Orbit Post Sitemap
US spot Bitcoin ETFs posted a $236.46 million net outflow on Sept 1 — the sharpest since July 31 — reversing the prior session's $216.7 million inflow. The reversal lands right after August's best month of 2026, when $3.52 billion flowed in and BTC ran up 25%. The selling wasn't even. IBIT alone absorbed $201.18 million, 85% of the total outflow. FBTC lost another $43.67 million. BITB, meanwhile, still pulled in $8.38 million it didn't sell with the crowd. Money isn't fleeing the whole BTC ETF b🚨 The probability of a rate hike in September has surged past 70%, so where exactly will BTC's "needle" prick?
In the past 5 times when the rate hike probability exceeded 70%, $BTC experienced a sharp spike of over 8% on 4 occasions.
So the real question now isn't "will it spike," but rather—after the spike, will it rally straight up or continue to consolidate?
Currently, BTC is oscillating around 77,000, stuck tightly in a narrow range of about 3,000 dollars between bulls and bears.
What's even more interesting: whales are quietly accumulating between 75,000 and 78,000, while above 79,000 there's a large buildup of highly leveraged long positions.
On one side, big money is taking positions; on the other, retail traders are betting on the non-farm payrolls.
The tension in this market setup is growing increasingly intense.
History doesn't simply repeat itself, but the market's favorite move is to first liquidate the most crowded side.
If this time the longs above 79,000 get flushed out first, it could directly reverse into a rally; if the key support breaks first, a further liquidity sweep downward can't be ruled out.
I actually think the biggest danger now isn't the direction, but betting on the direction prematurely.
Because once this needle drops, BTC will most likely end this frustrating consolidation and truly choose a direction.
👉 What do you think this time will be:
Spike to shake out longs → then surge to new highs?
Or
Repeated sweeps up and down → grinding out both longs and shorts before taking off?
#DailyOrbit Robinhood Chain has generated a total of 13.05 million in fees within two months of launch, of which 1.3 million fees were allocated to Arbitrum. Uniswap processed over 7 million transactions yesterday, setting a new record high.
L2 tokens finally have a concrete revenue return path. But don't forget that on September 23, 139 million ARB tokens will be unlocked; high network earnings do not necessarily mean low selling pressure.
UNI's record trading volume is a good thing, but high fees do not mean UNI holders will receive money; these are two different matters.
I currently do not hold ARB or UNI but am keeping an eye on them. After the ARB unlock and sell-off, there might be an opportunity.#Nonfarm data divergence before release, September rate hike expectations heat up
The most interesting thing in the market right now is not whether BTC rises or falls, but that macro data is showing divergence.
September rate hike expectations have clearly heated up, and the market has even started to reprice the possibility of "continued tightening." (Reuters)
But I actually think $BTC 77000 might not be the end at all.
What really needs caution is the nonfarm payrolls.
If employment data is weak, rate hike expectations could quickly cool down, and $BTC might instead see a repricing of liquidity expectations.
But if nonfarm payrolls exceed expectations, combined with continued pressure from inflation and oil prices, then the market will have to face a question again:
Will the September rate hike really happen?
So it's a bit early to directly judge "77000 is the bottom" or "77000 is the top."
What I’m more focused on is:
👉 Whether the nonfarm payrolls can change rate hike expectations
👉 Whether US Treasury yields will continue to rise
👉 Whether BTC can firmly hold around 80,000 again
#Nonfarm data divergence before release, September rate hike expectations heat up
77000 is not the end, it might just be the starting point of the next round of volatility.
The real big show this week might not have started yet.
What do you think after the nonfarm payrolls, will $BTC first surge to 80,000 or first test 77,000? $BTC Is this moving away from a bull market and heading into a bear market?
According to Lookonchain monitoring, the government of the Kingdom of Bhutan has just transferred out another 400 BTC, worth about $30.62 million.
This short-term action intensifies market concerns. This continuous selling behavior itself sends a "supply increase" signal to the market, which may unsettle some investors.
However, the actual selling pressure is limited, buffered by multiple factors:
1. It is not a one-time dump. Bhutan adopts a planned gradual liquidation, and large transfers are mostly done through over-the-counter (OTC) trades, which do not directly impact the exchange order books.
2. The remaining holdings are not much. Currently, Bhutan holds about 3,000-4,000 BTC, which is not large compared to the daily market trading volume. At the current pace, it is expected to be fully liquidated around October 2026.
3. There are other forces hedging. For example, when Bhutan made transfers before, the US Bitcoin ETFs often saw strong capital inflows, which can offset the selling pressure caused by government liquidation to some extent.
The Bhutan government's transfer of another 400 bitcoins is a mild negative signal to the market but is unlikely to trigger drastic volatility. It is more like a "continuous potential selling pressure" to watch rather than a one-time "black swan event."
#21家金融机构拟推美元稳定币 #财报观察员：戴尔业绩超预期，博通雪花接棒 #Robinhood链上放量，币股Meme引争议 AI companies used to compete for chips, and now they are starting to compete for a city's water and electricity meters. On September 1, Cerebras announced that it will use a phased expansion AI data center in Mikkeli, Finland: the first phase of 50MW is already under construction, with a final contracted IT capacity of 165MW and a service order term of seven years. Finnish public media Yle provided a more vivid reference—the actual power demand of the entire park may exceed 200MW, with an annual electricity consumption roughly equivalent to a city the size of Tampere. These numbers are easiest to write off as "another giant computing power center," but I think what it truly indicates is that AI competition is shifting from chip specifications to land, power grids, cooling, and long-term contracts. Chips can be bought, but stable 200MW power access cannot be replicated overnight. Whoever first secures substations, cooling systems, construction teams, and local governments into contracts will be the first to get shelf space for the next round of inference services. The project also tells a Nordic story well: closed-loop cooling reuses water repeatedly, and waste heat can be recycled back to the city in the future. This design is commendable, but "recyclable" does not mean "already recycled." Who pays for the heat network interface, how to match winter and summer demand, and whether the subsequent three phases can deliver power on time will determine if the beautiful recycling diagram can ultimately be realized. For a company like Cerebras, which challenges the GPU ecosystem, 165MW has another layer of meaning. It is not just selling a larger wafer-scale chip but betting that customers are willing to continuously purchase the entire inference capacity. Seven years of serviceIt turns out that the real person anxious behind this "dollar saving the yen" situation is Trump.
The New York Times revealed that in May this year, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen had an intense nearly two-hour discussion with the Japanese Finance Minister about the yen issue.
Yellen's core question was very direct: Why is Japan still trying to devalue the yen?
Because from Trump's perspective, a weak yen is not solely beneficial to Japan. The weaker the yen, the more price advantage Japanese exporters have, which further squeezes U.S. manufacturing and export companies.
What the U.S. is truly dissatisfied with is Japan's long-term maintenance of low interest rates while continuously expanding fiscal spending. Capital keeps flowing out of Japan in search of higher returns, ultimately forming a cycle of "low interest rates + fiscal expansion + yen depreciation."
So now the U.S. approach is becoming clearer:
Not to continue propping up the yen through foreign exchange intervention, but to hope that the Bank of Japan raises interest rates on its own.
This is the key point.
If the Bank of Japan enters a sustained rate-hiking cycle, the yen carry trades built on ultra-low interest rates in the past may begin to reverse.
Once a large amount of capital flows back to Japan, global assets will be affected.
So don't just focus on the dollar-yen exchange rate.
What really deserves attention is where global capital will withdraw from and flow to after Japan raises rates.
$BTC, $ETH, U.S. stocks, and even gold could all be repriced.
This time, what Trump may be targeting is not just the yen, but the global capital faucet.AI servers have been selling like crazy, with $DELL jumping nearly 10% in pre-market trading. I think this earnings report explains where the AI money is flowing better than just looking at NVIDIA $NVDA alone.
