Self-check wallet: Users holding old Coldcard Mk2/Mk3 firmware should quickly verify asset security and transfer funds according to official guidelines;
2. Don't think extremistically: it's not that cold wallets can't be used, but avoid holding large assets with a single device; Diversified asset storage is basic risk control;
3. Market Perspective: The news is likely to intensify short-term volatility. Bitcoin remains focused on the 62,200 support and 64,000 resistance range. The news is unlikely to change the current box structure, so don't rely solely on this news to be bearish.
Interactive voting
After the Coldcard collapse, how do you view the way Bitcoin assets are stored?
A. Diversify hardware wallets across multiple brands to avoid the risk of a single manufacturer
B. Prioritize multi-signature schemes to raise the asset safety floor
C. Moderately return to leading exchanges, abandoning extreme self-custody
D. Continue to observe, waiting for more safety solutions to be implemented
$BTC $CORE
#BTC #冷钱包安全 #BTCFi
📌 Liquidity Selection | Today's Continuous Monitoring List:
$BTC · $ETH · $SOL · $BEAT · $EDGE · $COAI · $TRUMP · $VIRTUAL · $SPACE · $SOPH · $IP · $AVNT · $ZAMA · $OFC · $PIEVERSE ·
$ACU · $H · $MEGA · $JELLYJELLY · $OPG · $SLX · $LAB · $BSB · $ALLO · $CHIP · $MEME · $EDEN · $HUMA · $ZKP · $CORE · $TAO · $WLD · $DOGEThe most chilling thing on the board isn't the general, but when you see your opponent abandon the rear pawn before seven moves, you finally realize you're paving the way for the suffocating kill in the eleventh move. KOSPI's 5% blow on Monday smashed two huge holes in Samsung and SK Hynix's K-line charts—an 8% drop felt like a stack of soldiers whose foundation had been drained. But if you only focus on the ground lost that day, you'll never understand the next line of the game record: that 14% intraday rally at the end of July, plus SK Hynix's 28% jump, is the real first move. It was a carefully arranged lure to lure the enemy in, inviting the rally chasers into the center, then the South Korean authorities suddenly revealed "emergency powers": leveraged ETFs cut the multiples to 1.5 times, added price limit limits, and simulated trading rules. This wasn't a rule fix; it was the referee forcibly swapping the board to the other side before the bell rang.
Grandmasters watch the market by looking at the situation assessment chart. Nomura has raised Samsung's profit forecast for 2028 to 770 trillion KRW, a strategy to abandon the seed and attack early; BofA said Samsung's pricing "only blocks the downside, not the upside," meaning your royal city gate is on fire, but your rear wing channel troops have already pushed the opponent's secondary bottom line, waiting for upgrades. When the two evaluation sheets are laid out, one sees the immediate benefits of the chariot eating the horse, the other sees the finish line of the rank general in the endgame.
Roundhill's DRAM fund cut about $430 million in Samsung positions and turned around to add CXMT—a classic case of swapping. You swap the heavy on the E line for the light on the C line, not because you're afraid of the other side, but because you need to create space on the other side. Samsung is like the car being exchanged, while CXMT is the horse that suddenly appears on the enemy king's wing.
And the piece marked $XAAPL is the silentest referee in the game. The shock of Korean chips may seem like a chessboard on the side, but in reality, it resembles a horizontal line running through both sides. Every storage chip in Apple starts from the central pawn of this game; SK Hynix's offer is the touchstone for whether this piece can improve in the next twenty moves. When the South Korean authorities reduced the leverage from 2x to 1.5x, it was like tightening the clock on the opponent's clock, but $XAAPL still moved forward according to its own opening rhythm—it wasn't bleeding today, it was waiting to clear the endgame in 2028.
