Orbit Post Sitemap
I've held the ETF for three months, and the price hasn't moved at all, think about that
There's a particularly interesting data point: three ETFs tracking $SUI have been continuously buying since listing, for over ten weeks without stopping, only buying in, never selling, not even taking a week off.
Look at the price again, stuck on the moving average without a twitch, as if nothing is happening.
So which side is lying? My answer: neither is lying. Institutions build positions on a yearly basis; they don't care about next week; the stagnant market reflects that retail investors' confidence hasn't caught up yet. The chips are quietly changing hands, moving from impatient holders to those who can hold steady.
Don't miss another detail: some of these ETFs have a staking feature, so the coins bought can still earn interest—the locked coins are non-circulating chips, and the floating supply is shrinking tighter and tighter.
This kind of silent accumulation won't give any warning when it starts moving; chasing it is futile. But there's a logic: once ETF money stops flowing, the story has to be retold. I even suspect someone is waiting for the day the funds dry up to dump the pit.
It's lying on my watchlist; I haven't taken a position yet, waiting for volume and price confirmation. The intensive statements from institutions and leaders can now only be treated as noise; without resonance in the order book, they are worthless. Looking at the naked K-line, the four-hour level has repeatedly poked the 77300 line, but the close never returns above 77800. The overhead trapped positions press down hard, and the rebound lacks real spot support. The contract funding rate fluctuates around the zero line, and trading volume has not simultaneously expanded. This structure makes chasing longs unprofitable and looks more like a weak correction in a downtrend.
I'm parking my car under the shade and scrolling through my phone; the order reminder pushed the screen down twice, but I’m too lazy to care.
If BTC rebounds to the 78200–78700 range, short positions can be entered, with a stop loss set above 79500 to prevent being stopped out by spikes. The first take profit target is 76200, and if it breaks below, continue to watch 74800. Do not chase shorts at the current price; wait for the rebound to act. The key lies only in the order book's order thickness, not in the news.
$BTC
#PPI、CPI接连公布，美联储迎关键两日
@OKX星球 The first reaction of market makers when seeing this number is not excitement, but calculating inventory. In 90 days, tokenized stock holders have increased to 3.6 million, and this speed means the bid-ask spread will have to passively absorb a large number of small orders.
Most people interpret this as adoption, but I prefer to see it as a ranking competition among distribution channels. BNB Chain has 1.5 million, Robinhood Chain 1.2 million, Solana 647,500; together, these three account for the vast majority.
Whoever controls the entry point decides who controls the order book depth. Market makers here actually have no bargaining power and can only follow the channels.
Focus on one point: if the growth rate of holders continues to outpace the transaction volume, it indicates that this is just an airdrop-style user acquisition, and the spread will be forced to widen.
#Robinhood加密交易量8月环比增61% $SOL $BNB WLFI surged 16% in one day but only rose 0.2% over a week
$WLFI is currently at 0.05709 USDT, up 16.3% in 24h. It climbed from 0.0489 to 0.0578, now hovering near the high point, with a daily amplitude of 18.1%.
But don’t just look at today. The 7-day change is only +0.2%. This big bullish candle basically recovers the losses from the previous days in one go, not a new high breakout.
Trading volume is 4.24 million USDT, ranking 41st in the entire USDT market, with a small market cap. The funding rate is +0.0050%, and perpetual positions are only 0.1 billion USD, indicating the rally is mainly driven by spot trading, with leverage not yet following.
During the same period, $BTC is up 0.5% in 24h, $ZEC up 4.7% in 24h, the overall market is flat, so WLFI’s move is an independent trend.
Legzi checked the order book; for coins of this scale, fluctuations of a dozen points are common, rising fast and falling fast. The current price has already moved a considerable distance from the low of 0.0489.
If you didn’t buy at the low, don’t chase it now. If you want to participate, wait for it to pull back and stabilize first. Chasing small coins at highs is the hardest to endure if trapped. The L2 war of ETH has moved from "anyone can tell a story" to the knockout stage
L2BEAT currently counts Rollup TVL at about $34.2 billion, Base at about $15.1 billion, and Arbitrum at about $12.6 billion. Together, these two chains total nearly $27.8 billion, accounting for roughly 80% of the entire Rollup capital. Looking ahead, OP Mainnet has only about $1.7 billion, Mantle about $1.4 billion, with the gap already very clear
A few years ago, the market was still betting on "whether Ethereum would spawn dozens of large L2s," but now it looks more like liquidity is actively concentrating on a few leading chains. Users, stablecoins, DEX depth, and applications all need to coordinate with each other. Even if a new L2 has good technology, without liquidity and developers, it will become increasingly difficult to catch up
At this stage, I tend to pay less attention to "another new chain launched" and more to what Base and Arbitrum are actually competing for.
Base is backed by Coinbase's user entry point, while Arbitrum has a deep DeFi foundation. The competition between the two is about who can become the largest application layer on Ethereum
As L2s develop further, they may not become more fragmented but rather more concentrated.
When the top two or three chains end up capturing the vast majority of users, Ethereum's ecosystem structure will also become much clearer. $ETH Brothers, the three major mainstream altcoins show divergent trends today
$XRP $1.37 | $SOL $101.93 | $DOGE $0.0849
XRP struggles around $1.37, down over 6% in the past seven days, testing the key 200-day EMA support at $1.34. SOL stabilizes near $101, but SOL ETF weekly inflows have plummeted from $153 million at the end of August to $6.18 million, a 96% drop. DOGE is the worst off, with $0.0849 staying below the 200-day moving average for four consecutive days
XRP holds the 200-day line, SOL ETF inflows plunge, DOGE bulls get bloodied
For XRP, network payment volume surged 26% in 24 hours to 462.9 million coins, but the price did not follow. ETF funds remain resilient, with a net inflow of $5.14 million on September 10, positive for three consecutive days. The market is awaiting the Senate vote on the CLARITY Act on September 15 and the Federal Reserve decision on September 16
For SOL, the second switch of the rent reduction proposal SIMD-0437 activates on September 12, cumulatively reducing storage costs by 27%. However, ETF inflows have clearly cooled, dropping from $153 million weekly to $6.18 million, with funds clearly retreating.
