Orbit Post Sitemap
TRX Treasury bought 148,000 coins, but the price only rose 0.5% in 24h
$TRX Treasury is buying, yet the price only increased by 0.5%—I am directly bearish at this level.
This morning, discussions about the TRON ecosystem circulated on Twitter, with Justin Sun being mentioned; TRON INC. Treasury increased its holdings by 148,000 TRX, bringing total holdings to 717.1 million TRX. After the event, the price only climbed from 0.3364 to 0.3369, +0.15%, barely making a splash.
Three logics are suppressing the price. First, it only rose 0.5% in 24h, with the price stuck at the 0.3376 ceiling without breaking through; second, the daily RSI is 45.8, neutral to slightly weak, MACD has been showing a death cross near the zero line for 6 days, with the green bars flattening; third, sentiment is off, with a volume ratio to the 30-day average of only 0.828, fear-greed index at 67 leaning toward greed, large coin long-short account ratio averaging 2.44, breadth 28/63, median price change -1.9%, indicating money is contracting.
Resistance above: 0.3376 (24h high)
Support below: 0.3309 (Bollinger lower band)
Current price 0.337, enter short directly; exit with loss if it breaks back above 0.3376, first target 0.3309.
Watching the market, follow me, next signal will come without rush or delay.
$TRX $BTCUS nonfarm payroll data exceeded expectations, and the probability of a Fed rate cut in October has dropped to around 20%. With Bitcoin and Ethereum pulling back after a rally yesterday, the bottom is rising. As the US midterm elections approach, they will provide support to the Middle East situation, so there is no risk of losing control in the short term. Bitcoin has been fluctuating around 82,600-87,200 in the past week. It is likely to push towards 90,000 or 100,000 only if it stabilizes above 87,000; breaking below 83,000 could test 70,000. Therefore, the current pattern remains sideways. It is recommended to buy Bitcoin on dips near 84,000 and sell on rallies near 86,000; for Ethereum, buy on dips near 2,670 and sell on rallies near 2,740, repeatedly capitalizing on the oscillating market. #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 #美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备 One confirmation and finality are not the same thing.
After a transaction enters a block, wallets usually show success quickly, but a brief chain reorganization can still cause it to leave the canonical chain and be re-mined. The rollback cost only becomes significant as subsequent proofs and finality form. Small daily payments can accept fewer confirmations, while high-value settlements should wait for stronger certainty and set thresholds based on application risk. Interfaces that translate "included," "confirmed," and "finalized" all into green checkmarks may mislead users into thinking there is no difference. The key to understanding $ETH as a settlement asset is not that all transactions are instantly irreversible, but that certainty increases as the protocol progresses. Exchanges, bridges, and institutions set different posting waits, which is not necessarily inefficiency but risk management for reorganizations. Speed and certainty should be expressed in layers; the more important the funds, the more you cannot rely solely on the first success notification.
Payment scenarios should also distinguish between the payee having seen the transaction and the funds being truly irreversible. Delivering high-value goods in advance actually assumes the risk of reorganization and double-spend windows. The larger the amount and the more irreversible the delivery, the higher the waiting standard should be; the same green status should not correspond to all real business risks.$SAND continues to short! It has risen by 20% in the past dozen hours, but looking at the real moves of smart money in the backend, they are completely operating in the opposite direction.
At midnight, there were 543 bulls versus 232 bears. Now that the price has risen, the bulls not only did not follow up, but quietly withdrew 19 positions, while the bears on the other side suddenly increased by 100 people, with the total position soaring directly to 6.68 million U, $WLFI Is it worth holding? Is USD1 safe? Expert In-depth Explanation: The investment risk of the WLFI token is extremely high, while the USD1 stablecoin has decent technical security but faces significant centralization and political risks. Experts generally believe these two products are deeply tied to the political fate of the Trump family, and their risks far exceed those of ordinary crypto assets. 1. WLFI Token: A High-Risk Political Concept Investment The price performance and governance structure of the WLFI token reveal its extremely high investment risk. First, the price has continued to plummet, repeatedly hitting new lows. Since its issuance, WLFI has been falling more than 65% from its annual high, breaking below its all-time low of $0.056 in May 2026. Its price movement is closely tied to Trump's political outlook. Analysts warn that if the Republicans lose the election, the token could face even greater selling pressure. Second, there are serious governance and conflicts of interest. The project team was exposed for selling an additional 5.9 billion WLFI tokens to private investors without sufficient disclosure. At the same time, 75% of the net proceeds from token sales flowed to entities linked to the Trump family. The project team also borrowed 5 billion WLFI tokens worth $429 million as collateral to borrow over $75 million USDC. This move drained the USDC liquidity pool on its lending platform, preventing other users from withdrawing and raising concerns about bad debts and contagion risks. On-chain analysis shows that only four wallet addresses controlled about 40% of voting rights,Big Brother Maji is back to accumulating again. $BTC $ETH
After today's operations, the position size has been rebuilt to $145 million, and it's still all long positions. Don't just focus on his small coins for entertainment; what really matters is his position structure.
BTC 290 coins, about $24.52 million; ETH 37,100 coins, about $99.43 million; HYPE 177,000 coins, about $15.54 million; PUMP about 1.025 billion coins, about $5.65 million.
The four long positions add up to $145 million, currently with an unrealized loss of about $1.027 million, and the margin usage rate is already 83.76%.
What's more interesting is that he didn't just blindly add all day today. From midnight to afternoon, he first reduced BTC, ETH, and $HYPE, with a net loss of about $171,000, then gradually rebuilt the positions, adding 53 BTC alone.
My understanding is that Maji's core strategy is very clear now: BTC and ETH form the main holdings, while small coins are for flexibility. The direction can be wrong, and positions can be adjusted, but the main line never changes.
Of course, a $145 million position looks fierce, and an unrealized loss of over $1 million is real money. A large position doesn't necessarily mean being right; it only shows he's still willing to bet on this direction.This market situation is really a bit frustrating. $BTC $ETH
#US September nonfarm payrolls increased by only 29,000, unemployment rate rose to 4.2%
PCE was below expectations, nonfarm payrolls were poor at only 29,000, US stocks all rose, but BTC and ETH fell after the good news, as if they were deliberately waiting for the news to trap those chasing longs.
Let's first talk about the recent macro environment.