So don't treat this crash as the final outcome. A true Go player only softly says when an opponent shows a weakness: You, the general. As for the shadow called $XAAPL, it has already taken twenty steps, and you're still counting the minions in the front row. #KoreaChipSelloff U.S. stocks had a strong start on Monday, with all three major indices closing higher. The Dow Jones rose 1.3% to a closing high, the S&P 500 gained 1.48%, and the Nasdaq gained 2.1%. Tech giants led the way, with Microsoft and Google up nearly 5%, Meta up 6%, and Tesla and Nvidia up over 3%. Memory chip sector divergence—SanDisk rose 6%, while SK Hynix bucked the trend and fell 0.7%. Among Chinese concept stocks, the Nasdaq Golden Dragon China Index rose 0.75%, and Alibaba gained 4%. Breaking down the logic behind the rally: The core narrative dominating the market is shifting from "inflation-interest rates" to "AI capital expenditure return verification." Microsoft's last week report confirmed AI investment converting into cloud revenue, and Amazon's AWS growth hit a four-year high, both confirming that AI infrastructure spending is paying off. The market shifted from "who invests more" to "who invests smartly," with verified companies receiving centralized pricing on Monday. After significant market volatility last week, some funds chose to buy on dips. The short squeeze effect from retail investors after the record sell-off in July is still unleashed—a clear sign in SanDisk's 6% rally. U.S. Treasury yields remain the "ceiling," and the suppressive factors have not completely disappeared. The 30-year Treasury yield remains near 5.229%, close to a 19-year high, and remains the "anchor of global asset pricing." Some Wall Street strategists believe that as long as yields remain high, tech stock valuations will find it difficult to truly unlock upward potential. The current rebound is mainly driven by valuation recovery and sentiment recovery, while the real catalysts are the substantial implementation of the Middle East ceasefire agreement and the Federal Reserve's policy shift in SeptemberMorning of August 4th, let's talk about the market.
BTC is at 63,800, it touched 64,000 last night but unfortunately couldn't hold and came back down. ETH is at 1,860, a bit weak, down 0.6%.
The US stock market actually did well yesterday, the Nasdaq rose over 2 points, and the Dow even hit a new high. Normally BTC should have followed the rally, but it only rose a little, indicating that funds really haven't flowed into crypto.
This move to 64,000 was driven by Trump’s rhythm. He again announced canceling strikes on Iran, causing oil prices to crash 7%, falling below $80. With geopolitical tensions easing, risk assets caught a breather, and BTC took advantage to push up. South Korea also saw a positive premium, Asian buying is returning, and sentiment is indeed warming up.
But failing to hold 64,000 shows selling pressure above is still heavy. One reason is the probability of a rate hike in September has reached 67%, and in October even 77%. Although the drop in oil prices is good, inflation won’t calm down so quickly, and the Fed governors who voted against are not to be underestimated.
The ETF side is quite interesting. Bitcoin ETFs only saw inflows of 170 million in July, while Ethereum ETFs had 365 million, more than twice BTC’s. The trend of money moving from BTC to ETH continues, indicating institutions are rebalancing, not fleeing.
In the short term, if BTC can hold above 63,500, there’s a chance to test 64,000 or even 64,500 again. ETH’s bottom line is 1,850; as long as it holds, it’s not a big problem. Overall, geopolitical tensions are easing, oil prices are falling, US stocks are rising, so the environment is better than last week, but the pressure above still needs time to digest. Those with positions should hold steady; those looking to enter should wait for a pullback near 63,500 rather than chasing highs. Missing out doesn’t lose money, chasing highs is painful. $BTC $ETH Fundamental Research Report $YFI / Yearn Finance (Other) $3.20
To summarize: Yearn Finance ($YFI) has an overall score of 47/100, rated as an early-stage project, but lacks validation. Looking at the three layers, the company team has cash reserves, the protocol network already shows signs of paid usage, and token capture has been implemented.
Fundamental analysis: Yearn Finance (token $YFI), other tracks. Focuses on income aggregators. Benchmarked against AAVE and COMP. Traditional centralized platforms charge commissions of 15-40%, and user data is not autonomous. On-chain trustless transaction fees are lower, and token incentives convert early users into contributors. Average order value is $50-500/month, with settlement required in USDC or fiat currency. Narrative-driven tracks, bear market usage cut by 60-80%. Positioning the end-to-end vertical platform. Product implementation: The protocol layer is officially operational, and the on-chain dashboard shows protocol fees accumulating, showing signs of paid usage. Latest version not found, 60 valid submissions in the past 90 days.
