Orbit Post Sitemap
Leverage is often seen as a dangerous beast, and there are indeed countless stories in the crypto world of liquidations caused by high-leverage contracts. But upon deeper reflection, the tool itself is not inherently flawed; the problem often lies in whether the user has a complete investment system in place. Without a solid system, recklessly chasing profits naturally brings risks along. In my framework, leverage and spot trading are never two separate things but two sides of the same coin. The most straightforward analogy is real estate logic: when housing prices were low in earlier years, people with limited capital bought quality assets through low-cost loans; leverage essentially amplifies the compounding effect of time and knowledge. The crypto market is similar, but I only accept one form of leverage—at the bottom area, low ratio, loan-based, and only long positions. It is definitely not about 10x or 20x contract gambling, nor daily short-term long/short speculation. This logic is divided into three levels. First, anchor on long-term assets. If the ETH/BTC exchange rate maintains an upward trend over the next few years, I focus on ETH, do not diversify heavily into BTC, and only consider switching between the two when the exchange rate reaches extreme levels. Second, judge the cycle position. I am not obsessed with bull or bear labels; by observing the 10-year heat map of BTC and ETH, I find that there are alternating months of rises and falls each year. What I do is keep cash during downturns and hold chips during upswings. Third, only when the price truly falls into a deep value range do I use leverage: first establish a base position with spot holdings; if the market continues to dip to more extreme prices, then mortgage BTC to borrow USD and add to BTC positions inversely. This method does not pursue short-term explosions but uses a system to constrain human nature Bitcoin Just Had Its Best August In Years. But Something Is Missing.
$BTC gained roughly 24% in August, making it Bitcoin’s strongest August since 2017.
At first glance, that looks extremely bullish.
But the market is telling a more complicated story.
Bitcoin pushed above $81K, then quickly fell back toward the $77K area.
Now it is struggling to reclaim $80K.
My radar:
🟠 $BTC — strong monthly performance, but $80K remains resistance
🔵 $ETH — watching relative strength
🟣 $SOL — sensitive to liquidity and risk appetite
🟢 $XRP — monitoring institutional demand
The biggest question is not whether Bitcoin rallied.
It did.
The question is whether the demand behind that rally is strong enough to push $BTC into a new breakout.
August ETF flows were strong, with U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs attracting billions during the month.
But the latest session also recorded around $201.9M in outflows, ending a nine-session inflow streak. 0
That matters because price and capital flows are starting to tell slightly different stories.
$BTC has already delivered the performance.
Now the market needs confirmation.
If buyers can defend $77K and reclaim $80K with strong spot demand, the $81K–$81.5K region could come back into focus.
But if $77K breaks while ETF demand continues cooling, the August rally could need a deeper correction before another attempt higher.
September also brings another problem.
The Fed.
Markets are increasingly pricing a possible September rate hike, while higher oil prices are adding another layer of inflation pressure. 1
That means Bitcoin enters September after a powerful rally but with a less supportive macro environment.
This is why I am watching $ETH, $SOL and $XRP as well.
If they continue holding strength while $BTC consolidates, it could mean capital is rotating within crypto.
If the entire market starts breaking down together, macro pressure is probably taking control.
For me, the setup is simple.
$77K is support.
$80K is the first major resistance.
#LaborMarketTestsWalsh #BTCGoldCorrelation #BroadcomDellAIResults Early Monday morning, global market sentiment was completely ignited by a military news report. The US military conducted an airstrike on Iran's Larak Island in the early hours of August 31, marking the first publicly acknowledged physical strike by the US since the ceasefire broke down in July. Unlike Iran's unilateral blockade of the strait in March, this time the US proactively attacked rocket launchers, and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps immediately retaliated with missiles. The conflict escalated from a simple oil price risk pricing to a two-way direct confrontation. Within just a few hours, the risk to crude oil supply sharply intensified, while the crypto market weakened simultaneously, with Bitcoin falling below the $78,000 mark. Notably, during this round of geopolitical turmoil, Bitcoin's movement was highly synchronized with crude oil rather than following gold's safe-haven rhythm. Traditional safe-haven asset gold did not rise as expected; instead, it opened sharply lower. On the surface, this seems counterintuitive, but the underlying macro logic is quite clear: the surge in oil prices amplified concerns about energy inflation, directly squeezing the Federal Reserve's future rate cut space, causing the real US dollar interest rate to rise, and naturally putting pressure on gold as a non-yielding asset. The market is currently pricing not just pure panic-driven safe-haven demand but a renewed game of inflation and liquidity expectations. What is intriguing is the timing background. Recently, Trump had signaled willingness to negotiate and open dialogue with Iran, driven by practical considerations: domestic public opinion in the US is war-weary and hopes to end Middle East consumption; stabilizing oil prices and lowering inflation could also gain leverage for the midterm elections. This strike clearly compressed the space for diplomatic negotiations. As a result, a mainstream market speculation has emerged—that some forces do not favor a smooth US-Iran reconciliation.This week, the BTC sentiment index has jumped from "Extreme Fear" to "Extreme Greed," but the price has yet to stabilize near the 52-week moving average (around $81,700). Both criteria for confirming a rebound have not been met—this is an oversold rebound, and it is still too early to declare a bull market. From the perspective of Chan Theory, the daily endpoint 5 is currently in the final stage of leaving the central zone A, closely monitoring the construction node of the second rising central zone B; HYPE is simultaneously entering the construction period of central zone B, with short-term focus on the $73–$77 support zone stabilization signals. 1. Current nature assessment of Bitcoin's market 1) Market sentiment index: switched from "Extreme Fear" to "Extreme Greed" From the above sentiment index, it can be seen that BTC has experienced a rebound over nearly two months, especially an accelerated rise in the past two weeks, causing a fundamental reversal in market sentiment. The market's perception of this rebound has changed, with more views leaning toward the judgment of a "bull market return." Below, we will analyze our core judgment of the current market phase from a technical perspective. 2) Historical data rebound and 52-week moving average confirmation mechanism Based on the weekly framework, we conducted a retrospective analysis of nearly 9 years of historical data and found that whenever there is a significant market trend reversal (i.e., bull-bear cycle switch), it can be confirmed by a quantitative indicator, the 52-week moving average. This moving average has strong noise filtering ability for medium- to long-term trends and serves as a watershed for distinguishing bulls and bears. To improve the executability of this indicator, we break it down into two quantitative confirmation standards: 1. Position status (trend direction judgment) BTC getting slapped down to 77K on rate-hike jitters and Iran escalation. Fear & Greed went from 73 → 62 in a week.
Meanwhile, Morpho vaults are still printing 20% APY on ETH. Aave Base pools sitting at 7-9% on USDC.
The question isn't whether to be in DeFi. It's whether you're comfortable with concentrated risk in isolated vaults, or you want the sleep-easy pooled model.
I'll take the vaults at these rates. Risk is priced in.Funds don't just talk tough; their flow is a direct vote.
BlockBeats reports that the US spot Ethereum ETF saw a net inflow of $102.1 million yesterday, maintaining net inflows for 12 consecutive trading days, indicating strong capital support.
On the same day, the Bitcoin spot ETF had a net outflow of $202 million, ending a 9-day streak of net inflows. One continues to advance while the other turns to outflow, a clear contrast: capital is signaling a rotation from BTC to ETH.
Twelve consecutive days of net inflows show that institutional appetite for ETH allocation is still heating up. Supported by capital, ETH is relatively resilient and even somewhat strong.
But don't just watch the excitement. After continuous large inflows, whether the marginal increase slows down is the key focus going forward. If daily inflows can maintain at the hundred-million-dollar level, ETH's relative strength is likely to continue; if inflows suddenly drop, be wary of short-term profit-taking.
Tokens involved: ETH, leaning bullish.
