Orbit Post Sitemap
The $CORE deposit channel has been opened, and LFG and SHDW can also be traded normally, but the main coin CORE remains sluggish. Many people are still fantasizing that these two ecosystem tokens can have an independent major rally!
DAPPs can be accessed and transactions can be executed normally, which is just the most basic bottom line. The fate of ecosystem tokens is tightly bound to the consensus and capital flow of the parent chain CORE.
With the main coin grinding at a low level for a long time, a large number of community users choose to lie flat and refuse to invest more principal. Confidence in the parent chain is damaged, incremental funds are exhausted, and even if ecosystem applications can be used normally, LFG and SHDW will find it difficult to take off independently.
Some people bet on the ecosystem narrative, gambling that DEX and supporting applications will trigger a market explosion. But the harsh reality is right in front of us: the parent chain's chip issue remains unresolved. Once the main coin continues to weaken, the liquidity of small ecosystem coins will worsen, and the downside damage will be even more terrifying.
Stop fantasizing about ecosystem tokens breaking away from the parent chain to enter a bull market. If the parent chain consensus collapses, ecosystem projects will hardly survive independently.
Whether the ecosystem can break through depends on the real on-chain trading volume and, more importantly, how the CORE legacy chip issue is resolved. As long as the parent chain's hidden risks are not addressed, it is basically wishful thinking for ecosystem tokens to surge significantly.
Some are willing to bet on ecosystem opportunities, but more choose to stay away from risk and observe.
If you agree with this market observation, let's exchange rationally.
The above is only a personal information summary and observation and does not constitute investment advice.#BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元
The leader has something to say
BTC spot ETFs have seen nearly $450 million outflow over three days. From September 8 to 10, there was continuous net outflow, with $283 million running out on the 10th alone. BlackRock, Fidelity, Grayscale, and ARK are all selling. The previous week saw an inflow of $1.01 billion, so the fund direction reversed within a week.
The reason is not complicated. CPI and PPI both exceeded expectations, and the probability of a rate hike in September has reached 90%. Funds are hedging before the FOMC, withdrawing first to wait for the results.
There are two key events in the next two weeks. The Federal Reserve interest rate decision on September 16, and the BTC and ETH quarterly options expiration on September 25, with BTC options nominal size about $14.39 billion. ETF funds, FOMC, and options expiration all overlapping means position changes won’t be small.
I still hold over 76,700 long positions, with a stop loss at 74,500 and a target between 80,000 and 81,000. After today’s CPI, the V-shaped rebound retreated, failing to hold above around 77,300, indicating selling pressure at high levels remains. The 90% rate hike probability is weighing down, so $BTC $ETH $ZEC positions are not heavily bet on direction. I will decide whether to add positions after the FOMC.
Short term looks like consolidation, mid-term waiting for direction. Don’t chase sharp rises, don’t panic on sharp drops, set stop losses properly.
The above analysis is time-sensitive; stop losses must be set for positions. Good luck.Chen Jie publicly reminded everyone last week to short on rallies. From the peak at 4443, it plunged all the way down to 4290, smashing out a typical 150-point swing in the whole week!
Although the weak rebound didn't provide the absolute best entry point, it doesn't prevent the entire major shorting logic from being completely sealed by the market.
Stick to the main direction, follow the rhythm and trend downwards. Those who caught this big wave of shorting have already made a good profit. When the overall trend is accurate, you can profit anywhere. #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 $XAU The initial expectation for this week was that BTC would retrace below 76k, then establish multiple bottoms before continuing to surge.
Looking at it this way, I barely got half of it right. Last night it just dipped to the integer level, so bottom-fishing definitely missed out, because the main focus in recent days has been on ETH, with little attention paid to BTC.
Of course, ETH lived up to expectations, repeatedly emphasizing bottom-fishing at 2430-2470, and finally showing results after the CPI release.
Next week, I believe ETH will remain strong because a large amount of ETH is staked and locked, reducing circulating supply. Also, institutions no longer have the willingness to pump BTC, at least before the FOMC; the second largest will still be stronger than the largest for a while.Brothers, come laugh at me
$SUI really trapped me this time
Originally, I saw the daily chart pullback hold, so I started to build long positions according to my strategy
But shortly after buying, the market started to drop
No choice, I really bought too early this time
But what I'm most conflicted about now isn't whether to stop loss, but at what price to add more
Because after reviewing the market again, $BTC is indeed still weak, with ETF funds continuously flowing out, but other major coins are not weakening together
ETH and BNB are actually stronger on the 4-hour chart, both have already moved back above their moving averages first
So now I tend to believe the market hasn't fully turned weak, it's just that BTC is temporarily holding it back.
That's also why I haven't directly cut my SUI long positions.
SUI itself hasn't made a particularly large gain this round. As long as the market stabilizes later, if I get a position I consider suitable, I will still consider adding SUI longs in batches.
At the same time, I also opened a $ETH long today.
But my handling of these two positions is completely different.
For SUI, I prefer to lay low at a low level, willing to give it more room for fluctuation; ETH has already strengthened ahead, so I will strictly use stop loss for this position.
If the market weakens again, I actually think ETH, having risen more earlier, might have a larger short-term pullback.
So my current thinking is simple:
SUI is trapped, I will keep waiting to add in batches at the right positions.
ETH follows the short-term strength, but stop loss must be strictly set Banks paid six to seven figures for TAO subnet technology, but the coin price remains stagnant: valuation logic needs to change
Wow, two hours ago someone did a real calculation for $TAO: Red Team is not a story, it’s a real company selling device fingerprinting technology, and banks and exchanges have already paid six to seven figures for it. I’m bullish at this level, but the market hasn’t responded.
Two transmissions. First, the valuation anchor has shifted; the subnet was originally priced by narrative, but with real revenue in hand, it should switch to fundamentals. With a market cap of 2.26 billion, 68.9% below the previous high, there’s considerable elasticity in recalculation. Second, after the event, 235.6 slid to 235.4, and no one responded.
Current status: current price 235.4; MA7 still above MA30, but MACD shows a bearish death cross with expanding green bars and multi-period bearish bias. BTC at 77360 (+0.374%) is sideways, with all attention on the 15-day FOMC—$TAO remains quiet.