At the user level, address MAU not disclosed, DAU not disclosed, 24-hour transaction volume $80.00M, TVL not found. Wallet addresses do not equal monthly active users of natural persons; large large addresses holding concentrated positions tend to overestimate the actual number of users. On the revenue side, user fees are not disclosed. Supply-side revenue is about 80-90% of user fees (attributed to LPs and nodes), protocol treasury revenue is $2.00M, token holders buy back and burn at an annualized rate, with no burn mechanism. 24-hour transaction volume is business turnover, not revenue. A company making money does not mean the protocol makes money, and protocol profits do not equal token holders making money. On the code side, 60 valid submissions in 90 days, 25 active contributors, latest version not found. GitHub is a Class A evidence that can be directly verified. Investment background: For company equity financing, look to PitchBook/Crunchbase (A-level); for token private and public funding, use whitepapers, release curves, and on-chain unlocked contracts (A-level); market makers and ecosystem funding are B-level and do not represent long-term holdings of tech VCs; for technical integration, look to API/SDK access evidence (B-level); strategic partnerships and logo walls are D-level. The use of NVIDIA GPUs does not equate to NVIDIA investment, and going public on exchanges does not equal strategic investment.
On the token side, total supply is 1,300,000,000, circulating 950,000,000 (73.1%), FDV $4.20B, next unlock is 2026-Q4 (+3.50% circulating), burn buyback annualized rate, no explicit buyback burn. Do you have to buy coins to use the product? Some require medium-value capture (staking/discounting/governance). Looking at it together with peers (unified standards, no cross-sector random comparisons): In terms of circulating market capitalization, Yearn Finance $3.00B, AAVE not disclosed, COMP not disclosed. For FDV, Yearn Finance $4.20B, AAVE not disclosed, COMP not disclosed. In terms of annualized revenue, Yearn Finance is $2.00M, AAVE not disclosed, COMP is not disclosed. Regarding monthly active addresses or users, Yearn Finance has not disclosed this, AAVE has not disclosed it, and COMP has not disclosed it. Figures are based on public data snapshots; any omissions are supplemented by official self-reports or industry standards. Valuation, market cap $3.00B, FDV $4.20B, P/S 1500.0x, FDV divided by revenue 2100.0x. Pessimistic outlook: $3.00B at 50-70% off, oscillating within a neutral range; optimistic outlook: revenue doubling, burns landing, enterprise clients coming in, FDV corresponding to P/S, aligning with the top companies. To sum up: insufficient evidence, narrative-driven (score 47/100). Token value capture has been implemented (buyback/burn/gas). Circulating market cap is relatively high relative to fundamentals, overdrawing expectations, and FDV is moderate. Risk warning: Short-term large-scale unlocking and sell-off, long-term protocol revenue wiping out, token demand relying solely on incentives (once incentives break off, usage collapses). Ongoing monitoring: protocol fee cycles, burn amounts, active address retention, TVL/loan balances, GitHub version releases. The above is the logic and judgment of the publicly available information and does not constitute buying or selling advice. Core financial indicators deviate by more than 30%, and the conclusion needs to be reassessed.
That's all for the fundamentals; leave the rest to the market.
#基本面研报 #加密 #研究 #OKXOrbit#财报观察员：Four earnings releases this week, Circle is the grand finale
Folks, tomorrow night I’m only watching one question:
Are users continuing to stay, and is capital continuing to flow in?
Circle will release its new quarterly earnings tomorrow night.
Last quarter’s data was actually very interesting:
• Stablecoin circulation about $77 billion, up 28% year-over-year
• Total revenue and reserve income up 20% year-over-year
• Net profit, however, down 15%
This shows growth is fine, but making money is getting harder.
Now look at the stock price.
$CRCL closed at $60.35 on the last trading day.
For me:
📍 $58 is the emotional defense line.
📍 Only if it climbs back above $62 can US stock funds be considered to have bet on the earnings in advance.
📍 If it falls below $58, I’d rather wait for the earnings report before watching.
Many people focus on EPS.
I care more about two indicators that ordinary people can understand:
1. Are more people using USDC?
2. Is the money staying longer?
Because what really determines long-term value is not quarterly profit, but whether users and capital continue to accumulate.
Numbers can deceive for a moment, users rarely lie.
For personal observation only, not investment advice.
#Circle #CRCL #USDC #USStocks #EarningsSeason $SKHYNIX #韩股重挫5%, storing long-short signal standoffs
SK Hynix 1114 short position: I continue to expect a pullback this time
I took a short position on Hynix at 1114.
The reason for short selling is simple.
Although the earnings report was good, it did not exceed the market's highest expectations.