#ETH #Crypto100WRisk Warning: This article is only an objective market review and does not constitute any investment advice. Cryptocurrency assets are highly volatile, so please pay close attention to risks. In the long-term structural differentiation market, many participants are always waiting for ETH to show relative strength and achieve excess returns over BTC. However, ETH outperforming BTC is not a given; it will not happen automatically just because of a low valuation. It requires a complete set of conditions. Most of the time, the market is dominated by certainty, with BTC holding the upper hand; only when all specific conditions are met will the growth style have a window of opportunity, allowing ETH to achieve relative returns. Clarifying the preconditions that trigger rotation prevents passively waiting for an illusory recovery market for a long time. The BTC dominant phase essentially reflects a cautious overall market risk appetite. Macro uncertainties remain, and institutional capital allocation prioritizes principal safety, using BTC as the core allocation vehicle in the crypto market. ETFs continuously provide stable capital inflows, and long-term whales keep accumulating chips during pullback intervals, forming a solid price floor. At this stage, the market's core demand is preservation of value and allocation, not chasing high elasticity returns. Even if the market rebounds, it is mostly of a corrective nature. Capital is only willing to give BTC a certainty premium and remains cautious about ETH's long-term narrative. ETH mostly passively follows the market rally, with the ETH-BTC exchange rate maintaining sideways movement or continuing to decline. Many investors increase their ETH positions to gamble on excess returns when the market warms up, but the market rises while their net value continues to underperform. In this environment, forcing ETHThe blockchain has been quite active these days, especially the Robinhood chain. After leveraging the meme market rally, both TVL and trading volume have surged directly to the forefront of public chains. Moreover, since meme coins can only be traded on DEXs, this has directly driven the burning of UNI tokens, pushing up UNI's price. Actually, there is a data point that most people don't know: the proportion of DeFi trading volume has increased significantly compared to before. Some data shows that the recent peak proportion reached as high as 24%, while last year this figure was less than 20%, and a few years ago it was even in the single digits. The increase in DeFi trading volume proportion is actually a sign of the continuous development of the entire crypto space. Of course, this is still a trend because the crypto space is based on blockchain technology that emphasizes decentralized trading. With the popularization of wallets, investor education, and further improvement of DeFi infrastructure, more users are choosing to complete their trades through DeFi, which is inevitable. It is foreseeable that in the future, the trading volumes of CEXs and DEXs will continue to rise, with DEXs' share further increasing and then stabilizing within a certain range. The advantages of DeFi are very evident in this wave of capturing the stock trading market share, coupled with the 7x24 trading characteristic of crypto exchanges, stock trading continues to grow. However, what puzzles me is that whether it was the previous bull market or this wave of Robinhood chain's boom, the catalyst always involves the shadow of meme coins, including the "Niu Lai" meme launched on Binance yesterday. From the perspective of value investing, it's quite difficult.LONGi Green Energy's semi-annual report shows that photovoltaics still have to endure.
A net loss of 3.68 billion yuan in the first half of the year, compared to a loss of 2.57 billion yuan in the same period last year, with losses continuing to widen.
Weak demand, overcapacity, and price wars are cutting like three knives. The pressure from asset impairment has not yet been fully released.
So don't rush to call a turnaround in photovoltaics.
If capacity is not cleared, prices will be hard to truly stabilize; profit recovery is even less likely to appear just by shouting "cycle reversal."
On the other hand, Crypto like BTC, ETH, and DOGE follow a different logic.
Traditional industries are still waiting for capacity clearance, while the Crypto market focuses more on liquidity, capital rotation, and risk appetite.
So don't treat all assets as the same cycle now.
Photovoltaics need to wait for supply and demand to rebalance, while $BTC, $ETH, and $DOGE need to watch when capital flows back.
In short: traditional industries wait for clearance, Crypto waits for liquidity.
Whoever endures first will be qualified to seize the next market rally. #BTC高位震荡，与黄金联动增强 #就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验 $SNDK's drop from 2300 was indeed quite severe, hitting a low near 1400 in August, nearly a 40% retracement.
But I think the main issue with this decline isn't the fundamentals; it's that the previous rise was too steep. From June to July, it surged from 1000 directly to 2350, more than doubling, so a correction was inevitable. The logic behind AI storage hasn't changed, and SanDisk's fundamentals remain solid. The investor day guidance on August 13 was quite positive.
Currently, the price is consolidating in the 1550-1600 range, which is a bit indecisive and tricky to trade. On the left side, wait around 1400; on the right side, wait for a volume breakout above 1700. The key medium-term resistance lies in the 1750-1800 area.
My judgment is that this decline is nearing its end but still needs a bottoming structure to confirm. In the short term, it may oscillate between 1400-1600 repeatedly. Only after the moving averages flatten and turnover is sufficient can the next wave begin.Last week, mainstream crypto spot ETFs still attracted over $1.9B in inflows. What truly deserves attention is not whether "funds have entered the market," but rather: where are the funds flowing from and to? Latest weekly fund performance: 🟠 $BTC → +$886.3M 🔵 $ETH → +$768.7M 🟣 $SOL → +$171.5M 🟢 $XRP → +$96.8M One detail is especially worth noting. Previously, BTC spot ETFs maintained net inflows for several consecutive days, but then experienced a single-day net outflow of about $185M, ending the streak of continuous inflows. Meanwhile, ETH, SOL, and XRP funds still showed relatively strong performance. This looks more like a reallocation of funds rather than a bleeding of the entire crypto market. When BTC's gains slow down and enter a high-level consolidation, some funds may start seeking assets with higher volatility and greater elasticity. This also explains why: BTC → fund growth slows ETH → institutional demand remains resilient SOL → high Beta characteristics begin to attract attention XRP → funds still have support Of course, a single day of ETF outflows cannot directly define market trends. What really matters is observing the next few days: 👀 Will BTC funds continue to flow out? 👀 Can ETH and other major coins continue to attract funds? 👀 Are funds spreading toward high Beta assets? If BTC's outflow is just temporary,$BTC THE REAL QUESTION ISN’T “WHO IS SELLING?”
Bitcoin has already shown that institutional demand can be strong.
Now the market is entering a different phase.
The nine-session ETF inflow streak brought more than $3B of reported demand before Friday recorded roughly $201.9M in outflows.
That shift is interesting, but I don't see it as an immediate bearish signal.
After a strong rally, someone has to take profits.
The market cannot move higher forever without supply entering the order book.
What matters is what happens after the sellers appear.
If Bitcoin pulls back and buyers step in quickly, that's a completely different signal from a market where every bounce gets sold.
It means there is still capital waiting for better entries.
And that's the part I'm watching most closely.
A strong market doesn't necessarily look like constant green candles.
Sometimes strength looks like this:
Price falls.
Leverage gets reduced.
Short-term holders take profits.
Sentiment cools down.
Then stronger buyers quietly absorb the supply.
That's often where the next trend begins to develop.
The opposite is also possible.
If ETF outflows continue, spot demand weakens and BTC starts losing major support levels, then the market may be telling us that buyers need lower prices before returning.
So I don't want to make a decision based on one flow number.
I want to see how price reacts to the flow.
That's the missing piece.
Strong inflows + rising price = obvious demand.
Strong inflows + stagnant price = possible absorption or heavy selling.
Outflows + stable price = potential underlying strength.
Outflows + falling price = much more concerning.
This is why capital flow should always be viewed alongside price structure.
Bitcoin doesn't need every institution to keep buying every single day.
It needs enough demand to absorb available supply over time.
That's a much higher-quality signal.
For now, I'm watching whether BTC can maintain its broader structure while the market digests recent gains. 👻: 👉
- Scenario Analysis: Trump reiterates the ban on Iran's nuclear weapons, making the prevention of its nuclear armament a top diplomatic priority.
- Motivation Analysis: Through a maximum pressure policy, reshape the Middle East security framework and establish strong negotiation leverage.