Resistance above: 237.0 (today’s high) → 239.1
Support below: 234.9 → 233.0 (today’s low)
Watershed level: 233.0. Hold to wait for fermentation; if broken, drop to 228.3 (yesterday’s low) to find support.
At this level, I’m entering directly—small position first, stop loss at 233.0 if broken; if volume breaks above 237.0, consider it a buy signal and add aggressively. I’m watching this valuation shift stock closely, don’t lose track.
$TAO $BTCCoinglass's liquidation heatmap shows that the amount of money stacked on both longs and shorts is almost the same.
Should we first pull up to sweep the top or directly have a big pullback to sweep the bottom❔
Top: $BTC breaks 81058, short liquidation intensity $1.174 billion; $ETH breaks 2669, short liquidation $844 million.
Bottom: BTC falls below 73474, long liquidation intensity $1.165 billion; ETH falls below 2417, long liquidation $1.123 billion.
The scale on both sides is almost the same, but the liquidation intensity below ETH is nearly $300 million more than above, meaning shorts have less money above ETH.
Looking at the distances: BTC is now around 77000, needing a 4% rise to reach 81058 above, or a 5% drop to 73474 below. ETH is around 2500, needing a 6.7% rise to 2669 above, or only a 3.3% drop to 2417 below.
The distance down for ETH is twice as close as up.
Also, during last night's CPI move, shorts were already liquidated once. In the past 24 hours, ETH shorts liquidated $215 million, while BTC shorts only $94.26 million. Short-term short fuel has already burned quite a bit.
Most likely scenario: first test upwards to clear out the remaining shorts, then turn downwards to find liquidity. The magnet below ETH is much bigger than above. Did nothing, just went to the restroom, and when I came back, the K-line had already done the work for me. Last night before bed, I was reviewing the rebound of $ARB, and the more I looked, the more it seemed like a fake move without volume. I placed a short order there, waiting for it to play out on its own. Before the market fully started, the resistance above was already very obvious.
The upper resistance was clear; every upward push fell just short, with insufficient support, and selling pressure kept layering down. I followed a high-short strategy, not chasing the sharp drop, waiting for the rebound to weaken before entering. Rhythm is even more important than direction. As it turned out, the rebound was just a brief gesture, volume didn’t keep up, and no one caught it on the way up.
Have a strategy before the market, discipline during, and reflection after.
Shorted in at 0.19556, current price 0.14353, return +1330.28%, nailed it. Pocketed the big chunk first, closed 80%, kept 20% at cost price for protection. If it continues to drop, let it run, don’t be greedy for the last bit. Take profits and secure them, move the stop loss to cost price, sleep soundly.
Panic comes from no plan, losses come from overthinking.
Missed it, don’t chase; now is not the time to rush. Wait for the next structure to form, I’ll notify immediately, opportunities remain, don’t be anxious. If you haven’t gotten on board, don’t worry, the market isn’t short of opportunities, it’s short of patience.
$DOGE $ZEC CPI is hawkish but violently surges?
Yesterday's CPI data was hawkish, yet the market staged a textbook-level leveraged mutual liquidation! Many folks were stunned, clearly the data was negative, so why did the market rally first?
Let's look at the real capital data:
Within 1 hour of the data release, short positions liquidated nearly $250 million; within 4 hours, the entire network cleared $470 million, of which short liquidations accounted for $350 million.
First, a violent short squeeze; after the shorts are liquidated, then retail traders chasing longs get washed out.
Many are wondering, why can the market rally if the data is hawkish?
Remember Xiaoyan's core logic: in crypto, it's not about whether the news is good or bad, but about the expectation gap and the concentration of positions.
PPI strengthening, oil prices breaking $100, and high long-term US Treasury yields mean the market had already priced in the expectation of a September rate hike.
The worst-case scenario for this CPI did not happen; core inflation month-over-month did not reach 0.4%.
Also, around 76,000 there was a large accumulation of short positions; the short side was overcrowded. After the data release, shorts collectively covered and bought back, forcibly pushing the price up.
The key focus for the subsequent trend is next week's FOMC.
This Fed meeting is the real key to determining the market direction.
If they raise rates by 25bp and the tone is hawkish, then watch if the 76,000 level can hold.
If they unexpectedly pause rate hikes, the market will likely see another round of short squeeze rebound. #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 #BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元 #财报观察员：甲骨文AI云收入增121% $BTC $ETH $CP: The Truth Behind Ten Consecutive Days of Continuous Decline
💥 After $CP was launched, it weakened for 10 consecutive days, dropping from 0.0406 on the first day to a low of 0.0127, a decline of more than half.
Many mistakenly think it’s due to team or institutional unlocking and dumping.
In fact, it’s completely the opposite: the project team, seed round, and Series A chips are all locked long-term; this round of decline is unrelated to large holders unlocking.
The real selling pressure comes from three types of chips that are tradable immediately upon listing:
1⃣️ Community airdrops
2⃣️ Foundation marketing budget
3⃣️ 400 million tokens in market-making inventory
On-chain data shows large market-making wallets continuously transferring tokens to exchanges to sell, combined with retail airdrop dumping, creating sustained pressure.
Previously, the listing on the Korean exchange also saw a spike followed by a drop, becoming a selling window.
Currently, the market bottom has slightly stabilized, but there is heavy resistance from layers of trapped positions above, making rebounds weak.
Short-term focus on key ranges:
Support at 0.014; if broken, continue to test lower and do not bottom-fish;
Resistance at 0.018; if it can’t hold above, all rebounds are weak recoveries.
Overall, this is a clearing of listed inventory, not a fundamental crash; before inventory is cleared, a reversal is unlikely. The probability of a rate hike in the month has risen to 90%, so why didn't it follow the "rate hike = market crash" pattern?
1. Negative factors have been priced in advance
With strong non-farm payrolls, high oil prices, and hawkish comments from the Fed, the market had already pushed the rate hike probability from 35% to 70%. The logic has shifted to: "sell the expectation, buy the realization." The first reaction after data release was liquidity squeeze and stop-loss sweeps, followed quickly by buying on dips.
2. Inflation is mainly driven by energy shocks, not a full-blown loss of control
The heat in PPI/CPI mainly comes from oil prices. The market fears "uncontrolled inflation + consecutive rate hikes," but the pricing is closer to "one 25bp hike first," not continuous aggressive tightening.