Changxin Memory's continued expansion has also made the market worry about the upcoming DRAM supply and price increase cycle.
Technically, after rebounding to around 1150, the price failed to hold steady, with selling pressure still lingering above.
For this one, I'll look at the 1050 first.
If 1050 can't hold, then look at 1020–1030.
Only if selling pressure continues to expand will we look at around 1000.
If it holds above 1150 again, I will reduce my position; Once it reaches 1165, I won't keep taking this short position.
I'm not a long-term follower of Hon-Hai Nix.
I just feel that the current rebound hasn't changed the short-term downward pattern.
This short mark reflects sentiment and valuation declines, not SK Hynix's future.The yen, this load-bearing wall, was hanging at 162 yesterday, but today it was forcibly pulled back to 156 by the financial cables of the US and Japan. This is not an ordinary repair; since 1998, it is the first joint pouring by construction teams from both countries signing and stamping the same blueprint!
From my professional perspective, Becent's statement "strongly supporting a correction of yen undervaluation" essentially means the chief engineer issued a structural reinforcement order. The two rounds of funding totaling 14 to 15 trillion yen from the Ministry of Finance were urgently allocated precast concrete components, driving two full rings at the vulnerable USD/JPY node. At the moment it fell below 156, the large bearish candlestick on the market chart shattered more decisively than cracks in curtain wall glass under wind pressure tests.
But note, experienced architects know that external supports are only a temporary fix. What truly determines whether this "exchange rate structure" can stand firm on the 162 platform is the underlying foundation—that is, the market's long-term trust in both countries' fiscal and monetary policies. The value of the joint statement issued in September 2025 is no less than a geological survey report, telling all investors: beneath the foundation lies a layer of rock, not silt. The New York Fed's entry into the market is like the most advanced mechanical setup, directly using post-tensioning prestressing technology to tighten the yen's prestressing tendon, instantly invalidating the anchoring end of the market bears.
Now let's look at the XCRCL collaboration. In my view, it is a sister building next to this structural event. When the exchange rate bearing wall is corrected, the scaffolding for carry trades will begin to loosen. Risk assets stacked on top of yen depreciation expectations, especially highly volatile crypto projects, act like oversized cantilevered structures that must recalculate wind loads. XCRCL's market reaction was a precise pricing of a "structural stability reset": it did not dance with the US dollar index but closely followed the yen's anchored depth. This indicates that its design logic avoided the eccentric pressure of a single currency from the start, instead adopting a bidirectional symmetrical prestressed framework.
In the market blueprint I am now laying out, the yen intervention is merely the keel installation of the first layer of the curtain wall. What truly determines the final height of this building is the subsequent direction of the Federal Reserve's interest rates and when the Bank of Japan will withdraw the lifting arm of quantitative easing. The contest between these two forces is like a technical approval between a design institute and a construction company at a critical juncture—every minute and every meeting leaves a clear mark on the market like steel rebar tying.
The USD/JPY fell from 162 to 156, marking the building's entry into a new period of stability and subsidence. XCRCL's payment is simply smart funds watering and curing the concrete for the next floor.
The date for the next load test has quietly been recorded in the construction log. #USJapanYenIntervention Summary of Core Global Financial Market Events and Data (August 4) —— Two core contradictions emerged in the global financial markets today
First, Trump said US-Iran negotiations would "yield results today or tomorrow," but Iran denied that talks had resumed, with both sides contradicting each other.
Second, US tech stocks surged across the board, with Palantir's earnings beating expectations comprehensively. However, BTC briefly touched 64,000 before falling back, still suppressed by the 64K level.
Looking at these two signals together, the market is pricing in either "geopolitical easing" or "inflation risk relief," but the direction remains unsettled.
1. US-Iran Negotiations: Trump speaks out, Iran denies, this "negative" has not yet materialized
Trump said at the White House that the US and Iran are in dialogue, with the first phase of negotiations aimed at reopening the Strait of Hormuz, "which could be fully open as soon as tomorrow." He threatened Iran to "either reach an agreement or surrender completely," calling Iranian senior officials "two-faced."
But Iran completely denied this. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Bagheri clearly stated that there are currently no negotiations with the US side; the only ongoing talks are with Oman regarding passage through the Strait of Hormuz. Senior Iranian officials also explicitly said they would not allow the US to open a non-Iranian shipping route in the Strait of Hormuz.