For DOGE, long positions liquidated $8.59 million, shorts only $319,000. Analyst Ali Martinez's TD Sequential gives a buy signal on the 4-hour chart
#PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 #PPI, CPI released, multiple institutions raise September rate hike expectations
Rate hike expectations heat up but US stocks and Bitcoin do not fall
The core lies in the fact that the market pricing has never been about the single event of "whether to raise rates or not"
but about the expectation gap
A comprehensive game of earnings resilience and liquidity structure
When the probability of a rate hike rises from 60% to 90%
If futures and interest rate markets have already priced in one or even two rate hikes
The actual implementation may instead be a "sell the news" event
At the same time, US stocks are supported on the numerator side by AI capital expenditure and upward revisions in big tech earnings
Preventive rate hikes are interpreted as the Fed repairing credit rather than starting a tightening cycle
As long as the 10-year US Treasury yield does not effectively break 5%
The cash flow of heavyweight stocks can absorb the rise in discount rates
On the Bitcoin side, structural buying from spot ETFs is superimposed
Marginal liquidity brought by stablecoin inflows
And hedging demand under the narratives of fiscal deficit and fiat depreciation—it is both a risk asset and a scarce asset
When real interest rates do not soar in sync with nominal rate hikes
Independent capital flows can outweigh the negative impact of rising opportunity costs
Therefore, as long as "rate hikes are fully priced in + economic data is not bad + liquidity is not truly tightening" are all met simultaneously
Stocks and crypto can completely diverge during a rising interest rate cycle.
#美债收益率逼近5%，回购难缓长期压力 $BTC → scarcity that compounds into monetary credibility.
$ETH → liquidity that compounds into financial infrastructure.
$SOL → activity that compounds into network effects.
$BTC gets stronger as more capital treats it as neutral collateral.
$ETH becomes harder to displace as stablecoins, DeFi, and applications continue building around its settlement layer.
$SOL is betting that cheap, fast execution can turn high-frequency on-chain activity into a durable moat.
Three different paths. WHY DOES AN 8.80% RALLY STILL FEEL LIKE A TRAP?
$CP spiked from 0.01327 to 0.01580, then faded to 0.01520. Solid 1h move, but the 7D chart still shows -52.86%. One green stretch doesn't erase that damage.
Are you reading this as reversal or just relief?
#CPIPPIEaseFedSplit Just about to go to the forum to rant, but then I checked the balance and decided against it; the market daddy is always right. When the screen is full of green, everyone is shouting "it's over," but I keep an eye on $CP's high-level resistance, and each rebound is weaker than the last. Short positions are actually getting steadier. After lunch, when I checked the market, it was still giving opportunities, with selling pressure layer upon layer.
The selling pressure is strong, trading volume is low, and support is clearly insufficient; all the upward moves are just false fire. I advise not to chase high shorts; wait until the rebound ends before acting, don't open positions recklessly in panic. Being out of the market isn't a sin; reckless opening of positions is the mistake. If you catch the rhythm right, the rest is just letting the profits run.
The market is to be waited for, profits are to be held onto.
Shorted at 0.03914 to 0.01520, +1223.3% in hand, nailed the rhythm this round. Took 80% off the table first, kept 20% at cost price as protection; if it continues to drop, let the profits run, if it rebounds, don't give the profits back. Take the big part first, watch the protection level for the rest, stay calm.
Hold as long as the trend isn't broken, run when it breaks, don't fall in love with stocks.
Now is not the time to rush; if you miss it, don't chase. Wait for the next signal to act; the market isn't short of opportunities, it's short of patience. I'll give the first alert, wait for the next shot.
$BTC $ETH Popular coins are starting to compete for the next lead, who will bring the market up first, BNB or XRP?
#After the release of PPI and CPI, multiple institutions raised their expectations for a September rate hike
$BNB, $XRP, and $DOGE are especially interesting to watch together now: one is stable, one is waiting for a breakout, and one is most driven by sentiment. After BTC revived the market, funds can't hold BTC forever; the next step will definitely spread to popular mainstream coins. But among these three trends, who shows active buying first is the key.
#Nearly $450 million outflow from BTC spot ETF in three days
$BNB's biggest advantage is its resistance to decline; during market fluctuations, it is often more stable than high Beta coins. To truly lead the rally, it needs volume to absorb the previous high sell orders. $XRP is like a spring compressed for a long time, with heavy resistance above, so following the rise usually makes no sense. Only when it continuously breaks through the pressure zone with volume can we say funds are really moving. $DOGE is the most direct; when Meme sentiment returns, it usually stirs first, but a sharp rise isn't scary—what's scary is no one following after the surge.
Next, watch these three moves: can $BNB actively break the previous high, can $XRP stand firm with volume, and is there buying on $DOGE's pullback? Whoever achieves this first is more likely the next leader among popular coins.
Popular doesn't mean strong; true strength is when everyone is watching it, and it can still keep going up. SanDisk perp caught my eye this morning. It topped at 1,821 and has been sold every single bounce since, now sitting at 1,632.
Look at the MA stack. Price under all of them, each one sloping down, and the heaviest volume came on the red candles. That's distribution, not a dip.
Same risk-off tone I'm seeing in crypto this week. Nothing here interests me until 1,700 gets reclaimed. Under 1,620, sellers stay in control.
$SNDK #SanDiskMSCIRebalance Bitcoin sentiment surges to a two-year high, but $BTC stops rising first: Is this "mania" so hollow?
The most interesting thing about Bitcoin recently is that sentiment and price have started to clash.
BTC once surged to $82,000 not long ago, with market sentiment heating up quickly, but now it’s consolidating around $78,000 to $79,000. Meanwhile, the US spot BTC ETF saw a net inflow of $987 million last week, marking three consecutive weeks of capital inflow; institutional money is indeed still coming in.
Here’s the question: Money is flowing in, so why isn’t the price continuing to surge?
Glassnode data shows BTC futures open interest has risen to $37.1 billion, with leveraged positions continuing to increase, but spot momentum has clearly cooled down. The previous rally was more driven by ETF fund flows and liquidity expectations; now the market is facing another issue: Are these new buy orders enough to push BTC past $80,000?
So I think this time the rising sentiment is not really about "the bull market getting crazier," but rather the rally entering a validation phase. Institutions are buying, leverage is building, but spot isn’t accelerating in sync. This divergence is more worth watching than the sentiment indicators themselves.