Dell's latest quarter revenue surged 58% to $47 billion, hitting a record high. Even more impressive are AI servers: cumulative orders have reached $60 billion, with about $95 billion in backlog. The company has raised its full-year revenue forecast from $167 billion to $192 billion.
This is easy to understand. NVIDIA sells GPUs, but if enterprises really want to build AI computing power, they can't just take a few GPUs home and plug them in themselves. The entire server, storage, networking, and racks all need to be assembled and delivered by someone, and Dell is capturing that layer of revenue.
So after this earnings report came out, $SMCI and $HPE also rose in pre-market trading. The AI industry chain is becoming increasingly clear: GPUs get the first bite, and server systems and storage start to get the second bite.
Now, I'm more interested in watching those "people selling shovels." As long as Dell's $95 billion order backlog keeps growing, it shows that no matter how much big companies talk about an AI bubble, their CapEx spending hasn't stopped.
#财报观察员：戴尔业绩超预期，博通雪花接棒 $BTC dropped from 81,000 back to 76,000! The bond vigilantes are pressuring the Fed, are you still foolishly waiting for a rebound?
Bitcoin just touched 81,000 and then quickly corrected nearly 10%, now struggling around 76,000. Behind this is the surge in US Treasury yields — the 10-year yield has surged to 4.814%, the highest since November 2023. The market is betting that the Fed will intervene again like last month to support the market, but the hawks dare not pull the trigger easily, fearing it will fuel inflation expectations. On top of that, oil prices have returned to $90, financing costs are rising across the board, and risk assets are the first to get hit.
Retail investors say: The bond market is unsettled, oil prices are surging, the Fed simply can’t ease. Those with heavy positions should reduce on rallies, those looking to bottom-fish should wait a bit longer. Remember, every time you think it’s the bottom, it’s often just halfway up the mountain. #BTC high-level pullback, gold linkage under test #TradingVoice: Your experience deserves to be heard BitMine has hoarded 5.9 million $ETH, with 86% staked, earning over 300 million USD in interest annually just by holding. This isn’t just hoarding coins; it’s like running an interest-collecting company with coins. Strategy holds 840,000 $BTC, and MSCI’s plan to remove them has been delayed again, but the threat still looms. The critical points aren’t the amount of coins but the index seats and financing channels. Passive funds are being squeezed by rules, and those who bought at high prices are cut off. If you ask me, it’s better to hold coins yourself; the premium in the treasury comes from financial engineering, and taking BTC’s beta yourself is more straightforward.
#加密财库扩张面临指数资格考验 $CELO — RECOVERY PLAY 📈
Current Price : 0.07727
24H Move : +5.27%
Entry : 0.0760 - 0.0775
Target :
*0.080
0.085
0.090*
Stoploss : 0.0725
Resistance : 0.080
Signal : LONG 📈
Reason : $CELO is building positive momentum and approaching the 0.080 resistance. A clean breakout and successful retest of this level could give buyers room to push toward 0.085 and 0.090.The four-year cycle is still valid, but the amplitude is converging. The peak in October 2025 will be the mildest in history, with an MVRV peak of only 2.29, far lower than previous rounds. The bottom of this $BTC retracement will most likely fall in the 40,000-60,000 range, with the time window pointing to Q4 2026.
A higher bottom is a good thing, but don’t rush to bottom-fish—the majority of on-chain bottom signals have not yet been triggered. Endure these few months and hold low-priced chips while waiting for the next halving narrative.
The cycle exists, the pattern exists, the opportunity exists. Let’s hold on together.🧡
#BTC #FourYearCycle #OuyiPlanet
#非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温 #Robinhood链上放量，币股Meme引争议 #财报观察员：戴尔业绩超预期，博通雪花接棒 This market situation is really a bit of a slap in the face.
A few days ago, the market was still discussing liquidity returning, ETFs continuously buying, and some people had even started celebrating $BTC hitting 100,000 in advance.
But then the wind shifted: oil prices approached $91 again, the 10-year US Treasury yield rose to 4.78%, and the market began to trade inflation and interest rate hikes again.
$BTC couldn't hold up either, directly falling back below 80,000.
This is quite awkward.
After shouting "digital gold" for so long, when macro data changes, the trend still follows US Treasuries, the dollar, oil prices, and US stocks.
Oil prices rise, worrying about inflation;
Yields rise, worrying about rate hikes;
The dollar strengthens, worrying about liquidity;
Risk assets fall, and BTC also finds it hard to stand alone.
On the surface, it's decentralized, but in reality, every day it's watching the Fed's next move.
What the market really needs to answer now might not be when BTC will break 100,000, but how long this round of macro pressure will last.
If the expectation of a rate hike in September heats up further, do you think BTC will first dip near 70,000, or will it first squeeze shorts to wash them out before continuing to fall?$BTC $ETH $SOL Don't be fooled by the green on the big chart; the market isn't dead yet. BTC dominance has climbed to 59.1%, the fear and greed index is at 63, and money is moving from SOL and XRP to BTC—not a retreat but a consolidation.
Liquidations of 340 million have hurt long positions, but FIL is up 14%, UNI up 9.5%, ARB up 8.3%—DeFi and storage sectors are bucking the trend, with internal volume cutting each other.
Leverage hasn't decreased but increased; a certain whale holds 45,000 ETH longs with an unrealized loss of 4.1 million USD, liquidation price at 2,252. If ETH tests 2,250 again, it will trigger a chain reaction.
Cycle rhythm: daily chart is adjusting, 4-hour chart hugging the lower Bollinger Band, but the ETF's net inflow of 3.5 billion USD in August provides support. As long as 76K isn't broken, it's still a high-level box, not a reversal.
Macro events to watch: September 5th Nonfarm Payrolls + 16th FOMC; now all rises and falls are driven by news. To profit, trade the edges of the box; don't trust calls saying "today will definitely break." #SEC拟更新转让代理规则，证券上链受关注 #日本长债收益率升至高位 #贝森特拟放宽银行信贷，高利率压力待解 $BTC Fear and Greed Index drops from 88 to 70, still in the extreme greed zone - detailed analysis
Range standards: 75-100 = Extreme Greed; 51-74 = Greed. 88 indicates overheated frenzy, falling back to 70 means it has left the extreme greed zone and entered the greed zone, but bullish sentiment has not completely dissipated.
1. The index dropping from 88 to 70 sends two signals
① Retail FOMO frenzy cools down, starting to take profits and reduce leverage
At 88: The market is overwhelmingly bullish, many retail investors chase the rally, contract longs are fully leveraged, social media is full of bullish voices, indicating an overheated market.
Falling back to 70:
• Price rally fails, BTC repeatedly hits resistance at 80,000, combined with hawkish comments from Powell and Middle East geopolitical risks, some short-term bulls choose to take profits and exit;
• Contract longs reduce positions, leverage levels decline, the market no longer blindly chases higher;
• Social media heat and Google search interest both decline, "fear of missing out" anxiety fades.
② Cooling sentiment ≠ immediate bottom, conditions for bottom fishing are not yet met
Contrarian indicator logic: Extreme fear marks historical bottoms; a greed level of 70 only means the frenzy is subsiding, risks are not fully cleared.
A common misconception: When the index falls, it’s time to bottom fish. Reality: The drop from 88 to 70 is just the first phase of sentiment release; it can still continue down to 50 or 40.
2. Cross-verification with current market conditions
1. Spot market: BTC-ETF has no large-scale sell-off but stops aggressive buying; on-chain whales do not panic sell, long-term support remains. This indicates retail sentiment is cooling, institutions are still cautious, no collective despair selling.
2. Coin structure: The overall market is correcting, but there are still localized profit opportunities in DeFi and storage narratives, with some tokens rising against the trend. This is typical of the greed zone: overall optimism declines, but some speculative hopes remain, and funds are still playing localized opportunities.