Sources from the Pakistani government also confirmed that US-Iran negotiation representatives have no plans to meet within at least the next 24 hours.
2. US Stock Market Performance: Tech stocks surge, Dow hits record high
On Monday's close, the Dow rose 1.32% to 53,178 points, a record high; the S&P 500 rose 1.48% to 7,600 points; the Nasdaq rose 2.13% to 25,913 points. The US Big Seven tech index rose 3.6%, marking its best single-day performance since March 31.
Google rose over 4%, with its market cap surpassing Apple to become the world's second largest. Amazon rose over 4%, hitting a new high, with a market cap exceeding $3 trillion, becoming the fifth company in history to surpass this valuation. Nvidia rose nearly 3%, with its market cap again exceeding $5 trillion.
Microsoft rose nearly 5%, up about 25% over the past three trading days. Meta rose 6%, with the company attending the White House AI meeting today. Oracle rose 9.2%, CoreWeave rose 19.5%. Alibaba released the new generation AI model Qwen3.8-Max, with US stocks rising over 4%.
Cloud computing and AI sectors were the absolute main themes yesterday, highly related to expectations of the "White House AI framework review meeting."
3. Commodities: Oil prices plunge, geopolitical premium rapidly fades
WTI crude closed down 7.42% at $78.72/barrel, Brent crude closed down 5.92% at $83.07/barrel. The core driver of the oil price plunge was Trump's remarks about the imminent reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. But Iran denies negotiations; whether oil prices can continue to be pressured depends on whether an agreement is actually reached.
Spot gold closed up 0.31% at $4,055/ounce, the US dollar index rebounded 0.23% to 99.96, returning near the 100 mark.
For BTC, the oil price drop easing inflation expectations is positive, but if oil prices only temporarily fall and then rebound, this benefit is short-lived.
4. Cryptocurrency Market: BTC briefly breaks 64,000 then falls back
BTC briefly broke above 64,000 to around $64,009 today, briefly touched $64,400, but failed to hold, then fell back to around $63,800 and fluctuated. The daily chart remains constrained by dual resistance from EMA50 and EMA200 (around 63,800-64,000 range), this technical resistance remains effective.
Palantir's earnings beat expectations, improving sentiment in the AI sector. Palantir's Q2 revenue was $1.94 billion, analyst expectations were $1.81 billion; adjusted EPS was $0.41, expected $0.35.
Full-year revenue guidance was sharply raised from $7.65-7.66 billion to $8.15-8.16 billion. This is a positive catalyst for the AI sector and may indirectly support BTC risk appetite.
Today's focus: AMD earnings (after market close). The market expects AMD's Q2 revenue to be about $11.3 billion, up 47% year-over-year. AI chip revenue is the biggest highlight, with options market pricing stock volatility at about 10%.
If AMD beats expectations, AI sector sentiment may continue to improve, further supporting BTC; if it misses, tech stock correction pressure will transmit to BTC.
My interpretation:
BTC briefly broke 64,000 but failed to hold, a typical "low-volume rebound hitting resistance and unable to push through." Palantir's earnings beat is a fact, tech stocks surged is a fact, but BTC only touched 64,000 then retreated, indicating the current market pricing logic for BTC is still mainly technical, with news as a secondary factor.
For BTC to truly break above 64K, three conditions must be met:
1. Oil prices continue to fall (inflation expectations cool down),
2. AMD earnings beat expectations (AI sentiment continues),
3. ETFs resume sustained inflows.
Currently, none of these three conditions are fully confirmed.
5. Key events today
① AMD earnings after market close (market expects $11.3 billion revenue, +47% YoY, AI chip revenue is the biggest highlight)
② White House AI meeting (attended by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta)
③ US June trade balance (8:30 PM Beijing time)
④ FMS 2026 Flash Memory Summit (August 4-6, attended by Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron; a sentiment indicator for memory chips)
6. My core judgment
Putting aside all the messy news, returning to the multidimensional analysis of the three-dimensional integrated trading system, combined with the previous AI judgment of the system, I personally think Bitcoin is unlikely to break above 64,500 first and will most likely continue to decline and pull back to around 62,500.
"Which side are you on today?"