Next, BTC will either firmly reclaim $80,000 with volume or high sentiment will first turn into a high-level consolidation, possibly even fueling the next round of leverage liquidation. There’s still more money now, but it’s not as easy to make profits as in previous weeks. Fast finality is not simply about speeding up block production; don't confuse the two concepts.
Faster block appearance can only improve the speed at which users see transactions; for transactions to truly become irreversible, economic finality is also required. The fast finality direction researched by the Ethereum Foundation aims to further decouple finality from block production.
The current design approach includes a usable chain and an independent finality component, with the goal of compressing minute-level final confirmations down to seconds. This is more complex than simply shortening slot times but is closer to the guarantees truly needed for large-scale financial settlements.
Stablecoins, RWAs, and institutional trades will not only ask how long it takes for a page to show success but also how long, under extreme conditions, it becomes almost impossible for the transaction to be reorganized. The latter question determines whether funds can treat Ethereum as a serious settlement layer.
For $ETH, faster block production can improve user experience, while faster finality may enhance capital efficiency. Assets do not need to wait for excessively long confirmation times, making cross-system settlement and risk management easier.
Speed is suitable for marketing, while finality is responsible for accountability. If Ethereum can shorten the latter without sacrificing verification decentralization, its value is far greater than simply reducing block time by a few seconds more.3. ETH: Possibly the key focus for the next phase
The biggest change in ETH now is not the price, but its increasingly strong financial infrastructure attributes.
Several directions are worth attention:
ETH =
Stablecoin infrastructure
RWA infrastructure
DeFi infrastructure
Tokenization infrastructure
ETF assets
AI × Blockchain infrastructure
For example, BlackRock has already launched tokenized euro money market fund shares based on Ethereum, indicating that traditional finance is further adopting Ethereum as the infrastructure for financial asset issuance and settlement.�
Caleb and Brown
So in the coming years, I believe:
BTC is more like "digital gold," while ETH is more like "digital financial infrastructure."
The investment logic for these two assets will increasingly diverge. The biggest concern for $BTC is not the CPI itself, but who will still be willing to buy after the "bad news is fully priced in." The US August CPI rose 0.4% month-over-month and 3.4% year-over-year, with PPI final demand also increasing by 0.4% month-over-month. The data is now settled, and the macro variables have shifted from "how big the surprise is" to "whether interest rate expectations will continue to be revised upward." If spot trading volume can hold steady when $BTC pulls back and $ETH no longer weakens first, the market still has room to absorb pressure; if prices rebound but volume thins and high-volatility assets fall further again, weekend liquidity will amplify the retracement.2. BTC: Still the "core asset" of the entire market
Currently, the logic of BTC is different from the past.
In the past:
BTC → speculative asset in the crypto market
Now gradually becoming:
BTC → ETF → institutional asset allocation → global macro liquidity asset
Recently, the US spot BTC ETF has seen a clear inflow of funds again, with a cumulative net inflow exceeding $1 billion over several consecutive trading days.�
The Wall Street Journal
This means:
The ability to absorb funds when BTC declines is significantly stronger than in earlier cycles.
Therefore, I would not simply define the current situation as a traditional "bear market."
A more accurate description is:
BTC is undergoing a "macro adjustment within an institutionalized bull market."[The probability of a rate hike has soared to 87%, yet $ETH ETF funds are flowing in against the trend—who is betting on "the bad news being fully priced in"]
There has been a contradictory phenomenon these past two days: the market's bet on a Federal Reserve rate hike on September 16 has surged to 87.3%, more than double the 40.6% from a month ago—this should theoretically be a major negative suppressing risk assets. However, ETF inflows into ETH have hit a two-week high at this critical moment, and despite Goldman Sachs issuing rate hike warnings at the same time, the market seems unfazed.
The logic behind this is not hard to understand: when the probability of a rate hike has been repeatedly priced in at such a high level of 87%, the "rate hike" itself is no longer news. What truly triggers large fluctuations is never "bad news that meets expectations," but rather "surprises"—since the market generally believes the rate hike is a done deal, the funds willing to enter now are betting that the moment the boot drops will actually clear out the last batch of shorts.
Looking at the price action, ETH has rebounded from 2404 to 2530, right within the short-term key range of 2480-2550. Holding this range would confirm the "bad news fully priced in" logic; breaking below it might indicate the market has overestimated its ability to digest the bad news. Before the FOMC decision is finalized, this battle between "pre-pricing" and "actual outcome" could be the most compelling drama to watch next.
DYOR, this is not investment advice.
#ETH触及2500美元后震荡 #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 $ETH's short squeeze this round has crushed the bears to the ground! In 24 hours, liquidations reached $683 million, with $422 million of shorts wiped out. Ethereum surged past $2600 in one go, dealing another heavy blow to the shorts.
The most extreme part is that ETH-related liquidations have already hit $262 million, and Hyperliquid even saw single liquidations exceeding $20 million. This figure clearly shows how fierce this recent rally was.
Interestingly, spot ETFs still saw a net outflow of over $46 million in a single day, indicating no obvious strengthening in capital flow, yet ETH managed a sharp rebound purely through a rapid surge.
So I prefer to interpret this rally as an extreme short squeeze rather than a sudden fundamental reversal.
And the most dangerous zone now is not $2600, but above $2600.
The short squeeze has pushed prices to a level where around $2650–$2700 there is a large amount of previous trapped positions. Without continuous spot capital support, this kind of rise driven by short stop-losses and liquidations is unlikely to hold firm all the way.
So don’t blindly chase ETH just because it’s rising.
After the bears were bloodied, what’s truly worth watching is whether real money steps in to take over next. $BTC $ETH
#PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 The $CORE deposit channel has been opened, and LFG and SHDW can also be traded normally, but the main coin CORE remains sluggish. Many people are still fantasizing that these two ecosystem tokens can have an independent major rally!
DAPPs can be accessed and transactions can be executed normally, which is just the most basic bottom line. The fate of ecosystem tokens is tightly bound to the consensus and capital flow of the parent chain CORE.
With the main coin grinding at a low level for a long time, a large number of community users choose to lie flat and refuse to invest more principal. Confidence in the parent chain is damaged, incremental funds are exhausted, and even if ecosystem applications can be used normally, LFG and SHDW will find it difficult to take off independently.