US August PCE year-on-year was 3.4%, core PCE was 3.0%, both overall lower than the market's previous concerns. The subsequently released September nonfarm payrolls increased by only 29,000, unemployment rate rose to 4.2%, wages grew only 0.1% month-on-month, and July and August employment numbers were revised down by a total of 60,000.
Inflation cooling and weakening employment—both sets of data reduce the market's worries about further Fed rate hikes.
Therefore, US stocks rose after the nonfarm release, with the Nasdaq rising especially noticeably.
But for the crypto market, weak data does not only have the interpretation of "good news."
If employment is only moderately cooling, it indeed benefits liquidity expectations; but if employment continues to weaken while consumption and corporate profits also start to come under pressure, the market will shift from "the Fed won't raise rates" to "is the economy going to have problems?"
Now BTC and ETH have not maintained the post-news rally, indicating that the crypto community has not yet fully believed the first narrative.
BTC is currently around 84,600, with a 24-hour high of 87,239 and a low of 83,826.
The most obvious problem in this movement is that the upward breakout was not sustained. Just a little space opened above 87,000, and the price was immediately pushed back below 85,000, suggesting a possible false breakout in the short term.
However, BTC has not completely deteriorated.
84,000–83,800 remains the current first key support. As long as this is not effectively broken, the overall movement can still be seen as a high-level oscillation within the 84,000–87,200 range, rather than a confirmed new round of decline.
For BTC to regain strength, the first step is to reclaim 85,500–86,000, then it can qualify to retest 87,000–87,200.
If the next attempt to break 87,200 still fails to hold, it means selling pressure above remains; but if it can break through and hold on a pullback, it truly opens the way to 88,000 and even higher levels.
Conversely, if 83,800 is lost and the rebound cannot recover, the short-term structure will weaken, with the next supports at 82,000 and then the 80,000 round number.
On the funding side, BTC spot ETFs have maintained slight net inflows in the past two days, indicating traditional funds have not fully withdrawn, but the inflow intensity has clearly cooled compared to the previous phase.
So BTC now looks like it has some capital support but temporarily lacks incremental buying power to break upward.
Looking at ETH, the situation is somewhat weaker than BTC.
ETH is currently around 2,682, with a 24-hour high of 2,768 and a low of 2,646. After failing to break 2,780–2,800 earlier, the price fell back below 2,700, indicating that resistance in this area remains effective.
ETH spot ETFs have recently seen continuous net outflows, forming a clear contrast with BTC's slight net inflows.
This is why, facing the same weak nonfarm data and rising US stocks, BTC can still hold above 84,000, while ETH repeatedly falls below 2,700: the market's incremental funds currently favor BTC, and ETH has not yet regained dominance.
In the short term, ETH should first watch 2,645–2,670.
This is both near the 24-hour low and the last relatively clear support zone in the current rebound structure. As long as it holds, the price may still rebound to 2,700 and 2,720–2,740.
But 2,720–2,740 has now changed from support to the first rebound resistance. ETH must reclaim 2,740 to have a chance to retest 2,780–2,800.
The real reversal of weakness depends on an effective breakthrough and hold above 2,800. Before that, ETH's rise is better seen as a recovery after a decline, not the start of a new trend.
If 2,645 is effectively broken, the next support to watch is 2,600; if 2,600 is lost, the market may continue to seek lower support.
Next, we need to observe the linkage between BTC and ETH.
If BTC holds 83,800 and returns to 86,000, but ETH still cannot hold 2,740, it indicates ETH's relative weakness will continue.
If BTC breaks below 83,800, then ETH's 2,645 will likely continue to be under pressure.
Only if BTC breaks above 87,200 again and ETH reclaims 2,800 can it be said that the liquidity expectations brought by this weak nonfarm data have truly transformed into an upward trend in the crypto market.
Now entering the weekend, with US stocks and ETFs suspended, the crypto market lacks incremental funds from traditional markets, making prices more prone to repeated spikes at key levels.
So even if there is a sudden surge or drop over the weekend, one should not judge by a single candlestick; at least observe whether the breakout can hold.
Babala's 2,740 short position has already taken partial profit, with the remaining position mainly watching 2,645.
My overall current judgment is: BTC remains in consolidation, ETH is relatively weak, macro news is temporarily positive, but prices have not yet confirmed a bullish trend.
When good news comes out but prices can't rise, it is often more worrisome than no good news; but as long as key supports are not truly broken, one should not prematurely label the consolidation as a major downtrend. $ZEC is still not at the bottom yet. It has been gradually falling from 1695, then there was a sharp spike down to 1270. This kind of "dull knife cutting flesh + sudden bleeding" chart clearly shows the main force repeatedly testing the support depth below, while also trying to blow out high-leverage long positions.
Now the price has rebounded to 1315, and the MACD just started to show a tiny red bar below zero. This is only a technical correction after a sharp drop and does not represent a trend reversal at all.
There is heavy resistance at 1400 and 1500, where a lot of trapped positions are stuck.
Since it’s not enough, what’s next?
First, absolutely do not heavily buy the dip. The current spike down is just the first wave of intimidation. The main force is likely to repeatedly spike around 1300, or even push below 1270 to blow out the last wave of leverage.
Second, patiently wait for the right side. If you want to buy, at least wait for a second test of the bottom without breaking 1270, or a volume breakout above 1400. Only then consider buying spot in batches. Entering now is just fueling the manipulative whales.
Third, if you’re itchy-handed, look for opportunities to short. As long as it rebounds with low volume to the 1380-1400 range and stalls, I will short along the trend to capture profits from the downward continuation, with a stop loss set at 1450.
The overall market is currently pressured by macro data, and privacy coins like ZEC find it hard to have an independent rally. Don’t catch falling knives before it’s fully bottomed. $ETH continues to short! Smart money bulls are orderly retreating.
Three days ago, there were 1,999 smart money bulls going long; now only 1,732 remain, a decrease of 267, with nearly 90 leaving daily; long positions dropped from 1.44 billion to 1.18 billion, with about 80 million U liquidity withdrawn daily.
The profit situation of the remaining bulls is also worsening, with the profit ratio falling from 77% to 62%.
This rhythmic exit is not retail emotional selling but large funds systematically reducing positions at the high level. Bulls are withdrawing in batches, continuing to maintain a bearish outlook, hold your short positions well.