- Economic Situation Impact: Geopolitical risks rise, crude oil supply chain premiums increase, and energy costs escalate.
- Bull-Bear Ratings:
Bulls 🟢 Defense and military-industrial sectors supported by expectations of increased defense budgets.
Bears 🔴🔴🔴 Geopolitical conflicts intensify causing oil price volatility and a rebound in inflation expectations.
- Importance: 6/10 #Focus $BTC $ETH $TRUMP Nearly $1B Entered Bitcoin ETFs. So Why Is $BTC Still Below $80K?
One thing on my radar right now is the disconnect between institutional demand and Bitcoin's price.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs attracted around $924M in net inflows last week.
That is a strong amount of capital.
But $BTC is still struggling around the $78K area.
So the question is simple:
Why hasn't Bitcoin broken $80K yet?
My radar:
🟠 $BTC — strong ETF demand, but resistance at $80K
🔵 $ETH — watching relative strength
🟣 $SOL — sensitive to liquidity conditions
🟢 $XRP — institutional demand remains important
The ETF data tells us institutions are still interested in Bitcoin.
BlackRock's IBIT alone accounted for roughly $938M of the weekly inflows.
But price is telling us something different.
$BTC pushed toward $81K and failed to hold the breakout.
Then price returned toward $77K before recovering.
That creates an important battle between buyers and sellers.
On one side, institutional capital is still entering.
On the other, macro conditions are becoming less supportive.
Fed rate expectations have increased.
Treasury yields are rising.
Oil is above $90.
And geopolitical uncertainty is adding more pressure to risk assets.
So strong ETF inflows are not automatically enough to trigger a breakout.
For $BTC, the levels are clear.
$77K is the support I am watching.
$80K is the immediate resistance.
$81K–$81.5K is the breakout zone.
If Bitcoin can reclaim $80K with strong spot volume, the recent rejection could turn into a consolidation before another attempt higher.
But if $77K breaks while yields continue rising, institutional demand may need more time to absorb the selling pressure.
This is also where $ETH becomes interesting.
If Ethereum continues showing relative strength while $BTC remains below $80K, it could suggest capital is rotating within crypto rather than leaving the market.
$SOL and $XRP are worth watching for the same reason.
#LaborMarketTestsWalsh #BTCGoldCorrelation #BroadcomDellAIResults $BTC A STRONG MARKET ISN’T ONE THAT NEVER SELLS OFF
Bitcoin's recent ETF activity has been impressive, with more than $3B in reported inflows during the nine-session buying streak.
Then came the first meaningful interruption:
Around $201.9M in ETF outflows on Friday.
The easy reaction is to call it bearish.
I'm not convinced.
The more important test begins when the market stops receiving constant positive flow.
A rally can look powerful when capital is continuously chasing higher prices.
But the real strength of an asset becomes clearer when buyers have to absorb profit-taking, uncertainty and short-term selling pressure.
That's where Bitcoin is now.
The question isn't whether some investors are taking profits.
Of course they are.
After a strong move, selling is normal.
The question is whether new demand is strong enough to replace that supply.
If it is, the market can continue building higher even with occasional ETF outflows.
If it isn't, Bitcoin may need to consolidate or retrace before buyers become interested again.
This is also why I wouldn't judge the entire institutional narrative from a single day's flow.
One outflow doesn't erase weeks of demand.
But several consecutive outflows combined with weakening price action would deserve much more attention.
For me, the next phase is about confirmation.
I'm watching whether BTC can hold its important support areas.
I'm watching whether spot demand returns when price becomes less attractive to momentum traders.
And I'm watching whether volume expands when buyers attempt another breakout.
Bitcoin rising because everyone is chasing it
and
Bitcoin holding because investors are willing to accumulate weakness.
The second one is much more interesting.
A healthy market needs both buyers and sellers.
Profit taking isn't necessarily a problem.
Sometimes it is exactly what allows stronger hands to enter.
If sellers distribute their positions and new capital absorbs that supply without allowing BTC to lose its broader structure, the market could actually become more resilient. Don't blindly believe in the "safe haven" narrative. Bitcoin and Ethereum are now fighting for survival logic.
When geopolitical conflicts flare up, Bitcoin didn't act as gold; instead, it became a tough companion to crude oil, falling below $78,000. Gold fell, BTC followed—the market is clearly trading on "inflation stickiness"—oil prices push inflation up, the Fed can only stubbornly maintain high interest rates, real rates rise, and all zero-yield assets get hit together.
Wake up, BTC's "digital gold" image is shattered. In this cycle, it is a high-beta risk asset, the first to be hit when liquidity recedes. As long as the Fed doesn't ease, Bitcoin will struggle to have a trending market; oscillation and gradual decline are the norm.
Ethereum is even worse: gas fees have flattened, ecosystem enthusiasm has cooled, ETFs continue to bleed, and its drop is much harsher than Bitcoin's. But resilience lies here—volatility is a double-edged sword; once macro sentiment reverses, ETH's spring-like nature will explode first. Right now, it’s not the leader in gains but a leveraged blade for swing trading.
My simple approach is still dollar-cost averaging, but with a focus on offense and defense:
· BTC, 60% of the portfolio, steadfast monthly buys as the base holding.
· ETH, 30% of the portfolio, grid buys on dips, specialized for volatility.
· 10% cash, waiting for extreme panic days—like moments when the market crashes over 10% in a single day—to scoop up and exit quickly, never holding on to a losing battle.
Don't try to guess the bottom, don't argue logic, the market makers won't reason with you. Survive and wait for the wind to change. Bitcoin is sitting around $77.8K after failing to hold the recent move toward $81K.
August was still a powerful month, with BTC recovering roughly 24–25% from the low-$60Ks and briefly trading above $80K. But now the easy momentum has cooled, and the market is asking a much harder question:
Is this consolidation before another breakout, or the beginning of a deeper correction?
Right now, the price structure is giving both sides a reason to hesitate.
The first important area is around $77.2K.
If buyers continue defending this zone, Bitcoin can remain trapped between support and the psychological $80K resistance.
Below that, $75.7K becomes much more important. A decisive break and failed reclaim would weaken the current structure and could open the door toward the mid-$75K area.
On the upside, $80K–$81.4K remains the major supply zone.
Bitcoin already showed that it can trade above $80K.
The question is whether it can stay there.
That distinction matters.
A quick move above resistance can simply be a liquidity sweep.
A breakout that holds, consolidates and turns resistance into support is a completely different signal.
ETF flows add another layer to the picture.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs still recorded about $924M in net inflows during Aug. 24–28, despite BTC struggling to stay above $80K. The Aug. 28 session itself saw roughly $201.9M in outflows, ending a nine-session inflow streak.
So institutional demand hasn't simply disappeared.
Instead, we're seeing an interesting divergence:
Capital is still coming in, but price is struggling to push through resistance.
That tells me sellers around $80K are still significant.
And this is exactly why I wouldn't force a large leveraged position in the middle of the range.
Shorting around $78K can be dangerous if buyers defend support and squeeze the market back toward $80K.
Going aggressively long around $78K isn't attractive either when the market hasn't confirmed that the correction is finished.
This is where many traders get trapped.
They feel they need to trade because the market is moving. This week brings JOLTS, ADP, jobless claims and Aug payrolls, making labor data key for September policy pricing. July payrolls fell 23K and May-June were revised down 103K, signaling softer hiring. At Jackson Hole, Walsh said inflation remains above 2%, conditions are not restrictive and policy should prioritize price stability. September hike odds briefly rose from ~35% to nearly 60%, lifting yields and pressuring gold and BTC. The data will define room for his anti-inflation stance.Let's talk about a macro hidden line covered by the encrypted K-line: Trump laid his cards on the table last night, ExxonMobil and Chevron will enter Venezuela, and he also said the U.S. will replenish its strategic petroleum reserves. On one hand, there's talk of increasing production; on the other, calls to replenish inventories. The oil market game is getting bigger and bigger.