3. Macro pressure: The Fed rate hike expectations rising is the external driver of this index decline, not an internal spontaneous capitulation in crypto.
Summary
1. 88 to 70: Frenzied FOMO subsides, short-term bulls take profits and reduce leverage, but overall bullish expectations remain, risks are not fully released.
2. Cooling sentiment does not mean the downtrend is over; as long as the index stays above 50, most of the market remains bullish.
3. The future direction of the index mainly depends on changes in Fed rate hike expectations driven by nonfarm payroll data.
#非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温
#Robinhood链上放量，币股Meme引争议 At 19:32 on September 2, BTC was around $76,490, down about 2.0% in 24 hours. OKX reported a range of $76,261—$78,421, Binance reported $76,264—$78,424, both almost identical.
This trend is very suitable for discussing "time stop-loss." On September 1 at 13:00, the 1-hour candle once touched $79,220, closing near $79,175; the next hour closed back near $78,740. The evening rebound peaked only at $78,424, and at 18:00 today it dipped again to $76,261. From the brief breakout to the low point, the retracement was about 3.7%.
The issue is not who can guess the direction, but whether the breakout strategy pre-defines "how long the market has to prove I'm right." If the price only briefly stands above the threshold, quickly falls back, and subsequent highs move lower, the invalidation signal actually appears earlier than the fixed stop-loss price. Binding exit only to a single price line easily lets small mistakes turn into big losses; setting both structural failure and time failure prevents constantly making excuses for the market.
How many candles would you require a breakout to hold for confirmation? If the price does not hit the stop-loss but fails to continue within two hours, would you reduce your position or keep waiting?
#BTC #RiskManagement #TradingDiscipline BTC plunged 2300 points! Over 790 long positions trapped, keep this solution for getting out of the trap!
The biggest fear in the crypto circle is bottom-fishing halfway up the mountain. Many friends chased longs at 790, the current price is 763, with an unrealized loss of nearly 2300 points, torn between cutting losses or holding on.
Reasons for the decline: The intensified US-Iran conflict suppresses risk assets, while the market's expectation of a Fed rate hike in September heats up; on-chain demand weakens, funds have net outflows for multiple consecutive cycles, with a single-day outflow reaching 1.746 billion.
Technically, the 1-hour Bollinger Bands open downward, the 775 middle band is the primary resistance, and the MACD green bars shrinking only indicate an oversold rebound repair, not a trend reversal.
Practical solution to get out of the trap:
1. Control key support: Focus on the 761-767 range, if the price stabilizes, continue holding; if it breaks below 760 with volume, stop loss decisively to prevent further losses.
2. Add positions in batches to average down cost: Lightly add positions at 761-765 to lower the average holding price near 775; gradually reduce positions during the rebound at 775-778 to compress holding risk.
3. Strictly follow double stop-loss rules: If the rebound fails to break through the 782-785 range, exit all positions; if it breaks below 760, exit immediately to prioritize capital preservation.
In trading, learn to admit mistakes timely; capital is needed to have trading opportunities. If unsure about holding, do not operate based on feelings. The above solution is for reference only.
$BTC
#非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温 $BTC and $XAU both fell. What signals are they closely releasing? What will the market look like in the future? Is the crypto space following gold?
1. The double sell-off market releases 3 core signals
1. Macro liquidity tightening expectations dominate absolutely, traditional safe-haven logic fails
Gold is originally a geopolitical conflict safe-haven asset, BTC is called digital gold, but now both are falling simultaneously. This indicates: the bearish impact of rising real US Treasury yields has overshadowed Middle East geopolitical safe-haven buying.
Both are non-interest-bearing assets with no dividend. When the market prices in a higher probability of a September rate hike and US Treasury yields rise, the opportunity cost of holding gold and bitcoin rises sharply, leading institutions to reduce holdings of both assets, with funds flowing back to the dollar and US Treasuries.
2. The market enters a "liquidity first" mode, causing collective asset liquidation
When interest rate expectations change drastically, institutions need to replenish margin and will sell the most liquid assets they hold. Gold and BTC have ample liquidity and are sold first, causing both safe-haven and risk assets to fall together.
3. BTC's risk attribute outweighs its safe-haven attribute
Gold has continuous global central bank purchases as a medium- to long-term base; Bitcoin has no central bank backing. Coupled with leverage and contracts, under the same macro bearish conditions, BTC and ETH declines will be significantly greater than gold, and altcoin volatility will further amplify.
2. Is the crypto space following gold?
✅Short term: highly correlated, but gold is not the "conductor"; they are "partners in hardship," both driven by real US Treasury yields.
• US Treasury yields fall → gold rises, BTC likely strengthens in sync
• US Treasury yields rise → gold falls, BTC bears pressure simultaneously
❌In the medium to long term, the two will definitely diverge; crypto will not fully follow gold
1. Gold's underlying support: global central bank gold purchases, physical demand, inflation-hedging allocation demand, long-term geopolitical reserve demand.
2. BTC's underlying support: ETF institutional fund inflows and outflows, crypto industry narratives, regulation, halving cycles, on-chain funds.
3. Key market watch distinctions
1. Do not treat gold prices as a leading indicator for BTC; the true leading indicators are real US Treasury yields and the US dollar index. When yields rise, both suffer; when yields turn down, there is a basis for recovery.
2. Gold falling ≠ BTC must fall; gold rising ≠ BTC must rise. Only when driven by macro interest rates do they move together.
3. BTC has ETF fund variables; gold has central bank purchase variables. These two variables can break their synchronous correlation at any time.
Brief summary
1. BTC and gold falling together represents non-interest-bearing assets collectively sold off due to rate hike expectations; geopolitical safe-haven logic is temporarily invalid. It is not gold dragging crypto down, but the same macro bearish factors hitting both simultaneously.
2. Highly correlated in the short term, but medium- to long-term trends will diverge. Crypto has its own independent funds and industry narratives and will not permanently follow gold.
3. All market turning points anchor on US nonfarm payroll data and changes in real US Treasury yields.
#非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温
#Robinhood链上放量，币股Meme引争议
#21家金融机构拟推美元稳定币 $SOL fell back to $100
I have actually started paying attention again
Looking at the market, SOL retraced along with the broader market, with short-term cycles pressured by risk appetite and macro data. Around 100 is a psychological barrier and a previous high-volume trading area. But simply dismissing it as a one-day pullback is a bit crude.
What’s more worth watching are the on-chain and supply-side changes. Alpenglow has entered an activation rhythm, aiming to push further on confirmation delay and consensus efficiency. If successfully implemented, it will have substantial significance for high-frequency trading, payment settlement, and ecosystem experience. Plus, with the previous inflation reduction proposal passed, the release pace slows down, so the chip pressure is not unidirectionally increasing.
Demand side hasn’t stopped either: ETF expectations/product narratives, stablecoins and payment scenarios, ecosystem project activity—all continue to fuel SOL’s fundamental base. Of course, the premise is that BTC doesn’t continue to drag down risk assets. If 100 breaks, the next level depends on whether support and on-chain activity weaken simultaneously.
My approach: no chasing shorts, nor rushing to fully buy in; waiting for a stop-loss structure and volume confirmation near 100. With upgrades + supply improvements + institutional attention, this kind of asset is more worth adding to the watchlist during pullbacks than pure sentiment coins.
#非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温 #Robinhood链上放量，币股Meme引争议 Today's drop is not sudden!
Overnight, US stocks first rose then fell sharply; after missile news broke, oil prices jumped, bonds were sold off, yields surged, and stocks and gold both fell.
Asia directly took the hit, with the Nikkei, South Korea, and A-shares all weak, especially the ChiNext board. There was no momentum at the open; everyone is basically waiting.