⚠️This is only a personal market observation and does not constitute investment advice#美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% $PONS had a peak single-day revenue of 9M in early September, but now it's down to just 1.3M, a direct plunge of 85%. The coin price also dropped from 0.95 to 0.42. However, compared to the revenue decline, the coin price still seems to have room to fall further.
My judgment remains unchanged: $PONS, as the leader on this wave of RH, will have a second wave later, but it will likely take a few months of consolidation in between. No need to rush to bottom-fish; first, see if the revenue can stop falling. Also, keep an eye on BTC's performance—if BTC can't hold steady, all altcoins are pointless. So if you want to buy in, I suggest doing it in batches. $SOL doubled from the year's low and is now waiting for a catalyst
SOL is currently priced around 119, with a recent high of 124.95. Looking at the moving averages, MA5, MA10, MA20, and MA30 are all aligned bullishly, and the price is above all these averages. The trend is intact, but since it’s hugging the MA10, it indicates that after a +102% rise from the year's low, the short-term is taking a breather.
What truly supports SOL isn’t the candles on the chart, but two external factors:
Spot SOL attracted about $264 million in inflows in a single month, with six consecutive days of net inflows.
The October Alpenglow upgrade rollout plus ETF approval are catalysts on the table.
Institutions project a 2026 price range of $128–178, meaning the current 119 is still some distance from the "consensus target," but it’s not cheap either.
Don’t just look at the positives. SOL’s nature is that once bullish leverage stacks up, it gets flushed: back in June this year, the price retraced to 72.9, wiping out about $4.9 billion in long leverage alone. This kind of coin rises fast and deleverages fast.
119 is neither a top nor a bottom; it’s the market hesitating before the two catalysts in October arrive. A real breakout above 125 would confirm trend continuation, while a drop below 114 would indicate the buying pressure in this rebound is fading.
Don’t chase the highs; wait for the Alpenglow upgrade and ETF approval milestones before making moves. $WLD After the stop loss, I did not continue watching the market and did not enter again.
My ID's viewpoint
WLD daily chart shows a rebound wave, currently building a small middle pivot at a high level, which belongs to an uptrend continuation. Entry: Wait for a minor level pullback that does not break below the middle pivot ZD, and consider going long after a stabilization signal appears. Stop loss: Set below 0.4612 (21-day moving average); breaking this level signals the end of this rebound phase.
Chan Theory Structure
At the daily level, the rebound started from the low point 0.2260, with a previous high at 0.7229. After this rebound, a small daily middle pivot is forming. ZG is around 0.6117, ZD at 0.5311. Two possible follow-up scenarios: a minor level pullback holds above ZD, forming a third buy, continuing to challenge the previous high 0.7229; or a drop breaks through ZD directly, damaging the rebound structure and returning to deep consolidation.
Wyckoff Volume-Price Observation
During this rally phase, trading volume has significantly increased, showing strong capital inflow willingness. After the surge, consolidation occurs with gradually shrinking volume on the K-line, and the pullback selling pressure is not large, indicating a consolidation phase in the uptrend without a high-volume long bearish distribution. Currently, it oscillates within the middle pivot, waiting for capital to choose an upward breakout.
Key Observation Points
Focus on the recent high at 0.6117; if volume supports holding this level, bulls will continue to exert strength; if multiple attempts fail to break through and consolidation time lengthens, watch for a pullback testing the lower edge of the middle pivot. DriftFDN, which was stolen for about 296 million USD, has started compensation
Compensation rules announced on October 1: For every 1 USDT lost, you can receive 1
$DFX
Calculated at an exchange rate of 0.0578 USDT per token, only 5.78% of the loss amount can be recovered
Looking at the details of this theft, it’s basically the crypto version of "Infernal Affairs"
According to information disclosed by Drift, the attacker started planning in the fall of 2025, impersonating a quantitative trading company and contacting the team at industry conferences
Discussing strategies, integration, meeting offline multiple times, even depositing over 1 million USD in real money into Drift. They acted more seriously than actual partners
At the same time, they pre-issued a CVT, repeatedly trading back and forth in a pool with little liquidity, pushing the price to about 1 USD
After building trust, they tricked the multi-signature authorization, took over management rights, added their issued CVT to the collateral list, and relaxed risk control restrictions
Finally, they deposited 500 million CVT, letting the system calculate collateral value based on this price, then withdrew real assets like JLP, USDC, etc.
Today's scammers are really clever, using 1 million USD as bait to set up the attack Evernorth plans to debut on Nasdaq on October 8, pushing the tokenization model of treasury in the US stock market to $XRP. From the initial Bitcoin treasury precedent, to Ethereum following suit, and now the rapid replication of mainstream tokens, the channel between traditional US stock capital and on-chain native assets is being rapidly expanded.$QNT direction seems consistent, but the volume contraction shows no clear stance
$QNT 24h +8.56%, current price 258.89. Both 1-hour and 4-hour structures are relatively strong, but the current trading volume is only 0.32 times the average volume of the previous 20 bars. The direction is consistent, but participation hasn’t kept up, which is exactly the most debatable point right now.
Price levels are more honest than adjectives. The current price is about 13.24% above the 1-hour support at 224.61 and about 4.29% below the resistance at 270. Putting these two distances together helps clarify which side requires more evidence. Looking only at the price change can easily mistake the space already traveled as if it hasn’t started yet.
Volume does not back the price movement: the current 1-hour volume is only 0.32 times the average volume of the previous 20 bars. Low volume can also move prices quickly, but sustainability must be proven by the next phase of the market. A single touch or a long candlestick is not enough to draw conclusions.
It’s easier to understand this phase as an equipment acceptance test: running without load doesn’t count as completion; stability under boundary conditions gives weight to conclusions. Let the key levels provide results first, then discussing direction will be more honest. Do you think consistent direction is more important, or that the volume contraction will cause this move to quickly lose momentum? The market is volatile; the above is only market observation and does not constitute investment advice. This is Crypto Bull Talk.CPI exceeded expectations, but BTC plunged? Bulls were "stabbed in the back" by "inflation"
Tonight, the US CPI rebounded year-on-year, with stubborn core data completely shattering the market's hopes for "cooling inflation." According to the old logic: hot inflation → sustained tightening → liquidity contraction → gold and $BTC should fall. But it once surged before the market opened, confusing many.