If BTC tests 64,000 again this week and is blocked, you would:
A: Believe the breakout failed, continue to be bearish, wait for a pullback
B: Believe it's only a matter of time, breakout is inevitable
C: Wait and see, decide after non-farm payroll data
Which one would you choose? Feel free to share your answer and reasoning in the comments.Fundamental Research Report $BAL / Balancer (Other) $3.20
To summarize: Balancer ($BAL) overall score 52/100, rated with narrative over implementation. Looking at the three layers, the company team has cash reserves, the protocol network already shows signs of paid usage, and token capture has been implemented.
Project Overview: Balancer (token $BAL), other tracks. Focusing on weighted index pool DEXs. Benchmarked against UNI and CRV. Traditional centralized platforms charge commissions of 15-40%, and user data is not autonomous. On-chain trustless transaction fees are lower, and token incentives convert early users into contributors. Average order value is $50-500/month, with settlement required in USDC or fiat currency. Narrative-driven tracks, bear market usage cut by 60-80%. Positioning the end-to-end vertical platform. Product implementation: The protocol layer is officially operational, and the on-chain dashboard shows protocol fees accumulating, showing signs of paid usage. Latest version not found, 60 valid submissions in the past 90 days.
At the user level, address MAU not disclosed, DAU not disclosed, 24-hour transaction volume $80.00M, TVL not found. Wallet addresses do not equal monthly active users of natural persons; large large addresses holding concentrated positions tend to overestimate the actual number of users. On the revenue side, user fees are not disclosed. Supply-side revenue is about 80-90% of user fees (attributed to LPs and nodes), protocol treasury revenue is $2.00M, token holders buy back and burn at an annualized rate, with no burn mechanism. 24-hour transaction volume is business turnover, not revenue. A company making money does not mean the protocol makes money, and protocol profits do not equal token holders making money. On the code side, 60 valid submissions in 90 days, 25 active contributors, latest version not found. GitHub is a Class A evidence that can be directly verified. Investment background: For company equity financing, look to PitchBook/Crunchbase (A-level); for token private and public funding, use whitepapers, release curves, and on-chain unlocked contracts (A-level); market makers and ecosystem funding are B-level and do not represent long-term holdings of tech VCs; for technical integration, look to API/SDK access evidence (B-level); strategic partnerships and logo walls are D-level. The use of NVIDIA GPUs does not equate to NVIDIA investment, and going public on exchanges does not equal strategic investment.
On the token side, total supply is 1,300,000,000, circulating 950,000,000 (73.1%), FDV $4.20B, next unlock is 2026-Q4 (+3.50% circulating), burn buyback annualized rate, no explicit buyback burn. Do you have to buy coins to use the product? Some require medium-value capture (staking/discounting/governance). Comparing with peers (unified standard, no cross-sector random comparisons): In terms of circulating market cap, Balancer $3.00B, UNI undisclosed, CRV undisclosed. For FDV, Balancer $4.20B, UNI undisclosed, CRV undisclosed. In terms of annualized revenue, Balancer $2.00M, UNI undisclosed, CRV undisclosed. Regarding monthly active addresses or users, Balancer has not disclosed this, UNI has not disclosed, and CRV has not disclosed it. Figures are based on public data snapshots; any omissions are supplemented by official self-reports or industry standards. Valuation, market cap $3.00B, FDV $4.20B, P/S 1500.0x, FDV divided by revenue 2100.0x. Pessimistic outlook: $3.00B at 50-70% off, oscillating within a neutral range; optimistic outlook: revenue doubling, burns landing, enterprise clients coming in, FDV corresponding to P/S, aligning with the top companies. In short: solid fundamentals (score 52/100). Token value capture has been implemented (buyback/burn/gas). Circulating market cap is relatively high relative to fundamentals, overdrawing expectations, and FDV is moderate. Risk warning: Short-term large-scale unlocking and sell-off, long-term protocol revenue wiping out, token demand relying solely on incentives (once incentives break off, usage collapses). Key points to look at next: protocol fee cycles, burn amounts, active address retention, TVL/loan balances, and GitHub version releases. Data is sourced from public sources and is for reference only, not constituting investment advice. If the indicator deviation exceeds 30%, a reassessment is required.
That's all for the content—judge for yourself.