What does this mean for trading? Increasing production is a force to suppress oil prices, but "replenishing strategic reserves" is a solid buy order. These two forces hedge each other, making the short-term direction of oil prices even harder to bet on. And this oil price line is directly connected to inflation expectations, the pace of interest rate hikes, and the interest rate ceiling above $BTC.
So don't just focus on the coin price when watching the coin price. How crude oil moves often determines your winning or losing move this month more than that neighboring encrypted K-line.Here's the most trade-relevant tech case today: Apple has officially sued OpenAI, accusing them of stealing trade secrets. Apple claims to have found new evidence in a MacBook provided by OpenAI last August, alleging that OpenAI used Apple's proprietary information to train AI agents and even accessed circuit diagrams of power adapters. Apple is now requesting expedited disclosure of evidence.
Why does this matter for the market? The entire AI narrative has been the main engine driving risk assets this year, with $NVDA's earnings and computing power expansion supporting everyone's valuation expectations. But once the top players shift from "collaboration" to "mutual accusations of trade secret theft," the market will inevitably have to reprice the certainty of this narrative.
When giants clash, it's gossip in the short term but a narrative fracture in the long term. This underlying thread is more worth noting than a single bullish candlestick on the chart.In September, the A-shares market saw the Shanghai Composite hovering around 3100 points for twenty days, with trading volume shrinking from 600 billion to 400 billion.
Several positive policies were introduced, but every time the market opened higher, it turned into an opportunity to run, specifically targeting retail investors chasing rallies.
Spending enough time in the stock market makes it clear that this "all good news priced in" script is the same pattern as pump news in the crypto space.
Recently, $UNI was pumped from $7.5 to $8.2; once the news spread, those who chased got stuck halfway up the mountain.
Three days later, it dropped back to $7.3, failing even to hold the starting point, very much like those A-shares thematic stocks that dump after announcements.
Then there's $AVAX, repeatedly faking breakouts around $25; every time volume surged, people thought it was a real start.
What happened? The next day, it shrank volume and drifted down, mirroring the trend in our photovoltaic sector—pure deception.
Now I only watch $BTC, which has been sideways between 59,000 and 62,000 for almost two weeks, no volume means no movement.
In August, I made a trade in the stock market, earned 3% and exited, avoiding the subsequent four consecutive down days.
Remember, in a low-volume market, patience beats any technical indicator.
Wait until the two markets’ trading volume returns to 800 billion, or Bitcoin breaks above 65,000 with volume, then go all in.
Entering a few days late won’t lose money, but entering one day too early might lose all profits. Staying alive is better than anything else. #就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验 This week, the US employment data lineup is intense, with ADP, initial jobless claims, and nonfarm payrolls coming one after another. The market will once again scrutinize: Is Walsh continuing to focus on inflation and applying the brakes, or quietly easing off after seeing employment cool down? This round of employment data not only determines rate cut expectations but also tests how firm Walsh's previously tough stance really is. If new job additions are strong, unemployment remains stable, and wage growth is on the hot side, it indicates the US economy can still hold up, giving Walsh more confidence to emphasize inflation risks. The market will reprice for "higher rates staying longer," strengthening the dollar and US Treasuries, which is short-term bearish for Bitcoin. If Bitcoin happens to be at a high level, it might use this opportunity to shake out the bulls! Conversely, if employment clearly cools and unemployment rises, the market will preemptively bet on policy easing. The dollar and Treasury yields will fall, giving BTC a chance to retest previous highs. But if the data is too bad, don't pop the champagne yet; the market might first trade recession fears, causing a collective plunge in risk assets before a big V-shaped recovery. The most likely scenario is a moderate slowdown in employment without a crash. This leaves room for policy easing without triggering recession alarms, which is most favorable for BTC in the medium term. Employment data sets the questions, Walsh answers them, and Bitcoin tests both bulls and bears to the point of existential doubt $BTC #就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验 Last night, the three major US stock indexes all fell—the Dow dropped 0.7%, the S&P and Nasdaq also closed in the red, the Nasdaq Golden Dragon China Index dropped more than 2 points in one day, and Alibaba fell 4%. Risk assets collectively weakened in the same direction, and $BTC was no exception, lingering near seventy-eight thousand with a bearish tone.
People often ask me whether to buy the dip or short at this level. My answer is: neither should be rushed. In this "stocks down, crypto follows" linkage, the biggest mistake is to talk about crypto's independent story—the overall market bias hasn't eased, so crypto is unlikely to rally against the trend on its own. I’m almost fully short on futures, not because I lack an opinion, but because I’m waiting for the market bias to give a clear direction first.
Do you think this is the start of a risk-off phase, or just another fake move on a thin Monday market?#Anthropic: New IPO Developments, Prospectus Expected to be Public in September Anthropic's IPO is clearly accelerating. The latest news shows that the company plans to publicly release the IPO prospectus after the US Labor Day, with a potential listing window around late September to early October. Previously, Anthropic secretly submitted an S-1 draft to the SEC in June, so if the prospectus is officially made public this time, it means the market will be able to see for the first time its revenue, costs, cash flow, and the actual level of AI computing power investment.
I believe what is truly worth watching is not "Anthropic is finally going public," but how much valuation premium the public market is willing to give to cutting-edge AI companies.
The market has even discussed a potential valuation close to $2 trillion, and the core supporting this pricing is the expectation of rapid future revenue growth. But Anthropic is also aggressively expanding its computing power, with a six-year computing power agreement signed with Nscale alone reaching $45 billion.
Therefore, after the prospectus is made public, the three numbers I am most focused on are: revenue growth rate, computing power costs, and free cash flow.
If growth can cover the huge capital investment, the high valuation still makes sense; if revenue grows quickly but requires continuously higher computing power costs, then the market is ultimately trading not profits but a very expensive long-term expectation.
This IPO by Anthropic may not only be about pricing itself but also the public market's first real pricing of the "cutting-edge large model" business.Iran attacked Jordan, US stocks first faltered, but BTC is still hovering around 78K.
I actually find this quite interesting.
Yesterday, the US and Iran exchanged fire again, pushing oil prices directly above $90, and the market immediately started worrying about one issue:
If oil prices keep rising, what about inflation?
Coincidentally, with the Fed turning hawkish, expectations for a rate hike in September were already heating up. Another surge in energy prices will only increase the market's interest rate pressure.
Logically, this environment is not very friendly to BTC.
But after BTC fell from around 81K to a low near 77K, it is still fluctuating around 78K.
This shows that although the market is scared, there hasn’t been obvious panic selling yet.
Right now, I’m watching two levels:
77K — whether the pullback here can hold.
80K — when BTC can reclaim this level.
If 77K holds, this wave of BTC looks more like a high-level consolidation.
If the Middle East situation continues to escalate and oil prices keep pushing up, and BTC can still hold 78K or even break above 80K again, then the strength of this market is worth serious attention.
Personally, I’m still bullish for now, not chasing short-term moves, waiting for BTC to take back 80K on its own.
The real signal this time might be hidden in "the war escalated, but BTC didn’t really drop".
$BTC #美伊军事对抗升级，原油供应风险升温 Brothers, August has ended, and BTC delivered a surprisingly good report card.📈
Starting from 62,000, it surged past 81,000 at its peak, closing near 78,400 at the end of the month, up 23% for the month, outperforming gold (9%) and the Nasdaq (4%), marking the strongest August performance since 2017.
🔥 Three driving forces: ETF inflows of $3.3 billion for the month, BlackRock IBIT absorbed $600 million in a single day; US Treasury bond repurchases doubled, a weaker dollar ignited a "devaluation trade"; shorts were collectively slaughtered, with about $9.7 billion liquidated over two weeks.