The key is after the US stock market opened. US Treasury yields soared sharply, indicating the market did not stay at the first level of "hot data" but moved to the second level: real interest rates and dollar repatriation. Crude oil oscillated at high levels, combined with the peak of US bond issuance, investors demanded higher risk premiums. Long-term bonds were sold off, the dollar strengthened, and interest-free assets like gold and crypto assets were the first to be bloodied. BTC and ETH broke short-term support; essentially, the high interest rate environment suppresses risk appetite.
Therefore, today is not about the fundamentals of the crypto market worsening, but the main trading theme shifting from "rate cut speculation" to "real interest rate pricing." Short-term focuses on data, long-term on fiscal policy and supply-demand. If the dollar falls later, risk assets will have room to breathe; if bond issuance pressure does not ease, rebounds will still be sold off. The market is trading not the CPI itself, but the more expensive dollar.Price is slipping down, but on-chain activity is heating up—this kind of divergence seen with DOGE often signals a market bottom.
The 7-day average of active addresses is rising, indicating that people are taking action at the current price level: opening new wallets, transferring their first DOGE, trying out transfers, and experiencing payments. Users entering at low prices have a healthy cost structure and a stable holding mindset. They are not chasing highs but building positions, reserving "fresh blood" for the next market cycle.
The value of this signal lies in reflecting real demand. Prices can be influenced by short-term funds, but the number of addresses is hard to fake—each new address represents a genuine download, registration, and transfer. When more people enter during quiet times, chips shift from short-term traders to holders willing to wait. This turnover is precisely the accumulation process at the bottom.
Of course, a single indicator is not enough to confirm a reversal. The rise in address count needs to be cross-verified with signals like increased volume and net outflows from exchanges; otherwise, it might just be temporary on-chain noise. But at least one thing is certain: the user base is expanding, and the network’s capillaries are thickening.
For an asset like $DOGE, which relies on community and payment scenarios, user growth is the most solid foundation. No one can predict when the market will start, but the foundation is already being laid. #美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备 Releasing up to 100 million barrels from reserves while simultaneously withdrawing the diesel export ban: The US energy maneuver puts both "supply security" and "face" on the table
The White House's latest move is quite contradictory: first announcing an emergency release of 100 million barrels from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), then quietly abandoning the draft to "restrict diesel exports"—seemingly caught in a tug-of-war, but actually pressed down by reality.
The oil release is because US inland distillate inventories (diesel/heating oil) have dropped to a five-year low, crucial for farm harvesting, truck freight, and Northeast winter heating; Middle East risk aversion + Gulf hurricanes + refinery maintenance cause oil prices to spike, affecting midterm votes first. Releasing 100 million barrels helps suppress WTI, supplies refineries with raw materials, and prevents voters from complaining about "expensive fuel."
But the "diesel export ban" was overturned as soon as it was proposed: the US is a major finished fuel exporter, with Houston docks shipping liquid fuels daily to Latin America and Europe. A real ban would cause refinery inventory buildup, crack spreads to collapse, and allies (especially Europe) to protest, with Texas energy interests rebelling first. So abandoning the ban = protecting the industry chain, releasing oil = protecting public opinion.
Translation for ordinary people:
Don't expect big gasoline price drops, don't expect diesel shortages to halt production; the US goal is "no domestic supply cuts, no overseas fallout, and oil prices not hitting 90."
Energy security has never been just "having oil," but a four-variable equation of how much to release, how much to ban, who to sell to, and who to appease. Washington's answer this time: reserves can be tapped, exports should not be touched; votes need warming, Wall Street should not be angered.
$BTC $ETH BTC Long Position Plan:
* Existing: 0.0596 BTC @ 84,556
* 84,050: +0.04 BTC
* 83,650: +0.06 BTC
* 83,250: +0.10 BTC
* 82,900: +0.10 BTC
* 82,650: +0.09 BTC
Total left-side position: approximately 0.45 BTC
Average entry price for all executed orders: approximately 83,350
Risk Control:
* 1H candle closes below 82,580: stop loss
* Stop loss near 82,580 results in approximately $346 loss
* If executed around 82,300–82,400, loss is approximately $430–470
Profit Expectations:
* 85,000: approximately $742 profit
* 85,700: approximately $1,057 profit
* 87,000: approximately $1,641 profit
* 90,000: approximately $2,990 profit
Risk-Reward Ratio:
Stop loss at 82,580, first target at 85,700, about 1:3
Core Logic: Gradually accumulate in the 82.5k–85.7k range, with heavier positions closer to the lower boundary; admit mistake if it breaks below the lower boundary, consider adding positions on the right side if it breaks above the upper boundary. Lick a little every day, small position, take profits when you see good gains. Never go big, because going big might lead to zero.
Now every time I open a short position at a high point, I worry about liquidation. It's really about altcoins because after being doubled by altcoins twice, then pulled 5 times higher on the short side, I've been crushed twice. So now whenever I short altcoins, I shrink the interface a bit to check the historical highest point. If the forced liquidation price is within half of the historical high, I get very anxious inside, afraid it will hit me suddenly. Small positions, go hard! $NIGHT Why is the BTC correction in this cycle relatively shallow? Much smaller than the previous 70%+ corrections?
In the early cycles, the market was mainly composed of retail investors, crypto-native funds, and miners. After the price rose, profit-taking was concentrated, and there were insufficient new buyers, making it easy for selling pressure to trigger continuous liquidations.
Since BTC was officially included in ETFs in 2024, the capital structure in this cycle has become more complex. Spot ETFs, asset management institutions, corporate funds, and more mature market makers have increased potential buyers. Their behavior typically manifests as:
1️⃣ Including BTC in long-term asset allocation, reducing the concentration of short-term selling;
2️⃣ Entering the market through ETFs and custody systems, alleviating the previous "insufficient funds within exchanges" constraint;
3️⃣ Rebalancing in batches during pullbacks, unlike retail investors who rely on emotional trading;
4️⃣ Managing risk with futures, options, and basis trading, reducing one-sided spot market dumps.
This changes the slope of price declines. Sellers still exist, but the selling pressure in this cycle is more likely to be met with buyers, so the price does not immediately plunge over 70%, but first forms a significant correction between 40% and 60%.#The US-Iran situation remains tense, and the G7 will release up to 100 million barrels of reserves. Geopolitical friction in the Middle East continues to escalate, with market concerns over potential disruptions to navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, rapidly increasing the risk to crude oil supply. Against this backdrop, the G7 announced a joint release of up to 100 million barrels of strategic petroleum reserves, with a release period lasting up to four months. Diesel will be prioritized in the early phase to directly hedge against the current shortage of refined oil products. After the announcement, oil prices quickly plunged intraday, and the geopolitical premium noticeably retreated in the short term.