#基本面研报 #加密 #研究 #OKXOrbit据SolanaFloor消息，Solana两项核心代币经济学提案今日开启初步投票。
两项提案分别聚焦提升交易费销毁比例、加速通胀回落（SIMD-0550、SIMD-0553）。
如果两份提案同步顺利通过：
1. SOL年度通胀衰减幅度提升至30%，加速抵达终端通胀水平；未来六年，预计减少价值约13.6亿美元的SOL新增代币发行。
2. 链上日均销毁量将从当前约650枚SOL，大幅提升至9000枚SOL，销毁规模接近扩容14倍。
利好逻辑
双重收紧供给：新增铸造变少+手续费销毁大幅增加，长期改善SOL净流通增速，强化稀缺性叙事。
也是Solana近几年力度最大的Tokenomics升级，有望吸引中长期现货资金关注。
需要警惕的分歧点
1. 目前只是初步投票，距离正式落地还有完整治理流程，存在提案否决、修改的不确定性；
2. 通胀减速意味着质押奖励长期下行，部分验证节点、大额质押者存在反对动机；
3. 利好属于中长期基本面，短期行情依旧绑定$BTC大盘流动性，消息很难独立走出单边行情。
简单总结：叙事筹码已经摆在台面上，重点跟踪最终投票结果。不要提前重仓博弈预期，避免“买预期、卖事实”行情。
$SOL $BTC $ETHSK Hynix's record-breaking earnings collided violently with the liquidity vacuum of on-chain contracts on the market, and the rebounding candlestick repeatedly left abnormal stitch trails late at night during the Korean market holiday.
$SKHYNIX contract prices showed a V-shaped rebound after a deep correction, but trading volume remained highly concentrated during the Korean stock market open, with significant volatility amplified during the market closure.
Cooling macroinflation has pushed U.S. Treasury yields down, and improved risk appetite has driven the replenishment of short positions, but concerns over long-term capacity expansion competition continue to suppress buying enthusiasm for higher prices.
If the sentiment recovery from short covering does not translate into sustained capital inflows, the lack of liquidity during the Korean market closure will directly amplify the liquidation risk of abnormal oracle quotes.
If the price can hold above the 1210 resistance level with increased volume, the rebound potential could extend toward 1270. However, if trading volume cannot match, it would signal the start of a rally followed by a pullback.
Once the price effectively breaks below the core support zone between 1070 and 1090, the corrective structure will be broken, and bearish forces may carry on-chain liquidity shocks to test further downward.
If the overall U.S. storage sector strengthens, it will disprove the market's pessimistic expectations of competitive pressure from capacity expansion, thereby stabilizing the confidence of bulls.
The most important variable to watch in the next 24 hours is the volatility of on-chain contract funding rates after the close of Korean stocks.
#特朗普媒体链上转账2628BTC, nature not disclosed. #亚马逊向OpenAI投500亿美元: Bet or bubbleFundamental Research Report $LRC / Loopring (Other) $3.20
Core judgment: Loopring ($LRC) overall score 48/100, rated as an early-stage project, insufficient validation. Looking at the three layers, the company team has cash reserves, the protocol network already shows signs of paid usage, and token capture has been implemented.
Project Overview: Loopring (token $LRC), other tracks. Focusing on ZK Rollup DEX. Benchmarked against UNI and AAVE. Traditional centralized platforms charge commissions of 15-40%, and user data is not autonomous. On-chain trustless transaction fees are lower, and token incentives convert early users into contributors. Average order value is $50-500/month, with settlement required in USDC or fiat currency. Narrative-driven tracks, bear market usage cut by 60-80%. Positioning the end-to-end vertical platform. Product implementation: The protocol layer is officially operational, and the on-chain dashboard shows protocol fees accumulating, showing signs of paid usage. Latest version not found, 60 valid submissions in the past 90 days.
At the user level, address MAU not disclosed, DAU not disclosed, 24-hour transaction volume $80.00M, TVL not found. Wallet addresses do not equal monthly active users of natural persons; large large addresses holding concentrated positions tend to overestimate the actual number of users. On the revenue side, user fees are not disclosed. Supply-side revenue is about 80-90% of user fees (attributed to LPs and nodes), protocol treasury revenue is $2.00M, token holders buy back and burn at an annualized rate, with no burn mechanism. 24-hour transaction volume is business turnover, not revenue. A company making money does not mean the protocol makes money, and protocol profits do not equal token holders making money. On the code side, 60 valid submissions in 90 days, 25 active contributors, latest version not found. GitHub is a Class A evidence that can be directly verified. Investment background: For company equity financing, look to PitchBook/Crunchbase (A-level); for token private and public funding, use whitepapers, release curves, and on-chain unlocked contracts (A-level); market makers and ecosystem funding are B-level and do not represent long-term holdings of tech VCs; for technical integration, look to API/SDK access evidence (B-level); strategic partnerships and logo walls are D-level. The use of NVIDIA GPUs does not equate to NVIDIA investment, and going public on exchanges does not equal strategic investment.