Some people bet on the ecosystem narrative, gambling that DEX and supporting applications will trigger a market explosion. But the harsh reality is right in front of us: the parent chain's chip issue remains unresolved. Once the main coin continues to weaken, the liquidity of small ecosystem coins will worsen, and the downside damage will be even more terrifying.
Stop fantasizing about ecosystem tokens breaking away from the parent chain to enter a bull market. If the parent chain consensus collapses, ecosystem projects will hardly survive independently.
Whether the ecosystem can break through depends on the real on-chain trading volume and, more importantly, how the CORE legacy chip issue is resolved. As long as the parent chain's hidden risks are not addressed, it is basically wishful thinking for ecosystem tokens to surge significantly.
Some are willing to bet on ecosystem opportunities, but more choose to stay away from risk and observe.
If you agree with this market observation, let's exchange rationally.
The above is only a personal information summary and observation and does not constitute investment advice.#BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元
The leader has something to say
BTC spot ETFs have seen nearly $450 million outflow over three days. From September 8 to 10, there was continuous net outflow, with $283 million running out on the 10th alone. BlackRock, Fidelity, Grayscale, and ARK are all selling. The previous week saw an inflow of $1.01 billion, so the fund direction reversed within a week.
The reason is not complicated. CPI and PPI both exceeded expectations, and the probability of a rate hike in September has reached 90%. Funds are hedging before the FOMC, withdrawing first to wait for the results.
There are two key events in the next two weeks. The Federal Reserve interest rate decision on September 16, and the BTC and ETH quarterly options expiration on September 25, with BTC options nominal size about $14.39 billion. ETF funds, FOMC, and options expiration all overlapping means position changes won’t be small.
I still hold over 76,700 long positions, with a stop loss at 74,500 and a target between 80,000 and 81,000. After today’s CPI, the V-shaped rebound retreated, failing to hold above around 77,300, indicating selling pressure at high levels remains. The 90% rate hike probability is weighing down, so $BTC $ETH $ZEC positions are not heavily bet on direction. I will decide whether to add positions after the FOMC.
Short term looks like consolidation, mid-term waiting for direction. Don’t chase sharp rises, don’t panic on sharp drops, set stop losses properly.
The above analysis is time-sensitive; stop losses must be set for positions. Good luck.Chen Jie publicly reminded everyone last week to short on rallies. From the peak at 4443, it plunged all the way down to 4290, smashing out a typical 150-point swing in the whole week!
Although the weak rebound didn't provide the absolute best entry point, it doesn't prevent the entire major shorting logic from being completely sealed by the market.
Stick to the main direction, follow the rhythm and trend downwards. Those who caught this big wave of shorting have already made a good profit. When the overall trend is accurate, you can profit anywhere. #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 $XAU The initial expectation for this week was that BTC would retrace below 76k, then establish multiple bottoms before continuing to surge.
Looking at it this way, I barely got half of it right. Last night it just dipped to the integer level, so bottom-fishing definitely missed out, because the main focus in recent days has been on ETH, with little attention paid to BTC.
Of course, ETH lived up to expectations, repeatedly emphasizing bottom-fishing at 2430-2470, and finally showing results after the CPI release.
Next week, I believe ETH will remain strong because a large amount of ETH is staked and locked, reducing circulating supply. Also, institutions no longer have the willingness to pump BTC, at least before the FOMC; the second largest will still be stronger than the largest for a while.Brothers, come laugh at me
$SUI really trapped me this time
Originally, I saw the daily chart pullback hold, so I started to build long positions according to my strategy
But shortly after buying, the market started to drop
No choice, I really bought too early this time
But what I'm most conflicted about now isn't whether to stop loss, but at what price to add more
Because after reviewing the market again, $BTC is indeed still weak, with ETF funds continuously flowing out, but other major coins are not weakening together
ETH and BNB are actually stronger on the 4-hour chart, both have already moved back above their moving averages first
So now I tend to believe the market hasn't fully turned weak, it's just that BTC is temporarily holding it back.
That's also why I haven't directly cut my SUI long positions.
SUI itself hasn't made a particularly large gain this round. As long as the market stabilizes later, if I get a position I consider suitable, I will still consider adding SUI longs in batches.
At the same time, I also opened a $ETH long today.
But my handling of these two positions is completely different.
For SUI, I prefer to lay low at a low level, willing to give it more room for fluctuation; ETH has already strengthened ahead, so I will strictly use stop loss for this position.
If the market weakens again, I actually think ETH, having risen more earlier, might have a larger short-term pullback.
So my current thinking is simple:
SUI is trapped, I will keep waiting to add in batches at the right positions.
ETH follows the short-term strength, but stop loss must be strictly set Banks paid six to seven figures for TAO subnet technology, but the coin price remains stagnant: valuation logic needs to change
Wow, two hours ago someone did a real calculation for $TAO: Red Team is not a story, it’s a real company selling device fingerprinting technology, and banks and exchanges have already paid six to seven figures for it. I’m bullish at this level, but the market hasn’t responded.
Two transmissions. First, the valuation anchor has shifted; the subnet was originally priced by narrative, but with real revenue in hand, it should switch to fundamentals. With a market cap of 2.26 billion, 68.9% below the previous high, there’s considerable elasticity in recalculation. Second, after the event, 235.6 slid to 235.4, and no one responded.
Current status: current price 235.4; MA7 still above MA30, but MACD shows a bearish death cross with expanding green bars and multi-period bearish bias. BTC at 77360 (+0.374%) is sideways, with all attention on the 15-day FOMC—$TAO remains quiet.
Resistance above: 237.0 (today’s high) → 239.1
Support below: 234.9 → 233.0 (today’s low)
Watershed level: 233.0. Hold to wait for fermentation; if broken, drop to 228.3 (yesterday’s low) to find support.
At this level, I’m entering directly—small position first, stop loss at 233.0 if broken; if volume breaks above 237.0, consider it a buy signal and add aggressively. I’m watching this valuation shift stock closely, don’t lose track.
$TAO $BTCCoinglass's liquidation heatmap shows that the amount of money stacked on both longs and shorts is almost the same.
Should we first pull up to sweep the top or directly have a big pullback to sweep the bottom❔
Top: $BTC breaks 81058, short liquidation intensity $1.174 billion; $ETH breaks 2669, short liquidation $844 million.