However, this reserve release is an emergency backstop measure that can only alleviate short-term panic and cannot fundamentally resolve supply risks. If the conflict escalates again and shipping through the strait is obstructed, even more reserves will struggle to fully offset the impact of crude oil supply cuts. The overall direction of oil prices ultimately depends on whether direct military confrontation occurs between the US and Iran.
For the global macro and crypto markets, if oil prices continue to rise, inflation will rebound again, disrupting the Federal Reserve's rate cut schedule and putting pressure on risk assets. Conversely, if this round of reserve release can stabilize energy prices, it will help ease inflation expectations.
Two key signals to watch going forward: whether tensions between the US and Iran further escalate, and whether oil prices can hold key support levels. Geopolitical market volatility is extremely strong and expectations may reverse at any time. $BTC $ETH $ZEC BTC pushed above $86K, but the real signal is whether buyers can defend the higher range after the excitement fades. A breakout can attract attention. Acceptance is what proves conviction. That’s the part I’m watching. 🧠₿ Are we seeing real demand — or just momentum chasing price?$PONS dropped from 0.99 to 0.43 now, a decline of about 56.57%, FDV 295 million
I have already prepared myself mentally for an 80% drop from the high point
At that time, the price was 0.198, FDV 135 million
After all, buybacks can't pump the price, they just amplify imagination and increase expectations
Otherwise, the neighbor STONK earns 500,000 daily, much higher and also does automatic buybacks, so why has it now dropped below a 200 million market cap?
Making money is really hard 🥹
PONS will pump, but will it be after those of us who bought in halfway down have seen it drop several times?
Below 0.4, even below 0.3, will I start dollar-cost averaging? I’m not sure
If it really drops 80%, then my $30,000 principal will be left with just a few thousand dollars, which is basically the same as zero, so should I still build a position?
Fortunately, all the money I have left is locked up, keeping my hands in check, otherwise this loss would be huge
The above is just sharing my mental journey, not investment advice, DYORIs the good news fully priced in, meaning bad news ahead?
September nonfarm payrolls increased by 29,000, and the CME's probability of a rate hike in October dropped to around 22%. Logically, the crypto market should be taking off.
However, the 10-year US Treasury yield has returned to around 5.26%, a multi-decade high, indicating the market doesn't believe the Fed is in a hurry to raise rates but also doesn't believe inflation has come down.
The good news is $BTC has already risen in advance, with this dip still near $84K.
Personally, I think it's hard for $90K to break out with volume before the CPI release on October 14, or in other words, this rebound will likely top out around $90K.📊 The $BTC holding structure is changing
Some BTC holders who bought at high levels have started to reduce their positions, especially funds that entered during the previous upward phase and are currently at a floating loss.
🔹 1–2 year holding cost: about $96K
🔹 6–12 month holding cost: about $90K
🔹 Current BTC price: about $87.3K
From the on-chain holding structure, buyers who entered during the recent pullback phase tend to continue holding, while funds with high-cost bases are selling more.
👀 Next, focus on the supply pressure around $90K and the support strength between $85K–$87K.
The market is undergoing a reshuffle of chips; short-term volatility may increase, so monitoring capital flow is more important than a single candlestick.
#G7OilReserveRelease #USNFPDataCools #BTCETHETFOutflows #BTCAttention everyone, do not go long! Four major logics:
1. Strong non-farm payrolls in September, rising rate hike expectations, and bill obstacles should have caused a drop, but the price was pulled from 74,900 to 87,300 on news of the crypto bill being reintroduced, washing out the shorts, indicating main force control.
2. This October's non-farm payrolls weakened significantly, combined with Middle East easing and Fed dovishness, all positive factors, but the market had already risen in advance, with many retail investors chasing longs. Most likely, good news will lead to a drop, as the main force dumps to harvest longs.
3. Since the rise from 63,000, shorts have basically cleared, and longs have clustered. Clearing the board: only 2.5 billion above 91,000, while below 82,600/80,600/76,800 there are over 10 billion in long liquidation positions, giving the main force stronger motivation to harvest downwards.
4. Coinbase data: BTC profit-taking hits a new yearly high, spot demand decreased by 170,000 coins in 30 days, speculative futures increment nearly exhausted, institutions likely taking profits at highs.
The market repeatedly disrupts expectations, approaching the annual turning window, with a high probability of a sell-off. Firmly bearish for the past 10 days, holding this view until 10.12.
BTC targets: 82,600 → 78,800 → 68,800 → 63,800
ETH and altcoins under simultaneous pressure, none spared in the avalanche.
After this drop is realized, a quality bottom-fishing opportunity will come, patiently waiting for the script to unfold
Highlights in the past 24 hours include Bitcoin's reversal after approaching 87,000 USD, along with more than 433 million USD in liquidated positions. Meanwhile, ETF fund flows are mixed, and monetary policy signals continue to impact investor sentiment.
Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF fund flows are mixed
According to preliminary data for the week of 9/28–10/2: Bitcoin ETFs recorded net inflows of 82.9 million USD.
Ethereum ETFs saw net outflows of 118 million USD. Solana ETFs attracted about 800,000 USD. The level of yield is not the answer to asset prices; the cycle is. The market in September provided a comparison: the 10-year US Treasury yield held at 4.2%, bond prices fell; zero-coupon DOGE rose 15% in the same period. Non-yielding assets outperformed fixed-income assets, which seems to contradict textbooks but actually aligns with the rules.
The premise of textbook logic is the interest rate hike cycle: as rates rise, the coupon of high-yield assets suppresses zero-coupon assets, and funds flow back to bonds. In a rate cut cycle, this chain breaks. Coupons are fixed, and a 4.2% yield locks in the return ceiling; capital gains, however, follow liquidity. The Fed shifts to easing, dollar liquidity expands, and funds are no longer satisfied with interest but chase elasticity. DOGE has no coupon, so no interest rate pricing ceiling; its price is determined by liquidity and risk appetite. Each step of easing amplifies elasticity.