⚠️ At the end of the month, Powell turned hawkish, and BTC dropped from 81,000 back to 77,000. The probability of a rate hike in September is priced at 58%, and upcoming non-farm payroll data will decide whether this fire continues to burn or gets extinguished.
August ended well, but September is the real test.👇$BTC Inflation in Europe is once again sounding the alarm for the market.
Germany's consumer prices rose 2.9% year-on-year in August, higher than July's 2.8%, marking the highest level since April. Although this is below the market's original expectation of 3.1%, the trend itself is still noteworthy.
What I am more concerned about is not how high the 2.9% figure is, but the reasons behind it.
Energy prices have once again become the main driving factor. The Middle East situation has not eased significantly, and rising oil and gas prices are transmitting inflationary pressure to Europe. Similar situations have been seen in data previously released by France and Spain.
This puts the European Central Bank in a rather awkward position.
On one side is the pressure on economic growth, and on the other is the inflationary pressure brought by energy prices. If inflation continues to rise, monetary policy will naturally find it difficult to quickly shift toward easing.
According to the current official schedule, the European Central Bank has already raised interest rates once, and the market expects another rate hike on September 10. Traders have even started betting on further tightening of policy next year.
From the perspective of the crypto market, I think this signal cannot be ignored.
In the past, people were more accustomed to focusing on the Federal Reserve, but now Europe is also showing the chain of "energy price rise → inflation heating up → interest rate expectations turning hawkish."
If this situation continues to spread, the global liquidity environment may be more complex than imagined.
So, how BTC, ETH, and other risk assets move next cannot be judged by their own charts alone.
Oil prices, European inflation, the Federal Reserve, and the European Central Bank may be jointly determining the next phase of market sentiment. #BTC high-level tug-of-war between bulls and bears, gold linkage strengthens After BTC's rapid rebound, the real focus is no longer whether it can continue to rise, but whether there is enough incremental capital at the high level to complete turnover.
This round of BTC and gold linkage has clearly strengthened. Essentially, both share a similar trading logic behind them: market concerns about fiscal deficits, long-term inflation, and the decline in fiat currency purchasing power lead capital to seek scarce assets again. Gold is the traditional answer, while BTC increasingly resembles another choice in the digital age.
But the biggest short-term variable comes from the Federal Reserve.
After Waller released a hawkish signal, the market re-priced higher interest rate expectations. If the US dollar and US Treasury yields continue to strengthen, it will put pressure on gold and theoretically also be unfavorable for BTC. Therefore, the most valuable observation going forward is not how much BTC rises, but whether BTC can maintain relative strength when gold is under pressure.
If gold continues to adjust while BTC still holds key support or even breaks upward again, it indicates that there may be independent ETF funds and risk appetite supporting the crypto market internally; conversely, if BTC weakens again following gold, then the previous rise was more likely a resonance driven by macro liquidity.
High-level oscillation is not garbage time but a re-pricing of BTC's asset attributes.
The real question to answer in the next phase is: does the market continue to treat BTC as a high Beta risk asset, or does it start assigning it more "digital gold" pricing weight? This may determine the height of the subsequent market trend. Everyone is shouting that the bull market is back, but I'm thinking, are those who haven't sold really brave, or have they just not learned how to read the market yet? When that bearish candle dropped last night, what were you all panicking about? I'll give my conclusion first: this ETH drop is definitely not caused by ETF funds running away. Spot ETFs are still steadily seeing net inflows. The real trigger was the failed surge around 2534. The technical side lost momentum first, then the US-Iran situation heated up, oil prices surged, US Treasury yields stubbornly held high, and the market's bets on a September rate cut started to loosen. When risk capital pulls back, the chain of liquidations falls like dominoes, directly hitting 2386. Now back at 2430, in my view this is just a breather after overselling, not a reversal. The 2460 to 2490 range above has become a resistance zone, and the short-term selling structure is not yet complete. Don't rush to bottom-fish; at least wait for the structure to give a signal. Now about $BEAT, this one deserves even more attention. Its trading volume has shrunk faster than its price, down over 50%. What's more troublesome is that about 11.25 million tokens will unlock on September 1. Liquidity is already thin, and with supply hanging like a knife, if 0.12 doesn't hold, the selling pressure below could be denser than expected. At times like this, I don't talk about faith with it, I only talk about position management. Honestly, my own short position almost got stopped out yesterday, but I held on until the target zone. After taking profits, the first thing I did was not to add to the position, but to raise the stop loss. The meat is already at the mouth, so no Big news is here, everyone. September 1st is not just the day to go back to school, but also the time to close the monthly candle.
For an uptrend, usually after closing the monthly candle, BTC will surge and then pull back.
Moreover, according to historical statistics of the US stock market, early September tends to be strong with a high probability of a surge:
The reason is that after the US Labor Day holiday ends, traders return, market liquidity recovers, and some funds that had exited re-enter positions, pushing the US stock market to a short-term surge.
But in mid to late September, the probability of a surge followed by a pullback is even higher.
The reason is simple: in mid-September (usually around September 17-20), the Federal Reserve holds a major interest rate meeting, and the market often chooses to lock in profits and exit to avoid risk before the outcome is announced.
Also, at the end of the quarter (end of September), fund managers adjust their portfolios before earnings reports, tending to sell high-profit positions.
Since the US stock market has a high probability of surging and then pulling back, the risk of BTC crashing or sharply correcting is relatively low. It is more likely to follow the US stock market with initial volatility and a surge, breaking through the 820-830 resistance zone, possibly even surging to 840-860 and oscillating for a while before a big correction. I believe this scenario has a relatively high probability. DYOR $BTC Lately, many people have been asking whether Dogecoin has been forgotten by Musk. Watching it surge near 0.1U and then fall back, and seeing oneself buy in around 0.086 only to be deeply trapped, that feeling is indeed unpleasant. With a floating loss exceeding 260% displayed in the account, anyone would repeatedly weigh whether to cut losses. Actually, looking at the bigger picture, Bitcoin and other mainstream assets have performed well in this market cycle, but Dogecoin's weakness stands out conspicuously. Everyone has a simple expectation: as long as Musk mentions it on social media, even just posting an emoji, Dogecoin could instantly ignite. But the fact is, he has not only refrained from mentioning Dogecoin, he hasn't even mentioned the entire cryptocurrency sector, even though Tesla's balance sheet still holds Bitcoin. This deliberate avoidance indeed makes people wonder more. 🧐 Let's try to understand this from another angle. Musk's identity now is quite different from a few years ago; he is deeply involved in the U.S. government's efficiency reform efforts, and every move he makes is under the spotlight. At this point in time, publicly endorsing a crypto asset would not only bring regulatory troubles but could also embroil him in conflicts of interest. The days of casual posts and market celebrations are probably hard to replicate. Another detail worth noting is that Tesla holding Bitcoin is a fact, but this does not mean Musk will continuously endorse the entire crypto market. Corporate asset holdings and a founder's public endorsement are essentially two different things. His choice to remain silent may precisely indicate that he is deliberately maintaining a$BTC has never experienced a sustained one-sided strong trend in September-October of any midterm election year; the only difference is the magnitude of the pullback. When the market is mild, there is a slight correction of 3%-8%.
During fragile market and macro pressure phases, there can be deep, phased pullbacks exceeding 15%.
Many retail investors wonder: Why is it that in the midterm election years, market volatility systematically amplifies specifically in September and October?
Breaking down two fundamental core logics, all are macro principles agreed upon by institutions, with no subjective speculation:
First, the policy uncertainty premium of the midterm elections.
The U.S. midterm elections will rewrite the power structure of both houses of Congress, directly affecting subsequent fiscal policy, industrial policy, regulatory policy, and trade policy directions.
Before the results are finalized, the entire market is in a policy vacuum.
All major institutions and long-term funds will proactively reduce risk exposure, lower positions, and decrease aggressive bets.