The core issues are twofold: escalation in the Middle East reignites inflation expectations; after Powell's statement last week, the probability of a September rate hike was revised upward again. When oil prices rise, global risk assets come under pressure together, making it hard for A-shares to stand alone.
What follows is even more critical. On the 2nd, the small nonfarm payrolls; on the 4th, the nonfarm payrolls; on the 11th, US CPI; from the 15th to 17th, the interest rate meeting; in between, there are stock index, options, and A50 deliveries; and on the 20th, the LPR. The schedule is too dense, so volatility will be greater than usual.
My view is threefold:
Don't rush to bottom-fish in the short term; data and geopolitics are not yet clear.
The real direction changers are still oil prices and CPI; only when they ease is there room for a rebound.
Avoid chasing gains or selling off around delivery dates; first manage your positions.
Survive September first, then talk about opportunities! $BTC #Robinhood链上放量，币股Meme引争议 #非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温 Cango lost $81.6 million in a single quarter and began converting mining farms into AI GPU data centers $BTC Mining companies are now seriously calculating: should they continue to compete on computing power, or sell their power and data centers to AI? Cango's latest Q2 financial report shows the company's quarterly revenue was $50.8 million, of which $47.4 million came from Bitcoin mining, but the net loss for the quarter reached $81.6 million. The company mined 656 BTC that quarter, with an average cash mining cost of about $73,313 per BTC. After the financial report was released, Cango's stock price fell more than 20% intraday on September 1. 1. Paul Yu began to emphasize not scale, but how much per unit of hash power Cango CEO Paul Yu was very direct this time: "Unit economics rather than scale." In other words, the company no longer simply pursues higher hash power but focuses more on whether each unit of hash power is profitable. The company is phasing out old, low-efficiency mining machines, shifting some computing power to managed leasing, and has begun hedging to reduce the impact of BTC price fluctuations on operating cash flow. 2. The real change: mining farms are shifting toward AI GPU infrastructure Cango has completed partial infrastructure upgrades at its Georgia mining farm, currently supporting up to about 3MW of GPU computing power. GPU hardware is arriving in batches, and the company has started introducing it to customers, with Q3 expected to be finalizedAlso, there are always people who simplify complex matters.
Take OKB for example. In hindsight, "selling at the peak and catching the dip" looks great, but during the trading session, you never know if it's a dip or a shakeout before a breakout. Previously, you could catch it because the structure gave you the chance; now liquidity, platform narratives, and buyback/ecosystem expectations have all become more complicated, so you can't treat historical candlesticks as a script.
Some ask why not sell between 110-120? The problem is if you sell and it continues to rise, your mindset immediately distorts: chasing, fearing catching a pump; not chasing, watching it move away from your cost; if you really chase and it pulls back, you become even more passive. Especially when your position hasn't returned to a comfortable level, frequently switching is the easiest way to mess up your rhythm.
I prefer to handle it according to rules and cost: core positions are not moved lightly, only small positions are used to cope with volatility; if you really want to set pressure points, set them in advance, not gambling on emotions during trading. Long-term focuses on platform value capture and buyback burn logic, short-term focuses on emotional dips. Mixing the two leads to both greed and fear.
So it's not that I can't do T, it's that I don't want trading actions to undermine holding conviction. Be a bit more patient, at least you won't be led by the market's emotions.
#非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温 #Robinhood链上放量，币股Meme引争议 Dell's AI servers sold for 16.4 billion, so why are Broadcom and Snowflake the real tests?
Dell's quarterly revenue reached $47 billion, with the annual AI server forecast raised to $74 billion. Hardware shipments are indeed skyrocketing. But equating a hardware sales boom directly with a successful AI business cycle is premature.
The strong server sales essentially only indicate that tech giants are still frantically spending on the arms race (CapEx capital expenditures). However, whether the computing power purchased can actually be monetized is not decided by Dell.
The upcoming earnings reports are the true litmus test: Broadcom will verify the real capacity of hyperscale clusters to digest custom chips (ASICs) and network switching; Snowflake must reveal the most critical card—whether ordinary enterprises are truly running AI in their daily operations and continuously paying real money for it.
In the entire industry chain, Dell selling servers is just stacking upfront costs; downstream software generating cash flow is the oxygen for the whole bull market.
If enterprise AI applications cannot bring excess returns, the servers sold wildly today will become a heavy depreciation burden on the giants' balance sheets tomorrow.
The shovel sellers can only determine the momentum of the gold rush; the miners who extract real gold decide the lifespan of the boom.
#财报观察员：戴尔业绩超预期，博通雪花接棒 The most unusual scene today: the US-Iran conflict escalates, yet gold is still falling.
On the surface, it looks like a failure of safe-haven demand, but in essence, interest rate logic is outweighing geopolitical logic. Spot gold dipped to around 4300, falling for several trading days—not because capital is indifferent to risk, but because the market is repricing the "inflation—interest rate—real yield" relationship. Brent crude was pushed near 95; with tightening on the energy front, rate cut expectations immediately retreated, the probability of short-term rate hikes/maintaining high rates rose, US Treasury real yields pushed up, and gold, as a non-yielding asset, got squeezed.
The chain is now very clear: geopolitical friction pushes oil, oil pushes inflation expectations, inflation expectations push interest rates, and interest rates suppress precious metals and risk appetite. So when looking at gold, you can't just count missiles; you have to watch whether oil prices can stabilize, whether US Treasury yields continue to rise, and whether the dollar strengthens simultaneously. If Brent crude rushes to 100, gold may not follow safe-haven demand in the short term; instead, it might continue to be pressured by real interest rates; high-valuation tech stocks in equities will also be more sensitive.
After employment and inflation data are released and rate expectations stabilize, gold's safe-haven and monetary attributes will perform better. Currently, don't blindly bottom-fish using a single safe-haven framework; position sizing and stop-losses should be set in advance.
#非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温 #Robinhood链上放量，币股Meme引争议 $XRP's recent rally has clearly cooled down. Data shows that the token has dropped nearly 6% over the past week, but over a longer period, it still gained more than 35% in the last two weeks and over 26% in the past month. On August 22, XRP once surged to $1.66 before gradually retreating.
The previous rapid rise of XRP was largely driven by Bitcoin breaking through $80,000, which boosted market risk appetite and led funds to flow into mainstream altcoins simultaneously. Additionally, the U.S. Treasury's expansion of the Treasury repo operations was seen by the market as helping to improve liquidity, indirectly supporting crypto asset performance.
However, short-term positive factors are weakening. The hawkish signals from the Jackson Hole meeting have reinforced market concerns about high interest rates. If future rate expectations tighten further, risk assets may face greater pressure, and XRP could continue to be under strain, even risking falling below $1 again. $BTC $ETH #非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温 #21家金融机构拟推美元稳定币 #BTC高位回落，黄金联动受考验 $BTC $ETH
If you were around in August, you probably experienced the same kind of heartbeat.
From the low point where you didn’t want to open the market app, to being pushed all the way near 81,000, the community sentiment instantly flipped; after Jackson Hole, it retraced back to around 78,000. The rise and fall was basically just a single daily candle. That’s normal—don’t judge the whole month by one day’s sentiment.
This August move wasn’t just air: during the period of the US spot Bitcoin ETF, net inflows were obvious, marking a strong capital window recently, and short squeezes also helped push the price. But later, inflows stopped and net outflows appeared, indicating not everyone was willing to keep supporting above 80,000; turnover and disagreements increased.
I look at levels, not slogans: BTC in the 76,000–78,000 range is first a chip exchange zone after a big rise; only when it stands back at 81,000–82,000 can we talk about August’s move upgrading from a rebound to a trend. ETH follows around 2450–2470 but with softer elasticity; the main focus remains on BTC.