3. Funds have not massively exited crypto but are reallocating between BTC and ETH.
BTC spot ETFs have seen slight outflows in recent days, but outflows narrowed on September 11;
ETH spot ETFs had about $216 million inflow on September 11 alone, which explains why ETH is more resilient than BTC and even strengthened.
#SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121% Brothers, both BTC and ETH were squeezed and arranged simultaneously by CPI and the bears last night.
$BTC $77,340 | $ETH $2,530
BTC surged to nearly $80,000 within 24 hours, then fell back to around $77,000, down 3.9% for the week. ETH performed significantly stronger than BTC, rallying sharply from $2,430 to $2,660, an increase of over 8%, marking the largest intraday gain in three weeks, then retreating to around $2,530. There is a divergence in capital flow: BTC spot ETF outflows continued for 4 consecutive days, with another $13.29 million outflow in a single day; ETH ETF, however, saw a net inflow of $216 million against the trend, with BlackRock's ETHA alone accounting for $149 million.
CPI exceeded expectations, but ETH shorts were the first to be liquidated.
August CPI rose 0.4% month-over-month, core CPI 0.3%, both exceeding expectations, pushing the probability of a September rate hike to 70%. However, in the past 24 hours, ETH shorts were liquidated for over $300 million, BTC shorts for $212 million, with total liquidations across the network reaching $668 million. Short sellers paid funding fees to hold their positions, but when prices rallied, they were forced to cover, a classic short squeeze scenario.
Let's discuss in the comments, can ETH withstand the FOMC against the trend this time? 👇
#PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期
#BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元 The phrase "Everything will be resolved smoothly" is the hardest type of signal to price for long-term holders. It is neither a protocol change nor a capital flow; it merely postpones uncertainty.
If the Strait of Hormuz is truly blocked, oil prices will move first, followed by inflation expectations, which will delay the rate cut path. On this chain, $BTC is bearing liquidity tightening rather than safe-haven buying. A more likely explanation is that the market will trade the latter first and then be forced to correct.
So don't focus on that phrase itself. Focus on the intraday volatility of Brent crude oil and whether U.S. Treasury yields rise in sync. If both move in the same direction, it indicates the market is pricing inflation rather than risk aversion.
#PPI, CPI releases lead multiple institutions to raise September rate hike expectations #SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121% BTC vs $ETH — INSTITUTIONAL FLOWS
Latest daily flow:
$BTC: –$283M (Sept 10) → +$216M (Sept 11)
$ETH: improving institutional demand
2026 YTD:
$BTC: ~–$1B
$ETH: ~+$863M
Price performance (Aug 11–Sep 10):
$BTC: +23%
$ETH: +33%
Key institutional drivers:
$BTC → Profit-taking + macro sensitivity
$ETH → Staking yield narrative + relative value
The divergence is becoming harder to ignore.#SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121% The probability of a rate hike in September has risen to 90%, so why hasn't the market reacted with the usual "rate hike = sell-off"?
1. Negative factors have already been priced in
With strong non-farm payrolls, high oil prices, and hawkish signals from the Fed, the market had already pushed the rate hike probability from 35% to 70%. The logic shifted to: "sell the expectation, buy the realization." The initial reaction to the data release was a liquidity sell-off and stop-loss sweeps, but buying on dips quickly returned.
2. Inflation is mainly driven by energy shocks, not a full-blown loss of control
The heat in PPI/CPI mainly comes from oil prices. The market fears "uncontrolled inflation + consecutive rate hikes," but pricing is closer to "one 25bp hike first," not a series of aggressive tightenings.
3. Funds have not massively exited crypto but are reallocating between BTC and ETH.
BTC spot ETFs have seen slight outflows in recent days, but outflows narrowed on September 11;
ETH spot ETFs had about $216 million inflow on September 11 alone, which explains why ETH is more resilient and even stronger than BTC.
This does not mean rate hikes have become bullish:
If the FOMC hikes rates next week and issues a more hawkish guidance, rates could step up again, increasing pressure on risk assets.
$BTC Support level at 76000; a decisive break below signals a weakening trend
$ETH 2,500 is the bull-bear dividing line; watch 2435 support
$ZEC Currently structurally strong; upper liquidity between 1218-1245; a decisive break below 1125 would trigger a bearish exit #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 They say they are very confident about achieving $100 billion in ARR by the end of the year. Why are they so confident? The core is just one thing: AI computing power. The CFO personally said that a new AI computing power hosting agreement was recently signed, directly bringing an additional $13.3 billion in ARR. Moreover, Starship's 14th flight will be the first to carry production V3 Starlink satellites, officially generating revenue. Even more aggressively, they plan to deploy computing power satellites in space by 2027. Pinpin, Musk is basically moving servers directly into space. Let's look at the impact on the crypto world in two layers. First, computing power costs won't drop in the short term. AI infrastructure funding is still being poured in, and now it's already rushed from Earth to space. Hardware costs for miners and AI computing projects still have to be borne; don't expect to breathe easy in the short term. The second layer is that traditional tech giants are turning AI computing power into new infrastructure. For companies of SpaceX's scale, AI computing power has become the second growth curve after rocket launches. This supports the risk appetite of the entire tech sector, and as a high-beta asset, the crypto market will ultimately benefit. But in the short term, it's best to wait for macro data to come in. Here are my thoughts. This 100 billion ARR pie is indeed a big picture, but the stock price fell from 176 to 104.83, indicating the market is not blindly buying Musk's "future narrative." Space AI computing power is a good story; 2027 is still far away, with too many variables in between. Money is indeed being spent, but whether it can truly turn into profits remains to be seen in earnings reports. YesCLARITY bill stuck at 60 votes! BTC and ETH weak and volatile, regulatory measures hard to implement
The CLARITY bill vote is imminent on September 15.
60 votes is just a threshold, and now even that threshold is hard to reach.
Lummis proposed a 630-page amendment incorporating 114 demands, and Bassett urgently calls for progress.
But the officials' crypto conflict of interest clause remains untouched, and the Republicans are still 7 votes short of bipartisan support.
The uncertainty is huge, and regulatory certainty is far off.
The market has already given the most genuine feedback.
BTC is currently at 77355, down 0.43%, ETH is at 2531, down 1.01%.