The situation for US Treasuries is the opposite. The downward space for yields is limited, fiscal bond supply suppresses prices, bondholders earn coupons but lose on price differences. In a rate hike period, the competition is on who has the thicker coupon; in a rate cut period, it’s who has greater elasticity. September’s US Treasury price drop and DOGE’s rise reflect the switch between two pricing logics.
This is not a victory for $DOGE, but an inevitability of asset rotation. In easing phases, the unit of valuation for funds shifts from interest to price appreciation, turning the "zero" of zero-coupon assets from a flaw into potential. Matching assets to cycles rather than choosing assets based on yield is closer to the market’s answer.🗳️【Vote】Will it break 85,000 tonight?
💰 Current price 84,597.6, -0.81%
📊 24h high 87,239 / low 83,826
⚖️ Buy 1.70M vs Sell 571.56K, buy orders nearly 3 times dominant
📍 Reached a high of 87,374 three days ago, now pulling back to consolidate
📈 7-day +0.58%, 30-day +4.03%, mid-term trend still bullish
🧱 84,117 (MA10) is short-term support, watch out if broken
🗳️ Voting time
A. Hold above 85,000 tonight, aiming for 87,000
B. Continue to fluctuate, 85,000 hard to break
💬 Which do you vote for? Comment A or B below👇
$BTC $ETH $SOL Originally planned to take a break, but ended up lying on the sofa checking the market. The more I checked, the more hooked I got, and I transferred another 6,000 into the account. I said I would just look, but my fingers were faster than my brain and I directly opened a position. Even more ridiculous, I intended to try isolated margin but accidentally selected cross margin, and I also set the leverage too high. The market shook, and in less than ten minutes, the position was gone. It's really no one's fault but my own impatience.
Now that I'm calm, I reopened a full position on $BTC, no more reckless moves. I plan to hold for a while, at least recover 180u before considering exiting, otherwise this round would be too frustrating. 🔥$MU — AI DEMAND IS NOW A CASH-FLOW STORY
Micron just raised the bar for the AI memory trade.
💰 Q4 operating cash flow:~$44B
💵 Adjusted free cash flow:$33.2B
📈 Q4 revenue:$54.2B, up ~379% YoY
🚀 Q1 FY27 guidance:$61.5B revenue
And here's the part I care about:
Revenue tells us customerswantAI memory.
Cash flow tells us Micron is actuallyturning that demand into cash.
Long-term customer commitments jumped to$32B, while Micron expects memory supply conditions to remain tight into FY2027–28.👀🌙 Saturday Night｜BTC holds near $87K, weekend watchlist is here!
🚀 $BTC — $87,240
After market volatility brought by NFP data, BTC has returned near $87K. Weekend liquidity is low; if $87K holds steady, the upside can continue to watch $89K–$90K.
🔹 $OKB — $124.10
Although the trend is not as strong as BTC, it remains relatively stable overall. As long as the $122 support is not broken, the $136–$142 area can be observed above.
⚡ $ZEC — $1,425
After rebounding from a low, it is gradually approaching above $1,400. Short-term focus is on whether $1,400 can turn into support, with resistance at $1,480–$1,500 above.
📉 $RE — $0.518
Despite market recovery, RE still shows weakness. $0.50 is an important support area; only after holding can further rebound space be observed.
👀 Weekend market is easily affected by liquidity; focus on key price levels and volume changes, and control risk cautiously.
#USNFPDataCools #BTC #OKB #ZEC #RE #CryptoHappy weekend meow, some coins are still restless
$AAVE recovered this afternoon, which I find more interesting than just looking at the price change. It was around 177.6 at noon, then returned to 181.5 by evening, close to last night's 182 level. Although the 24-hour price change is still negative, the price has indeed been recovering since noon. So you can't just assume it's continuously falling because of a negative sign.
Next, let's see if it can reclaim last night's level and hold this gain when it pulls back. If it returns and then falls again, it's just a back-and-forth repair; if it holds and moves up further, I will have more confidence in its strength.
$WLD was 0.571 in the afternoon, then dropped to 0.563 by evening. Although it has risen about 4% in the past 24 hours, this afternoon's segment was a pullback. Here, expectations should be slightly tempered; don't ignore the price retreat just because the overall gain is still positive. I will watch if it can return to the afternoon level. If it can't, don't rush to expect this rise to continue far.
$ETH remains around 2685, basically unchanged in the past week, with no clear short-term direction. I won't wait for a so-called big rebound just because it hasn't risen much. Even if it returns to 2700 later, we need to see if it can continue upward; a rebound of a few dollars is not enough to change the judgment. It's better to wait for it to strengthen actively rather than adding expectations prematurely.
#BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 MU Q1 guidance at 61.5B ±1.5B, closed Friday at 1074.89 down 2%, watching but not chasing.
What we saw: Q4 revenue 54.23B, non-GAAP EPS 33.42, company guided next quarter revenue around 61.5B, adjusted EPS about 38.15, gross margin guidance around 86.25%.
Wall Street's original revenue expectation was about 57B, the guidance is significantly higher, management also said fiscal 2027 will set new records.
But on Thursday it first surged to 1097, Friday opened at 1107, high 1108, low 1072, closed 1074.89, volume about 27.34M shares, giving back more than half of the overnight gains.
US stock market closed, don’t treat the guidance as a guaranteed Monday rally over the weekend.
Storage shortage and AI memory narrative still ongoing, but short-term price has already priced in the good news, chasing now has average cost-performance.
Two days after earnings, first up then down, typical good news realization rhythm.
I think the guidance is really strong, but Friday’s high then pullback shows funds are taking profits, watching not chasing.
How to act: break below about 1072 invalidates, hold above about 1108 then talk continuation.
Do you believe the guidance fulfillment will continue to lift valuation, or think the good news is fully priced and it needs to dip again?
$MU $ON $AVGO
#EarningsWatcher: Micron raises guidance, storage demand continues to strengthen
#US September nonfarm payrolls only increased by 29K, unemployment rate rose to 4.2% The first time I got into crypto was last fall.
Next to the parcel locker downstairs.
I heard someone say he bought a second-hand phone with $BTC profits.
I went home and downloaded the app.
Registered, linked my card, stayed up half the night.
After buying, my palms were sweaty.
Then I just stared at the screen.
When it went up a bit, I smiled foolishly.
When it dropped a bit, I cursed myself for being reckless.
Later I saw $ETH seemed more stable.