Entering September, buybacks, legislative milestones, macro employment data, and interest rate expectations will all amplify volatility; historical seasonal effects are just background, not trading basis. Tonight feels more like a test: will 80,000 be fully given back, or are people still here but just jittery? Keep positions light and wait for confirmation; don’t hand your position over to emotions.
#非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温 #Robinhood链上放量，币股Meme引争议 Apple changes leadership, Ternus takes over on September 1. The market often cites a 22.7x multiple during Cook's tenure, but breaking it down: the stock price rose from 13.35 to 316.61, which is 23.7x, while the market cap only increased from 347 billion to 4.76 trillion, a 13.4x multiple. The difference does not come from business growth but from about 40% of the outstanding shares being repurchased, shrinking from approximately 26 billion to 14.6 billion. The per-share return created by the reduced denominator is a one-time resource; the best portion to buy has already been bought. Ternus's new card is in Mac: quarterly revenue of 10.4 billion hit a new June quarter high, up 29% year-over-year, the fastest in the company; unified memory allows a 64GB Mac to run models that 24GB discrete graphics cannot handle. But another 22x increase would equal 105 trillion. For reference, Apple's 4.76 trillion market cap is already 1.8 times the entire crypto market's 2.6 trillion, with $BTC at 76,658 during the same period. There will be no multiple-level rally in the next 12 months. #非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温
Can't win, brothers
The US military launched airstrikes targeting the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, while Trump simultaneously warned that if Tehran retaliates, it will face even more severe strikes. In response, Bitcoin plummeted sharply from around $79,000, briefly dipping to $76,762 during trading, breaking below the $77,000 mark; Ethereum weakened in tandem, falling below $2,400. Meanwhile, WTI crude oil surged 5.2% to $90.22, and Brent rose 4.6% to $94.65.
Geopolitical risks ignited oil prices, pushing up inflation expectations, which in turn caused the probability of a September rate hike to jump from 39.6% to 66.2% within a week—five links in a chain, each connected.
Interestingly, the ETF market showed a clear divergence. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net outflow of $236 million yesterday, with BlackRock's IBIT alone withdrawing $201 million, reversing the $217 million net inflow recorded just the day before. In contrast, Ethereum spot ETFs have maintained net inflows for 11 consecutive trading days, adding another $87.68 million yesterday. Bitcoin is bleeding capital while Ethereum is attracting funds—two streams in the same race moving in opposite directions.
Currently, Ethereum is priced around $2,400, just $63 above its concentrated long liquidation price—in other words, a further 2.6% drop would trigger forced liquidation of nearly $100 million in positions.
The flames of conflict have not died down, crypto prices are under pressure, and ETF divergences are intensifying. This game is tightening with every move.
$BTC
$ETH
#Robinhood链上放量，币股Meme引争议
#财报观察员：戴尔业绩超预期，博通雪花接棒 $BTC $ETH $SOL hovered around $77,000 this morning, down about 1.8% in 24h, ETH lost support at 2,420, SOL dropped over 4% to around 99, BTC weak, altcoins even weaker.
The whole network saw $340 million liquidated in 24h, 87,000 people wiped out, longs accounted for 273 million — leveraged longs chasing the 78K rebound yesterday were basically cut down.
From a cycle perspective, after a 24% rise in August, the daily chart is retracing, the 5/10-day moving averages look like a death cross, 76,800–77,000 is the short-term critical level; breaking it points to the 75,000 liquidity pool.
On the macro side, oil prices broke 90, 10Y US Treasury yield at 4.79%, September rate hike odds priced up to 66%, fear and greed index still stuck at 63 in the greed zone, a typical case of “greedy on the surface, fearful inside.”
Forget about profits today; not giving back gains is a win; strictly control leverage before the non-farm payrolls, don’t give back August’s profits in one day. #BTC高位回落，黄金联动受考验 #SEC拟更新转让代理规则，证券上链受关注 #贝森特拟放宽银行信贷，高利率压力待解 #Diverging data before non-farm payrolls, September rate hike expectations heat up
Diverging data before non-farm payrolls, September rate hike expectations heat up, $BTC has dropped to 76500
BTC dropped again, hitting a low of 76261, now hovering around 76500. A couple of days ago it was still above 78,000, dropping nearly 2000 points in two days.
ISM Manufacturing PMI fell from 55.6 to 54.6, below the expected 55.2, indicating a slowdown in manufacturing expansion. But the prices paid index remains high at 71.1, so cost pressures have not eased. JOLTS job openings are 7.27 million, below expectations but slightly up from the previous 7.18 million; employment hasn't collapsed nor fully improved.
These two data points don't give a clear one-sided answer. The probability of a rate hike has already climbed above 66%, US Treasury yields are rising again, and high Beta assets are indeed being squeezed hard.
The market's current single theme: waiting for the non-farm payrolls. On September 4th at 8:30 PM, the real directional decision will come. If non-farm payrolls are weak, rate hike expectations cool down, BTC rebounds; if strong, pressure continues, and if 77,000 can't hold, it may drop to 75,000.
In this market, chasing rallies or selling into dips risks getting chopped back and forth. Better to wait for the data to land before making moves. Today's market rebound is just a pump!! Isn't this just a steady climb? Today's pump target points were reached one after another. Although the daily level hasn't yet completed the 815-755 range breakout in the short term, the market's highs and lows continue to move downward, with supports being continuously broken. However, every time the bottom support is touched, a small rebound is triggered. Going forward, pay close attention to the effectiveness of the 760-755 level breakdown; if it breaks, the next short-term support below is 738. The short-term support below Ethereum at 2355 is 2310 $BTC $ETH This issue is no longer as simple as "Will US sanctions on Iran cause oil prices to rise?"
Now both sides are directly choking each other by targeting oil tankers and shipping lanes.
The US just struck about 100 targets in Iran and for the first time executed an "oil tanker for oil tanker" exchange: Iran hit a commercial ship, and the US hit an Iranian government oil tanker.
Iran didn’t back down either; it turned around and launched drones toward Kuwait and Bahrain, also threatening to further tighten control over the Strait of Hormuz.
The worst part is, the US’s own crude oil inventory has dropped by about 2.6 million barrels, and diesel and other distillate inventories are also declining. With incidents in the shipping lanes and domestic stockpiles falling, it’s hard for oil prices to stay calm right now.
The US has already blocked banks, shipping, gold, technology, and digital assets all at once, and now military pressure has been added.
The harsher the restrictions, the more likely Iran is to use the Strait of Hormuz as leverage.
So don’t assume that just because there’s a war, $BTC and $XAU will immediately rise.
When oil prices surge, the market may first trade on energy inflation, interest rate hikes, and US Treasury yields; BTC and US stocks can still get hit, and gold might also be hammered by liquidity first.
The US is indeed tightening the screws hard, but the tighter it gets, the more valuable Iran’s counter-leverage on the Strait of Hormuz becomes.
Tonight, don’t just watch oil prices—watch whether ships can still pass normally.
$ETH
#霍尔木兹风险升温，能源通胀受关注 $KAITO 50x short, +714.89%. Entered at 0.3497, now 0.2997, still holding the position.
Like a sudden breeze on a summer evening, it's cool, but you can't forget to close the window just because it feels good. A 50x short position, no matter how beautiful the floating profit looks, is just a "scenery on the account." The protection line must be nailed down first; don't let a single pullback turn your dinner into stomach acid.
New narratives surge fiercely but recede quickly. Now, no chasing, no betting on a reversal, just watching it slowly give back, like watching the green plant on the balcony—watering it less each day actually helps it live more steadily. #非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温
Wash the bowl first, keep an eye on the market after hours. Do you watch the market while eating dinner or turn off your device and go for a walk after eating? $BTC $ETH #伦敦证券交易所与Payward拟推英股代币化
The leader has something to say
LSE is collaborating with Payward, the parent company of Kraken, to explore tokenization of UK stocks. The plan is to support xStocks on the LSE24 trading venue by 2027, with the first batch of London-listed xStocks launching in the coming weeks. Payward intends to include the 100 largest market cap companies on the London Stock Exchange within the xStocks framework.