Bottom: BTC falls below 73474, long liquidation intensity $1.165 billion; ETH falls below 2417, long liquidation $1.123 billion.
The scale on both sides is almost the same, but the liquidation intensity below ETH is nearly $300 million more than above, meaning shorts have less money above ETH.
Looking at the distances: BTC is now around 77000, needing a 4% rise to reach 81058 above, or a 5% drop to 73474 below. ETH is around 2500, needing a 6.7% rise to 2669 above, or only a 3.3% drop to 2417 below.
The distance down for ETH is twice as close as up.
Also, during last night's CPI move, shorts were already liquidated once. In the past 24 hours, ETH shorts liquidated $215 million, while BTC shorts only $94.26 million. Short-term short fuel has already burned quite a bit.
Most likely scenario: first test upwards to clear out the remaining shorts, then turn downwards to find liquidity. The magnet below ETH is much bigger than above. Did nothing, just went to the restroom, and when I came back, the K-line had already done the work for me. Last night before bed, I was reviewing the rebound of $ARB, and the more I looked, the more it seemed like a fake move without volume. I placed a short order there, waiting for it to play out on its own. Before the market fully started, the resistance above was already very obvious.
The upper resistance was clear; every upward push fell just short, with insufficient support, and selling pressure kept layering down. I followed a high-short strategy, not chasing the sharp drop, waiting for the rebound to weaken before entering. Rhythm is even more important than direction. As it turned out, the rebound was just a brief gesture, volume didn’t keep up, and no one caught it on the way up.
Have a strategy before the market, discipline during, and reflection after.
Shorted in at 0.19556, current price 0.14353, return +1330.28%, nailed it. Pocketed the big chunk first, closed 80%, kept 20% at cost price for protection. If it continues to drop, let it run, don’t be greedy for the last bit. Take profits and secure them, move the stop loss to cost price, sleep soundly.
Panic comes from no plan, losses come from overthinking.
Missed it, don’t chase; now is not the time to rush. Wait for the next structure to form, I’ll notify immediately, opportunities remain, don’t be anxious. If you haven’t gotten on board, don’t worry, the market isn’t short of opportunities, it’s short of patience.
$DOGE $ZEC CPI is hawkish but violently surges?
Yesterday's CPI data was hawkish, yet the market staged a textbook-level leveraged mutual liquidation! Many folks were stunned, clearly the data was negative, so why did the market rally first?
Let's look at the real capital data:
Within 1 hour of the data release, short positions liquidated nearly $250 million; within 4 hours, the entire network cleared $470 million, of which short liquidations accounted for $350 million.
First, a violent short squeeze; after the shorts are liquidated, then retail traders chasing longs get washed out.
Many are wondering, why can the market rally if the data is hawkish?
Remember Xiaoyan's core logic: in crypto, it's not about whether the news is good or bad, but about the expectation gap and the concentration of positions.
PPI strengthening, oil prices breaking $100, and high long-term US Treasury yields mean the market had already priced in the expectation of a September rate hike.
The worst-case scenario for this CPI did not happen; core inflation month-over-month did not reach 0.4%.
Also, around 76,000 there was a large accumulation of short positions; the short side was overcrowded. After the data release, shorts collectively covered and bought back, forcibly pushing the price up.
The key focus for the subsequent trend is next week's FOMC.
This Fed meeting is the real key to determining the market direction.
If they raise rates by 25bp and the tone is hawkish, then watch if the 76,000 level can hold.
If they unexpectedly pause rate hikes, the market will likely see another round of short squeeze rebound. #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 #BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元 #财报观察员：甲骨文AI云收入增121% $BTC $ETH $CP: The Truth Behind Ten Consecutive Days of Continuous Decline
💥 After $CP was launched, it weakened for 10 consecutive days, dropping from 0.0406 on the first day to a low of 0.0127, a decline of more than half.
Many mistakenly think it’s due to team or institutional unlocking and dumping.
In fact, it’s completely the opposite: the project team, seed round, and Series A chips are all locked long-term; this round of decline is unrelated to large holders unlocking.
The real selling pressure comes from three types of chips that are tradable immediately upon listing:
1⃣️ Community airdrops
2⃣️ Foundation marketing budget
3⃣️ 400 million tokens in market-making inventory
On-chain data shows large market-making wallets continuously transferring tokens to exchanges to sell, combined with retail airdrop dumping, creating sustained pressure.
Previously, the listing on the Korean exchange also saw a spike followed by a drop, becoming a selling window.
Currently, the market bottom has slightly stabilized, but there is heavy resistance from layers of trapped positions above, making rebounds weak.
Short-term focus on key ranges:
Support at 0.014; if broken, continue to test lower and do not bottom-fish;
Resistance at 0.018; if it can’t hold above, all rebounds are weak recoveries.
Overall, this is a clearing of listed inventory, not a fundamental crash; before inventory is cleared, a reversal is unlikely. The probability of a rate hike in the month has risen to 90%, so why didn't it follow the "rate hike = market crash" pattern?
1. Negative factors have been priced in advance
With strong non-farm payrolls, high oil prices, and hawkish comments from the Fed, the market had already pushed the rate hike probability from 35% to 70%. The logic has shifted to: "sell the expectation, buy the realization." The first reaction after data release was liquidity squeeze and stop-loss sweeps, followed quickly by buying on dips.
2. Inflation is mainly driven by energy shocks, not a full-blown loss of control
The heat in PPI/CPI mainly comes from oil prices. The market fears "uncontrolled inflation + consecutive rate hikes," but the pricing is closer to "one 25bp hike first," not continuous aggressive tightening.
3. Funds have not massively exited crypto but are reallocating between BTC and ETH.
BTC spot ETFs have seen slight outflows in recent days, but outflows narrowed on September 11;
ETH spot ETFs had about $216 million inflow on September 11 alone, which explains why ETH is more resilient than BTC and even strengthened.
#SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121% Brothers, both BTC and ETH were squeezed and arranged simultaneously by CPI and the bears last night.