Moved some money into it.
But it just stayed flat.
So flat I wanted to uninstall every day.
Then $SOL surged hard.
I couldn’t resist chasing it.
It pulled back right after I got in.
Got stuck and even muted the group chat.
Some in the group shouted "take off."
Others shouted "run fast."
I was confident one moment, panicked the next.
I also tried contracts.
Once I used leverage, my heart raced like a drum.
The night I got liquidated, I sat on the balcony in the breeze.
Later I slowly figured it out.
This thing can’t be how you live your life.
Now I only use spare money.
Losing it won’t affect paying rent.
If I make a little, I withdraw it.
Buy some barbecue.
Or add something for the family.
If I get itchy hands, I walk around downstairs.
When tired of walking, I don’t want to buy anymore.
Others show off profits, I just swipe away.
Others shout about 100x gains, I treat it like listening to a comedy show.
Too much news, too mixed.
Good news today, bad news tomorrow.
Anyway, the market has taken its toll on me.
Now I don’t watch the market every day.
Set a reminder and leave it there.
Being able to sleep soundly is better than anything.
Everyone dreams of getting rich quick.
But you have to survive first.
Don’t borrow money.
Don’t get carried away.
Don’t believe in guaranteed profits.
These words sound corny.
But they come from losses.
I still watch the market now.
Just for fun.
No longer fantasizing about a big turnaround.
Take it slow.
Be steady. #BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温
#美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备
#英伟达股价再创历史新高，市值逼近6万亿美元 A data point worth being cautious about: 70% of Tokenized Assets lack sufficient transparency
Today I saw an interview about RWA on #CoinDesk, and there was a piece of data that surprised me:
A recent study by Chronicle found that about 70% of the Tokenized Assets they reviewed did not meet their transparency standards, involving assets exceeding $12.3 billion.
This actually hits a core issue of RWA:
Tokens on-chain do not mean the assets behind the Tokens are equally transparent.
After a US Treasury bond, fund, stock, or other real-world asset is tokenized, what we really should be concerned about might be:
Does the underlying asset actually exist?
Who is the custodian?
Can the data be verified in real time?
After asset changes, can the on-chain information be synchronized?
In the interview, Chronicle founder Nik Kunkel even specifically proposed 5 transparency pillars that Tokenized Assets should meet, and why real-time, verifiable Proof of Asset is needed in the future. The program also discussed these kinds of issues faced by institutions like BlackRock, BNY Mellon, Galaxy, etc., when pushing assets on-chain.
Strongly recommend everyone to watch it to increase understanding of RWA. But ZEC also has real problems: ETF funds have shifted from "net buying" to "net selling," North Korean hackers are laundering money through its privacy pool, whales cashed out $27 million after building positions at $425, bulls were liquidated for $76.59 million at 1333, and open contracts plummeted 38%, indicating leveraged funds are systematically retreating.
This plunge from 1698 to 1333 is essentially a quadruple squeeze of "ETF cliff + privacy narrative poisoned + whale cashing out + bull stampede."
1233 is the lifeline. Holding it means there is room for volatile recovery. Breaking below it means ZEC's "privacy story" will have to be retold.
Don't talk about bottom-fishing on a night when privacy coins are used for money laundering. First, see if 1233 can hold.
(The above content does not constitute investment advice. The market has risks; only those alive have the right to talk about the future.) $BTC $ZEC $ETH #美国9月非农仅增2.9万，失业率升至4.2% #BTC、ETH现货ETF同步转流出，资金热度降温 #美伊局势持续紧张，G7将释放最多1亿桶储备 Attention everyone, do not go long! Four major logics:
1. Strong non-farm payrolls in September, rising rate hike expectations, and bill obstacles should have caused a drop, but the price was pulled from 74,900 to 87,300 on news of the crypto bill being reintroduced, washing out the shorts, indicating main force control.
2. This October's non-farm payrolls weakened significantly, combined with Middle East easing and dovish Fed, all positive factors, but the market had already risen in advance, many retail investors chased longs, likely causing a bullish reversal and main force dumping to harvest longs.
3. Since the rise from 63,000, shorts have basically cleared, and longs have clustered. Clearing the table: only 2.5 billion above 91,000, while 10 billion worth of long liquidation positions are concentrated at 82,600/80,600/76,800, giving the main force stronger motivation to harvest downward.
4. Coinbase data: BTC profit-taking hits a yearly high, spot demand decreased by 170,000 coins in 30 days, speculative futures increment nearly exhausted, institutions likely taking profits at highs.
The market repeatedly disrupts expectations, approaching the annual turning window, with a high probability of a sell-off. Firmly bearish for the past 10 days, holding this view until 10.12.
BTC targets: 82,600 → 78,800 → 68,800 → 63,800
ETH and altcoins under simultaneous pressure, none spared in the avalanche.
After this drop is realized, a quality bottom-fishing opportunity will come, patiently waiting for the script to unfold! $BTC $ETH$PENGU actually has never connected on-chain and off-chain. It also hasn't fed back on-chain; maybe this meme is just that the team hasn't finished unlocking yet, and by the time it's unlocked, most will have been sold. Taking a wait-and-see attitude, regarding the ABS project, I believe everyone has invested a lot of money, time, and effort, yet the team still hasn't responded at all. It's unclear whether they don't care about the community or think the investors have been milked enough.$ONE brothers, why is it 0.0025 on some exchange but only 0.0021 here? Can anyone tell me the reason for such a big price difference? $SNDK opened both long and short positions for arbitrage starting before the market on September 30th, and has made a profit of over 3000 so far. Currently, the long position is larger than the short position. Essentially, at the 1800 resistance level, a few more short positions can be opened. The grid is still not perfect; otherwise, there wouldn't have been a 1000 pullback. Next, I'll try opening a 2000-dollar arbitrage.If you had to choose, would you pick 100% of your funds with 1x leverage or 1% of your funds with 100x leverage?
My answer is 1% of funds with 100x leverage, because you can free up 99% of your funds to invest in other assets.
Use a small position with high leverage to speculate on short-term market moves, risking a tiny portion of your capital to bet on explosive moves in highly volatile coins like ZEC for potentially large short-term gains; meanwhile,WLD rose about 11.5%, while contract open interest expanded about 4.6 times within an hour, nearing the intraday peak.