This is different from Robinhood Chain's crypto-stock pairing. Robinhood is a chain-driven Meme market, while LSE is an exchange-led infrastructure buildout. Both approaches are progressing simultaneously.
Currently, xStocks are merely tokenized representations tracking stock performance 1:1, without direct ownership of the underlying shares. The next phase will explore whether it can extend from price exposure to trading, settlement, and shareholder rights arrangements, which is key to whether the RWA sector can truly scale.
The above analysis is time-sensitive; orders must have stop-losses set. Good luck.半夜爬起来看盘的人，大概都能懂那种又爱又恨的感觉。 明明睡前还好好的，一睁眼仓位就绿得发光，是种什么体验？ 昨晚加密市场又给所有人上了一课。美国9月加息预期升温，加上伊朗局势再度紧张，风险资产集体跳水，BTC一度急跌到76300U附近，ETH也没扛住，下探接近2380U。整个市场像被抽走了氧气，山寨币更是血流成河。 有意思的是，我在BTC跌到77486U、ETH跌到2441U的时候选择接了针。目前浮亏100U出头，但并没有特别慌，因为这种级别的急跌，往往伴随情绪超调。市场真正在交易的，其实不是战争本身，而是不确定性溢价——资金在提前给所有可能的风险定价。 这里有个容易被忽略的细节，SNDK逆势走强，从1500U区域一路拉到1610U附近，在大盘普跌的夜里走出一条独立行情。这种强势币往往是资金最后的避风港，也说明市场并没有全面撤退，而是选择性地抱团。可惜当时注意力都在接BTC的针上，错过了这波拉升。倒是半夜挂的空单补回了一点损失，算是不幸中的小确幸。 需要冷静拆解的是当前市场的三层逻辑： - 短期看，急跌后的技术性反弹随时可能出现，但力度取决于今晚美股开盘情绪和地缘消息面。 - 中期看，Although Federal Reserve Chair Wash insisted in his Jackson Hole speech that he would "not provide forward guidance," he triggered market turmoil by releasing intensive signals. He reiterated the 2% inflation target as "unchanged" four times, mentioned "inflation" thirty times, and bluntly stated that the responsibility for high inflation lies with the central bank itself. The market immediately repriced: short-term Treasury yields rose (1-year up to 4.13%), long-term yields briefly declined, forming a curve flattening similar to a "twist operation"—but without using any policy tools, relying solely on words, it was a so-called "verbal twist operation." However, long-end yields fully gave back their declines before the close, as the bond market realized the real pressure comes from the supply side: over $10.5 trillion of U.S. debt will mature and need refinancing in the next year, plus about $2 trillion in new deficits. The Treasury had previously tried a "Treasury twist" by expanding long-term bond buybacks, but the effect was short-lived. Wash's remarks temporarily lowered inflation expectations (breakeven rates declined) but could not change the reality of the debt flood. Gold, silver, and Bitcoin plunged in response (gold fell 3.7% that day) due to tightening expectations suppressing zero-coupon assets. However, the article points out that current market volatility is mainly a "rate issue" (reaction to the Fed), while the long-term challenge is a "supply issue"—the latter will not disappear because of a few words. Investors should distinguish between the two and pay attention to the upcoming September Fed meeting, Bank of Japan decision, and Treasury buyback window developments.A 1 billion short position hangs overhead! Once 81338 is pierced, a new round of a meat grinder market will immediately start
BTC's trend in September is quite twisted: it has been grinding around 77000 below for several days, seemingly quiet on the surface, but above 81000 there is a thick stack of short position chips pressing down like a timer button. In the last surge to 81455, breaking through 80,000 instantly took away over 2 billion short leverage. This time the structure is somewhat like a replay, but the macro environment does not cooperate—employment data, rate hike pricing, the dollar, and oil disruptions are all suppressing risk assets.
The real split is at the capital level: spot ETFs and institutions are still buying with low leverage, leaning towards allocation; on the contract side, funding rates are negative, shorts are adding leverage betting on a pullback, showing strong short-term speculation. Both sides are not on the same time dimension; who gets falsified first depends on the trigger point.
If volume breaks above 81338, short stop losses will turn into passive buying, pushing prices up and triggering more short stop losses, making short squeeze quite fierce; but if macro data is strong or geopolitical/liquidity issues arise, high-leverage longs can also be counterattacked. There is no comfortable one-sided zone in a volatile market.
In terms of operation, do not preset a script; prioritize position and stop loss. 81338 is just an observation point, not a holy grail.
#非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温 #Robinhood链上放量，币股Meme引争议 #Robinhood on-chain trading surges, Meme coins and stocks take center stage
$STX
Did you all watch that Nvidia investor meeting? They boldly claimed FY28 growth of 70% is not even the ceiling, with bottlenecks in production capacity rather than demand. My first reaction was: wow, the AI narrative just got extended again, tech stock risk appetite is directly boosted, and the crypto space is also catching this wave of sentiment.
What does the capital side think about this? The demand logic for AI chips has shifted from "whether it can be sustained" to "whether it can be manufactured," which is a completely different nature. This means the duration tolerance for all risk assets has been raised, and capital is more willing to stay in growth assets rather than fleeing to safety due to inflation concerns. For our crypto market, this signals an improvement in external liquidity expectations, not a change in the crypto space's own fundamentals.
BTC will first test whether this sentiment can pull it out of the current consolidation range; ETH acts as an amplifier of risk appetite, whether capital dares to chase highs depends on its mood; SOL is a barometer for highly elastic capital, if the AI narrative ferments to overflow, it will definitely be the first pool capital tests. STX, as a leveraged product in the BTC ecosystem, its trend depends on whether BTC breaks out directionally, and is not much related to the AI news itself.
Next, I will focus on two conditions: first, whether BTC can hold above key moving averages after digesting the news; The brightest stars in today's market aren't on Bitcoin's side but with the veteran DeFi projects. Amid widespread declines, these three are bucking the trend together, as if funds are searching for deeply undervalued value spots. $ARB $CRV $UNI
But to pour cold water on this, ARB's recent rally has pushed its RSI up to 70.95, a classic overbought zone, making it the kind of position where chasing can easily get you stuck at the peak. Curve and Uniswap have more solid logic behind them: one is a veteran stablecoin swap leader, the other a top DEX. After two years of bearish valuation cuts, a bit of a rebound narrative seems reasonable.
Macro shock. The US and Iran have clashed again near the Strait of Hormuz, pushing WTI crude oil prices straight past $90, Brent up 4.6% to 94.65, and the 10-year US Treasury yield touching 4.8%, hammering global bond markets. This combination should logically crush all risk assets, yet these DeFi veterans remain green, indicating on-chain funds are indeed seeking elastic assets beyond safe havens.