$BTC $77,340 | $ETH $2,530
BTC surged to nearly $80,000 within 24 hours, then fell back to around $77,000, down 3.9% for the week. ETH performed significantly stronger than BTC, rallying sharply from $2,430 to $2,660, an increase of over 8%, marking the largest intraday gain in three weeks, then retreating to around $2,530. There is a divergence in capital flow: BTC spot ETF outflows continued for 4 consecutive days, with another $13.29 million outflow in a single day; ETH ETF, however, saw a net inflow of $216 million against the trend, with BlackRock's ETHA alone accounting for $149 million.
CPI exceeded expectations, but ETH shorts were the first to be liquidated.
August CPI rose 0.4% month-over-month, core CPI 0.3%, both exceeding expectations, pushing the probability of a September rate hike to 70%. However, in the past 24 hours, ETH shorts were liquidated for over $300 million, BTC shorts for $212 million, with total liquidations across the network reaching $668 million. Short sellers paid funding fees to hold their positions, but when prices rallied, they were forced to cover, a classic short squeeze scenario.
Let's discuss in the comments, can ETH withstand the FOMC against the trend this time? 👇
#PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期
#BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元 The phrase "Everything will be resolved smoothly" is the hardest type of signal to price for long-term holders. It is neither a protocol change nor a capital flow; it merely postpones uncertainty.
If the Strait of Hormuz is truly blocked, oil prices will move first, followed by inflation expectations, which will delay the rate cut path. On this chain, $BTC is bearing liquidity tightening rather than safe-haven buying. A more likely explanation is that the market will trade the latter first and then be forced to correct.
So don't focus on that phrase itself. Focus on the intraday volatility of Brent crude oil and whether U.S. Treasury yields rise in sync. If both move in the same direction, it indicates the market is pricing inflation rather than risk aversion.
#PPI, CPI releases lead multiple institutions to raise September rate hike expectations #SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121% BTC vs $ETH — INSTITUTIONAL FLOWS
Latest daily flow:
$BTC: –$283M (Sept 10) → +$216M (Sept 11)
$ETH: improving institutional demand
2026 YTD:
$BTC: ~–$1B
$ETH: ~+$863M
Price performance (Aug 11–Sep 10):
$BTC: +23%
$ETH: +33%
Key institutional drivers:
$BTC → Profit-taking + macro sensitivity
$ETH → Staking yield narrative + relative value
The divergence is becoming harder to ignore.#SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121% The probability of a rate hike in September has risen to 90%, so why hasn't the market reacted with the usual "rate hike = sell-off"?
1. Negative factors have already been priced in
With strong non-farm payrolls, high oil prices, and hawkish signals from the Fed, the market had already pushed the rate hike probability from 35% to 70%. The logic shifted to: "sell the expectation, buy the realization." The initial reaction to the data release was a liquidity sell-off and stop-loss sweeps, but buying on dips quickly returned.
2. Inflation is mainly driven by energy shocks, not a full-blown loss of control
The heat in PPI/CPI mainly comes from oil prices. The market fears "uncontrolled inflation + consecutive rate hikes," but pricing is closer to "one 25bp hike first," not a series of aggressive tightenings.
3. Funds have not massively exited crypto but are reallocating between BTC and ETH.
BTC spot ETFs have seen slight outflows in recent days, but outflows narrowed on September 11;
ETH spot ETFs had about $216 million inflow on September 11 alone, which explains why ETH is more resilient and even stronger than BTC.
This does not mean rate hikes have become bullish:
If the FOMC hikes rates next week and issues a more hawkish guidance, rates could step up again, increasing pressure on risk assets.
$BTC Support level at 76000; a decisive break below signals a weakening trend
$ETH 2,500 is the bull-bear dividing line; watch 2435 support
$ZEC Currently structurally strong; upper liquidity between 1218-1245; a decisive break below 1125 would trigger a bearish exit #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 They say they are very confident about achieving $100 billion in ARR by the end of the year. Why are they so confident? The core is just one thing: AI computing power. The CFO personally said that a new AI computing power hosting agreement was recently signed, directly bringing an additional $13.3 billion in ARR. Moreover, Starship's 14th flight will be the first to carry production V3 Starlink satellites, officially generating revenue. Even more aggressively, they plan to deploy computing power satellites in space by 2027. Pinpin, Musk is basically moving servers directly into space. Let's look at the impact on the crypto world in two layers. First, computing power costs won't drop in the short term. AI infrastructure funding is still being poured in, and now it's already rushed from Earth to space. Hardware costs for miners and AI computing projects still have to be borne; don't expect to breathe easy in the short term. The second layer is that traditional tech giants are turning AI computing power into new infrastructure. For companies of SpaceX's scale, AI computing power has become the second growth curve after rocket launches. This supports the risk appetite of the entire tech sector, and as a high-beta asset, the crypto market will ultimately benefit. But in the short term, it's best to wait for macro data to come in. Here are my thoughts. This 100 billion ARR pie is indeed a big picture, but the stock price fell from 176 to 104.83, indicating the market is not blindly buying Musk's "future narrative." Space AI computing power is a good story; 2027 is still far away, with too many variables in between. Money is indeed being spent, but whether it can truly turn into profits remains to be seen in earnings reports. YesCLARITY bill stuck at 60 votes! BTC and ETH weak and volatile, regulatory measures hard to implement
The CLARITY bill vote is imminent on September 15.
60 votes is just a threshold, and now even that threshold is hard to reach.
Lummis proposed a 630-page amendment incorporating 114 demands, and Bassett urgently calls for progress.
But the officials' crypto conflict of interest clause remains untouched, and the Republicans are still 7 votes short of bipartisan support.
The uncertainty is huge, and regulatory certainty is far off.
The market has already given the most genuine feedback.
BTC is currently at 77355, down 0.43%, ETH is at 2531, down 1.01%.
Interest rate hike expectations combined with Middle East turmoil leave the market powerless to rise, and regulatory benefits are delayed.
The bill remains undecided, a typical bearish expectation.
Don't bet on the outcome of political games.
Hold your hands, protect your principal, and wait for the September 15 vote results before making moves.
Being alive is more important than anything.
#CLARITY替代修正案公布，贝森特呼吁参院推进 BTC surged 2.26 times in volume past 77375, but closed back below the threshold
From 17:00 to 18:00, BTC trading volume reached 7.7793 million USDT, a 2.26-fold increase compared to the previous period. The price touched 77392.4, closing at 77354.9, falling back below the previous 6-hour high of 77375.6.