Interest rate hike expectations combined with Middle East turmoil leave the market powerless to rise, and regulatory benefits are delayed.
The bill remains undecided, a typical bearish expectation.
Don't bet on the outcome of political games.
Hold your hands, protect your principal, and wait for the September 15 vote results before making moves.
Being alive is more important than anything.
#CLARITY替代修正案公布，贝森特呼吁参院推进 BTC surged 2.26 times in volume past 77375, but closed back below the threshold
From 17:00 to 18:00, BTC trading volume reached 7.7793 million USDT, a 2.26-fold increase compared to the previous period. The price touched 77392.4, closing at 77354.9, falling back below the previous 6-hour high of 77375.6.
The hourly price change was only -0.005%, with open interest at 2.821 billion USD, down 0.029% from the previous period. The volume expansion did not lead to price advancement or increased positions; near the threshold, it looks more like volume absorption.
If the next 1H candle closes above 77392.4 with continued volume expansion, the breakout will be confirmed; if it closes below 77329.6, support weakens. This volume-driven sideways movement seems more like a turnover or a pressure test?
Source: OKX API; as of 18:00, confirm=1.
#BTC #Bitcoin #MainstreamCoin $LAB did something worth studying today. It got crushed to 0.0464, then snapped all the way back to 0.0789 within hours.
That's a liquidation wick, not price discovery. Leverage got flushed, forced sellers hit the bid, and the market instantly said the real value was higher.
But this is still a downtrend from 0.111. One candle doesn't fix a month. I need a hold above 0.075 and then a push through 0.088 before I believe it.
#SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121% #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期
The battle for the second dragon: Marscoin, Lobster, or Niulai — who will carry the BSC banner?
Binance Life has firmly secured the top spot with a market cap of 500 million, so who will take the seat of the second dragon? Let's get real.
Mars coin, personally endorsed by Binance, is listed on both contracts and spot markets — the first time in nearly a year that a meme coin has opened a spot channel. Its market cap once surged to 1.1 billion but has now fallen back to around 150 million. The largest profit-taking address has started to reduce holdings, and there is a significant amount of trapped positions above. The narrative is the strongest, but profit-taking needs to be digested first.
Lobster has a market cap of 120 million USD, with only 3.5 million in trading volume. What does this mean? The order book is light, making it easy to pump with fewer bullets and quick to dump. Among Chinese meme coins, it has the most "orthodox" narrative, promoted by Binance's Chinese official Twitter. The disconnect between market cap and volume indicates tightly locked chips; a small amount of money can push it up, but it also means liquidity is thin and no one will catch the fall when it runs.
Niulai peaked at 130 million but has now dropped below 80 million, down over 22% in 24 hours. KOL Frank sold 1.23 million USD at 0.073 average price in the early morning, netting a profit of 750,000. Big holders have left first, so short-term pressure remains.
My view: For the second dragon position, Mars coin has the strongest foundation with Binance's backing but needs time for consolidation. Lobster has a small market cap and is easy to pump, suitable for brothers betting on elasticity but must run fast. Niulai's chip structure is loose; wait for stabilization before commenting. No one can hold the meme second dragon seat for too long.
Comment below, which one are you holding? $marscoin$SNDK is still sitting near $1,632.51, but the interesting part isn't the AI-memory story. It’s the price reaction. SanDisk just reported Q4 revenue of $8.97B, up 51% QoQ, with roughly two-thirds of that growth coming from higher pricing. Datacenter revenue also jumped 437% YoY. Management guided Q1 FY27 revenue to $10.3B–$10.8B. Yet price recently pushed above $1,800 and failed, then closed Friday at $1,633.35, down 3.50%. That creates the real trade: $1,800 = breakout confirmation $1,600–$1A phrase like "everything will be resolved smoothly" is the hardest type of signal to price for long-term holders. It is neither a protocol change nor a capital flow; it just postpones uncertainty.
If the Strait of Hormuz is truly blocked, oil prices will move first, inflation expectations will follow, and the rate cut path will be delayed. On this chain, $BTC is bearing liquidity tightening rather than safe-haven buying. A more likely explanation is that the market will trade the latter first and then be forced to correct.
So don't focus on that phrase itself. Focus on the intraday volatility of Brent crude oil and whether U.S. Treasury yields rise in sync. If both move in the same direction, it indicates the market is pricing inflation rather than risk aversion.
#PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期
#BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元 #美债收益率逼近5%，回购难缓长期压力 $BTC Eagle Sister says #BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元
After the CPI data was released, ETH first experienced a sharp drop for a washout, bottoming out at $2513, then shorts were forced to cover, driving a rapid price rebound with liquidation exceeding $300 million. This surge triggered by liquidations has strong short-term explosive power but does not mean the trend has reversed.
The "Maji" side is still adjusting positions, currently holding an average price roughly in the $2510–$2515 range, with the overall direction still bullish. However, it is important to note that market sentiment has clearly heated up, spot trading volume has expanded, and large funds are flowing into ETH long positions, but at the same time some funds are starting to take profits.
Therefore, for short-term operations, it is not recommended to blindly chase the rally. The next key observations are twofold: first, whether capital continues to flow in net; second, whether on-chain activity can keep pace. If capital keeps flowing in and price holds key support, swing longs still have opportunities; if sentiment quickly cools and capital flows out, beware that this rally is just a short-term rebound driven by liquidations.
Liquidations can push prices up in the short term, but only sustained capital support can uphold the trend. Currently, participation in swings is possible, but do not FOMO into the hottest sentiment positions.
#PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期
#沙特关闭关键输油管道，供应风险升级 Only about 37% of stocks in the S&P are above the 50-day moving average.
This is the worst market breadth in over 5 months.
What it shows: The index can be supported by a few large stocks, but most components have fallen below the moving average.
The chart reading is about 36.97 and still dropping; it has slid from over 70% at the end of July to now, indicating that the profit-making effect is clearly narrowing.
I think we shouldn’t take a green index close as confirmation of a broad rally. With such poor breadth, the rebound looks more like a leadership narrative, not a comprehensive risk appetite recovery.
What to do: Hold light positions and wait for breadth to rise above 50% before adding more; don’t chase the index with high leverage; the invalidation signal is a sustained rise and stabilization of the proportion above the 50-day moving average.
Do you trust the green index close more, or wait for breadth to recover first?