Collective risk aversion by capital directly leads to a weakening of bullish momentum, making oscillations and pullbacks a phase norm.
Second, the widely recognized seasonal weakness effect of September in the U.S. stock market.
In the century-long seasonal statistics of the U.S. stock market, September is the month with the worst average returns and the highest probability of negative returns.
Behind this is a very fixed institutional behavior cycle:
During summer, institutions take vacations and trading is light, with many risks temporarily set aside; every September, institutions return en masse to start concentrated portfolio adjustments, quarterly rebalancing, and annual review rebalancing, while overlapping with the redemption windows of public and private funds.
The combined forces of concentrated selling pressure, portfolio adjustments and stock swaps, and risk repricing naturally suppress market trends.How much more do you want to say!
1. Trump says interest rates are too high
He wants the Federal Reserve to cut rates!
Cutting rates means more money in the market, more money for crypto speculation, which generally leads to price increases!
2. He also says he respects the Federal Reserve chair
Simply put, he won’t force them to cut rates immediately, avoiding making a scene and reducing the risk of major chaos.
3. He also talks about Iran and the oil in the Strait of Hormuz
Basically, throwing tough words at the Middle East!
If it’s just talk with no war → Bitcoin basically doesn’t react much
If it really escalates into war → oil prices rise, prices go up again, rate cuts become difficult, and Bitcoin tends to fall
This news is somewhat bullish for a rise, but it’s just a short-term hype, lively for a while but most likely will return to the original market...
The Middle East is a hidden bomb; if something really happens, it will backfire and suppress $TRUMP $BTC #特朗普称通胀迎来好消息 #OKX Expert
August BTC Review and September Outlook — Strategic Thoughts Amidst Mixed Bull and Bear Forces
In August, the Bitcoin market experienced a rollercoaster of "rise first, then fall." At the beginning of the month, it hovered around $64,000; mid-month, driven by multiple positive factors, it once broke through $80,000, hitting a three-month high. However, by the end of the month, under macroeconomic pressure, it quickly fell back below $78,000. This fluctuation was essentially a pulse rebound driven by "macro expectations + short squeeze," rather than a trend reversal.
---
I. Three Major Drivers of August's Rise
1. Improved Regulatory Expectations (Strongest Catalyst)
On August 20, Trump urged Congress to pass the CLARITY Act to establish clear regulatory rules for crypto assets, prompting BTC to break above $70,000. The SEC simultaneously proposed exempting some digital asset issuances from securities registration requirements. This policy shift was the core support for this rally.
2. US Treasury Repo and Weakening Dollar (Macro Support)
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen proposed expanding long-term Treasury repo operations, sparking market concerns about dollar depreciation and shifting funds toward alternative assets like Bitcoin. BTC once broke through $80,000, reaching a three-month high.
3. Continuous Inflows into ETFs (Real Money)
From August 17 to 28, the US spot Bitcoin ETF saw nine consecutive days of net inflows, totaling about $3.04 billion. Institutions like BlackRock became key buyers in this rebound.
---
II. Three Major Pressures Behind the End-of-Month Pullback
1. Fed Hawkish Signals (Biggest Negative Factor)
At the end of August, the Fed released hawkish signals, with the probability of a rate hike rising to 58%. BTC promptly plunged 5.7% from above $80,000 to $76,845. The shift in interest rate expectations directly suppressed risk asset valuations.
2. Temporary Reversal of ETF Flows
On August 28, the Bitcoin spot ETF recorded a net outflow of $201.9 million, ending the nine-day net inflow streak. Although the full week still saw a net inflow of about $924.5 million, the single-day outflow signal is worth caution.
3. Tariff Impact and Geopolitical Risks
Trump announced a 50% tariff on Canadian cars, raising concerns about an escalating trade war. Coupled with US military actions against Iran, geopolitical risks intensified risk-off sentiment.
---
III. September Trend Forecast
Short-term (1-2 weeks): Consolidation around $78,000
The late August pullback touched a low of $76,845, with technical oversold conditions needing repair. However, $78,670 is a resistance level from the May rally, making a breakout difficult. The short-term range is likely between $76,000 and $80,000, awaiting new directional catalysts.
Mid-term (September-October): Focus on Two Key Variables
· Fed September rate decision: If rate hike expectations continue to rise, BTC may retest $76,000 or lower; if expectations ease, it could challenge $80,000-$82,000 again.
· ETF fund flows: If institutional inflows resume steadily, BTC will have solid support; if outflows persist, rebound strength will be limited.
Extreme Scenario (Low Probability): 10x Research points out that if the macro environment continues to deteriorate, BTC may drop to around $55,000 before forming a cycle bottom.
---
IV. Strategic Thoughts
1. Follow the trend, don’t guess tops or bottoms: Trade near the edges of the $76,000-$80,000 range, avoid positions in the middle.
2. Closely watch macro catalysts: The Fed rate decision and ETF fund flows are the two most important indicators in September; control position size before direction is clear.
3. Strict stop-loss: Regardless of long or short, set hard stop-losses for each trade, limiting single-trade losses to within 5% of the account, using discipline to manage uncertainty.
---
The above is a personal review and strategic thought, not investment advice. The market carries risks; decisions should be made cautiously. $BTC $BTC THE ETF STORY IS ENTERING A NEW PHASE
Bitcoin's biggest test may no longer be attracting institutional attention.
It's proving that institutional demand can survive volatility.
After nine consecutive sessions of reported spot ETF inflows, the streak was interrupted by roughly $201.9M in outflows.
That number sounds bearish on the surface.
But I think the bigger picture deserves more attention.
A strong rally naturally creates profit-taking.
Investors who accumulated BTC at lower levels now have a reason to lock in gains. That selling isn't necessarily a rejection of Bitcoin's long-term value.
The important question is what happens after those sellers exit.
If fresh capital steps in and absorbs the supply, Bitcoin could be demonstrating something more meaningful than another short-term pump.
It could be showing that demand is expanding into a higher price range.
That's an important distinction.
A market becomes stronger when sellers can exit without completely destroying the structure.
It means there are buyers waiting underneath.
For $BTC, I'm watching the reaction around support more closely than the headline ETF number.
If Bitcoin holds its recent range, consolidates and gradually attracts fresh demand, the current weakness could simply be part of the market's normal price discovery process.
But if outflows continue while BTC keeps losing important support, that would tell a different story.
Then the market may need to reset expectations before another sustained move higher.
This is also why I don't think investors should treat ETF inflows as a simple buy signal.
Flows are one piece of the puzzle.
Price tells us how the market is responding to those flows.
Volume tells us how much participation is behind the move.
And liquidity tells us whether the market can absorb the pressure.
Put those together and the picture becomes much clearer.
Bitcoin doesn't need every institution to buy every day.
It needs the broader demand base to remain strong enough that profit-taking doesn't turn into a cascade.🚨 Trump has spoken: "We will hit them hard, there will definitely be a response."
Iran just launched missiles at the US base in Jordan, and Trump immediately clarified his stance on Fox News.
He said the US air defense system "let through a missile that wouldn’t hit any target," but intercepted all the others. But that’s not the main point. The key is the next sentence — "We will hit them hard."
A few hours ago, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard launched missiles and drones at the US base in Jordan. The cause was a US airstrike late on the 30th targeting Iran’s Larak Island, destroying two launch devices that were preparing to mine the Strait of Hormuz. Iran retaliated overnight, and now Trump added that "there will be a response." The cycle has already begun.
This is not just talk; it’s a real escalation of conflict. The AI video of Khark Island, the Larak Island airstrike, the missile attack on the Jordan base — the US-Iran tension is rapidly heating up. The Strait of Hormuz has been effectively blocked for nearly half a year, and if the conflict continues to escalate, there’s no short-term hope of reopening this global oil lifeline.