My judgment is that this DeFi rebound is more of an oversold correction plus event-driven, not the horn of a new bull market. The Altcoin Season index is only 28; the main fund theme still clusters around Bitcoin. For those wanting to participate, pick CRV and UNI, which have real transaction fees; avoid chasing ARB, which is already overheated like a Teletubby. Take profits quickly and don't get attached to the fight. Himanshu Sahay: $XAU used to only be held, but now it can also be directly collateralized to borrow USD and USDC. After gold goes on-chain, the real change might not just be "more convenient trading." On September 1, Arch Lending officially began accepting PAX Gold and Tether Gold as loan collateral. Eligible users can collateralize PAXG or XAUT to directly borrow USD or USDC, with a maximum initial collateralization ratio of up to 75%. 1. Gold begins to transform from a "store of value" asset into "usable collateral." In the past, holding gold was most commonly for long-term value storage. Now, on-chain gold has an additional use: Gold → Tokenization → Collateralization → Borrow USD or USDC → While retaining gold exposure. The terms offered by Arch Lending are already very close to traditional secured loans: Minimum loan amount of $250,000; Typically 12-month term; Maximum initial collateralization ratio of 75%; 85% triggers margin call; 90% triggers liquidation. 2. This is not just a concept; there is real market lending demand. Aave previously set a $25 million debt ceiling for XAUT, which was nearly fully utilized at about $24.99 million, and the limit was later increased. This indicates that on-chain gold is not only held by those willing to keep it but also by those willing to use it for financing. Himanshu Sahay's core judgment is straightforward: "Tokenization solvesIn the evening, the market continued to contract risk, but the hotspots did not completely disappear; instead, they shifted from the relatively concentrated DeFi in the morning to storage, new coins, and a few highly volatile targets. On the news front, the conflict between the US and Iran has escalated again, and the transportation risk in the Strait of Hormuz continues to push up crude oil prices; meanwhile, US Treasury yields rose, and major US stock indices generally fell overnight. The combined pressure of oil prices, inflation, and interest rate expectations suppresses high-volatility risk assets. Regarding macro data, the market will soon face ADP employment, US factory orders, ISM services PMI, and the non-farm payroll report. During this data-intensive period, funds tend to shorten holding periods, which aligns with the current market performance: mainstream coins weaken, strong sectors rotate quickly, and small-cap targets rely on localized funds to create independent rallies. 1. Mainstream coins' declines widen, and market risk appetite continues to decrease. $BTC fell about 1.8% in the past 24 hours, trading around $76,600 in the evening, with a decline of about 1.3% in the last 4 hours and trading volume reaching 1.18 times the recent average. Compared to the morning, BTC's short-term structure has weakened. The price has approached the intraday low of $76,200, and trading volume did not significantly shrink during the decline, indicating this is not a natural pullback due to lack of trading but that funds are actively reducing risk positions. Around $76,200 is the current first line of defense. If this level is broken, the market is likely to continue seeking lower support zones; on the upside, it needs to first recover around $77,500 and then observe whether it can challenge again.While most people are still measuring Solana by the Meme market, a set of on-chain data is indicating that its role may have changed. Network revenue in the first half of the year dropped 87% year-over-year, but the internal structure has undergone an intriguing shift: the share of Meme coins in spot trading fell from 40% to 16%, while stablecoins rose from 6% to 19%. Even more noteworthy is that Solana currently handles about 97% of the on-chain tokenized stock DEX trading volume, with related scale reaching $4.9 billion in the first half of the year, and stablecoin settlement volume exceeding $1.9 trillion. Meanwhile, the SOL balance within exchanges decreased by nearly 4.9% in one week, and the US SOL ETF has seen net inflows for seven consecutive weeks, adding over $150 million last week. These signs together point to a quieter transformation—it is gradually evolving from a highly volatile speculative market into an infrastructure for stablecoin, stock, and RWA liquidity. If this evolution continues, the market’s pricing framework for SOL may also shift from short-term sentiment to a longer-term structural value reassessment. 🌿 Risk warning: On-chain structural changes still require longer-term verification, and ETF fund flows may fluctuate; investors should evaluate cautiously. $SOL$AVGO Broadcom is about to release its earnings report
Revenue expected at 26.4 billion, AI semiconductor accounts for 16 billion
❗️Pay attention to their previously stated 2027 AI revenue target of 100 billion, see if there's any upward revision
This is the leader in AI semiconductors, its stock price affects the entire sector. The earnings report will definitely be good, but Wall Street's expectations are too high. Last quarter's earnings release caused a sharp drop
There might be a spike up or down by about 10 points
Options at 335 put have 3,864 contracts
Call options between 400-420 have 925 contracts
October 2 expiration, strike price 375 USD
The price outlook doesn't seem optimistic. I opened a long position at 360; if it can reach 375 today, I will exit. If the earnings are bad, I will go short directly
Support at 355, resistance at 427 G20 Bombshell! Besentism Intends to Rewrite the Global Landscape for the Next Decade
The world cannot tolerate a country with a $1.2 trillion trade surplus (implying China)—this was a sudden remark made by U.S. Treasury Secretary Besent to the global media at the G20 Finance Ministers' meeting. This statement is not a casual criticism but a new proposal from Treasury Secretary Besent regarding the future global trade pattern, which the market calls Besentism. Today, let's talk about what exactly Besentism is and how it might impact China.
First, Besentism was not just introduced at this G20 meeting. On June 23, 2026, at a commemorative dinner for the 250th anniversary of the United States held by the New York Economic Club, Besent delivered a very important speech outlining five key principles.
The first is National Capability. In Besent's words, the U.S. economy must ensure it has critical manufacturing capabilities domestically, including semiconductors, AI, quantum computing, advanced manufacturing, shipbuilding, critical minerals, and pharmaceuticals.
The second is Reciprocity. The U.S., previously the world's largest consumer, had implicitly opened its market to global trade partners. In the future, it will shift to a pay-to-play system where trade partners must pay a fee to enter the U.S. market. Starting with the Trump administration's tariffs 2.0, we have seen this new model mature, including heavy protection fees for Japanese and South Korean automakers entering the U.S. market, typically in the form of commitments to invest heavily in U.S. manufacturing.
The third is Economic Security. Previously, U.S. multinational companies prioritized economic benefits and costs when arranging global supply chains. In the future, security will take precedence. In other words, "Just in time" will become "Just in case," preparing for scenarios where a critical supply chain link might be cut off by a strategic competitor, and how the U.S. would respond.
The fourth is Financial Leadership. This needs no elaboration: to maximize the use of dollar hegemony to impose financial deterrence and pressure on other countries worldwide. From kicking Russia out of the SWIFT system to recent financial sanctions on Iran, the U.S. has taken financial sanctions to the extreme. Besent also emphasized upgrading future sanctions from a hammer to a scalpel—fewer sanctions but more precise ones.
The fifth is Standard Setting. Whoever sets the next generation of technical standards will define the next wave of global economic growth.
These five aspects are not independent but form a closed loop of confrontational competition. From domestic national capacity, to reciprocal relations between countries, to the formation of secure industrial supply chains, to money-led global financial leadership, and finally to rule-making in high-end technology fields like AI. Once this loop is established, it will be extremely difficult for any country to break it. The greatest danger of this system lies in the U.S. embedding all its allies into such a framework, attempting to create a new internalized trade and financial system that continuously pressures its competitors.
Is this easy to achieve? I believe not at all. It seems more like a castle in the air fabricated by Besent. In today's global supply chain and trade integration, China is deeply embedded and even serves as the foundational infrastructure of global trade. At this point, any country or industry trying to separate from China's manufacturing capabilities and critical minerals is just wishful thinking.
Besent's proposed path is more of a call to action, focusing everyone's attention on the rising AI technology in the U.S. and the old era's firmly held U.S. dollar hegemony. But both are currently facing dangers. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield is 4.77%, and Besent's two attempts to rescue the market have completely failed. AI has not made any substantial progress for over half a year; OpenAI and Anthropic are still anxiously preparing for IPOs to raise funds, and the entire industry is in a confused transition phase. The issuance of AI debt and U.S. Treasuries has created a situation of mutual struggle, and all this chaos is erupting simultaneously.
It can be said that Besent's current rhetoric is an attempt to divert global attention and shift the U.S.'s ongoing liquidity crisis onto the global trade system.
Therefore, I scoff at the so-called Besentism. He has never been a strategist; he is merely a financial trader trying to win a game he is destined to lose with a depreciating asset.
The above is my personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Please be aware of the risks. Warning! US tech stocks are being bloodied, and Bitcoin is crashing along with them. This wave of risk is spreading!