$SPY $QQQ $NVDA
#After PPI and CPI releases, multiple institutions raised September rate hike expectations
#BTC spot ETF outflows near $450 million in three daysOriginally, I just wanted to freeload a breakfast, but the market ended up handing me dumplings for half a year. Yesterday at dawn, everyone was still watching the rebound, I glanced at $UP, the pressure at the high level was too obvious, no one took over when it surged, so I casually placed a short order. At that time, the market hadn't fully started yet; the quieter it was, the more it felt like something bad was brewing.
The judgment was simple then: the rebound was weak, volume didn't keep up, and it felt like a bull trap. I suggested a high short strategy, waiting for resistance above before moving, not chasing the first move. Later it proved that patience is more valuable than speed; those who rushed to chase were easily taught a lesson by the rebound.
The market is something you wait for, profits are something you hold onto.
From 0.4420 all the way down to 0.3605, +184.61% in hand, this profit feels good. I first closed 80%, keeping the remaining 20% as cost protection; if it continues to drop, let the profit run, and if it rebounds, don't give the profit back. Put the big chunk in your pocket first, leave the rest to the protection level.
Risk control done upfront is called rationality; cutting losses after losing is called decisive action.
For friends who haven't gotten on board yet, listen to me: now is not the time to rush in. Chasing shorts easily gets slapped by rebounds; wait for a more comfortable position in the next round. If you miss it and don't chase, I'll notify you immediately; there will be more opportunities later.
$BTC $ETH The market barely moved today. BTC was at 77,372, basically flat in 24 hours. After seven days, it was still up 2.9%. The real movement was on the lower level: ETH at 2,533, up 2.2%. SOL stood above 102. Just a couple of days ago it was stuck at 99, but it just wouldn't rise. Today, it crossed it in one go. The total market is 2.74 trillion, up 0.4%. BTC dominance is 56.7%. That's still a high number. Money is basically still sitting on the safest chair, but people next to it started to stand up and move their hands. The most noteworthy thing today isn't the price It's the divergence between two numbers. Next Wednesday, September 16, the Fed will make a rate decision. Note that the market is betting on rate hikes, not cuts. CME FedWatch gives a 66% chance of a 25 basis point rate hike, but Kalshi reports 48%, Polymarket reports 49%. For the same event, the lottery is drawn on the same day. The three markets gave two completely different answers: 30/70 and 50/50. The middle 17 or 18 points are the part where everyone pretends to understand but is actually unsure. This scene is like asking three friends if they like you One says 100%, two say half and half. The conclusion you really need isn't probability, but that now isn't the time to bet heavily on this matter. That same week, there's a second draw. On Tuesday, September 15, the Senate will hold a procedural vote on the CLARITY Act, requiring 60 votes to enter the formal debate. The new version has a 630-page article specifically focused on nominal decentralization—the kind that talks about community governance but actually puts it down$BTC → scarcity that compounds into monetary credibility.
$ETH → liquidity that compounds into financial infrastructure.
$SOL → activity that compounds into network effects.
$BTC becomes stronger when more capital treats it as neutral collateral.
$ETH becomes harder to displace as stablecoins, DeFi and applications build around the same settlement layer.
$SOL is betting that cheap, fast execution can turn high-frequency on-chain activity into its own moat.
#SeptHikeOddsHit90% Rate hike bets surge past 70%, will the crypto market shake on next week's rate decision night?
Interest rate futures show the probability of a rate hike next week has risen above 70%. Inflation data remains volatile, the rate cut narrative is postponed, and funds are repricing tightening. Most people want to short as soon as they see the news, but don't forget: the market trades expectations first, then results.
During the expectation heating phase, highly volatile assets like BTC and ZEC get hit first, hot money withdraws, and contract leverage is easily liquidated. But once the meeting concludes, if the 70% probability has already been priced in, it might instead "sell the expectation, buy the fact," leading to a rebound.
The real danger is a hawkish surprise: beyond a rate hike, signaling continued tightening afterward, which would open the door to a deeper pullback.
Asset differentiation:
▪ BTC: sensitive to liquidity, volatility amplifies, liquidation risk rises.
▪ Gold: tug-of-war between rate hike pressure and safe-haven support, not necessarily a one-way decline.
Focus on two points:
1️⃣ Whether the rate hike is implemented
2️⃣ Whether Powell's speech is hawkish or dovish
$BTC
Just personal observation, not investment advice.FIL: What’s truly worth watching is not just the price, but the supply-demand inflection point.
There are three main highlights for Filecoin right now:
① Unlocking period ends on October 15
The pressure from early investors/foundation-related releases is expected to drop significantly, with new supply decreasing by about 75%. This is a crucial inflection point for FIL’s tokenomics.
② Narrative shifts from "selling storage" to "data infrastructure"
Filecoin is advancing Onchain Cloud, moving storage and data services further on-chain. The real value is not just "hard drives," but data storage, archiving, and verifiable infrastructure for the AI era.
③ The biggest variable: can demand keep up?
Improved supply does not equal guaranteed price increase. Whether FIL can have a major rally depends on sustained growth in real paid storage, enterprise adoption, and on-chain data demand.
My logic is simple:
Short-term looks at capital and market sentiment, mid-term looks at supply changes in October, long-term looks at AI + data storage demand.
If FIL can achieve the "supply reduction + real demand growth" double effect, its valuation logic may be repriced.
So studying FIL now shouldn’t just ask "can it still rise," but rather: does it have the qualifications to become decentralized data infrastructure in the coming years.
This represents only personal research and does not constitute investment advice. This round of the rally has a very strange sequence.
In previous years, Bitcoin was always the first to rise. After the market fully priced it in, subsequent funds would start chasing other major coins like SOL, ETH, following the logic of catching up with the mainstream coins.
This time, it seems like a broad bloom. $SOL and $ETH have both risen more than $BTC, not to mention ZEC. Looking at the exchange rates, SOLBTC and ETHBTC have almost hit new highs in recent months, especially ETH, which is particularly strong. This is completely different from the last round, where ETH was utterly worthless; this time it has been reborn.
Therefore, each market cycle cannot be simply approached with rigid thinking. Always respect the market; the market is always right. If one day it seems wrong, most likely it’s not the market that’s wrong, but your own understanding that hasn’t caught up yet.
#PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 #BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元 ⚡ $TRUMP /USDT: $2.006 (+1.15%)
Reclaiming the 1H MA cluster (2.001) after bouncing from the $1.912 low.
🔺 Break $2.093 → Retest 1.986** (MA20) → Flush to $1.977.
News Flash: The team moved $26M to BitGo, and the next unlock (Sept 18) adds ~28.7M tokens—that's a 10.5% supply increase in one day.
Play: Wait for a 1H close above $2.09 before entering! Don't FOMO the unlock chop.
#BTCSpotETF450MOutflow After four consecutive days of decline, $CRCL finally closed positive; the first day of stopping the fall is more important than how much it rises.
The day before yesterday, I mentioned in a post that Circle will launch its own mainnet Arc on the 16th, marking the start of its settlement ecosystem.
If its settlement ecosystem develops well, it will directly change the valuation logic of CRCL. So I expect there might be some speculation around $xCRCL in the coming days.
Yesterday's rise was a pattern where the decline gradually narrowed and stopped, indicating that panic selling is exhausting. Next, we will see the storyline of speculation around Arc's launch. The funds that rushed in early or waited have basically exited this week; the ones coming in next are likely those betting on the direction in advance.
Especially now, the USDC to Arc mainnet USDC ratio is 1.8:1, showing that speculation is still very intense. Looking forward to this reflecting in the $CRCL stock price. SOPH JUST TAUGHT ME A LESSON ABOUT CHASING GREEN CANDLES
$SOPH spiked to 0.004975 then cooled to 0.004773, still up 5.92% today and 35.78% over 30D despite a brutal -47.21% 180D drawdown. Momentum fades fast when greed outruns discipline. How do you avoid mistaking a bounce for a trend reversal?The last SanDisk trade closed at 1800, this time I bought back at 1759.2, but before the second take-profit, it dropped to 1631.72. The floating profit rate shown on this contract page is -543.48%, and the position is still open. This time the entry was indeed not good. 🥲
Going long again, I still focus on storage price increases and data center demand. SanDisk's earnings report released on August 5 shows that Q4 revenue grew 51% quarter-over-quarter, with about two-thirds of the increase coming from price hikes, and data center revenue grew 103% quarter-over-quarter. Selling more and at higher prices is the basis for my continued expectation of its future profitability.
There is also a clear timeline in the news: On September 4, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced that SanDisk will be included in the S&P 100 Index before the U.S. market opens on September 21. I will pay attention to the allocation demand from related index tracking funds and see it as a potential catalyst for a rebound. However, the announcement is already public, and the market may have priced in this expectation in advance, so it should not be understood as "it will definitely rise on that day."
But the biggest lesson from this trade is right here: positive news with a basis does not mean my entry point is appropriate. From 1759.2 to 1800, I originally only wanted to capture about a 2.3% rise, but now the contract price has retraced about 7.25%. I wanted to earn a small gain, but the drawdown I endured became larger and larger. I can no longer pretend that my original trading plan has not changed. #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 Last night, I watched the perpetual market for a while, and the feeling was obvious: leverage is quietly getting heavier, but the spot market side is actually quiet and unreal. 🫧 Have you recently felt that the few that have risen the fastest are the most unreasonable pullbacks? $OP A couple of days ago, the 5x increase was over 15%. It was great, but that money was essentially driven by derivatives sentiment, not spot buying. So now, what matters more isn't whether you can still chase, but who is being squeezed and who is running naked. If funding rates remain positive, the crowding of bulls becomes a weak point. Once BTC shakes, the chain-of-sale of altcoins will be faster than expected. That's why I've started treating $USDT as a "position." It's not about lying flat, it's about finding work for it: on OKX, X Stake is just over 10%, on Aave it's around 6%. The difference isn't small, but the real point is to ensure stablecoins have output during the waiting period, not just for the sake of the wait. At the same time, I hold onto spot positions for platform coins like $OKB and $BTC; the former feeds on ecosystem expectations, while the latter is the only thing still willing to catch you when a black swan arrives. Cross-market linkage is especially crucial now. When US risk appetite softens, BTC leveraged positions react first, then ETH follows, and only then do knockoffs come to add up. Conversely, if dollar liquidity expectations ease, perpetuals often move first rather than spot ones. At that point, funding rates and open interest will tell you the direction earlier than candlesticks. So now, what I look at isn't whether it's rising or not, but whether my holdings are overloaded or squeezedFive research mainlines make the Ethereum roadmap finally no longer look like a mere feature pile-up
The Ethereum Foundation summarizes future protocol work into five cross-upgrade mainlines: fast finality, post-quantum, privacy, state, and zkEVM. This change may seem like just a reclassification, but it actually affects how engineering resources are allocated.
In the past, the market saw a string of EIPs and upgrade names, making it difficult to judge their dependencies. The five mainlines require each piece of work to answer one question: which long-term goal is it advancing, and does it crowd out more critical paths?
For $ETH, a clear roadmap does not guarantee successful execution, but it can reduce the team being repeatedly pulled by short-term hotspots. Especially after the post-quantum goal is confirmed, many projects will reorder based on whether they support key migrations.
Fast finality solves settlement time, privacy protects user information, state controls long-term burden, zkEVM reduces verification costs, and post-quantum is responsible for future security. They are not five independent stories but different load-bearing structures of the same infrastructure.
What truly deserves pricing is not how grand the roadmap is written, but whether these mainlines can achieve verifiable progress through continuous upgrades.ETH bounced back to 2,534, but the bulls are unwilling to pay up
$ETH is now at 2,534.63 USDT, up 2.6% in 24h. The drop to 2,434.2 yesterday has basically been recovered today, but it's still far from the high of 2,667.
24h trading volume is 640 million USDT, ranking first among all USDT trading pairs in the market, with a volatility of 9.4%. The volume is sufficient, but the price increase is not very enthusiastic.
The funding rate on perpetual contracts is only +0.0005%, almost zero, with open interest at 1.6 billion USD. The price has risen, but the bulls are unwilling to pay for leverage, indicating fewer chasers and more takers.
During the same period, $BTC is up 0.4% in 24h, $SOL up 2.6% in 24h; ETH did not follow the broader market but synchronized with SOL in this catch-up rally.