Brent crude oil has already climbed back above $90. Rising oil prices → increased inflation expectations → the Federal Reserve dares not ease → risk assets under pressure, this transmission chain still holds true for BTC.
The words "hit them hard" have already been said; now it’s about how it will be done. This game is far from over. 👇
Let’s discuss in the comments, how big do you think this wave of conflict will be? $BTC #BTC high-level oscillation, enhanced linkage with gold
BTC is currently maintaining a high-level oscillation, but what I believe is truly worth paying attention to now is not just whether it can break through $80,000, but the strengthening macro linkage between it and gold.
In the past, the market tended to define BTC as a high-volatility risk asset, while gold was considered a traditional safe-haven asset; the logic behind the two was not entirely consistent. However, as fiscal deficits, debt expansion, inflation, and monetary credit issues are repeatedly traded, a common pricing factor has begun to emerge behind BTC and gold: market concerns about fiat purchasing power and long-term fiscal discipline.
This is also why, even if the Federal Reserve's policy is hawkish in the short term, gold and BTC may still attract capital attention over a longer cycle. The difference is that gold has lower volatility and a more mature institutional allocation attribute; BTC has higher elasticity, so it tends to fall faster when liquidity tightens and rebound more fiercely when expectations improve.
Therefore, I would not simply interpret BTC's recent high-level oscillation as a bull fatigue. What really needs to be observed is: if gold continues to remain strong, and BTC can still hold key support under macro pressure, then their synchronous strengthening may not be just a coincidental correlation, but the market trading the same theme — a long-term re-pricing of the traditional monetary system.
But in the short term, BTC is still constrained by interest rates and liquidity. Gold can rise as a safe haven, but BTC may not always move in sync; this "same logic, different volatility" relationship is actually more worthy of continuous observation. $BTC The valuation framework of the crypto market is undergoing a fundamental transformation—from speculation on expectations to solid revenue validation.
Bitwise's Chief Investment Officer points out that, except for BTC, crypto assets will increasingly adopt the same metrics as stocks and bonds—revenue. Two major turning points are driving this shift. First, regulatory easing: the SEC lost the Ripple case, and with the appointment of a new chairman, token distributions of revenue to holders are no longer considered "illegal securities offerings." Second, on-chain protocol revenue data has become impressive enough. Hyperliquid uses 97% of its fees to repurchase and burn HYPE; in the past year, it generated $871 million in revenue, with a market cap of $13.46 billion, a valuation multiple of 15x. The Grayscale leaderboard is even more striking: PUMP generated $459 million in revenue, with a market cap of only $456 million, a valuation multiple close to 1x—many cash-flow-rich crypto assets have valuation multiples even in the single digits.
BTC is the exception; it has no cash flow and does not fit the price-to-earnings framework. It still follows the "digital gold" path, priced based on scarcity, decentralization, and macro narratives. Institutional target prices include Bernstein's $150,000 and Standard Chartered's range of $100,000 to $250,000.
In the future, protocols that can continuously generate revenue will be revalued, while purely narrative tokens face clearance. Revenue is becoming the hardest currency in the crypto world.
$BTC $ETH
#BTC高位震荡，与黄金联动增强
#嘉信理财拟新增SOL、AVAX与LINK #就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验 Employment data is being released intensively, putting Walsh's hawkish stance to the test
Entering September, what the market really needs to focus on is no longer "what Walsh said," but whether the upcoming employment data will support his policy logic.
At Jackson Hole, Walsh clearly reinforced his anti-inflation stance, emphasizing that inflation remains above the 2% target. If underlying inflation does not fall quickly enough, the Federal Reserve still has room for further action. After his speech, market expectations for a rate hike in September clearly increased.
But the biggest variable this week is coming: the U.S. August nonfarm payrolls will be released on Friday. The BLS confirmed the data will be published on September 4, and the market currently expects an increase of only about 50,000 jobs.
This means the market is entering a very delicate phase: inflation demands the Fed maintain a hawkish stance, but if employment continues to deteriorate, the cost of further rate hikes will rise rapidly.
If nonfarm payrolls are significantly stronger than expected, Walsh's hawkish framework will be supported by the data, and expectations for a September rate hike may be further strengthened. U.S. Treasury yields and the dollar could both rise again, putting valuation pressure on BTC and tech stocks.
But if employment continues to weaken sharply, market trading logic may quickly reverse—not because inflation concerns disappear, but because the Fed's dual mandate begins to face real conflict.
So the most important thing to watch this week is not just a single nonfarm number, but: when employment and inflation start pointing in opposite directions, which will Walsh prioritize?
This may be the true core of market pricing in September.So that's it, it's Trump again. Whenever this old man makes a move, the market trembles. The US military strikes Iran, the Strait of Hormuz heats up, oil prices surge, and risk assets habitually take a knee first. But to be honest, $BTC's performance this time isn't bad at all.
From 78,000 down to 77,000, it recovered the full thousand points. In the past, such a level of geopolitical negative news would have sent it straight to 75,000. There is indeed support below; it's not as fragile as imagined. ETH is a bit worse off, failing to hold 2,500, and now even 2,400 is precarious. Looking back at last year's high of 5,000, it really feels like a different world. The ETF funds have been strong, but when the tide recedes, they show no mercy.
The real drama isn't tonight's conflict, but the upcoming crypto legislation. That is the key to whether funds will re-enter the market. Once there is substantial progress, the market turning bullish could be just one big green candle away.
The US stock market is also suffering; the three storage stocks just bounced and were pressed down again. But the logic behind AI storage hasn't changed: short-term valuation cuts, but the long-term supply-demand gap remains. In my view, this kind of pullback is just a reversal to pick up passengers; whether you catch them depends on your courage.
SPCX is quite resilient, holding steady at 141 like Mount Tai. The valuation is high, but good things are never cheap. I'll be watching closely around 155; my target for this stock is very clear—200.
In this market, there's no need to rush. Geopolitical conflicts are noise; legislative progress is the signal. Maintain your positions, keep enough ammo, and wait for the wind to come. 🛡️
#BTC高位震荡，与黄金联动增强 There has been a clear recent inflow of funds into US spot crypto ETFs, and the market structure is changing: 🟠 $BTC → about $872 million 🔵 $ETH → about $795 million 🟣 $SOL → about $167 million ⚫ $XRP → about $102 million Total inflows are close to $1.94 billion. This is not just a set of impressive numbers. What’s truly noteworthy is that funds are gradually spreading from a single Bitcoin allocation to major crypto assets like $ETH, $SOL, and $XRP. This indicates that some institutional investors’ risk appetite is recovering, and there is a more distinct selective rotation within the market. Meanwhile, many traders are still waiting for the so-called “altcoin season confirmation.” 👀 But funds usually don’t wait for everyone to confirm before they start moving. If $BTC remains relatively stable and ETF funds continue flowing into mainstream assets, the market may be preparing in advance for the next phase. 📊 Don’t just watch prices now. Focus on: 🏦 ETF net flows 💰 Where the funds are actually going 🔄 Rotation from BTC → ETH → mainstream altcoins 📈 $ETH/$BTC relative strength 💧 Overall market liquidity changes Don’t chase market noise; track where the money is really going. 👀🔥 #BTC #ETH #SOL #XRP #CryptoETF #Altcoins 20x short position floating profit +255.05% (entry 69.19 → mark 60.36). Logic clarified: $AXTI USDT is not an ordinary token; it is a synthetic perpetual contract tracking Nasdaq AXTI (compound semiconductor substrate manufacturer).
Core mechanism: funding rate anchored + US stock market intraday gap. Data: average funding rate +0.0353%, longs pay shorts. US stock AXTI recent 52-week range $1.32–$143.16, accompanied by a $550 million April capital increase.