The hourly price change was only -0.005%, with open interest at 2.821 billion USD, down 0.029% from the previous period. The volume expansion did not lead to price advancement or increased positions; near the threshold, it looks more like volume absorption.
If the next 1H candle closes above 77392.4 with continued volume expansion, the breakout will be confirmed; if it closes below 77329.6, support weakens. This volume-driven sideways movement seems more like a turnover or a pressure test?
Source: OKX API; as of 18:00, confirm=1.
#BTC #Bitcoin #MainstreamCoin $LAB did something worth studying today. It got crushed to 0.0464, then snapped all the way back to 0.0789 within hours.
That's a liquidation wick, not price discovery. Leverage got flushed, forced sellers hit the bid, and the market instantly said the real value was higher.
But this is still a downtrend from 0.111. One candle doesn't fix a month. I need a hold above 0.075 and then a push through 0.088 before I believe it.
#SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121% #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期
The battle for the second dragon: Marscoin, Lobster, or Niulai — who will carry the BSC banner?
Binance Life has firmly secured the top spot with a market cap of 500 million, so who will take the seat of the second dragon? Let's get real.
Mars coin, personally endorsed by Binance, is listed on both contracts and spot markets — the first time in nearly a year that a meme coin has opened a spot channel. Its market cap once surged to 1.1 billion but has now fallen back to around 150 million. The largest profit-taking address has started to reduce holdings, and there is a significant amount of trapped positions above. The narrative is the strongest, but profit-taking needs to be digested first.
Lobster has a market cap of 120 million USD, with only 3.5 million in trading volume. What does this mean? The order book is light, making it easy to pump with fewer bullets and quick to dump. Among Chinese meme coins, it has the most "orthodox" narrative, promoted by Binance's Chinese official Twitter. The disconnect between market cap and volume indicates tightly locked chips; a small amount of money can push it up, but it also means liquidity is thin and no one will catch the fall when it runs.
Niulai peaked at 130 million but has now dropped below 80 million, down over 22% in 24 hours. KOL Frank sold 1.23 million USD at 0.073 average price in the early morning, netting a profit of 750,000. Big holders have left first, so short-term pressure remains.
My view: For the second dragon position, Mars coin has the strongest foundation with Binance's backing but needs time for consolidation. Lobster has a small market cap and is easy to pump, suitable for brothers betting on elasticity but must run fast. Niulai's chip structure is loose; wait for stabilization before commenting. No one can hold the meme second dragon seat for too long.
Comment below, which one are you holding? $marscoin$SNDK is still sitting near $1,632.51, but the interesting part isn't the AI-memory story. It’s the price reaction. SanDisk just reported Q4 revenue of $8.97B, up 51% QoQ, with roughly two-thirds of that growth coming from higher pricing. Datacenter revenue also jumped 437% YoY. Management guided Q1 FY27 revenue to $10.3B–$10.8B. Yet price recently pushed above $1,800 and failed, then closed Friday at $1,633.35, down 3.50%. That creates the real trade: $1,800 = breakout confirmation $1,600–$1A phrase like "everything will be resolved smoothly" is the hardest type of signal to price for long-term holders. It is neither a protocol change nor a capital flow; it just postpones uncertainty.
If the Strait of Hormuz is truly blocked, oil prices will move first, inflation expectations will follow, and the rate cut path will be delayed. On this chain, $BTC is bearing liquidity tightening rather than safe-haven buying. A more likely explanation is that the market will trade the latter first and then be forced to correct.
So don't focus on that phrase itself. Focus on the intraday volatility of Brent crude oil and whether U.S. Treasury yields rise in sync. If both move in the same direction, it indicates the market is pricing inflation rather than risk aversion.
#PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期
#BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元 #美债收益率逼近5%，回购难缓长期压力 $BTC Eagle Sister says #BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元
After the CPI data was released, ETH first experienced a sharp drop for a washout, bottoming out at $2513, then shorts were forced to cover, driving a rapid price rebound with liquidation exceeding $300 million. This surge triggered by liquidations has strong short-term explosive power but does not mean the trend has reversed.
The "Maji" side is still adjusting positions, currently holding an average price roughly in the $2510–$2515 range, with the overall direction still bullish. However, it is important to note that market sentiment has clearly heated up, spot trading volume has expanded, and large funds are flowing into ETH long positions, but at the same time some funds are starting to take profits.
Therefore, for short-term operations, it is not recommended to blindly chase the rally. The next key observations are twofold: first, whether capital continues to flow in net; second, whether on-chain activity can keep pace. If capital keeps flowing in and price holds key support, swing longs still have opportunities; if sentiment quickly cools and capital flows out, beware that this rally is just a short-term rebound driven by liquidations.
Liquidations can push prices up in the short term, but only sustained capital support can uphold the trend. Currently, participation in swings is possible, but do not FOMO into the hottest sentiment positions.
#PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期
#沙特关闭关键输油管道，供应风险升级 Only about 37% of stocks in the S&P are above the 50-day moving average.
This is the worst market breadth in over 5 months.
What it shows: The index can be supported by a few large stocks, but most components have fallen below the moving average.
The chart reading is about 36.97 and still dropping; it has slid from over 70% at the end of July to now, indicating that the profit-making effect is clearly narrowing.
I think we shouldn’t take a green index close as confirmation of a broad rally. With such poor breadth, the rebound looks more like a leadership narrative, not a comprehensive risk appetite recovery.
What to do: Hold light positions and wait for breadth to rise above 50% before adding more; don’t chase the index with high leverage; the invalidation signal is a sustained rise and stabilization of the proportion above the 50-day moving average.
Do you trust the green index close more, or wait for breadth to recover first?
$SPY $QQQ $NVDA
#After PPI and CPI releases, multiple institutions raised September rate hike expectations
#BTC spot ETF outflows near $450 million in three daysOriginally, I just wanted to freeload a breakfast, but the market ended up handing me dumplings for half a year. Yesterday at dawn, everyone was still watching the rebound, I glanced at $UP, the pressure at the high level was too obvious, no one took over when it surged, so I casually placed a short order. At that time, the market hadn't fully started yet; the quieter it was, the more it felt like something bad was brewing.