As of 19:12 Beijing time, OKEx spot price was about $0.5981, with a 24-hour high of $0.6078 and low of $0.528, amplitude about 15.1%; trading volume approximately $38.72 million.
OKEx hourly statistics show that the nominal value of open interest rose from about $7.68 million an hour ago to about $35.65 million, an increase of about 364%; compared to about $4.5 million 24 hours ago, an increase of about 692%, only about 4% below the intraday peak of about $37.12 million. The current funding rate is 0.01%, with perpetual contracts trading at a discount of about 0.03% to spot.
My judgment is that after the price strengthened, leveraged positions suddenly concentrated in, shifting the risk from missing the rally to whether the high-level positions can absorb the new volume. The easiest misjudgment is to see the funding rate still at normal levels and assume no crowding; the growth rate of open interest itself is already significantly faster than the price.
Next, watch $0.6078 and $0.5752. If the previous high is broken and open interest remains while the price does not quickly fall back, the new positions may be absorbed by turnover; if it falls below the latter while open interest remains near the peak, the risk of concentrated liquidation will significantly increase.
$WLD The Night Before CORE Coin's Surge? Understand These 3 Signals to Avoid 3 Years of Detours
Many people wait for CORE to surge, only focusing on the price candlestick chart and ignoring the real turning point signals that start the market trend. From Soros' reflexivity logic, a positive cycle starts only when fundamentals, on-chain chips, and capital narratives resonate together—none can be missing.
Signal 1: SatPay Obtains Compliance License, Not Just a Verbal Preview
BTC-Fi is CORE's core narrative, and all hundredfold expectations are pinned on SatPay. Only when it obtains an official regulatory license and merchants massively onboard does the narrative shift from a "future fantasy" to a grounded reality.
Reflexivity perspective: License issuance causes market expectations to genuinely rise; if continuously delayed, the narrative is falsified, easily triggering a negative downward cycle. Without the license, all institutional stories are just promotion.
Signal 2: Foundation and Validator Node Wallets Stop Large Withdrawals to Exchanges
The on-chain data is the most authentic trump card. Continuously monitor CORE's official treasury and 21 node addresses. Once large funds no longer aggregate to exchanges, it means the big holders' selling pressure is temporarily paused, and chips begin to lock and settle.
Conversely, if nodes keep transferring large amounts out, it's a sell-off signal, and no matter how appealing the narrative, caution is warranted.
Signal 3: Institutional Custody Ecosystem Gradually Materializes, BitGo and Hex Trust Bring Real Incremental Capital
Connecting with BitGo and Hex Trust only builds custody channels; it doesn't mean institutions immediately enter the market. The true ignition signal is institutional funds flowing through custody accountsSAND COOLS OFF AFTER A VERTICAL RUN.
I'm watching $SAND near 0.07368 after tagging 0.08416 and cooling off. Up 63.87% over 7D, yet still -3.69% over 180D. Fast rallies test discipline more than conviction. Do you size smaller when volatility expands like this?
#USNFPDataCools $ARB Robinhood Chain has brought real money in.
This chain is built on Arbitrum Orbit, with net fees of $6.7 million in August and a direct surge to $35.8 million in September. According to the protocol, 10% of net income is returned to the Arbitrum ecosystem, 8% goes to the DAO treasury, and 2% to the developer guild. Just in these two months, ARB can collect about $4.3 million from the 10% portion, earning rent passively.
Robinhood Chain launched its mainnet in July, with daily fees once hitting $1.9 million. Supported by the narrative of RWA and stock tokens, ARB has become the invisible rent collector of this chain. The DAO earned $6.19 million in the first half of the year with a gross margin of 97%, making this business model cleaner than most L2s.
The coin price has already priced in the good news, rising 47% in 30 days then retracing 18% in a week, with RSI falling from overbought levels. The September rally bounced from a low of 0.07 to above 0.20; now profit-taking is emerging. 0.1867 is short-term support, 0.2368 is resistance, and breaking below 0.17 would kill this narrative.
Hold 0.186 to target 0.237; exit if it breaks 0.17.
Robinhood has fed ARB a real meal; the narrative is true but the chips are dirty. After the good news is fully priced in, don’t catch the falling knife yet. #The US-Iran situation remains tense, G7 to release up to 100 million barrels of reserves
I am the mid-term intelligence guy.
This round of G7 releasing up to 100 million barrels of reserves, despite the scary headline, is essentially "political pressure on inflation, market pressure on cracking spreads."
Spread over 4 months, it averages just over 800,000 barrels per day. The first 20 days will heavily dump diesel, which is the real move—specifically targeting freight, agricultural machinery, and shipping costs, without directly resolving the root US-Iran issues.
Short-term crude oil plunges but don’t chase shorts; geopolitical premiums remain at Hormuz;
Diesel premiums, refinery profits suppressed, transportation/manufacturing costs easing; if the Iran deadlock isn’t broken, releasing reserves is just robbing Peter to pay Paul, and once inventories run out, supply disruptions will resume.
Diesel cracking weakens first, then watch Middle East developments.
$BTC
$ETH The leader has something to say
Tesla delivered 486,500 vehicles in Q3, 24,000 more than market expectations, and its stock price rose about 5% at one point. However, it is still 2% less compared to last year.
The market is celebrating the beat on expectations, not growth. Expectations were set too low, so a slight improvement triggered a rebound. Tesla's fundamentals haven't changed; demand is slowing, and the price war continues. $PONS is bearish in the short term, with a huge whale holding about 14.85 million short positions, currently floating a profit of about 2.12 million USD, and still adding today. This guy starting with 0x936c has a short position worth about 6.26 million USD, only using 2x leverage, with a position return rate of about 50.6%. Having earned half, he’s not stopping and added about 1.09 million more short positions today. It has already dropped 19.44% in 24h and he still dares to add, clearly thinking it hasn’t bottomed yet. I respect this move. With 2x leverage, normal rebounds won’t shake him out; on the other side, in nearly 24 hours, there have been 368 long liquidations totaling 430,000 USD, but only 4 short liquidations — all the hits are on those catching flying knives. Current price is 0.4294, with a volatility of 30.1%, price sticking close to the low, the support is fake. Watch the 0.4134 low point in the next 24-48 hours: if it breaks below, the bearish trend continues, and the whale’s floating profit will keep growing; the only condition to flip bullish is to reclaim 0.5377, otherwise any rebound is just a downtrend consolidation.