Crypto market open interest weighted rate turned negative (-0.0109%), 24h liquidation $144,000 with 89% longs. Shorting profits from US stock high volatility mapping + crypto longs deleveraging time value. $BTC $ETH #就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验 $ZAMA entry at 0.05757 → current price 0.04998, single trade +263.67%, 20x leverage amplifies the trend rather than luck.
Key data: On September 2 at 0:00 Beijing time, 27.958 million tokens unlocked, accounting for 4.0% of market cap, valued at about $14.8M. Historical backtesting is even harsher — average decline of -18.4% 14 days after 6 unlocks, worst -23.8% (June 2). Current price has retraced 23% from ATH $0.06514, with a single-day drop of -11.56% on August 25, and the trendline has broken.
Contradiction: Revolut launched to 70 million users (8/11) + Confidential RFQ public beta in September (100% fee buyback and burn) + FHE throughput 1040 TPS (H100 single node), fundamentals narrative is historically strongest. But August open interest keeps declining, Bybit funding rate turns negative, leveraged funds are retreating.
Logical closed loop: positive news realized = distribution window. Unlock day coincides with RFQ public beta, September is the watershed for supply and demand game. Current $0.05 is the Dutch auction clearing price = psychological center; if broken, look to $0.045 (EMA20/30 overlap zone). $BTC $ETH #就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验 In August, the A-share market saw volume shrink as the main theme, dropping directly from 800 billion to 500 billion, with brokers moving and immediately crashing the market.
After all the speculation, only Huawei Chain and robots still have some popularity, but even they are inconsistent.
This kind of market reminds me of trading $AVAX, where a positive news would cause a 15% surge, only to fall back the next day.
As the old stock market saying goes, in a low-volume environment, all sudden rallies are just playing tricks, and the crypto world is no different.
Looking at $LINK, it has been weaving around $14 for nearly a month, unable to go up or down, just like our pharmaceutical sector in a bear market.
If you watch it, it stays still; if you don't, it suddenly plunges sharply, treating all kinds of discontent.
I've learned to be smart now: whether stocks or crypto, as long as the market volume doesn't increase, I firmly won't add positions.
The only exception is $BTC. I placed a small base position at 59,000; if it drops, I treat it as dollar-cost averaging, and if it rises, I don't get greedy.
In August, I made only two trades: one small profit and one break-even, outperforming friends around me who are constantly fussing.
Remember, when the market lacks money, patience is worth more than anything. Wait for that volume surge and the bullish candle before going heavy; it's not too late.$UB experiences a surge driven by community hype, with overall network attention rapidly climbing and market optimism spreading. However, reviewing the market data shows that during the rally, capital inflow only lasts for a short period before large holders begin concentrated selling, and trading volume quickly shifts from expansion to contraction. Each rebound peak gradually lowers, with a large amount of trapped positions accumulating above. The bulls no longer have the strength to continue pushing upward, and the balance between bulls and bears has shifted substantially.
Entry price was 0.13518, current price is 0.12017, short position has gained +222.07% unrealized profit. The rally driven by hype is emotion-driven and lacks long-term fundamental support. After the heat subsides, the previously accumulated selling pressure will be released. Such tokens should be viewed objectively regarding the false appearance of rallies brought by hype. $BTC $ETH #就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验 U.S. President Trump said we should have the lowest interest rates globally. What impact will this have on the Federal Reserve meeting in September?
The Federal Reserve has statutory independence, and interest rates are decided by collective voting of the 12 FOMC members. Trump has no authority to directly order rate cuts or hikes.
Historically, Trump has publicly called for lower rates multiple times, but the Fed still makes decisions based on inflation data and does not simply comply with political demands. Especially since Waller just sent a hawkish signal at Jackson Hole, needing to defend the central bank's independent image, if inflation remains sticky, the Fed will not easily shift to easing just because of the president's remarks.
Trump's statements are a secondary variable and can only create short-term pulses. The real determinants of whether $BTC can break through 80,000 remain the nonfarm payroll and PCE inflation data.
Don't treat the president's remarks as a confirmed signal for rate cuts; it's easy to get trapped by a short-term spike followed by a pullback.
In summary: verbal pressure cannot change the Fed's fundamental rules; the September decision depends on data, not White House statements. Such remarks only amplify market volatility and will not directly rewrite policy outcomes.
$ETH $TRUMP
#就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验
#BTC高位震荡，与黄金联动增强 Recently, there has been a voice in the market asking whether Dogecoin has been forgotten by Musk. Watching DOGE fall back from above 0.1U, some tried to buy around 0.086, only to get trapped with a floating loss exceeding 260%. This feeling is indeed agonizing, especially against the backdrop of other cryptocurrencies strengthening, making the contrast particularly stark.
An intriguing detail is that Musk has recently not mentioned cryptocurrency at all, even though Tesla still holds $BTC on its books. This deliberate silence may be more thought-provoking than any statement. Some expect him to shout out picks like before, but the reality is that the market narrative has long shifted—employment data, Walsh's policy stance, and AI return validation are now the focus of current capital.
Rather than obsessing over one person's attitude, it's better to examine $DOGE's own position. It lacks new catalysts, and the linkage effect is weakening. The high-level oscillation of $BTC and its strengthened correlation with gold indicate that risk-off sentiment still dominates. Whether to cut losses now depends on your position size and risk tolerance, but at least hope should not be pinned on external calls.
Risk warning: The market is highly volatile, please assess risks rationally. This article does not constitute investment advice. $DOGE $BTC$NEAR No vision, can't hold on, this wave of profit is as thin as paper, but I love it to death.
Just finished lunch and checked the market, NEAR surged fiercely, but the volume didn't keep up, heavy on the bull trap. The number of buyers stepping in above is decreasing wave by wave, I judged this as a fake move and went short directly. The prettier the rebound, the more cautious you should be that it's a trap.
Looking now, the short position entered at 1.866, 1.866 has already reached here, +288.02% in hand. This profit is thick enough, others are chasing longs, I'm waiting for a pullback, the timing is right.
Don't get carried away with trading, close 80% of the short position to lock in profits first, move the stop loss of the remaining 20% to the entry price. Let profits run, but first make sure to secure your gains. Don't fear earning less, fear giving back what you've earned.
Panic comes from lack of planning, losses come from overthinking. The premise of compounding is staying alive, the shortcut to getting rich often leads to zero. Don't be greedy for the last bite, now is not the time to chase. Wait for the next cycle structure to appear, the market is not short of opportunities.
$XRP $ZEC 50x short $ENA, floating profit 297.17%. Entry at 0.15883, marked at 0.14939. The high-yield stablecoin narrative cools down, and capital starts to calculate carefully.
Logically, Ethena generates USDe yield through hedging and derivatives basis; when market volatility and funding rates decline, the yield sources are compressed, staking attractiveness decreases, and token demand naturally weakens. The rebound at 0.15883 failed, structurally moving downward; shorting follows the trend rather than betting on direction.
The background involves risk budgeting from L2 and re-staking hotspots diversion, with ENA on-chain activity and token holding growth slowing. On the contract level, shorts dominate, and funding rates do not support longs. Down nearly 6%, holding to observe, no additions, no show. $BTC $ETH #就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验 Last week, MicroStrategy bought 4,600 BTC at an average price of 80,000, and now MicroStrategy holds 840,000 BTC at an average price of 75,400.
This explains two logics:
The first logic: many people crazily chased longs at 80,000, so shorting at 80,000 last week was reasonable.
The second logic: MicroStrategy's cost is 75,400, so bottom-fishing and going long in the 75,000-75,800 range at the beginning of September is reasonable.
Combined with Justin Sun's Twitter post hinting that $BTC will surge, and CZ Zhao Changpeng stating at the Hong Kong conference that Bitcoin reaching 1 million dollars won't take long.
My personal judgment is that a new bull market is about to arrive.
#就业数据密集公布，沃什政策立场受检验
#BTC高位震荡，与黄金联动增强
$ETH $OKB