The trader watched all afternoon; every dip above 2,470 was met with buyers, but no one dared to chase up to 2,667. This kind of market is the most frustrating.
Traders, don’t rush just because it’s up 2.6%; the 7-day gain is only 3.0%. Don’t fully load positions before 2,667; wait until it falls below 2,470 before considering other moves. The upper boundary condition from two hours ago was only half fulfilled: $BTC once had a full hour close near 77,360, but the next hour closed back at 77,349, failing to hold the pullback; the latest around 77,398 is just another test. This cannot be considered a confirmed breakout, more like a trigger without follow-through.
The original judgment required "closing above and then a pullback without breaking" both to occur simultaneously. The public market only briefly met the first step, the second step failed, so the upward plan is not upgraded for now; the downside 77,260 has not been broken either, so the bears also have no confirmation.
My adjusted market view is: continue to maintain the range, but place "consecutive closes" before a single penetration. Only when volume expands, the close holds steady, and the pullback is supported simultaneously will I increase risk exposure; otherwise, I'd rather miss the first move than repeatedly switch directions on false breakouts.
Going forward, will you pay more attention to consecutive closes or pullback support? This is just a personal market observation and does not constitute investment advice. $BTC → Censorship-resistant consensus, solidified as a trust anchor.
$ETH → Composable security, evolving into a settlement layer.
$SOL → High throughput experience, converging into a developer flywheel.
When institutions include $BTC in long-term asset allocation, its moat shifts from the halving narrative to cross-cycle trust.
When RWA, stablecoins, and L2 continuously share $ETH's security budget, replacing it is not just a chain swap but a complete rebuild of the trust and liquidity network.
$SOL bets on parallel execution and low fees, bringing on-chain interactions close to Web2 experience, solidifying high-frequency actions as migration barriers.
#PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 $STORJ｜Absolutely do not touch! This is a delisting and market exit scenario, not a phoenix rebirth
$STORJ surged 2.6 times in two days, and many thought the project was reversing and tried to jump in to gamble on a rebound, but absolutely do not get caught holding the bag.
First, major exchanges have basically drained liquidity.
Major exchanges have delisted storj, now only a few platforms like OKX still trade it, with shallow order books where small amounts of capital can quickly pump the price sky-high.
Second, after digging a deep pit, they reverse to crush the shorts.
Third, Korean exchanges are about to delist, and the market is betting on the final doomsday scenario.
Upbit and Bithumb will officially delist STORJ at 15:00 on September 14, with withdrawal windows open until October 14.
Before delisting, Korean exchanges often see this kind of short-term violent price action: short-term speculative funds scramble for rebounds, shorts close positions en masse, and whales transfer chips. Essentially, it’s just short-term agitation counting down to delisting.
Fourth, bankruptcy restructuring is being forcibly packaged by the market as a get-rich lottery.
Storj Labs filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy restructuring on July 26.
Although operations are temporarily maintained and they are collecting token holders’ intentions to swap for equity, the swap rules, shareholding ratios, and qualification requirements have no formal legal documents finalized, making uncertainty extremely high.
The top 100 addresses hold a concentration as high as 87%, so whales don’t need much capital to easily drive the price to surge or crash.
In summary: this kind of pump under delisting plus bankruptcy background is just a sucker’s game.$LAB did something worth studying today. It got crushed to 0.0464, then snapped all the way back to 0.0789 within hours.
That's a liquidation wick, not price discovery. Leverage got flushed, forced sellers hit the bid, and the market instantly said the real value was higher.
But this is still a downtrend from 0.111. One candle doesn't fix a month. I need a hold above 0.075 and then a push through 0.088 before I believe it.
#SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121% The market has been a bit confusing lately: the 10-year Treasury yield has surged, reaching as high as 4.98%, up nearly 30 basis points in a month. After the CPI was released, CME rate futures pushed the probability of a 25bp rate hike in September to around 90%, and the market is even pricing in another hike at year-end. But strangely, even with Treasury yields remaining high, Bitcoin has made a rebound. Many people have the illusion: has crypto no longer fears high interest rates? Based on recent data, let me share my own views on the market. First, understand the basic logic: U.S. Treasuries are almost zero-risk assets. Now, 10-year Treasuries are close to 5%, meaning holding U.S. Treasuries means you can steadily earn nearly 5% annualized returns. Bitcoin itself doesn't generate interest, so funds will settle the score: if you can safely take 5%, why take such a big risk to play crypto? A normal scenario would be that yields keep surging violently, liquidity tightens, and crypto as a whole comes under pressure. Bitcoin fluctuates and wears down the market, while altcoins fall even harder. But in recent days, abnormal phenomena have appeared in the market: sometimes US Treasury yields are still high, while Bitcoin actually rebounds. I think this isn't a pattern, it's just two narratives fighting. First: Rising yields stem from overheating and stubborn inflation—the current situation. PPI and CPI data are both strong, and the market is betting on the Fed to continue raising rates. This environment is real for cryptoBrothers, the September rate hike is basically locked in. PPI hit 5.4%, core CPI rose 0.3% month-on-month, Goldman Sachs changed its stance, and TD Securities said a new rate hike cycle might start, with CME pricing approaching 90%.
BTC is grinding around 78,000, with 80,000 as a strong resistance. Every attempt to break through gets crushed, but the support below is also strong. It can't fall because bad news has already been priced in, and it can't rise because the shoe hasn't dropped yet; both bulls and bears are waiting.
ETH is weaker than BTC, still stuck with the old problem of not following the rise but following the fall. The spot ETF keeps bleeding, no new explosive points in the ecosystem, and when BTC weakens, ETH slides down.
Gold $XAUT hasn't been spared either, dropping less than half a percent. The market is trading on a tightening logic; when real interest rates rise, non-yielding gold gets pressured. But the currency depreciation factor is still supporting it from below, so it doesn't fall deeply.
The most frustrating thing now is this sideways consolidation. Institutions are divided; Goldman Sachs turns hawkish, TD Securities calls for a new rate hike round, but the market isn't panicking or selling off. This shows most bad news has been priced in, and now it's just waiting for the FOMC statement at midnight on September 17 to clarify things.
