Post

挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Show original
5月,白宫。 特朗普拍着沃什的肩膀说:“做你自己的事吧。” 四个月后,沃什准备做的事是:加息。 而特朗普在爱尔兰公开喊话:“美国应当拥有全球最低利率。” 市场已经懒得猜了。 CME FedWatch显示,9月加息25个基点的概率飙到92%。高盛从“维持不变”紧急改口。摩根大通预计9月和12月各加一次。 联邦基金利率将从3.50%-3.75%升到3.75%-4.00%。这是2023年以来美联储第一次按下加息键。 如果落地,距离中期选举不到八周。 沃什由特朗普提名,上任仅四个月,现在要亲手给总统的利率愿望泼冷水。 这个人在加密圈曾经是个“自己人”。 沃什持有超过1亿美元的加密资产。投资了30多个数字资产项目,包括比特币、闪电网络初创公司Flashnet、预测市场Polymarket以及去中心化交易所dYdX。 他公开说比特币“不会让他感到紧张”,称比特币可以“对抗通胀”,主张将数字资产视为金融服务领域的合法组成部分。 参议院以54票对45票的史上最小票差批准了他的任命。市场当时把这解读为“加密友好信号”,期待他带来更宽松的监管和更低的利率。 然后他上任了。然后他在杰克逊霍尔说了这么一段话: “通胀已经连续65个月高于目标。”“在接近充分就业的背景下,金融条件谈不上紧张。”“价格稳定不会自我实现。” 这不是模棱两可的央行语言。这是直接告诉市场:我的政策反应函数变了。 过去,市场认为美联储会维持利率不变,除非数据逼着它加息。 现在,逻辑倒过来了——美联储倾向于加息,除非数据足以让它暂停。 特朗普当然不爽。 白宫顾问哈塞特在CNN上说,他和特朗普“都认为当前没有理由加息”。特朗普本人重申“美国应拥有全球最低利率”。 但这里有个历史级的讽刺—— 上一次美国总统如此粗暴地施压美联储,是1971年的尼克松。 尼克松逼时任美联储主席伯恩斯在通胀已经露头的时候保持低利率。伯恩斯屈服了。结果是什么?美国进入了长达十年的大滞胀。股债汇三杀。 沃什不可能不知道这段历史。他今年56岁,2006年就当过美联储理事,是当时最年轻的理事,经历过2008年金融危机。 他面前摆着一道没有正确答案的选择题: 加息 → 特朗普暴怒,中期选举前给总统添堵,被保守派骂“叛徒”。 不加息 → 美联储独立性彻底崩塌,通胀预期失控,被历史学家写成“第二个伯恩斯”。 加息是政治自杀。不加息是历史自杀。 但最魔幻的剧情在加密市场这边。 按理说,加息是风险资产的天敌。利率升高,流动性收紧,比特币应该第一个被砸。 但这次没有。 8月核心CPI环比上涨0.3%,超出预期。比特币在数据发布后反而涨了,24小时内涨1.5%,冲到78,600美元。 LMAX集团的交易员说:“大部分鹰派政策带来的风险已经体现在价格中了。”21Shares的数据更狠——在核心CPI高于预期的30天内,比特币平均涨幅2.13%。 为什么? 因为比特币的叙事正在变。它不再只是“风险资产”。当市场开始质疑美国政府债务和通胀失控的风险时,比特币的角色从“投机品”滑向了“宏观对冲工具”。 “我们无法印制石油,而比特币无法被贬值。” 这句话正在被越来越多的机构当真。 所以最后落到你身上: 沃什加不加息,你说了不算。特朗普说了也不算。市场已经替他们定了——92%。 但你知道什么说了算吗?波动率。 无论沃什周四凌晨选择加息还是不加息,比特币在7.8万美元附近的这轮横盘,都会被一个方向的剧烈波动撕开。 加息落地 → 短期砸盘,但“利空出尽”的反弹可能来得更快。 不加息 → 市场震惊,但美联储信誉崩塌的恐慌会推着资金流向比特币。 沃什在做一道没有正确答案的选择题。加密交易者不需要站队——你只需要知道,无论他怎么选,波动率都是确定的。 而波动率,就是你的机会。 $BTC $ETH $ZEC #本周FOMC揭晓,加息能否落地?
挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Everyone is betting on whether there will be a rate hike in the early hours of September 17. CME data shows the probability of a 25 basis point hike has surged to 92.4%. But that's not the main point. The key is—the underlying formula for the Fed's decision-making has changed. Most people are still calculating "whether to hike or not," but they don't realize: regardless of whether there is a hike this time, the game rules are no longer the same. 1️⃣ Past: Unless a rate hike. Now: Unless a pause. This is the most striking sentence in ING's latest report. The previous market logic was: the Fed would keep rates unchanged unless the data was so bad that a hike was necessary. Now ING says the logic has reversed: the Fed is more inclined to hike unless the data is good enough to justify a pause. What does this mean? The same set of data, previously meant "no action needed," now means "a hike is possible." The data hasn't changed, but the interpretation framework has. This is what you really need to understand. Core CPI rose 0.29% month-over-month in August—the monthly trend needed to achieve the 2% inflation target is about 0.17%, so the actual figure is nearly twice that target. August nonfarm payrolls increased by 162,000, unemployment rate at 4.1%, the labor market remains robust. The 10-year US Treasury yield touched 5.014% intraday, the first time since 2007. Under the old framework, the Fed could have held steady with these data. Under the current framework—each data point says: it's time to act. 2️⃣ The most counterintuitive judgment: hike once, then stop. The market is not only betting on a September hike but also pricing in about two and a half more hikes afterward. ING says: you are overthinking it. They call this a "one-time hike"—a policy recalibration, not the start of a tightening cycle. The analogy is mid-1990s: after the Fed cut rates in early 1996 and held steady, it did a "risk management hike" in March 1997, then stayed put for a long time. The purpose of the hike is not to suppress demand but to preemptively control the risk of inflation expectations spiraling out of control. In plain language: this is not to crush the market, but to buy insurance for itself. 3️⃣ What exactly is Bitcoin waiting for between 76,000 and 77,000? BTC is currently around $78,000, consolidating between 76,000 and 82,000. Leverage positions are heavily stacked at both ends: above $82,000 and below $75,000-$76,000. The market is not betting on direction—it is pricing two completely different scenarios simultaneously: Scenario A: Rate hike + dovish guidance. The statement emphasizes "one-time," and the dot plot does not imply consecutive hikes. BTC may dip then rise, holding support at 76,000 and pushing back to 82,000. Scenario B: Rate hike + hawkish guidance. The dot plot raises the future rate path, implying more hikes. BTC is likely to break below 76,000 to seek lower support. The same 25 basis point hike, but because of different wording on the "path forward," BTC's direction can be completely opposite. Most are waiting for the answer to "hike or not." The truly smart are waiting for: what will Wash say after the hike. 4️⃣ Wash's dilemma: credibility vs loyalty During the Irish Open, Trump told reporters: "America is so strong, we should pay the lowest rates in the world." But the Fed Chair Wash, personally chosen by him, may lead the central bank to hike this week. White House economic advisor Hassett said Trump "100% respects" Wash's independence—but also admitted Trump won't be "super happy" about the hike. If the Fed hikes, Wash offends the president. If it backs down, Wash loses credibility. Obstfeld from the Peterson Institute for International Economics bluntly said: "Either incur the president's anger or damage your own market credibility, the latter possibly causing more severe long-term inflation consequences." Wash's choice has never been "to hike or not." It's: price the Fed's credibility with a hike, or pay for the White House's loyalty with a retreat. $BTC $ETH $XAU #本周FOMC揭晓,加息能否落地?

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!