iamlequanghuong

Ooooo

‏‎874‏متابعة

‏‎862‏المتابعون

الموجز

Join me as we explore: Why did @zksnarks_ succeed? Four things worked together: → Ride the strongest native asset → Remove participation friction through mechanism design → Build scarcity through time, not hype → Make payment infrastructure invisible to the user The result: → 16,971 bids for 8,000 spots → 2.12x oversubscribed → Clearing price: 1.5 ZEC → 12,000 ZEC settled → 13,309 ZEC automatically refunded But there’s an important nuance. The market wasn’t simply “weak.” Liquidity and attention were highly fragmented. → BTC: -39.3% from ATH → SOL: -65.6% → DOGE: -88.8% Meanwhile, ZEC was up 201% over 90 days and had climbed to #9 by market cap. zkSNARKs didn’t fight the market. They positioned themselves where liquidity was still flowing. 1. Native wealth creates different buyer psychology Over the last 90 days, ZEC gained roughly 3.1x, while BTC, ETH and SOL moved considerably less. That creates an important dynamic: native-asset wealth. Someone sitting on ZEC gains may psychologically treat 1.5 ZEC very differently from someone spending fresh capital. At the same time, Zcash had relatively few native opportunities for that capital: → Limited DeFi → Limited meme liquidity → Almost no NFT primitive with meaningful attention zkSNARKs arrived as a new place for that capital to rotate. The opportunity wasn’t just selling an NFT. It was giving existing native capital somewhere new to go. 2. The auction removed the biggest reason NOT to bid This is where the mechanism design gets interesting. It was a sealed-bid, uniform-clearing-price auction. The rules were simple: → Top 8,000 bids win → Everyone pays the lowest winning bid → Bid above clearing → excess refunded → Bid below clearing → full refund That changes the psychology completely. The bidder can express their maximum willingness to pay without automatically paying that maximum. And the settlement numbers provide a clean check: 8,000 × 1.5 ZEC = 12,000 ZEC settled Everything above that was refunded automatically. The mechanism itself became part of the product. 3. Scarcity was built with time, not marketing spend The node-07 story started months before the auction. Instead of immediately pushing supply, price, roadmap and KOL campaigns, they kept information constrained. That created something more valuable than impressions: attention with intent. Reportedly, 41,655 people applied for SNARKLIST before there was even a public price or confirmed mint date. The counterintuitive part: Less information can create more demand. But only when the brand has enough credibility for silence to feel intentional rather than amateurish. The scarcity wasn’t just about supply. It was: → Access → Time → Uncertainty 4. Payment UX removed another major bottleneck Users could bid using supported assets while the routing infrastructure handled conversion into ZEC. That meant they didn't necessarily need to: → Buy ZEC first → Bridge assets → Figure out a new route → Deal with extra infrastructure The payment layer absorbed the complexity. And the auction was denominated in ZEC, not USD. That matters. The project and its users were operating in the same native unit of account, making the auction feel like a Zcash-native product rather than an NFT sale temporarily sitting on Zcash. The bigger lesson Capital doesn’t necessarily disappear during a weak market. It rotates toward where attention, liquidity and opportunity still exist. zkSNARKs captured that rotation by combining: → Native liquidity → Mechanism design → Time-based scarcity → Low-friction settlement