So, don't short heavily just because the rate hike probability is high, and don't rush to bottom-fish with full positions. Keep spot stable, set good stop losses for short-term trades, and wait for a clear direction before making moves. Get through this week, and bigger opportunities will come later. #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 @OKX星球 Core CPI exceeded expectations, reinforcing rate hike expectations, and Bitcoin rebounded against the trend, despite negative news but not falling further
$BTC $ETH $ZEC On September 12, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics released data showing that core CPI rose 0.3% month-on-month in August, higher than the market expectation of 0.2%, and up 2.4% year-on-year; Overall CPI rose 0.4% month-on-month and 3.4% year-on-year, both in line with expectations. This was the last key inflation data released before the Federal Reserve's policy meeting on September 15–16.
After the data release, CME futures markets showed the probability of a 25 basis point rate hike in September soared to 90%, and the likelihood of a second rate hike before year-end also increased significantly.
The crypto market showed a counterintuitive trend of "bad news without falling." Bitcoin briefly dipped to around $76,000, then quickly rebounded above $78,000, while Ethereum strengthened in tandem. LMAX Group strategists pointed out that most hawkish risks have already been priced in; 21Shares data shows that within 30 days after core CPI exceeded expectations, Bitcoin's average increase was 2.13%.
On the capital side, US spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen net inflows for three consecutive weeks, totaling about $3.8 billion, with institutional funds continuing to build positions. The market is repricing Bitcoin from a purely risk asset to a macro hedging tool.
The Federal Reserve's interest rate decision will be a key variable for Bitcoin's short-term direction. #PPI. After the CPI release, several institutions raised their September rate hike expectations to $#BTC现货ETF三日流出近4 50 million A newcomer just opened a position and immediately faced an unrealized loss of 4.9 million, but in the end actually turned it positive. I watched the path of this $ETH long position for a long time.
With 8x leverage, the price moved down from the entry price, and the unrealized loss expanded faster than the principal. He was able to hold on, not because of accurate judgment, but because the position size was relatively small compared to the account. The liquidation line was not touched, so the rebound was awaited.
The more likely scenario is that this rebound saved the leverage, rather than the leverage picking the right direction. For now, this is all that can be confirmed.
Watch the dense area below the entry price on the liquidation map. If the price retests but this area is not broken through, it indicates real support; once it breaks down quickly, the profit of this position will disappear before the price does. #SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121% OKX Delists ICXUSDT: Bots Will Close Positions First
On September 17 at 4 PM (Taipei time), OKX will directly delist ICXUSDT perpetual contracts.
The delisting time is September 17 at 08:00 UTC. Trading will stop at that time, all orders will be canceled, and positions will be settled based on the arithmetic average price of the OKX index during the hour before delisting; funding fees for that hour will still be charged.
The real catch is the automatic closing. Trading bots will gradually close positions within the hour before delisting. If you dislike the fees and slippage, stop trading yourself in advance. For positions with a nominal value exceeding 10,000 USDT, do not expect to transfer out of the trading account within half an hour after delisting; they will be automatically unlocked upon expiration. When the index fluctuates wildly, the official side may also change the limit price rules or even adjust the final settlement price.If Bitcoin has indeed already bottomed...
That would mean its cycles are speeding up significantly.
And the 4-year cycle is broken.
It would mean Bitcoin bottomed 650 days before the next halving and is on track to make new all-time highs before the halving again.
AND reach its cycle top within 350 days after the next halving.
$BTC #BTC Spot ETF Outflows Near $450 Million in Three Days BTC Spot ETF Outflows Near $450 Million Over Three Consecutive Days: The Real Issue Is That Outflows Are Accelerating
There is a clear shift in the US spot BTC ETF capital flow: a net outflow of about $46.6 million on September 8, expanding to $120.2 million on the 9th, and further rising to about $282.7 million on the 10th, totaling approximately $449.5 million in net outflows over three days.
What deserves the most attention here is not the absolute figure of $450 million, but the fact that the outflow speed has increased for three consecutive days. On the 10th, it set the largest single-day net outflow in nearly two months, with ARKB experiencing a single-day outflow of about $164 million.
Even more interestingly, in the week ending September 4, BTC ETFs still had a net inflow of about $987 million. In just a few trading days, institutional funds quickly switched from active accumulation to risk contraction.
Considering the recent resurgence of inflation and rising expectations of interest rate hikes, I believe BTC's inability to break above around $77,000 is not just a technical issue.
If ETFs continue to see outflows, $80,000 will increasingly look like a resistance level from a capital flow perspective; conversely, if ETFs turn positive again and BTC can hold between $76,000 and $77,000, it would indicate that this round of selling pressure is being absorbed by the market.
Going forward, more than guessing price movements, it is worth watching when the capital will return. $BTC $ZEC currently has no short positions on ZEC, and in 8 days you might miss out on a huge market profit!
Shorting logic:
Only 8 days remain until the NU7 vote results are announced. The market has already wildly speculated on the positive impact of the NU7 upgrade, and the price has fully priced in expectations.
This vote is merely a consultative public opinion poll with no mandatory mainnet upgrade effect. Even if the proposal passes, the upgrade won't be implemented until Q4; if voter turnout fails to meet the threshold or core features are delayed, the hype narrative will be directly disproven.
Market perspective: Earlier rallies have accumulated a large amount of long leverage, with crowded high-level chips. When the news is released, it is easy to see a "buy the rumor, sell the fact" scenario, triggering a chain liquidation of longs, causing the price to quickly drop, targeting 900 or even lower.
Trading strategy: Establish a short base position at the current price. You can add to the position when it rebounds to the 1190-1230 resistance zone. Do not blindly go long betting on positive news; once the good news is realized, a bearish market will start. RAY has been very strong these days, and the trend suggests it will continue to rise. However, brothers entering the market should stay alert; the crazier the rise, the more you need to watch out for pitfalls beneath your feet. If the trend worsens, take profits and exit in time.
There is capital openly injecting funds into RAY: StonkFun has moved all new tokens to Raydium's LaunchLab, and every transaction pays fees to the RAY pool.
The protocol also uses 12% of the fees to repurchase on the open market, with a total of 2.1 million accumulated so far. This is a solid fee return. So this counts as a fundamental improvement, supporting the potential for doubling in value.
Currently, the technical indicators show severe overbought conditions, RSI at 77, and the candlesticks form a typical strong bullish arrangement, so there is still some room for further gains. On-chain activity is real money. #SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121%