Just took a quick look at the market: Nasdaq futures dropped 0.55% directly, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunged 2.14%. CRDO is the worst hit, plummeting over 8% pre-market, with the entire optical communication, storage, and semiconductor sectors all turning red.
There are three reasons: the US-Iran conflict escalation pushing oil prices up, US Treasury yields soaring to 4.81%, and the Fed's September rate hike probability doubling to 68% in a week. Simply put, the market fears inflation won't be contained, and funds are fleeing high-risk assets.
Back to our crypto circle. Bitcoin directly fell below $77,000, hitting a low of 76,762, and Ethereum also broke below 2,400. $115 million long positions were liquidated in one hour. The total crypto market cap evaporated by 3.84%.
Tycoons' view is straightforward: US tech stocks are the barometer for crypto. Institutions are cutting positions there, so risk assets here can't remain unaffected. This wave isn't caused by crypto itself; it's macro sentiment doing the damage.
What should retail investors do now? Don't rush to bottom-fish; wait until the US-Iran situation and rate hike expectations become clear. Reduce leverage if needed, hold your spot positions calmly. After this round of cleansing, that's the real opportunity to get on board.
#非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温 #Robinhood链上放量，币股Meme引争议 #财报观察员：戴尔业绩超预期，博通雪花接棒 $BTC $ETH $SOL $BTC Bitcoin just broke below $77,000. $ETH is sliding toward $2,400. In just the past hour, $60 million worth of long positions have been liquidated.
What triggered this? Iran's statement about retaliating against recent US strikes. The market is reacting to geopolitical tensions—a typical risk-off move. When uncertainty rises, cryptocurrencies tend to take the initial hit.
This sharp deleveraging shows how quickly sentiment can reverse. Leverage had been building up and is now being rapidly unwound. Watch how prices stabilize (or fail to stabilize) in the next few hours. If macro-level fear persists, we may see more downside before a rebound #非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温 The Bitcoin ecosystem finance (BTCFi) sector currently has a total token market capitalization of only about $670 million, accounting for a very small portion of the entire crypto market. It is a highly volatile and elastic niche, not suitable as a core portfolio allocation. From the perspective of logical strength rather than price increase, native staking is the core of the sector. The Babylon protocol leads with a TVL of about $4 to $5.6 billion. The native BTC staking model does not rely on bridging or wrapping, resulting in a relatively clean risk model. However, the BABY token has a market cap of only about $54 million, priced at $0.0126, down 92% from its historical high of $0.1728, with a one-year decline of 73%. The protocol's strength has not translated into token value; staking rewards mainly go to BTC holders, and BABY serves only as gas and governance on the Cosmos chain, representing a typical case where optimism about the sector does not equal optimism about the token. In the second tier, Stacks has a market cap of about $460 to $490 million, priced at $0.25, with tokens fully unlocked and no additional selling pressure. It has recently surged 51% to 83% over 7 days and 84% over a month, indicating clear capital betting on catalysts. Core DAO, based on about $314 million sidechain TVL and 5,541 BTC staked, plans to shift from emission subsidies to real income buybacks by 2026. It has a market cap of about $32.68 million, priced at $0.026, representing a low market cap plus income model with elasticity. Pendle is not a native BTCFi but serves as a yield trading gateway, up 10.9% over 7 days. Attention is needed $BTC BTC and ETH fell 2-4%, but UNI bucked the trend with a 10%+ surge, hitting an 8-month high.
It's not that the market has gone crazy; it's that the reasons for their declines are fundamentally different.
The market drop is macro-driven: US-Iran conflict → oil prices breaking 90 → inflation concerns → September rate hike bets soaring to 70% → risk assets collectively under pressure.
$UNI UNI's rise is its own story:
🔥 The burn is real. Last December, the UNIfication proposal passed with 99.9% approval, burning 100 million UNI at once and enabling the fee switch. In July, it expanded to v4 and seven chains, with daily protocol revenue jumping from $110K to $320K.
🔥 Robinhood Chain brings real money. Single-day DEX volume hit 1.56 billion, with Uniswap capturing 76% of that. In six weeks, it handled 1.5 billion in tokenized stock trading volume, accounting for 60% of the entire market's RWA DEX flow.
🔥 The most counterintuitive point: while geopolitical conflict hammered BTC, safe-haven funds flowed into on-chain tokenized US Treasuries, most of which run on Uniswap. The same event is bearish for BTC but volume-positive for Uniswap.
From a governance token with "business but no value capture," it has become a deflationary asset linked to real revenue — this is the starting point for revaluation.
⚠️ But don't get carried away: it has fallen back from the 6.378 high to around 6 dollars; the key to the story is Robinhood Chain's volume.ADP data clashes with US-Iran conflict, risk assets face a tough night
At 8:15 PM tonight, the US August ADP employment data will be released, with the market expecting an increase of 48,000 jobs. This is the first employment report after Fed's hawkish stance, and the data will directly test the strength of the "September rate hike".
At the same time, the US-Iran conflict has escalated fully, oil prices are approaching $95, Brent crude has risen over 10% in 4 days, bond yields are soaring, and stock markets are under pressure.
Impact on the crypto market:
① ADP exceeds expectations: strong employment → rate hike expectations strengthen → risk assets continue to be pressured → BTC/ETH test support
② ADP below expectations: weak employment → rate hike pressure temporarily eases → BTC/ETH may see a breathing rebound
③ Geopolitical conflict combined effect: regardless of ADP data, the combination of high oil prices + high interest rates still suppresses risk appetite, limiting short-term rebound space
Key summary: Both bulls and bears must get through the data test tonight. Play it safe and hold back, wait for the results.
$BTC $ETH
#非农前数据分化，9月加息预期升温
#美伊再交火、油轮遇阻，布油重返90美元 The exterior wall of this building is still lit up overnight, but a 24-hour increase of just 3.56% can’t even fill the expansion joints of the curtain wall glass—the load-bearing wall of $IMX is already making strange noises. The short-term RSI is 68.2; this is like the concrete strain gauge screaming, the overbought warning line has long been broken, and the SELL signal is flashing like a warning light on a safety helmet.
Don’t just look at the renderings. IMX once planned to build a comprehensive hub for NFT and gaming layers, and the design was indeed beautiful. But a real building needs to withstand wind pressure, accommodate piping, and support additional floors ten years down the line—that’s what architecture really means. The long-term RSI is only 52.8, indicating the steel structure’s load redundancy isn’t thick, and the foundation bearing capacity is at best "ordinary geological conditions," lacking the confidence of being anchored to bedrock. Now the 1H stress indicator has crossed the red line at 64, like the core shear wall cracking first under high-intensity shaking. The facade can cover it up for now, but structural engineers know that when the first crack appears, it’s time to issue a stop-work order.
Look at the scaffolding again. In the short cycle of the Bollinger Bands, the price has been squeezed to 111%, meaning it has broken through the upper band and is standing on a cantilever beam with nothing solid beneath. The pressure from the upper band is only -0.3% from the top, while the support from the lower band looks low but actually requires a 3.4% drop to reach. With such little room to maneuver, the load-bearing platform is narrow and slippery—do you expect it to stand firm? The mid-cycle is the same; the price is stuck at 89%, the upper band only gives +0.5% room, and the lower band waits for a 4.4% drop— the building’s lateral support has been stripped down to just the facade components.
I’ve already raised my construction sign: don’t go long on this trade, go short. Like a demolition team measuring tilt, hang your entry on that 2.7% high concrete beam and let it fall into the safety net.
📉 Short:
Entry: 0.13 (2.7% above current price)
Take Profit 1: 0.12 (6.2% below entry price)
Take Profit 2: 0.12 (4.2% below entry price)
Stop Loss: 0.14 (13.2% above current price)
As for those who say "just add one more floor to break the deadlock," I only reply: the settlement monitoring data hasn’t even finished running, who dares to cap the structure? Stop writing, leave the signature blank.