The judgment was simple then: the rebound was weak, volume didn't keep up, and it felt like a bull trap. I suggested a high short strategy, waiting for resistance above before moving, not chasing the first move. Later it proved that patience is more valuable than speed; those who rushed to chase were easily taught a lesson by the rebound.
The market is something you wait for, profits are something you hold onto.
From 0.4420 all the way down to 0.3605, +184.61% in hand, this profit feels good. I first closed 80%, keeping the remaining 20% as cost protection; if it continues to drop, let the profit run, and if it rebounds, don't give the profit back. Put the big chunk in your pocket first, leave the rest to the protection level.
Risk control done upfront is called rationality; cutting losses after losing is called decisive action.
For friends who haven't gotten on board yet, listen to me: now is not the time to rush in. Chasing shorts easily gets slapped by rebounds; wait for a more comfortable position in the next round. If you miss it and don't chase, I'll notify you immediately; there will be more opportunities later.
$BTC $ETH The market barely moved today. BTC was at 77,372, basically flat in 24 hours. After seven days, it was still up 2.9%. The real movement was on the lower level: ETH at 2,533, up 2.2%. SOL stood above 102. Just a couple of days ago it was stuck at 99, but it just wouldn't rise. Today, it crossed it in one go. The total market is 2.74 trillion, up 0.4%. BTC dominance is 56.7%. That's still a high number. Money is basically still sitting on the safest chair, but people next to it started to stand up and move their hands. The most noteworthy thing today isn't the price It's the divergence between two numbers. Next Wednesday, September 16, the Fed will make a rate decision. Note that the market is betting on rate hikes, not cuts. CME FedWatch gives a 66% chance of a 25 basis point rate hike, but Kalshi reports 48%, Polymarket reports 49%. For the same event, the lottery is drawn on the same day. The three markets gave two completely different answers: 30/70 and 50/50. The middle 17 or 18 points are the part where everyone pretends to understand but is actually unsure. This scene is like asking three friends if they like you One says 100%, two say half and half. The conclusion you really need isn't probability, but that now isn't the time to bet heavily on this matter. That same week, there's a second draw. On Tuesday, September 15, the Senate will hold a procedural vote on the CLARITY Act, requiring 60 votes to enter the formal debate. The new version has a 630-page article specifically focused on nominal decentralization—the kind that talks about community governance but actually puts it down$BTC → scarcity that compounds into monetary credibility.
$ETH → liquidity that compounds into financial infrastructure.
$SOL → activity that compounds into network effects.
$BTC becomes stronger when more capital treats it as neutral collateral.
$ETH becomes harder to displace as stablecoins, DeFi and applications build around the same settlement layer.
$SOL is betting that cheap, fast execution can turn high-frequency on-chain activity into its own moat.
#SeptHikeOddsHit90% Rate hike bets surge past 70%, will the crypto market shake on next week's rate decision night?
Interest rate futures show the probability of a rate hike next week has risen above 70%. Inflation data remains volatile, the rate cut narrative is postponed, and funds are repricing tightening. Most people want to short as soon as they see the news, but don't forget: the market trades expectations first, then results.
During the expectation heating phase, highly volatile assets like BTC and ZEC get hit first, hot money withdraws, and contract leverage is easily liquidated. But once the meeting concludes, if the 70% probability has already been priced in, it might instead "sell the expectation, buy the fact," leading to a rebound.
The real danger is a hawkish surprise: beyond a rate hike, signaling continued tightening afterward, which would open the door to a deeper pullback.
Asset differentiation:
▪ BTC: sensitive to liquidity, volatility amplifies, liquidation risk rises.
▪ Gold: tug-of-war between rate hike pressure and safe-haven support, not necessarily a one-way decline.
Focus on two points:
1️⃣ Whether the rate hike is implemented
2️⃣ Whether Powell's speech is hawkish or dovish
$BTC
Just personal observation, not investment advice.FIL: What’s truly worth watching is not just the price, but the supply-demand inflection point.
There are three main highlights for Filecoin right now:
① Unlocking period ends on October 15
The pressure from early investors/foundation-related releases is expected to drop significantly, with new supply decreasing by about 75%. This is a crucial inflection point for FIL’s tokenomics.
② Narrative shifts from "selling storage" to "data infrastructure"
Filecoin is advancing Onchain Cloud, moving storage and data services further on-chain. The real value is not just "hard drives," but data storage, archiving, and verifiable infrastructure for the AI era.
③ The biggest variable: can demand keep up?
Improved supply does not equal guaranteed price increase. Whether FIL can have a major rally depends on sustained growth in real paid storage, enterprise adoption, and on-chain data demand.
My logic is simple:
Short-term looks at capital and market sentiment, mid-term looks at supply changes in October, long-term looks at AI + data storage demand.
If FIL can achieve the "supply reduction + real demand growth" double effect, its valuation logic may be repriced.
So studying FIL now shouldn’t just ask "can it still rise," but rather: does it have the qualifications to become decentralized data infrastructure in the coming years.
This represents only personal research and does not constitute investment advice. This round of the rally has a very strange sequence.
In previous years, Bitcoin was always the first to rise. After the market fully priced it in, subsequent funds would start chasing other major coins like SOL, ETH, following the logic of catching up with the mainstream coins.
This time, it seems like a broad bloom. $SOL and $ETH have both risen more than $BTC, not to mention ZEC. Looking at the exchange rates, SOLBTC and ETHBTC have almost hit new highs in recent months, especially ETH, which is particularly strong. This is completely different from the last round, where ETH was utterly worthless; this time it has been reborn.
Therefore, each market cycle cannot be simply approached with rigid thinking. Always respect the market; the market is always right. If one day it seems wrong, most likely it’s not the market that’s wrong, but your own understanding that hasn’t caught up yet.
#PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 #BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元 ⚡ $TRUMP /USDT: $2.006 (+1.15%)
Reclaiming the 1H MA cluster (2.001) after bouncing from the $1.912 low.
🔺 Break $2.093 → Retest 1.986** (MA20) → Flush to $1.977.
News Flash: The team moved $26M to BitGo, and the next unlock (Sept 18) adds ~28.7M tokens—that's a 10.5% supply increase in one day.
Play: Wait for a 1H close above $2.09 before entering! Don't FOMO the unlock chop.
#BTCSpotETF450MOutflow