On the token side, total supply is 1,300,000,000, circulating 950,000,000 (73.1%), FDV $4.20B, next unlock is 2026-Q4 (+3.50% circulating), burn buyback annualized rate, no explicit buyback burn. Do you have to buy coins to use the product? Some require medium-value capture (staking/discounting/governance). Comparing with peers (unified standard, no cross-sector random comparison): In terms of circulating market cap, Loopring $3.00B, UNI not disclosed, AAVE not disclosed. For FDV, Loopring $4.20B, UNI undisclosed, AAVE undisclosed. In terms of annualized revenue, Loopring $2.00M, UNI undisclosed, AAVE undisclosed. Regarding monthly active addresses or users, Loopring has not disclosed this, UNI has not disclosed it, and AAVE has not disclosed it. Figures are based on public data snapshots; any omissions are supplemented by official self-reports or industry standards. Valuation, market cap $3.00B, FDV $4.20B, P/S 1500.0x, FDV divided by revenue 2100.0x. Pessimistic outlook: $3.00B at 50-70% off, oscillating within a neutral range; optimistic outlook: revenue doubling, burns landing, enterprise clients coming in, FDV corresponding to P/S, aligning with the top companies. To sum up: insufficient evidence, narrative-driven (rating 48/100). Token value capture has been implemented (buyback/burn/gas). Circulating market cap is relatively high relative to fundamentals, overdrawing expectations, and FDV is moderate. Three major risks: short-term massive unlocking and sell-off, long-term protocol revenue wiping out, token demand relying solely on incentives (once incentives are cut off, usage collapses). Tracking metrics: protocol fee weekly, burn amount, active address retention, TVL/loan balance, GitHub version releases. Information sources are public, logic is self-developed, and does not constitute buy or sell advice. Data deviations exceeding 30% require reassessment.
That's all for the fundamentals; leave the rest to the market.
#基本面研报 #加密 #研究 #OKXOrbit特朗普罕见地把矛头对准了美国石油公司。 埃克森美孚和雪佛龙第二季度合计盈利290亿美元，平均每天3.18亿美元，是去年同期的三倍多。美国汽油零售均价已飙至每加仑4.10美元，较冲突前上涨超30%。特朗普公开批评称“赚得太多”，要求石油公司将部分利润返还公众，并降低汽油价格。 但问题在于，他手里没有太多能直接压低油价的工具。 美国战略石油储备已降至1980年代初以来最低水平，商业原油库存也在减少。政府和石油企业都缺乏快速压低油价的手段。 真正能解决问题的杠杆在霍尔木兹海峡——但那里仍被伊朗封锁着。重新开放海峡才是恢复全球供应并推动油价下降的关键。 所以特朗普的处境其实挺尴尬的：一边向石油巨头施压要求降价，一边手里却没有足够的储备来真正改变供需格局。他对石油公司的批评更像一种政治施压，而不是有实质政策工具支撑的行动。 市场给了初步回应——雪佛龙跌约2%，埃克森美孚跌0.6%。真正的变量仍然是霍尔木兹海峡谈判的走向。如果协议无法达成，无论特朗普怎么施压石油公司，油价都难有明显回落。 $BTC $ETH $TRUMP #美伊重回谈判桌，油价回吐 Funds are undergoing structural reallocation at the spot level, and $ETH's liquidity absorption ability is more pronounced during periods of macro divergence. In July, $ETH ETF net inflows reached $365 million, significantly surpassing BTC ETFs' $172.43 million, indicating institutional buying is leaning toward Ethereum. As long as the spot side continues to receive buying orders and derivative positions increase synergistically, the cash flow-driven premium logic will remain effective. If tightening macro liquidity leads to net ETF outflows or a market pullback, this round of liquidity repositioning simulations will become invalid.
#特朗普媒体链上转账2628BTC, nature not disclosed#美日确认联合购汇